wrote

I have a Tivoli model one radio, but I'm disappointed (excessive bass
output).

The Boston Acoustics Recepter HD Radio has a bass EQ adjustment while its
analog Recepter equivelent does not.
I have both and they each perform excellently.

Guerite. wrote:
wrote

I have a Tivoli model one radio, but I'm disappointed (excessive bass
output).

The Boston Acoustics Recepter HD Radio has a bass EQ adjustment while its
analog Recepter equivelent does not.
I have both and they each perform excellently.

Do you have the dipole, for the Receptor HD, mounted on the roof, or in
the attic ? Oh boy, more HD channels of the same terrestrial radio
garbage, if they can even be received. HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a
farse !

wrote in message
ups.com...

Guerite. wrote:
wrote

I have a Tivoli model one radio, but I'm disappointed (excessive bass
output).

The Boston Acoustics Recepter HD Radio has a bass EQ adjustment while
its
analog Recepter equivalent does not.
I have both and they each perform excellently.

Do you have the dipole, for the Receptor HD, mounted on the roof, or in
the attic ?

No, the included dipole is mounted on the wall right next to the radio.
You would need an antenna on any radio trying to pick-up any signal that is
1/100th the power level of the main carrier (IBOC) - you nitwit. You seem
to
constantly and conveniently omit this important fact about IBOC in your
propaganda.

Oh boy, more HD channels of the same terrestrial radio
garbage, if they can even be received.

Far better than the garbage on shortwave.

HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a farse !

A fraud and a farce in your own mind.

del.icio.us wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Guerite. wrote:
wrote

I have a Tivoli model one radio, but I'm disappointed (excessive bass
output).

The Boston Acoustics Recepter HD Radio has a bass EQ adjustment while
its
analog Recepter equivalent does not.
I have both and they each perform excellently.

Do you have the dipole, for the Receptor HD, mounted on the roof, or in
the attic ?

No, the included dipole is mounted on the wall right next to the radio.
You would need an antenna on any radio trying to pick-up any signal that is
1/100th the power level of the main carrier (IBOC) - you nitwit. You seem
to
constantly and conveniently omit this important fact about IBOC in your
propaganda.

Oh boy, more HD channels of the same terrestrial radio
garbage, if they can even be received.

Far better than the garbage on shortwave.

HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a farse !

A fraud and a farce in your own mind.

HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a farse !

"Washington Post disses HD Radio"

http://www.hear2.com/2006/06/washington_post.html

And, HD Radio is now dead in-dash:

http://www.hear2.com/2006/12/at_ford....html#comments

HAHA !!!

wrote in message
oups.com...

del.icio.us wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Guerite. wrote:
wrote

I have a Tivoli model one radio, but I'm disappointed (excessive
bass
output).

The Boston Acoustics Recepter HD Radio has a bass EQ adjustment
while
its
analog Recepter equivalent does not.
I have both and they each perform excellently.

Do you have the dipole, for the Receptor HD, mounted on the roof, or
in
the attic ?

No, the included dipole is mounted on the wall right next to the radio.
You would need an antenna on any radio trying to pick-up any signal that
is
1/100th the power level of the main carrier (IBOC) - you nitwit. You
seem
to
constantly and conveniently omit this important fact about IBOC in your
propaganda.

Oh boy, more HD channels of the same terrestrial radio
garbage, if they can even be received.

Far better than the garbage on shortwave.

HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a farse !

A fraud and a farce in your own mind.

HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a farse !

"Washington Post disses HD Radio"

http://www.hear2.com/2006/06/washington_post.html

"Washington Post" - BWAHAHAHA

And, HD Radio is now dead in-dash:

http://www.hear2.com/2006/12/at_ford....html#comments

HAHA !!!

What will you be bidding on - the AM frequencies or FM frequencies? -
BWAHAHAHA

del.icio.us wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...

del.icio.us wrote:
wrote in message
ups.com...

Guerite. wrote:
wrote

I have a Tivoli model one radio, but I'm disappointed (excessive
bass
output).

The Boston Acoustics Recepter HD Radio has a bass EQ adjustment
while
its
analog Recepter equivalent does not.
I have both and they each perform excellently.

Do you have the dipole, for the Receptor HD, mounted on the roof, or
in
the attic ?

No, the included dipole is mounted on the wall right next to the radio.
You would need an antenna on any radio trying to pick-up any signal that
is
1/100th the power level of the main carrier (IBOC) - you nitwit. You
seem
to
constantly and conveniently omit this important fact about IBOC in your
propaganda.

Oh boy, more HD channels of the same terrestrial radio
garbage, if they can even be received.

Far better than the garbage on shortwave.

HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a farse !

A fraud and a farce in your own mind.

HD Radio/IBOC - a fraud and a farse !

"Washington Post disses HD Radio"

http://www.hear2.com/2006/06/washington_post.html

"Washington Post" - BWAHAHAHA

And, HD Radio is now dead in-dash:

http://www.hear2.com/2006/12/at_ford....html#comments

HAHA !!!

What will you be bidding on - the AM frequencies or FM frequencies? -
BWAHAHAHA

The broadcast bands will be around for many decades, but HD Radio will
fail - BWAHAHAHA !

In article ,
"del.icio.us" wrote:

Far better than the garbage on shortwave.

Ah yes, this being rec.radio.shortwave what excuse do you have for
posting this garbage here?

I think you are just one of the handful of KOOKS that keep changing
their handle to get read after most people kill file them.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Some of the new Sangean HD / IBOC radios are also said
to receive C-Quam AM Stereo

"Steven Stone" wrote in message
et...
Some of the new Sangean HD / IBOC radios are also said
to receive C-Quam AM Stereo

How helpful. In the US, there are practically no stations in C quam any
more, and practically no music on AM to listen to anyway.

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Steven Stone" wrote in message
et...
Some of the new Sangean HD / IBOC radios are also said
to receive C-Quam AM Stereo

How helpful. In the US, there are practically no stations in C quam any
more, and practically no music on AM to listen to anyway.

I hear several AM stations broadcast music most of the time. Two of them
are right in town. The "Boomer" on 1450 is one of them. Those are the
english stations and then there are several mexican stations that are
also music broadcasters.

Couldn't tell you anything about C quam.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California