|
- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
Vendicar Decarian wrote:
Same people, different name. "dxAce" wrote Kinda like you being the same asshole, different name? Are you asking me to come burn down Washington? If I were interested in damaging the AmeriKKKan state through arson I would simply fly an aircraft over some really nice and dry grassland/forests/corn fields/wheat fields and drop some incendiary devices, Or maybe just launch them from a car window as I drive by. How many thousands of square miles of fire do you think one determined person could start over a long weekend? It's an interesting question isn't it? |
(OT) : VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.
Outlook Express? Now that is incompetent!
On Wed, 23 May 2007 07:53:02 +0430, "Vendicar Decarian" wrote: 24.36.213.198 OrgName: Cogeco Cable Inc. OrgID: CGOC Address: PO Box 5076, Stn. Main Address: 950 Syscon Road City: Burlington StateProv: ON PostalCode: L7R-4S6 Country: CA NetRange: 24.36.0.0 - 24.36.255.255 CIDR: 24.36.0.0/16 NetName: CGOC-5BLK NetHandle: NET-24-36-0-0-1 Parent: NET-24-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NS5.CGOCABLE.NET NameServer: NS6.CGOCABLE.NET Comment: RegDate: 2004-02-09 Updated: 2004-11-01 RTechHandle: IS7-ORG-ARIN RTechName: Cogeco Cable RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055 RTechEmail: RTechHandle: INS2-ARIN RTechName: IP Network Service RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055 RTechEmail: OrgAbuseHandle: INTER3-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Abuse and Security OrgAbusePhone: +1-905-333-5343 OrgAbuseEmail: OrgTechHandle: INS2-ARIN OrgTechName: IP Network Service OrgTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055 OrgTechEmail: CustName: Cogeco Cable Canada Inc. Address: P.O.Box 5076 Stn. Main Address: 950 Syscon Rd. City: Burlington StateProv: ON PostalCode: L7R-4S6 Country: CA RegDate: 2004-12-02 Updated: 2005-08-16 NetRange: 24.36.208.0 - 24.36.223.255 CIDR: 24.36.208.0/20 NetName: CGOC-HATO4 NetHandle: NET-24-36-208-0-1 Parent: NET-24-36-0-0-1 NetType: Reassigned Comment: Please email for abuse/security violations RegDate: 2004-12-02 Updated: 2005-08-16 RTechHandle: INS2-ARIN RTechName: IP Network Service RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055 RTechEmail: RTechHandle: IS7-ORG-ARIN RTechName: Cogeco Cable RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055 RTechEmail: OrgAbuseHandle: INTER3-ARIN OrgAbuseName: Abuse and Security OrgAbusePhone: +1-905-333-5343 OrgAbuseEmail: OrgTechHandle: INS2-ARIN OrgTechName: IP Network Service OrgTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055 OrgTechEmail: __________________________________________________ __ For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers: KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME! |
- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
On Wed, 23 May 2007 07:58:44 +0430, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote: Vendicar Decarian wrote: Same people, different name. "dxAce" wrote Kinda like you being the same asshole, different name? Are you asking me to come burn down Washington? If I were interested in damaging the AmeriKKKan state through arson I would simply fly an aircraft over some really nice and dry grassland/forests/corn fields/wheat fields and drop some incendiary devices, Or maybe just launch them from a car window as I drive by. How many thousands of square miles of fire do you think one determined person could start over a long weekend? It's an interesting question isn't it? I think that you are too stupid to light a match myself! __________________________________________________ __ For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers: KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME! |
- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
KE4ODD wrote:
If I were interested in damaging the AmeriKKKan state through arson I would simply fly an aircraft over some really nice and dry grassland/forests/corn fields/wheat fields and drop some incendiary devices, The New Jersey Air National Guard already does that for us. -- Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator : http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html |
- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance Meanwhile... Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios -------------------------------------------- - Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than even the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, say researchers. The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s, emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3% between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended. When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC drew up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as bad, if not worse. The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the amount used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2 emissions accelerated after 2000. They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in global population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne Le Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK. .... |
VD Scott Nudds - advocates- his senile agression
"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance Meanwhile... Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios -------------------------------------------- - Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than even the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, say researchers. The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s, emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3% between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended. When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC drew up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as bad, if not worse. The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the amount used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2 emissions accelerated after 2000. They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in global population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne Le Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK. .... |
- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance Meanwhile... Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios -------------------------------------------- - Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than even the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, say researchers. The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s, emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3% between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended. When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC drew up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as bad, if not worse. The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the amount used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2 emissions accelerated after 2000. They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in global population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne Le Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK. .... |
- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance Meanwhile... Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios -------------------------------------------- - Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than even the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, say researchers. The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s, emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3% between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended. When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC drew up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as bad, if not worse. The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the amount used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2 emissions accelerated after 2000. They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in global population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne Le Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK. .... |
- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance Meanwhile... Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios -------------------------------------------- - Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than even the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, say researchers. The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s, emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3% between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended. When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC drew up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as bad, if not worse. The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the amount used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2 emissions accelerated after 2000. They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in global population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne Le Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK. .... |
(OT) : "VD" Has Arrived At A NewsGroup Near You !
"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance Meanwhile... Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios -------------------------------------------- - Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than even the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, say researchers. The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s, emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3% between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended. When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC drew up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as bad, if not worse. The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the amount used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2 emissions accelerated after 2000. They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in global population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne Le Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK. .... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com