(OT) : Yes You Too Can Be The First In Your Neighborhood To Have An Al Gore Carbon Credit's Card !
 

"dxAce" wrote
It'll improve after we get rid of the dumbass Canucks!

You will die as you live, - in self imposed ignorance.

(OT) : Yes You Too Can Be The First In Your Neighborhood To Have AnAl Gore Carbon Credit's Card !
 

Vendicar Decarian wrote:

"dxAce" wrote
It'll improve after we get rid of the dumbass Canucks!

You will die as you live, - in self imposed ignorance.

Ignorance? Sorry, I'm not a dumbass Canuck!

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"dxAce" wrote
Well, send all two of your good people down here and let them have at it.

Yawn. You still think you are on a school playground don't you? Fool.

"dxAce" wrote
After they're done we'll bomb the **** out of the rest of you whiney
****ing
*******s!

Now that would be a provocation that would spurr me into action.

Canadians burned Washington to the ground once. Do you really need them to
teach you another lesson?

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"dxAce" wrote
Nah, I only said I was guessing, dumbass.

Well, that is all fools can do... Guess.

(OT) : Yes You Too Can Be The First In Your Neighborhood To Have An Al Gore Carbon Credit's Card !
 

Vendicar Decarian wrote:
You will die as you live, - in self imposed ignorance.


"dxAce" wrote
Ignorance? Sorry, I'm not a dumbass Canuck!

No, you are a dumbass AmeriKKKan who will die as he lives, - in self
imposed ignorance.

(OT) : VD - Rejoices in the Deaths of Our Troops Serving in Iraq
 

On May 21, 7:10 pm, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:
"dxAce" wrote

May must be the time for the hatching of the 'tards up in CanaDuh.
I'm LMFAO here!


- 15 more Dead AmeriKKKans this weekend in Iraq
- several years after the AmeriKKKan VP lied to the
- AmeriKKKan publiKKK and claimed that the
- resistance was in it's death throws.
-
- I'm laughing my ass off here.
-
- More AmeriKKKan death to come.
-
- Excellent.

VD - So you are another Liberal Democrat {or may be
a Can-A-Duh-Ian} : Who Rejoices in the Deaths of Our
American Troops Serving in Iraq [.] ~ RHF

(OT) : VD - Rejoices in the Deaths of Our Troops Serving in Iraq
 

On May 21, 11:54 pm, RHF wrote:
On May 21, 7:10 pm, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:

"dxAce" wrote

May must be the time for the hatching of the 'tards up in CanaDuh.
I'm LMFAO here!

- 15 more Dead AmeriKKKans this weekend in Iraq
- several years after the AmeriKKKan VP lied to the
- AmeriKKKan publiKKK and claimed that the
- resistance was in it's death throws.
-
- I'm laughing my ass off here.
-
- More AmeriKKKan death to come.
-
- Excellent.

VD - So you are another Liberal Democrat {or may be
a Can-A-Duh-Ian} : Who Rejoices in the Deaths of Our
American Troops Serving in Iraq [.] ~ RHF

Why ain't you there? Did your daddy get you a cushy post in Texas
instead?

Typical Socialists
 

One thing that I remember from my college days as a student
marxist/socialist activist, was that we were taught that calling
people names, swearing, using filthy language etc. could be effective
in shocking people into losing their grasp of an argument. It could
also result in the opposition becoming angry to the point of losing
their cool, and that would have the same result with the possibility
that a fight would break out. We were told that we could swear, and
name call the opposition all we want, but let one of them throw the
first punch if a fight was going to start. Then we could fight back,
and if the cops came, we could claim that we just fought back in self
defence. Sadly, we did get into a number of violent fights. I am only
glad that when I was involved, it didn't go beyond fists, except on
two occasions. We won some. But we also lost some. We gave beatings,
but took some beatings also. When I look back to those young years
from my older age, I know now that it was not worth it. The
"reactionaries" started the violence. Always make the other side react
first. But it was us that goaded them into it.

I was a young idealistic, believing in a socialist utopia that we
could build here on earth. It took quite some time to realize that
such a utopia is an impossibility. We can not create "Heaven on
Earth". It can NEVER happen. Human nature will never allow it.

