In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
.
..

Finally, an answer that makes sense. DxAce broke the code.

Aren't you the guy who posted that HD carriers are _not_ only 1% of the
analog signal strength?

Continue posting false data...

No I'm not the person that posted that. Continue to fabricate.


Here is your post, in response to my quantification of HD power levels... I
said it was 1% of analog power and you said that did not pass your test.
Care to retract?

No you posted that HD has a power level 1% of analog. Look at the
quoting those are not my words. So do you care to retract your
accusation?


In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
..
.

Nope, it is a fraction of the power. A 50 kw AM uses a 500 watt HD
signal
on
the same frequency

This is pure baloney. Same crapola the DRM crowd tried to pass off on
the general public.

Check the technical specs. We are installing a new Nautel RX 50, which
does
50 kw analog and 500 watts digital on AM.

In Band On Channel has 1/100th of the analog signal in the digital mode.

I have checked the specs. It does not even pass the smell test.

Like I stated previously the DRM consortium tried the same hyperbole,
which failed.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California