|
Help with 2 Meters
SR wrote in :
Hello I am a new ham and i have a friend in Parkersburg, West Virginia. He has a 2 meter radio and echolink. I do not have echolink. Does anyone know of a repeater close to where I am, that I would be able to hit with my 2 meter radio Radio Shack HTX 202 144-148 MHZ. I live in Queens County NY. Any information or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, 73 Steven I'd check with people on repeaters you can hear and ask them. Someone should know unless they're also clueless no-coders. If all else fails, you can take your HTX 202 back to Radio Shack and exchange blank stares with the clerk. SC |
Help with 2 Meters
"Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... SR wrote in : snip I'd check with people on repeaters you can hear and ask them. Someone should know unless they're also clueless no-coders. snip SC Usually the no-code techs have a better idea as to how echolink and IRLP work than most of the old-timers, because it is the only way that they can access "long distance" radio. Most of the old-timers don't consider it to be "real" radio and as such, are often stuck in their ways and slow to accept the new form of communication on the service. It is similar to many of the other forms that were incorporated into amateur radio and were slow to be accepted, such as SSB, SSTV, even ATV. I don't think any of these are any less ham radio than CW is ham radio. |
Help with 2 Meters
"Pat Stevens" wrote in
: "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... SR wrote in : snip I'd check with people on repeaters you can hear and ask them. Someone should know unless they're also clueless no-coders. snip SC Usually the no-code techs have a better idea as to how echolink and IRLP work than most of the old-timers, because it is the only way that they can access "long distance" radio. Most of the old-timers don't consider it to be "real" radio and as such, are often stuck in their ways and slow to accept the new form of communication on the service. Echolink isn't real radio, it's Retard DX. "No internet = The band ain't open." ROFL It is similar to many of the other forms that were incorporated into amateur radio and were slow to be accepted, such as SSB, SSTV, even ATV. I don't think any of these are any less ham radio than CW is ham radio. RTTY, SSTV, CW, AMTOR, PSK, PACKET, ATV, etc. are all real. No internet required. SC |
Help with 2 Meters --- Proof that 'Markie in the Darkie' attacks everyone.
Mark in the Dark" wrote in
oups.com: Nunya Bizness wrote: James wrote: So when it comes to DX bragging rights, I fully agree with you. But when it comes to the place of Echolink in amateur radio, I think it's got its place and I hope people can see it that way. 73! Jim KI4OCC/AG (Does passing my code test give ME some bragging rights? grin) intersting that you dmeand OTHERS not respond to such crosposting trol and do so yourself can you say hypocrtie I know you can but I suspect you are not man enough to fess up Above you can see someone says they learned CW and passed the code test, and Markie attacks them. Steve is not the problem in RRAP, Markie is. SC |
crapathon conitues
Funny post.
No-code ops usually don't give a hoot about getting on the HF bands. They are content with VHF/UHF communications, and so learning CW is not necessary since that mode is for repeater I.D. AND NOTHING ELSE. As far as learning the code, I see that as not only the most productive mode for HF communication, but as a rite of passage. The code tests should be more than 5 WPM, IMO. Dave W6IML wrote in message ... On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:18:41 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "Pat Stevens" wrote in : "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... SR wrote in : snip I'd check with people on repeaters you can hear and ask them. Someone should know unless they're also clueless no-coders. snip SC Usually the no-code techs have a better idea as to how echolink and IRLP work than most of the old-timers, because it is the only way that they can access "long distance" radio. Most of the old-timers don't consider it to be "real" radio and as such, are often stuck in their ways and slow to accept the new form of communication on the service. Echolink isn't real radio, it's Retard DX. stop the crap sc http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..-
SCBDSSFU?
wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:55:00 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Mark in the Dark" wrote in groups.com: Nunya Bizness wrote: James wrote: So when it comes to DX bragging rights, I fully agree with you. But when it comes to the place of Echolink in amateur radio, I think it's got its place and I hope people can see it that way. 73! Jim KI4OCC/AG (Does passing my code test give ME some bragging rights? grin) intersting that you dmeand OTHERS not respond to such crosposting trol and do so yourself can you say hypocrtie I know you can but I suspect you are not man enough to fess up Above you can see someone says they learned CW and passed the code test, and Markie attacks them. Steve is not the problem in RRAP, Markie is. ... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..- SC http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..-
Shouldn't this be in alt.ham-radio.flame?