Of course, now at my age, and being much wiser, I realized quite
a number of years ago that socialism of any kind, totalitarianism of
any kind, extremism of any kind, is badly mistaken. Being a
Libertarian, for me, is best. Freedom, true Liberty, is worth
defending.
But I do remember the lessons of the past. And I know the
punishment that I took for being a traitor to the marxist/ socialist
cause back then.
What I see here, with Vendicar Decarian, and a
few other people, is typical dirty socialist tactics. But they are
going even a bit further then we went. They are no better then the
lower form of animals.
Cato

(OT) : VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.
 

On May 21, 9:23 pm, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:
"dxAce" wrote

No one has to prove anything to a dumbass Canuck.

Meanwhile the U.S. dollar has lost another 5% of it's purchasing power
over the last 4 months, and over 40% since the Bush Traitor wormed his way
into office.


- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.

VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.

VD - Spoken like a true Robert "KKK" Bird
Democrat Party of the USA Political Cadre.

preach that hate and killing ~ RHF

(OT) : VD A Very Typical Democrat {Socialist} Want-To-Be !
 

"RHF" wrote
What Do We Want ? ? ?
VD's One Thought !
VD's One Voice !
VD's One Party !

Sound's like Bushie's plan for AmeriKKKa


"RHF" wrote
VD's Dictatorship of the Masses - Lead by VD [.]

A contradiction in terms. How typically KKKonservative of you.

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

Vendicar Decarian wrote:

"dxAce" wrote
Well, send all two of your good people down here and let them have at it.

Yawn. You still think you are on a school playground don't you? Fool.

"dxAce" wrote
After they're done we'll bomb the **** out of the rest of you whiney
****ing
*******s!

Now that would be a provocation that would spurr me into action.

Canadians burned Washington to the ground once. Do you really need them to
teach you another lesson?

That was the British, wasn't it?

Typical Socialists
 

"Cato" wrote
One thing that I remember from my college days as a student
marxist/socialist activist, was that we were taught that calling
people names, swearing, using filthy language etc.

So you were hated by your fellow University Students as well. I'm hardly
surprised.

I on the other hand remember the classes in quantum mechanics, Linear
Algebra, Geology, Waves, computer science, and AstroPhysics and Calculus.


"Cato" wrote
Sadly, we did get into a number of violent fights.

Scum Suckers like you always do.


"Cato" wrote
I am only glad that when I was involved, it didn't go beyond fists, except
on
two occasions. We won some. But we also lost some. We gave beatings,
but took some beatings also.

Scratch any Libertarian and you find a Violent Fascist with a thin coat of
paint.


"Cato" wrote
I was a young idealistic, believing in a socialist utopia that we
could build here on earth.

No, you were an ignorant Cock Sucker, and you remain an ignorant Cock
Sucker.


"Cato" wrote
We can not create "Heaven on
Earth". It can NEVER happen. Human nature will never allow it.

Not as long as Libertarian filth continue to exist.


"Cato" wrote
Of course, now at my age, and being much wiser, I realized quite
a number of years ago that socialism of any kind, totalitarianism of
any kind, extremism of any kind, is badly mistaken. Being a
Libertarian, for me, is best. Freedom, true Liberty, is worth
defending.

Just as long as you can molest those children ay? Extremist.



"Cato" wrote
But I do remember the lessons of the past. And I know the
punishment that I took for being a traitor to the marxist/ socialist
cause back then.

And now you are just an Traitor to your nation.


"Cato" wrote
What I see here, with Vendicar Decarian, and a
few other people, is typical dirty socialist tactics.

OOh, like telling the truth.. How darn socialist of me. Ahahahahahah...


"Cato" wrote
But they are going even a bit further then we went. They are no better
then the
lower form of animals.

Watching AmeriKKKans die in Iraq and Afghanistan is pure joy. Don't you
agree? Libertarian.

(OT) : VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.
 

On Tue, 22 May 2007 14:13:34 +0430, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:



"Vendicar Decarian" wrote:
- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.

"RHF" wrote
VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.

No, I advocate the continued Extermination of the AmeriKKKan state.

