Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 18th 06, 08:59 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 18
Default Passport receiver reviews

Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply them
with loan radio's.

I had some e-mails from Larry Magne and he explained that market research
had shown that the main interest for readers was in the $50 to $150 portable
radio range, and that there was only a handful of those like myself
interested in the more expensive tabletops.

With only a few top end radio's now available now that Drake has gone off
the scene, here's my comment on what's left:

Eton E1 - a couple of my DX pals own this new offering and rave about it's
abilities to do serious DX, even connected to a big antenna which will not
overload it.

Icom RC-75 - for the price really good value for money. Many of my serious
DX contacts use this radio with excellent results.

AOR 7030+ is probably the top analogue DX machine, but not everyone can get
used to it's difficult and quirky operating system, small limited display
and tiny cramped remote keypad. Those who got used to it's limitations love
it.

JRC NRD545 - every serious DXer I know had one sold it on. It's early 16 bit
digital processor limits it's performance. Here's what one serious DXer says
about the one he sold: "I will never advise anyone to buy a 545".

Ten Tec RX340 and WJ 1000 - these expensive radio's have only 16 bit
processors which limits them. However owners in this newsgroup defend them
to the hilt. Two of my DX friends had RX340's and sold them for better
options.

SDR computer radio's - some of my pals have moved onto these radio's and
love them. I don't like computer radio's at all though - prefer to have a
large radio in front of me with full functions and a nice tuning knob.

So, that's not a very wide choice left anymore, but there is another set of
radio's that represent good value for money and offer the listener
outstanding performance, and that is the ham transceivers. I asked Larry
Magne why he doesn't include some selected ones in Passport like WRTH
sometimes do, and he replied again that the interest was too limited to a
very few diehard DXer's and he could not therefore devote the limited space
and resources of Passport to this small market.

Here's my take on a few ham transceivers that I think you could have a look
at:

Icom IC-7000 has a 32 bit processor and every bell and whistle you could
want, plus FM up to 450 Mhz. See Bjarne Mjelde's review at:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/bm/ic-7000%20review.pdf
Very small and highly portable, also does not need to have the MW band
enhanced. $1500

Also at $1500 is the more heavy weight Icom 746Pro with a 32 bit processor.
See the Dallas Lankford review:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/Icom/IC-...20&%20Mods.pdf
It's only drawback is like most Icom's, the MW band has been attenuated and
you are going to have to get a skilled techie to remove that. Otherwise
great value for money and a great DX machine. Friends who own them rave
about their performance

Finally, if you want to spend big bucks on the ultimate with every bell and
whistle you could hope for, then take a look at the:
Icom 756 PRO III and the
Yaesu FT2000.
At a price of $3000 they will outperform the 16 bit processor's in the TT
RX340 & WJ1000 with their 32 bit processors.
See my review of the 756 at
http://www.dxing.info/equipment/

The ham transceivers do not have a sideband selectable sync detector in AM,
except for the Icom 746Pro. If you just like listening comfortably to AM
broadcasts then a ham transceiver will not suit you. Rather look on eBay for
a good used Drake R8B with it's superb sync detector. And if you are
squeamish about having a transmitter around, just get a techie to disable
the transmit function, a simple and inexpensive mod that can be reversed
later if you want to again sell the radio.

good DX and don't forget to have fun..............
--
John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa
South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s
RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods
Drake SW8 & ERGO software
Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100
BW XCR 30, Sangean 803A.
GE circa 50's radiogram
Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro, Datong AD-270
Kiwa MW Loop, PAORDT Roelof mini-whip
http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx




  #2   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 03:13 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,053
Default Passport receiver reviews

John Plimmer wrote:

good DX and don't forget to have fun..............



Thank you for the excellent posting. I'm still saving for the E1..






mike
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 03:23 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 49
Default Passport receiver reviews

My RX-340 was mediochre to say the least....Big waste of money!

RAYBURN
"John Plimmer" wrote in message
...
Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply
them with loan radio's.

I had some e-mails from Larry Magne and he explained that market research
had shown that the main interest for readers was in the $50 to $150
portable radio range, and that there was only a handful of those like
myself interested in the more expensive tabletops.