"Eagle" wrote in message news:1DH9h.248546$FQ1.74717@attbi_s71... SCBDSSFU? wrote in message ... On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:55:00 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Mark in the Dark" wrote in egroups.com: Nunya Bizness wrote: James wrote: So when it comes to DX bragging rights, I fully agree with you. But when it comes to the place of Echolink in amateur radio, I think it's got its place and I hope people can see it that way. 73! Jim KI4OCC/AG (Does passing my code test give ME some bragging rights? grin) intersting that you dmeand OTHERS not respond to such crosposting trol and do so yourself can you say hypocrtie I know you can but I suspect you are not man enough to fess up Above you can see someone says they learned CW and passed the code test, and Markie attacks them. Steve is not the problem in RRAP, Markie is. ... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..- SC http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
crapathon conitues
snip
snip snip snip damm I forgot what this stupid email was all about |
an ontopic post about code
You are right...no-code is what you should advocate since you couldn't pass
5WPM, let alone 13 or 20 as it was. Stay at VHF...it's where you need to be. wrote in message ... On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 19:06:44 GMT, "Eagle" wrote: Funny post. glad to amuse you No-code ops usually don't give a hoot about getting on the HF bands. where do you get yoursample? Most Notechs of my aquantance would LIKE HF access but it isn't worth the effort They are content with VHF/UHF communications, and so learning CW is not necessary since that mode is for repeater I.D. AND NOTHING ELSE. wrong althought it is close to useless at VHF and above it has its uses in EME and at the upper edges of in the microwaves bands for those interptid folk As far as learning the code, I see that as not only the most productive mode for HF communication, but as a rite of passage. "rite of Pasage" their you have the basic Rub of the whole issue if I may focus the point . I and other NoCode test advocates feel that the Govt has NO right to impose or support any rite of passage stuff either in radio or elsewhere as to it usefulness in HF I don't see it . if am I not going the ehar the other Id rather deal with a keyboard of deal with another CW mode Hell where the eye rather than the ear deal with the fuzy mode The code tests should be more than 5 WPM, IMO. there believe or not where we come the closest to agreeing. I see no value at all in 5wpm test it is should go away (which is what I think should or should always have been higher to produce a use operator ) the current system which I only supported going as step to ending testing is Hilary care for the mode Dave W6IML wrote in message . .. On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 01:18:41 GMT, Slow Code wrote: "Pat Stevens" wrote in m: "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... SR wrote in : snip I'd check with people on repeaters you can hear and ask them. Someone should know unless they're also clueless no-coders. snip SC Usually the no-code techs have a better idea as to how echolink and IRLP work than most of the old-timers, because it is the only way that they can access "long distance" radio. Most of the old-timers don't consider it to be "real" radio and as such, are often stuck in their ways and slow to accept the new form of communication on the service. Echolink isn't real radio, it's Retard DX. stop the crap sc http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..-
In article aFH9h.248548$FQ1.221986@attbi_s71,
"Eagle" wrote: Shouldn't this be in alt.ham-radio.flame? Snip Nope. It belongs in the kill file with all other cross posts about either being a ham or using code Mr. Eagle eyes. Plonk -- Telamon Ventura, California |
... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..-
"Eagle" wrote in
news:aFH9h.248548$FQ1.221986@attbi_s71: Shouldn't this be in alt.ham-radio.flame? Everything Markie posts is a flame ie. crap-job if he's following up to a real radio operator. My advice, Ignore Markie, you'll just get a headache if you try to figure out what he is trying to say. SC |
... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..-
What is a plonk?