The only good RepubliKKKan is a dead RepubliKKKan.



OrgName: Cogeco Cable Inc.
OrgID: CGOC
Address: PO Box 5076, Stn. Main
Address: 950 Syscon Road
City: Burlington
StateProv: ON
PostalCode: L7R-4S6
Country: CA

OrgAbuseHandle: INTER3-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse and Security
OrgAbusePhone: +1-905-333-5343
OrgAbuseEmail:
__________________________________________________ __

For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:

KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME!

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

How will this effect shortwave reception? I hope it inhanses F2 propagation
as well as sporadic E.

Sincerely,

Bruce Atchison - author of When a Man Loves a Rabbit (Learning and Living
With Bunnies).
http://www.bookadz.com/batchison.htm
http://www.bookstream.biz/cgi-bin/bo...s&store_id=102



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

(OT) : VD - Rejoices in the Deaths of Our Troops Serving in Iraq
 

RHF ) writes:

Bozo, the night is over and this is still off-topic and you still
continue to reply, not just replying but replying to the other newsgroup
too and changing the subject header.

Clearly, you don't care about rec.radio.shortwave because you are
doing your best to speed its death.

MIchael

(OT) : Yes You Too Can Be The First In Your Neighborhood ToHav...
 

America is the female version name from/of/whatever,Americus.Americus
Vespuci.(Vespuci,,, spelling.Italian name)
cuhulin

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

On May 21, 8:10 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
Vendicar Decarian wrote:
"Telamon" wrote
You need to read up on it then. It was a BIG issue before global cooling
came along.

Wrong again **** Licker.

There was never any issue warning of imminent, dangerous global cooling
issued by the scientific community.

In 1972 it made the NBC, ABC and CBS evening news.


When did they become scientific sources?

And it made radio news as well. Even the BBC was talking about it on
the World Service.

This was quite a big story. And yes, it came from the scientific
community.


Do it didn't. Find us a scientific journal article which predicted
this, if you claim it did.

Why are you reapeating a lie?

Because it isn't.

Find us the reference then.

(OT) : VD - Rejoices in the Deaths of Our Troops Serving in Iraq
 

......... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA.... From the warped, tiny mind of:
Scott Nudds aka VD Scotty "Vendicar Decarian" the
wrote in message ...
If I were an AlQueda operative then AmeriKKKa would be suffering from a
very odd series of disasters, fires, power outages, train derailments,
bridges and buildings that just fall down all by themselves, food
contamination, cattle illnesses, mysterious crop failures, etc.
The only good Libertarian is a dead Libertarian.

[hanson]
.... ahahaha...but Scotty, all these events are already here, naturally,
& without the help of Al Qaida, which is your idol that you yearn to
become a member of. But they would reject you because of your
"warped tiny mind" (you own words) and 'cuz you have one of those
cattle brain illnesses, the fiery pink-swine mouth disease... that is
manifest in all posts from you "Vendicar Decarian" aka Scott Nudds
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...8834b01a4d154d
ahahaha... ahahahaha

(OT) : "VD" Has Arrived At A NewsGroup Near You !
 

"Vendicar Decarian" wrote in message
...

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Foolishness.
that is seen in all posts from "Vendicar Decarian" aka Scott Nudds
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...8834b01a4d154d
ahahaha... ahahahaha

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"Vendicar Decarian" wrote in message
...

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Foolishness
that is seen in all posts from "Vendicar Decarian" aka Scott Nudds
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...8834b01a4d154d
ahahaha... ahahahaha

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"Vendicar Decarian" wrote in
message ...

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance
which is the only talent that "Vendicar Decarian" aka Sott Nudds has
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...8834b01a4d154d
ahahaha... ahahahaha

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

ahahaha... Peter touched a raw nerve in you, VD, didn't he!
ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha... ahahahaha... AHAHA...
It seem that Peter has cranked you grievously , Scott Nudds
aka "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote in message ...

"D Peter Maus" wrote
Your eloquence speaks to your character.
Your sophistry speaks to your intelligence.
Your anger speaks to the weakness of your position.
Your belligerence speaks to the fact that you know it.