With only a few top end radio's now available now that Drake has gone off
the scene, here's my comment on what's left:

Eton E1 - a couple of my DX pals own this new offering and rave about it's
abilities to do serious DX, even connected to a big antenna which will not
overload it.

Icom RC-75 - for the price really good value for money. Many of my serious
DX contacts use this radio with excellent results.

AOR 7030+ is probably the top analogue DX machine, but not everyone can
get used to it's difficult and quirky operating system, small limited
display and tiny cramped remote keypad. Those who got used to it's
limitations love it.

JRC NRD545 - every serious DXer I know had one sold it on. It's early 16
bit digital processor limits it's performance. Here's what one serious
DXer says about the one he sold: "I will never advise anyone to buy a
545".

Ten Tec RX340 and WJ 1000 - these expensive radio's have only 16 bit
processors which limits them. However owners in this newsgroup defend them
to the hilt. Two of my DX friends had RX340's and sold them for better
options.

SDR computer radio's - some of my pals have moved onto these radio's and
love them. I don't like computer radio's at all though - prefer to have a
large radio in front of me with full functions and a nice tuning knob.

So, that's not a very wide choice left anymore, but there is another set
of radio's that represent good value for money and offer the listener
outstanding performance, and that is the ham transceivers. I asked Larry
Magne why he doesn't include some selected ones in Passport like WRTH
sometimes do, and he replied again that the interest was too limited to a
very few diehard DXer's and he could not therefore devote the limited
space and resources of Passport to this small market.

Here's my take on a few ham transceivers that I think you could have a
look at:

Icom IC-7000 has a 32 bit processor and every bell and whistle you could
want, plus FM up to 450 Mhz. See Bjarne Mjelde's review at:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/bm/ic-7000%20review.pdf
Very small and highly portable, also does not need to have the MW band
enhanced. $1500

Also at $1500 is the more heavy weight Icom 746Pro with a 32 bit
processor. See the Dallas Lankford review:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/Icom/IC-...20&%20Mods.pdf
It's only drawback is like most Icom's, the MW band has been attenuated
and you are going to have to get a skilled techie to remove that.
Otherwise great value for money and a great DX machine. Friends who own
them rave about their performance

Finally, if you want to spend big bucks on the ultimate with every bell
and whistle you could hope for, then take a look at the:
Icom 756 PRO III and the
Yaesu FT2000.
At a price of $3000 they will outperform the 16 bit processor's in the TT
RX340 & WJ1000 with their 32 bit processors.
See my review of the 756 at
http://www.dxing.info/equipment/

The ham transceivers do not have a sideband selectable sync detector in
AM, except for the Icom 746Pro. If you just like listening comfortably to
AM broadcasts then a ham transceiver will not suit you. Rather look on
eBay for a good used Drake R8B with it's superb sync detector. And if you
are squeamish about having a transmitter around, just get a techie to
disable the transmit function, a simple and inexpensive mod that can be
reversed later if you want to again sell the radio.

good DX and don't forget to have fun..............
--
John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa
South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s
RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods
Drake SW8 & ERGO software
Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100
BW XCR 30, Sangean 803A.
GE circa 50's radiogram
Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro, Datong AD-270
Kiwa MW Loop, PAORDT Roelof mini-whip
http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx






  #4   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 03:43 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 68
Default Passport receiver reviews

John,

Thanks for the excellent assessment of current receivers available to DXers!

The fact that we are not seeing new, traditional communications receivers
come along once or twice a year as we used to is a sad commentary on the
hobby decline. I believe that more and more, DXers will need to content
themselves with quality used gear (in the traditional sense of radios with
knobs), unless they go the route of transceivers as you mentioned. I used to
own a Yaesu FT-900 and an ICOM IC-756Pro for receive-only use, and they are
fine performers. I had various reasons for selling them, but now am resigned
to operating computer-driven SDR radios for the foreseeable future if I want
cutting-edge performance.

