Bigger RFI threat than BPL, IBOC?
 

In article ,
Frank Dresser wrote:
The gee-whiz press reports are calling this a "breakthrough" although the
principles involved have been known since the days of Nikola Tesla.

http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12733/1066/
Anyway, this scheme uses resonant coupling "in the megahertz range".
Does anyone know which megahertz range?

"Gee whiz" is right. The ghost of James Clerk Maxwell is rolling in his grave.

IMHO, it would have to operate as an Industrial/Scientific/Medical apparatus
(in the US, under Part 18). Frequencies would then be
6.78 MHz +/- 15 kHz
13.56 MHz +/- 7 kHz
27.12 MHz +/- 163 kHz 10-4 good buddy.

Mark Zenier
Googleproofaddress(account:mzenier provider:eskimo domain:com)

Bigger RFI threat than BPL, IBOC?
 

In article ,
(Mark Zenier) wrote:

In article ,
Frank Dresser wrote:
The gee-whiz press reports are calling this a "breakthrough" although the
principles involved have been known since the days of Nikola Tesla.

http://www.itwire.com.au/content/view/12733/1066/
Anyway, this scheme uses resonant coupling "in the megahertz range".
Does anyone know which megahertz range?

"Gee whiz" is right. The ghost of James Clerk Maxwell is rolling in his
grave.

IMHO, it would have to operate as an Industrial/Scientific/Medical apparatus
(in the US, under Part 18). Frequencies would then be
6.78 MHz +/- 15 kHz
13.56 MHz +/- 7 kHz
27.12 MHz +/- 163 kHz 10-4 good buddy.

Yep, the concept uses induction fields. Nothing new.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California