[Aggravated and aggrieved VD Scotty]
Look at the ****ing Retard trying to hide his scientific Illiteracy.
Show us Maus, three references to peer reviewed scientific journals of
the era that warned of an imminent onset of an ice age.
So far you ****ing Losers have had 15 years to find the requested
references, and you haven't yet found one.
What's keeping you? You ****ing Ignorant Loser.

[hanson]
ahahaha... Scotty, you must be really afraid of the cold that
the mere mention of the word makes you so hot under your
collar.... ahahahaha... Therefore, you should welcome global
warming with an enormous yearning as it will ameliorate your
pitiful condition and state... ahahahaha....

"D Peter Maus" wrote
This was quite a big story. And yes, it came from the scientific
community.

[Cocksucking VD Scotty]
Prove it. You lying Cocksucker.

[hanson]
ahahaha... But Scott Nudds, you Scuttling your Nutts here like that
will only prove what you have said in here... you know, when you
posted about yours, "Scott Nudds warped and tiny mind":
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...8834b01a4d154d
ahahaha... ahahahaha

VD Scott Nudds - advocates- his senile agression
 

ahahahaha... VD Scotty has you really going... ahahaha...
Tracy aka "KE4ODD" wrote in message
...
Scott Nudds aka VD Scotty "Vendicar Decarian" wrote:
"Vendicar Decarian" wrote:
- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.

"RHF" wrote
VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.

[VD Scotty]
No, I advocate the continued Extermination of the AmeriKKKan state.
The only good RepubliKKKan is a dead RepubliKKKan.

[Tracy]
OrgName: Cogeco Cable Inc.
OrgID: CGOC
Address: PO Box 5076, Stn. Main
Address: 950 Syscon Road
City: Burlington
StateProv: ON
PostalCode: L7R-4S6
Country: CA
OrgAbuseHandle: INTER3-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse and Security
OrgAbusePhone: +1-905-333-5343
OrgAbuseEmail:
__________________________________________________ __
For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:
KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you
want to call me are all the same person!....ME!

[hanson]
..... ahahahaha... here's more stuff to support your extremely
worthy and essential efforts, in the national interest, to rid
VD Scotty from the Usenet... which would be a shame since
he is so hilariously entertaining with/in his fanaticism
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...8834b01a4d154d
ahahaha... ahahahaha

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"Vendicar Decarian" wrote in message
...

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Foolishness
that is seen in all posts from "Vendicar Decarian" aka Scott Nudds
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.e...8834b01a4d154d
ahahaha... ahahahaha

- Global Warming / "The Hockey Stick"
 

From:

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming...tickFAQ.html#4

5. How much does our understanding of global warming depend on the
hockey stick graph?

The short answer is "very little." The hockey stick graph constitutes
only one among literally thousands of pieces of evidence that have
contributed to the present scientific consensus on the human influence
on global warming. In 2001, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) concluded in its authoritative third assessment report
that "there is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming
observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities."
As one climate expert observed: The IPCC report Climate Change 2001:
The Scientific Basis is 881 pages in length. It weighs 5.5 pounds and
contains over 200 figures and 80 tables. It would be absurd to think
that the weight of its conclusions rests on any one figure or table;
rather it paints a convincing picture in the totality of its science,
as noted succinctly in its title."¹

We are now observing real changes due to higher temperatures. Here are
some examples:

* The Mt. Kilimanjaro glacier, which has survived the past 11,000
years, is currently at risk of disappearing by 2020 if present rates
of melting continue;


* Enormous tracts of Siberian peatlands, with vast stores of
carbon, are beginning to thaw and release carbon dioxide and methane
into the atmosphere;


* The Larsen B ice shelf in Antarctica has lost volume as large
chunks (some as large as the state of Rhode Island) have recently
broken free and melted;


* The annual surface area of Arctic sea ice has declined eight
percent over the past several decades;


* Large-scale increases in ocean temperatures have been detected
over the past 45 years; and


* Plants and animals are changing their habitation ranges,
sometimes dramatically, such as robins and mosquitoes in the Arctic
that were previously unknown there.