The advances in communications equipment will be in the SDR devices, not
labor- and parts-intensive analog receivers bristling with knobs. Like you
and most others, I prefer knobs to tweak, but the unique features and hotrod
performance of radios like my SDR-1000 make up for the lack of the tactile
feel of quality knobs, buttons, etc. when operating a receiver. I do use a
Contour Shuttle Pro and a Griffin Powermate knob when controlling the
SDR-1000, but they are a token nod to traditional receiver controls.

You mentioned the E1's usefulness with long antennas. I've been very
impressed with this ability, too, but only when keeping the "DX"
preamplifier turned OFF. My E1 is more prone to overload and spurious images
with big antennas if the preamp is enabled. If extra gain is needed (usually
it isn't), I found that a quality external preamp works better, something
like a Wellbrook preamp or Kiwa, which use the very stout
"negative-feedback" design. When I owned AR7030s, they had the same trouble
with the stock, internal preamp. Performance was always better with a good
external preamp, one that had better dynamic range & IP3.

Bjarne Mjelde's review of the Eton E1 is very thorough in this regard. He
describes his experiences hooking up long antennas to it, along with other
comments and information about the E1. His review is he
http://www.kongsfjord.no/bm/The%20Eton%20E1%20Story.pdf

73!

Guy Atkins
Puyallup, WA
www.sdr-1000.blogspot.com



"John Plimmer" wrote in message
...
Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply
them with loan radio's.

I had some e-mails from Larry Magne and he explained that market research
had shown that the main interest for readers was in the $50 to $150
portable radio range, and that there was only a handful of those like
myself interested in the more expensive tabletops.

With only a few top end radio's now available now that Drake has gone off
the scene, here's my comment on what's left:

SNIP


  #5   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 03:53 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 105
Default Passport receiver reviews

Good post John!

--
Brian Denley
http://home.comcast.net/~b.denley/index.html
"John Plimmer" wrote in message
...
Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply
them with loan radio's.





  #6   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 12:47 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 30
Default Passport receiver reviews


Thank you for the excellent post, John.


On the small receiver front, there seems to be some use of

new technology in the newer models; everything getting tinyier

with more and more features.

The Degen De1105 is now my favorite " Walking around" radio;

but the Icom R75 is what I use when everything else is just picking up
static.



- Stay tuned !




John Plimmer wrote:
Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply them
with loan radio's.

I had some e-mails from Larry Magne and he explained that market research
had shown that the main interest for readers was in the $50 to $150 portable
radio range, and that there was only a handful of those like myself
interested in the more expensive tabletops.

With only a few top end radio's now available now that Drake has gone off
the scene, here's my comment on what's left:

Eton E1 - a couple of my DX pals own this new offering and rave about it's
abilities to do serious DX, even connected to a big antenna which will not
overload it.

Icom RC-75 - for the price really good value for money. Many of my serious
DX contacts use this radio with excellent results.

AOR 7030+ is probably the top analogue DX machine, but not everyone can get
used to it's difficult and quirky operating system, small limited display
and tiny cramped remote keypad. Those who got used to it's limitations love
it.

JRC NRD545 - every serious DXer I know had one sold it on. It's early 16 bit
digital processor limits it's performance. Here's what one serious DXer says
about the one he sold: "I will never advise anyone to buy a 545".

Ten Tec RX340 and WJ 1000 - these expensive radio's have only 16 bit
processors which limits them. However owners in this newsgroup defend them
to the hilt. Two of my DX friends had RX340's and sold them for better
options.

SDR computer radio's - some of my pals have moved onto these radio's and
love them. I don't like computer radio's at all though - prefer to have a
large radio in front of me with full functions and a nice tuning knob.

So, that's not a very wide choice left anymore, but there is another set of
radio's that represent good value for money and offer the listener
outstanding performance, and that is the ham transceivers. I asked Larry
Magne why he doesn't include some selected ones in Passport like WRTH
sometimes do, and he replied again that the interest was too limited to a
very few diehard DXer's and he could not therefore devote the limited space
and resources of Passport to this small market.

