![]() |
Over-the-air digital signals subject to Internet radio royalties !
"More on the Copyright Royalty Board Decision on Internet Radio Music
Royalties" Written By:David Oxenford On March 5, 2007 10:19 PM "In response to David S above - a digital signal of an over-the-air station is in fact subject to these royalties. When the royalties were first adopted, the broadcasters claimed that their signals, when just retransmitted on the Internet, were exempt, but the Copyright Office and the Courts rejected that argument." http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/arch...tml#discussion Oh yes, DE ! And, it's not DRM ! :-) |
Over-the-air digital signals subject to Internet radio royalties !
wrote in message ps.com... "More on the Copyright Royalty Board Decision on Internet Radio Music Royalties" Written By:David Oxenford On March 5, 2007 10:19 PM "In response to David S above - a digital signal of an over-the-air station is in fact subject to these royalties. When the royalties were first adopted, the broadcasters claimed that their signals, when just retransmitted on the Internet, were exempt, but the Copyright Office and the Courts rejected that argument." http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/arch...tml#discussion Oh yes, DE ! And, it's not DRM ! :-) As I said, the rate structure sanctioned last week does not apply to anything except Internet streams. All digital broadcasts, whether streams or on air or via telephone or other technology fall under the DRM act, but different classes of service or supply have different rates. To start, the model announced last week is based on "streams" or "stream hours" and radio does not have multiple streams... just one per format on HD. So the model is based on other factors, just as ASCAP and BMI and SESAC licenses are. |
Over-the-air digital signals subject to Internet radio royalties !
On Mar 6, 2:15�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... "More on the Copyright Royalty Board Decision on Internet Radio Music Royalties" Written By:David Oxenford On March 5, 2007 10:19 PM "In response to David S above - a digital signal of an over-the-air station is in fact subject to these royalties. When the royalties were first adopted, the broadcasters claimed that their signals, when just retransmitted on the Internet, were exempt, but the Copyright Office and the Courts rejected that argument." http://www.broadcastlawblog.com/arch...-more-on-the-c... Oh yes, DE ! *And, it's not DRM ! *:-) As I said, the rate structure sanctioned last week does not apply to anything except Internet streams. All digital broadcasts, whether streams or on air or via telephone or other technology fall under the DRM act, but different classes of service or supply have different rates. To start, the model announced last week is based on "streams" or "stream hours" and radio does not have multiple streams... just one per format on HD. So the model is based on other factors, just as ASCAP and BMI and SESAC licenses are. - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - This just killed streaming the HD channels over the Internet - the channels are not profitable ! The fees are based on per-listener/per-stream/per-song. Too bad HD/IBOC falls under this ! All digital transmissions over-the-air and then streamed onto the Internet are subject to the fees ! LOL ! |
Over-the-air digital signals subject to Internet radio royalties !
ejaculated propaganda This just killed streaming the HD channels over the Internet - the channels are not profitable ! The fees are based on per-listener/per-stream/per-song. Too bad HD/IBOC falls under this ! All digital transmissions over-the-air and then streamed onto the Internet are subject to the fees ! LOL ! And you're so fukin ignorant it is astounding. |
Over-the-air digital signals subject to Internet radio royalties !
wrote in message ups.com... This just killed streaming the HD channels over the Internet - the channels are not profitable ! The fees are based on per-listener/per-stream/per-song. Too bad HD/IBOC falls under this ! All digital transmissions over-the-air and then streamed onto the Internet are subject to the fees ! LOL ! HD does not fall under last weeks approved tariff for streams. Very few stations are streaming their HD-2 channels, and the bulk of current streams are near-simulcasts of the Analog programming source with the AFTRA spots removed and substituted. Not streaming the HD-2 channels is a non-issue as it does not affect revenue or ratings (HD-2 channels do not contribute to Analog / HD1 channel listening, and web streams do not, either. HD radio has one stream. There is no way to quantify the usage per song for the "per stream" fee structure, which is why it is a separate tariff based on station, market, etc. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com