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming...tickFAQ.html#4

5. How much does our understanding of global warming depend on the
hockey stick graph?

The short answer is "very little." The hockey stick graph constitutes
only one among literally thousands of pieces of evidence that have
contributed to the present scientific consensus on the human influence
on global warming. In 2001, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) concluded in its authoritative third assessment report
that "there is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming
observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities."
As one climate expert observed: The IPCC report Climate Change 2001:
The Scientific Basis is 881 pages in length. It weighs 5.5 pounds and
contains over 200 figures and 80 tables. It would be absurd to think
that the weight of its conclusions rests on any one figure or table;
rather it paints a convincing picture in the totality of its science,
as noted succinctly in its title."¹

We are now observing real changes due to higher temperatures. Here are
some examples:

* The Mt. Kilimanjaro glacier, which has survived the past 11,000
years, is currently at risk of disappearing by 2020 if present rates
of melting continue;


* Enormous tracts of Siberian peatlands, with vast stores of
carbon, are beginning to thaw and release carbon dioxide and methane
into the atmosphere;


* The Larsen B ice shelf in Antarctica has lost volume as large
chunks (some as large as the state of Rhode Island) have recently
broken free and melted;


* The annual surface area of Arctic sea ice has declined eight
percent over the past several decades;


* Large-scale increases in ocean temperatures have been detected
over the past 45 years; and


* Plants and animals are changing their habitation ranges,
sometimes dramatically, such as robins and mosquitoes in the Arctic
that were previously unknown there.



On Apr 23, 7:10 am, wrote:
Here is a link to the latest IPCC findinigs on Global Warming;

http://freeinternetpress.com/story.php?sid=11216

- Global Warming / "The Hockey Stick"
 

YADA YADA YADA

Who gives a ****?!

Everybody has to die sometimes!

Earth Included!

wrote in message
oups.com...

From:

http://www.ucsusa.org/global_warming...tickFAQ.html#4

5. How much does our understanding of global warming depend on the
hockey stick graph?

The short answer is "very little." The hockey stick graph constitutes
only one among literally thousands of pieces of evidence that have
contributed to the present scientific consensus on the human influence
on global warming. In 2001, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change (IPCC) concluded in its authoritative third assessment report
that "there is new and stronger evidence that most of the warming
observed over the last 50 years is attributable to human activities."
As one climate expert observed: The IPCC report Climate Change 2001:
The Scientific Basis is 881 pages in length. It weighs 5.5 pounds and
contains over 200 figures and 80 tables. It would be absurd to think
that the weight of its conclusions rests on any one figure or table;
rather it paints a convincing picture in the totality of its science,
as noted succinctly in its title."¹

We are now observing real changes due to higher temperatures. Here are
some examples:

* The Mt. Kilimanjaro glacier, which has survived the past 11,000
years, is currently at risk of disappearing by 2020 if present rates
of melting continue;


* Enormous tracts of Siberian peatlands, with vast stores of
carbon, are beginning to thaw and release carbon dioxide and methane
into the atmosphere;


* The Larsen B ice shelf in Antarctica has lost volume as large
chunks (some as large as the state of Rhode Island) have recently
broken free and melted;


* The annual surface area of Arctic sea ice has declined eight
percent over the past several decades;


* Large-scale increases in ocean temperatures have been detected
over the past 45 years; and


* Plants and animals are changing their habitation ranges,
sometimes dramatically, such as robins and mosquitoes in the Arctic
that were previously unknown there.

(OT) : VD - Rejoices in the Deaths of Our Troops Serving in Iraq
 

On May 22, 7:52 am, (Michael Black) wrote:
RHF ) writes:

Bozo, the night is over and this is still off-topic and you still
continue to reply, not just replying but replying to the other newsgroup
too and changing the subject header.

Clearly, you don't care about rec.radio.shortwave because you are
doing your best to speed its death.

MIchael

MB - Why don't you do your Net Nazi Routine
{Attack Dog Act} on VD - unless . . . just may be
you are VD - MB you do make one wonder . . .

Oops - I Am So Sorry - It would seem that
My Reply to You is Off-Topic Too ! :o) ~ RHF

- Global Warming / "The Hockey Stick"
 

"ralph" wrote
Who gives a ****?!
Everybody has to die sometimes!