Here's my take on a few ham transceivers that I think you could have a look
at:

Icom IC-7000 has a 32 bit processor and every bell and whistle you could
want, plus FM up to 450 Mhz. See Bjarne Mjelde's review at:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/bm/ic-7000%20review.pdf
Very small and highly portable, also does not need to have the MW band
enhanced. $1500

Also at $1500 is the more heavy weight Icom 746Pro with a 32 bit processor.
See the Dallas Lankford review:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/Icom/IC-...20&%20Mods.pdf
It's only drawback is like most Icom's, the MW band has been attenuated and
you are going to have to get a skilled techie to remove that. Otherwise
great value for money and a great DX machine. Friends who own them rave
about their performance

Finally, if you want to spend big bucks on the ultimate with every bell and
whistle you could hope for, then take a look at the:
Icom 756 PRO III and the
Yaesu FT2000.
At a price of $3000 they will outperform the 16 bit processor's in the TT
RX340 & WJ1000 with their 32 bit processors.
See my review of the 756 at
http://www.dxing.info/equipment/

The ham transceivers do not have a sideband selectable sync detector in AM,
except for the Icom 746Pro. If you just like listening comfortably to AM
broadcasts then a ham transceiver will not suit you. Rather look on eBay for
a good used Drake R8B with it's superb sync detector. And if you are
squeamish about having a transmitter around, just get a techie to disable
the transmit function, a simple and inexpensive mod that can be reversed
later if you want to again sell the radio.

good DX and don't forget to have fun..............
--
John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa
South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s
RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods
Drake SW8 & ERGO software
Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100
BW XCR 30, Sangean 803A.
GE circa 50's radiogram
Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro, Datong AD-270
Kiwa MW Loop, PAORDT Roelof mini-whip
http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx


  #7   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 03:30 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 72
Default Passport receiver reviews


Excellent observations and comments John! I started in this hobby when
I was in elementary school with a Hallicrafters S-38E. At that time
tabletops were abundant beyond belief because they all used valves!
It's sad to see the demise of good tabletop receivers, however, there's
always a good supply in the used market for reasonable prices if you
shop a bit. That's were I've shopped for the last 15 years. I have
tried almost all of the solid state receivers and still use two of my
favorites, an old Icom R70 and a Kenwood R-5000. I really liked the
R75, but there just wasn't enough knobs to twiddle!!

Frank
K3YAZ
Tucson, AZ

  #8   Report Post  
Old November 19th 06, 07:10 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 200
Default Passport receiver reviews

Dear John,

Thank you for your very thoughtful and intelligent discussion of
current shortwave receivers. I should like to mention two points:

1. Software-defined radios are "iffy" at best, in my opinion, as when
operating systems change (Windows XP to Windows Vista to Windows XXX,
etc.) these radios may or may not work properly with these new OSs.
Therefore, the purchaser of a fairly expensive SDR may be forced to
operate it with an older computer and, if that computer "dies," he/she
may have a very expensive paperweight. Even though Microsoft has taken
some pains to ensure that "most" older programs still work with the
newer OSs, this may or may not continue to be the case. The situation
is even worse with Apple as they have, in the past, "abandoned"
compatibility with older programs in newer OSs.

2. In my opinion, the "difficulties" with the AOR AR7030 (Plus)'s OS
are VERY blown out of proportion. In reality, it's no more difficult to
operate than a VCR or a digital camera. (And remember - this is an "old
geezer" talking!) Yes, the radio takes some getting used to - but what
piece of good equipment does not? (It took me about a half-hour.) Read
the manual (which you can do online even before you purchase the
radio*) and you can see for yourself just how easy to operate it
actually is. Most of the menu selections are, in fact, rarely used.
Tuning in a station, adjusting the radio for best reception of that
station, and sitting back and listening are no "harder" than on any
other good shortwave radio. Yes, it's very different, but that doesn't
make it inordinately difficult per se as some have indicated. Some
people have been heavily influenced by "negative" reviews or postings
about the AOR's OS and were thus prejudiced when they obtained the
receiver. Others may have been unwilling to engage in the learning
process necessary for this sophisticated piece of machinery. ("When in
doubt, read the instructions!") Personally I feel that this radio is
the finest piece of shortwave equipment designed in the past fifteen
years. (AND - for those who do not wish to have to think about "menu"
selections, there is Jan Arkesteijn's superb and FREE "RxWINGS"
computer-control program which allows me to operate the radio from
across the room while sitting in my easy chair. With it, I don't even
have to look at the AOR's display! Everything is shown on my notebook
computer's screen and just about everything has its own "button" or
"adjustment" right in front of me! You are quite correct about the
disappointing remote control. I have put mine away, no longer having
any need for it, as I operate the receiver exclusively with "RxWINGS.")