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article aFH9h.248548$FQ1.221986@attbi_s71, "Eagle" wrote: Shouldn't this be in alt.ham-radio.flame? Snip Nope. It belongs in the kill file with all other cross posts about either being a ham or using code Mr. Eagle eyes. Plonk -- Telamon Ventura, California |
... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..-
Eagle wrote: What is a plonk? he is claiming he has killfiled you net speack you might know if you were not obessed with Morse Code |
... -.-. -. . . -.. ... ... ..-. ..-
What a loser. Now that he has killfiled me, he won't see me laughing at
him...lol! You sound like a no coder...true? "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Eagle wrote: What is a plonk? he is claiming he has killfiled you net speack you might know if you were not obessed with Morse Code |
an ontopic post about code
"John Smith" wrote in message ... K4YZ wrote: The IP Address and servers are complete proof that I do NOT share any annonymous character's "address". Steve, K4YZ You might enjoy viewing the headers associated with this post, it is the result of doing nothing, except proxy-ing though a very high security proxy--now what country do you think I am in? And, if you had to use the headers to find out? JS That's way too easy "John Smith" aka lardass. Here's everything about you. http://www.qrz.com/detail/N0VFP |
an ontopic post about code
Lloyd Davies Slappa wrote:
That's way too easy "John Smith" aka lardass. Here's everything about you. http://www.qrz.com/detail/N0VFP At 6'1" and 185 lbs. I am far from a lardass. I take pride in being physically fit in a world of obese blobs! JS |
an ontopic post about code
|
an ontopic post about code
wrote in message oups.com... John Smith wrote: please forgive me Allow me to introduce to one the few poster that may be nuttier than Robeson and Slow code his name is Roger Wismen AB8MQ Lloyd Davies Slappa wrote: That's way too easy "John Smith" aka lardass. Here's everything about you. http://www.qrz.com/detail/N0VFP http://www.qrz.com/detail/ab8mq At 6'1" and 185 lbs. I am far from a lardass. I take pride in being physically fit in a world of obese blobs! Roger has a relationship with LLoyf that is based on one of them propsitioning the other and being turned down but somehow the offended part was Roger and he ihas prused a vendata as vicous as any Robeson has tried to unleash on Me Roger also claims that any body that disagrees with him is gay, in lust for his body, deperately interested in both Kiddy and shemales JS please accept this courtesy of an introduction In all reality, truth be known, the "nuttiest" of posters herein is most certainly Mark himself. Mark has ample time to post to these newsgroups...look at his timelines. That bespeaks volumes. Look at the posts made by others and then compare them to the posts made by Mark. Clearly Mark has far too much time to whittle away. His home life is quite obviously lacking anything of interest. Usenet is Mark's entire life. He lives for it, breathes it, and is a sad result of same. So sad, he is. |
dlody is a pussy
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:33:45 -0500, "kb9rqz"
wrote: wrote in message Steve is not the problem in RRAP, Markie is. INDEED!!! |
dlody is a pussy
|
dlody is a pussy
|
dlody is a pussy
|
dlody is a pussy
|
dlody is a pussy
|
dlody is a pussy
|
dlody is a pussy
|
dlody is a pussy
|
Mark Morgan KB9RQZ is flooding usenet under [email protected],feel free to report him to [email protected]
On Jan 19, 7:42�pm, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:39:18 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:33:45 -0500, "kb9rqz" wrote: wrote in message � Steve is not the problem in RRAP, �Markie is. INDEED!!!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
Mark Morgan KB9RQZ is flooding usenet under [email protected],feel free to report him to [email protected]
On Jan 19, 7:55�pm, wrote:
On Jan 19, 7:42 pm, wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 18:39:18 -0500, wrote: On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:33:45 -0500, "kb9rqz" wrote: wrote in message Steve is not the problem in RRAP, Markie is. INDEED!!!- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I never gave Mark Morgan, KB9RQZ permission to do anything, he is too kooky for that. DL I never post through giganews |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:22 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com