Then you won't mind having your brains partly emptied from your skull by a
sharp blow with a claw hammer.

Who gives a ****?
Everybody has to die sometimes.

(OT) : VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.
 

"KE4ODD" wrote
OrgName: Cogeco Cable Inc.
OrgID: CGOC
Address: PO Box 5076, Stn. Main
Address: 950 Syscon Road
City: Burlington
StateProv: ON
PostalCode: L7R-4S6
Country: CA

OrgAbuseHandle: INTER3-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse and Security
OrgAbusePhone: +1-905-333-5343
OrgAbuseEmail:

Wrong again.
Are you so incompetent that you can't identify me even though I have
repeatedly posted my full address to this forum.

**** you KKKonservatives are losers.

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

Vendicar Decarian wrote:
Same people, different name.


"dxAce" wrote
Kinda like you being the same asshole, different name?

Are you asking me to come burn down Washington?

If I were interested in damaging the AmeriKKKan state through arson I
would simply fly an aircraft over some really nice and dry
grassland/forests/corn fields/wheat fields and drop some incendiary devices,
Or maybe just launch them from a car window as I drive by.

How many thousands of square miles of fire do you think one determined
person could start over a long weekend?

It's an interesting question isn't it?

(OT) : VD -advocates- Killing RepubliKKKans will soon be a national sport.
 

Outlook Express? Now that is incompetent!



On Wed, 23 May 2007 07:53:02 +0430, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:

24.36.213.198
OrgName: Cogeco Cable Inc.
OrgID: CGOC
Address: PO Box 5076, Stn. Main
Address: 950 Syscon Road
City: Burlington
StateProv: ON
PostalCode: L7R-4S6
Country: CA

NetRange: 24.36.0.0 - 24.36.255.255
CIDR: 24.36.0.0/16
NetName: CGOC-5BLK
NetHandle: NET-24-36-0-0-1
Parent: NET-24-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: NS5.CGOCABLE.NET
NameServer: NS6.CGOCABLE.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-02-09
Updated: 2004-11-01

RTechHandle: IS7-ORG-ARIN
RTechName: Cogeco Cable
RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055
RTechEmail:

RTechHandle: INS2-ARIN
RTechName: IP Network Service
RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055
RTechEmail:

OrgAbuseHandle: INTER3-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse and Security
OrgAbusePhone: +1-905-333-5343
OrgAbuseEmail:

OrgTechHandle: INS2-ARIN
OrgTechName: IP Network Service
OrgTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055
OrgTechEmail:

CustName: Cogeco Cable Canada Inc.
Address: P.O.Box 5076 Stn. Main
Address: 950 Syscon Rd.
City: Burlington
StateProv: ON
PostalCode: L7R-4S6
Country: CA
RegDate: 2004-12-02
Updated: 2005-08-16

NetRange: 24.36.208.0 - 24.36.223.255
CIDR: 24.36.208.0/20
NetName: CGOC-HATO4
NetHandle: NET-24-36-208-0-1
Parent: NET-24-36-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment: Please email for abuse/security violations
RegDate: 2004-12-02
Updated: 2005-08-16

RTechHandle: INS2-ARIN
RTechName: IP Network Service
RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055
RTechEmail:

RTechHandle: IS7-ORG-ARIN
RTechName: Cogeco Cable
RTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055
RTechEmail:

OrgAbuseHandle: INTER3-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Abuse and Security
OrgAbusePhone: +1-905-333-5343
OrgAbuseEmail:

OrgTechHandle: INS2-ARIN
OrgTechName: IP Network Service
OrgTechPhone: +1-905-333-7055
OrgTechEmail:

__________________________________________________ __

For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:

KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME!

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

On Wed, 23 May 2007 07:58:44 +0430, "Vendicar Decarian"
wrote:

Vendicar Decarian wrote:
Same people, different name.


"dxAce" wrote
Kinda like you being the same asshole, different name?

Are you asking me to come burn down Washington?