In any event, we are all entitled to our opinions, our likes, and our
dislikes but I do strongly recommend that any serious shortwave
listener consider purchasing a new AR7030 Plus, assuming he/she has the
financial ability to do so, and also assuming he/she is willing to take
the relatively small amount of time necessary to properly learn the
operating procedures of the radio. I do not believe any such person
will regret the purchase.

Thanks again very much for your excellent article. Your posts here are
always of great interest.

Best,

Joe

*You can even print out the manual should you desire to do so - that's
what I did! Remember - I'm an "old geezer" - I still prefer to read
something printed on paper rather than on a computer screen!

John Plimmer wrote:
Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply them
with loan radio's.

I had some e-mails from Larry Magne and he explained that market research
had shown that the main interest for readers was in the $50 to $150 portable
radio range, and that there was only a handful of those like myself
interested in the more expensive tabletops.

With only a few top end radio's now available now that Drake has gone off
the scene, here's my comment on what's left:

Eton E1 - a couple of my DX pals own this new offering and rave about it's
abilities to do serious DX, even connected to a big antenna which will not
overload it.

Icom RC-75 - for the price really good value for money. Many of my serious
DX contacts use this radio with excellent results.

AOR 7030+ is probably the top analogue DX machine, but not everyone can get
used to it's difficult and quirky operating system, small limited display
and tiny cramped remote keypad. Those who got used to it's limitations love
it.

JRC NRD545 - every serious DXer I know had one sold it on. It's early 16 bit
digital processor limits it's performance. Here's what one serious DXer says
about the one he sold: "I will never advise anyone to buy a 545".

Ten Tec RX340 and WJ 1000 - these expensive radio's have only 16 bit
processors which limits them. However owners in this newsgroup defend them
to the hilt. Two of my DX friends had RX340's and sold them for better
options.

SDR computer radio's - some of my pals have moved onto these radio's and
love them. I don't like computer radio's at all though - prefer to have a
large radio in front of me with full functions and a nice tuning knob.

So, that's not a very wide choice left anymore, but there is another set of
radio's that represent good value for money and offer the listener
outstanding performance, and that is the ham transceivers. I asked Larry
Magne why he doesn't include some selected ones in Passport like WRTH
sometimes do, and he replied again that the interest was too limited to a
very few diehard DXer's and he could not therefore devote the limited space
and resources of Passport to this small market.

Here's my take on a few ham transceivers that I think you could have a look
at:

Icom IC-7000 has a 32 bit processor and every bell and whistle you could
want, plus FM up to 450 Mhz. See Bjarne Mjelde's review at:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/bm/ic-7000%20review.pdf
Very small and highly portable, also does not need to have the MW band
enhanced. $1500

Also at $1500 is the more heavy weight Icom 746Pro with a 32 bit processor.
See the Dallas Lankford review:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/Icom/IC-...20&%20Mods.pdf
It's only drawback is like most Icom's, the MW band has been attenuated and
you are going to have to get a skilled techie to remove that. Otherwise
great value for money and a great DX machine. Friends who own them rave
about their performance

Finally, if you want to spend big bucks on the ultimate with every bell and
whistle you could hope for, then take a look at the:
Icom 756 PRO III and the
Yaesu FT2000.
At a price of $3000 they will outperform the 16 bit processor's in the TT
RX340 & WJ1000 with their 32 bit processors.
See my review of the 756 at
http://www.dxing.info/equipment/

The ham transceivers do not have a sideband selectable sync detector in AM,
except for the Icom 746Pro. If you just like listening comfortably to AM
broadcasts then a ham transceiver will not suit you. Rather look on eBay for
a good used Drake R8B with it's superb sync detector. And if you are
squeamish about having a transmitter around, just get a techie to disable
the transmit function, a simple and inexpensive mod that can be reversed
later if you want to again sell the radio.

good DX and don't forget to have fun..............
--
John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa
South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s
RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods
Drake SW8 & ERGO software
Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100
BW XCR 30, Sangean 803A.
GE circa 50's radiogram
Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro, Datong AD-270
Kiwa MW Loop, PAORDT Roelof mini-whip
http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx


  #9   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 06, 02:23 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 28
Default Passport receiver reviews

Never mind an operation system that is used by about a billion people with
applications being written by hundreds of thousands of programmers. The
question becomes is there a demand or need? Knowing ham radio people, an OS
has never been a hindrance to any valuable piece of radio hardware such as
the SDR-1000.

Now let us talk about what will make your analog radio like a AR7030
obsolete overnight without an outboard computer/OS: DRM and any present or
future digital mode you can dream about.

"Joe Analssandrini" wrote in message
oups.com...
Dear John,

Thank you for your very thoughtful and intelligent discussion of
current shortwave receivers. I should like to mention two points:

1. Software-defined radios are "iffy" at best, in my opinion, as when
operating systems change (Windows XP to Windows Vista to Windows XXX,
etc.) these radios may or may not work properly with these new OSs.
Therefore, the purchaser of a fairly expensive SDR may be forced to
operate it with an older computer and, if that computer "dies," he/she
may have a very expensive paperweight. Even though Microsoft has taken
some pains to ensure that "most" older programs still work with the
newer OSs, this may or may not continue to be the case. The situation
is even worse with Apple as they have, in the past, "abandoned"
compatibility with older programs in newer OSs.

2. In my opinion, the "difficulties" with the AOR AR7030 (Plus)'s OS
are VERY blown out of proportion. In reality, it's no more difficult to
operate than a VCR or a digital camera. (And remember - this is an "old
geezer" talking!) Yes, the radio takes some getting used to - but what
piece of good equipment does not? (It took me about a half-hour.) Read
the manual (which you can do online even before you purchase the
radio*) and you can see for yourself just how easy to operate it
actually is. Most of the menu selections are, in fact, rarely used.
Tuning in a station, adjusting the radio for best reception of that
station, and sitting back and listening are no "harder" than on any
other good shortwave radio. Yes, it's very different, but that doesn't
make it inordinately difficult per se as some have indicated. Some
people have been heavily influenced by "negative" reviews or postings
about the AOR's OS and were thus prejudiced when they obtained the
receiver. Others may have been unwilling to engage in the learning
process necessary for this sophisticated piece of machinery. ("When in
doubt, read the instructions!") Personally I feel that this radio is
the finest piece of shortwave equipment designed in the past fifteen
years. (AND - for those who do not wish to have to think about "menu"
selections, there is Jan Arkesteijn's superb and FREE "RxWINGS"
computer-control program which allows me to operate the radio from
across the room while sitting in my easy chair. With it, I don't even
have to look at the AOR's display! Everything is shown on my notebook
computer's screen and just about everything has its own "button" or
"adjustment" right in front of me! You are quite correct about the
disappointing remote control. I have put mine away, no longer having
any need for it, as I operate the receiver exclusively with "RxWINGS.")

In any event, we are all entitled to our opinions, our likes, and our
dislikes but I do strongly recommend that any serious shortwave
listener consider purchasing a new AR7030 Plus, assuming he/she has the
financial ability to do so, and also assuming he/she is willing to take
the relatively small amount of time necessary to properly learn the
operating procedures of the radio. I do not believe any such person
will regret the purchase.

Thanks again very much for your excellent article. Your posts here are
always of great interest.

Best,

Joe

*You can even print out the manual should you desire to do so - that's
what I did! Remember - I'm an "old geezer" - I still prefer to read
something printed on paper rather than on a computer screen!

John Plimmer wrote:
Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read

in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply

them
with loan radio's.