If I were interested in damaging the AmeriKKKan state through arson I
would simply fly an aircraft over some really nice and dry
grassland/forests/corn fields/wheat fields and drop some incendiary devices,
Or maybe just launch them from a car window as I drive by.

How many thousands of square miles of fire do you think one determined
person could start over a long weekend?

It's an interesting question isn't it?




I think that you are too stupid to light a match myself!
__________________________________________________ __

For the folks that get confused when I post from different computers:

KE4ODD, Tracy Fort, Beerbarrel and whatever the hell else you want to call me are all the same person!....ME!

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

KE4ODD wrote:

If I were interested in damaging the AmeriKKKan state through arson I
would simply fly an aircraft over some really nice and dry
grassland/forests/corn fields/wheat fields and drop some incendiary devices,

The New Jersey Air National Guard already does that for us.

--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance

Meanwhile...

Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios
--------------------------------------------
- Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service


The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than
even
the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate
Change, say researchers.

The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific
and
Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and
found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s,
emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3%
between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended.

When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC
drew
up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as
bad,
if not worse.

The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as
population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the
amount
used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2
emissions
accelerated after 2000.

They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in
global
population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more
efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne
Le
Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK.

....

VD Scott Nudds - advocates- his senile agression
 

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance

Meanwhile...

Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios
--------------------------------------------
- Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service


The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than
even
the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate
Change, say researchers.

The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific
and
Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and
found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s,
emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3%
between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended.

When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC
drew
up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as
bad,
if not worse.

The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as
population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the
amount
used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2
emissions
accelerated after 2000.

They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in
global
population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more
efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne
Le
Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK.

....

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance

Meanwhile...

Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios
--------------------------------------------
- Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service


The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than
even
the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate
Change, say researchers.

The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific
and
Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and
found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s,
emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3%
between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended.

When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC
drew
up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as
bad,
if not worse.

The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as
population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the
amount
used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2
emissions
accelerated after 2000.

They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in
global
population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more
efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne
Le
Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK.

....

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance

Meanwhile...

Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios
--------------------------------------------
- Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service


The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than
even
the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate
Change, say researchers.

The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific
and
Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and
found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s,
emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3%
between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended.

When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC
drew
up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as
bad,
if not worse.

The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as
population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the
amount
used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2
emissions
accelerated after 2000.

They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in
global
population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more
efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne
Le
Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK.

....

- Global Warming? So What? Remember the Ice Age Scare?
 

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance

Meanwhile...

Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios
--------------------------------------------
- Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service


The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than
even
the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate
Change, say researchers.

The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific
and
Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and
found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s,
emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3%
between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended.

When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC
drew
up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as
bad,
if not worse.

The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as
population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the
amount
used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2
emissions
accelerated after 2000.

They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in
global
population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more
efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne
Le
Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK.

....

(OT) : "VD" Has Arrived At A NewsGroup Near You !
 

"hanson" wrote Nothing but Ignorance

Meanwhile...

Recent CO2 rises exceed worst-case scenarios
--------------------------------------------
- Catherine Brahic - 22:00 21 May 2007 - NewScientist.com news service


The world's recent carbon dioxide emissions are growing more rapidly than
even
the worst-case climate scenario used by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate
Change, say researchers.

The team, led by Michael Raupach of the Australian Commonwealth Scientific
and
Industrial Research Organisation, looked at the growth of CO2 emissions and
found that emissions growth suddenly accelerated in 2000. During the 1990s,
emissions grew by 1.1% per year on average, but the number shot up to 3.3%
between 2000 and 2004, when the study ended.

When they compared the recent emissions trend to those the UN-backed IPCC
drew
up as its "worst case scenario", the team found the reality was at least as
bad,
if not worse.

The team then examined the changes between 1980 and 2004 in factors such as
population, economic growth, energy efficiency and carbon efficiency (the
amount
used per unit of GDP). From this, they were able to determine why CO2
emissions
accelerated after 2000.

They concluded that the rise in CO2 emissions is not due to a growth in
global
population, but a reduction in global efficiency. "We are not getting more
efficient at using CO2 in the way we projected," explains co-author Corinne
Le
Quéré from the University of East Anglia in the UK.

....