I had some e-mails from Larry Magne and he explained that market

research
had shown that the main interest for readers was in the $50 to $150

portable
radio range, and that there was only a handful of those like myself
interested in the more expensive tabletops.

With only a few top end radio's now available now that Drake has gone

off
the scene, here's my comment on what's left:

Eton E1 - a couple of my DX pals own this new offering and rave about

it's
abilities to do serious DX, even connected to a big antenna which will

not
overload it.

Icom RC-75 - for the price really good value for money. Many of my

serious
DX contacts use this radio with excellent results.

AOR 7030+ is probably the top analogue DX machine, but not everyone can

get
used to it's difficult and quirky operating system, small limited

display
and tiny cramped remote keypad. Those who got used to it's limitations

love
it.

JRC NRD545 - every serious DXer I know had one sold it on. It's early 16

bit
digital processor limits it's performance. Here's what one serious DXer

says
about the one he sold: "I will never advise anyone to buy a 545".

Ten Tec RX340 and WJ 1000 - these expensive radio's have only 16 bit
processors which limits them. However owners in this newsgroup defend

them
to the hilt. Two of my DX friends had RX340's and sold them for better
options.

SDR computer radio's - some of my pals have moved onto these radio's and
love them. I don't like computer radio's at all though - prefer to have

a
large radio in front of me with full functions and a nice tuning knob.

So, that's not a very wide choice left anymore, but there is another set

of
radio's that represent good value for money and offer the listener
outstanding performance, and that is the ham transceivers. I asked Larry
Magne why he doesn't include some selected ones in Passport like WRTH
sometimes do, and he replied again that the interest was too limited to

a
very few diehard DXer's and he could not therefore devote the limited

space
and resources of Passport to this small market.

Here's my take on a few ham transceivers that I think you could have a

look
at:

Icom IC-7000 has a 32 bit processor and every bell and whistle you could
want, plus FM up to 450 Mhz. See Bjarne Mjelde's review at:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/bm/ic-7000%20review.pdf
Very small and highly portable, also does not need to have the MW band
enhanced. $1500

Also at $1500 is the more heavy weight Icom 746Pro with a 32 bit

processor.
See the Dallas Lankford review:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/Icom/IC-...20&%20Mods.pdf
It's only drawback is like most Icom's, the MW band has been attenuated

and
you are going to have to get a skilled techie to remove that. Otherwise
great value for money and a great DX machine. Friends who own them rave
about their performance

Finally, if you want to spend big bucks on the ultimate with every bell

and
whistle you could hope for, then take a look at the:
Icom 756 PRO III and the
Yaesu FT2000.
At a price of $3000 they will outperform the 16 bit processor's in the

TT
RX340 & WJ1000 with their 32 bit processors.
See my review of the 756 at
http://www.dxing.info/equipment/

The ham transceivers do not have a sideband selectable sync detector in

AM,
except for the Icom 746Pro. If you just like listening comfortably to AM
broadcasts then a ham transceiver will not suit you. Rather look on eBay

for
a good used Drake R8B with it's superb sync detector. And if you are
squeamish about having a transmitter around, just get a techie to

disable
the transmit function, a simple and inexpensive mod that can be reversed
later if you want to again sell the radio.

good DX and don't forget to have fun..............
--
John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa
South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s
RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods
Drake SW8 & ERGO software
Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100
BW XCR 30, Sangean 803A.
GE circa 50's radiogram
Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro, Datong AD-270
Kiwa MW Loop, PAORDT Roelof mini-whip
http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx




  #10   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 06, 03:54 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 155
Default Passport receiver reviews

all you seem to say is your friends do or don't like them. how can a person
make an informed decision about a receivers strengths and weaknesses without
knowing any details ?
can you post what aspects of these receivers were bad ? for example a lot of
people like the RX-340 but you put it off with just a few words. these are 5
star receivers and there is a mail group devoted to receivers of this
caliber.




"John Plimmer" wrote in message
...
Passport does some nice reviews of serious radio's, better than I read in
most mags that seem too keen not to upset their advertisers who supply
them with loan radio's.

I had some e-mails from Larry Magne and he explained that market research
had shown that the main interest for readers was in the $50 to $150
portable radio range, and that there was only a handful of those like
myself interested in the more expensive tabletops.

With only a few top end radio's now available now that Drake has gone off
the scene, here's my comment on what's left:

Eton E1 - a couple of my DX pals own this new offering and rave about it's
abilities to do serious DX, even connected to a big antenna which will not
overload it.

Icom RC-75 - for the price really good value for money. Many of my serious
DX contacts use this radio with excellent results.

AOR 7030+ is probably the top analogue DX machine, but not everyone can
get used to it's difficult and quirky operating system, small limited
display and tiny cramped remote keypad. Those who got used to it's
limitations love it.

JRC NRD545 - every serious DXer I know had one sold it on. It's early 16
bit digital processor limits it's performance. Here's what one serious
DXer says about the one he sold: "I will never advise anyone to buy a
545".

Ten Tec RX340 and WJ 1000 - these expensive radio's have only 16 bit
processors which limits them. However owners in this newsgroup defend them
to the hilt. Two of my DX friends had RX340's and sold them for better
options.

SDR computer radio's - some of my pals have moved onto these radio's and
love them. I don't like computer radio's at all though - prefer to have a
large radio in front of me with full functions and a nice tuning knob.

So, that's not a very wide choice left anymore, but there is another set
of radio's that represent good value for money and offer the listener
outstanding performance, and that is the ham transceivers. I asked Larry
Magne why he doesn't include some selected ones in Passport like WRTH
sometimes do, and he replied again that the interest was too limited to a
very few diehard DXer's and he could not therefore devote the limited
space and resources of Passport to this small market.

Here's my take on a few ham transceivers that I think you could have a
look at:

Icom IC-7000 has a 32 bit processor and every bell and whistle you could
want, plus FM up to 450 Mhz. See Bjarne Mjelde's review at:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/bm/ic-7000%20review.pdf
Very small and highly portable, also does not need to have the MW band
enhanced. $1500

Also at $1500 is the more heavy weight Icom 746Pro with a 32 bit
processor. See the Dallas Lankford review:
http://www.kongsfjord.no/dl/Icom/IC-...20&%20Mods.pdf
It's only drawback is like most Icom's, the MW band has been attenuated
and you are going to have to get a skilled techie to remove that.
Otherwise great value for money and a great DX machine. Friends who own
them rave about their performance

Finally, if you want to spend big bucks on the ultimate with every bell
and whistle you could hope for, then take a look at the:
Icom 756 PRO III and the
Yaesu FT2000.
At a price of $3000 they will outperform the 16 bit processor's in the TT
RX340 & WJ1000 with their 32 bit processors.
See my review of the 756 at
http://www.dxing.info/equipment/

The ham transceivers do not have a sideband selectable sync detector in
AM, except for the Icom 746Pro. If you just like listening comfortably to
AM broadcasts then a ham transceiver will not suit you. Rather look on
eBay for a good used Drake R8B with it's superb sync detector. And if you
are squeamish about having a transmitter around, just get a techie to
disable the transmit function, a simple and inexpensive mod that can be
reversed later if you want to again sell the radio.

good DX and don't forget to have fun..............
--
John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa
South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s
RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods
Drake SW8 & ERGO software
Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100
BW XCR 30, Sangean 803A.
GE circa 50's radiogram
Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro, Datong AD-270
Kiwa MW Loop, PAORDT Roelof mini-whip
http://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx






Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ABOUT - The Ten-Tec RX-320 D [TenTec RX320D] Computer Controlled (PC) Shortwave (HF) Receiver RHF Shortwave 2 November 8th 05 02:49 PM
HIGH Q CAPS FOR VLF LOOP ANTENNA? TRABEM Antenna 85 October 31st 05 03:25 PM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 4 September 8th 03 03:20 AM
Review: Ramsey HFRC-1 WWV receiver kit Tim Shoppa Equipment 0 September 6th 03 08:52 PM
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP David Black Shortwave 0 July 21st 03 10:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017