| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Hi:
Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question. I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation, carriers, and modulators. Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga- eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond? If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a nanosecond is shorter than a second. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 cycles is an extremely large amount of cycles. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles is even more because a gigacycle is more than a cycle. Giga-eon = a billion eons Eon = a billion years Gigacycle = a billion cycles. *nanocycle = billionth of a cycle Gigaphoton = a billion photons 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one large large number. 10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000 So you get: (10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to- the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10- to-the-power-1,000,000,000)] No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am really interested in this. Thanks, Radium |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequencyon an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Radium wrote:
... Thanks, Radium ROFLOL!!! JS |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequencyon an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Radium wrote: Hi: Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question. Why not ? You're a trolling IDIOT. Graham |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
"Radium" wrote in message oups.com... snip No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am really interested in this. Didn't you pull something like this crap in the sci.engr.television.advanced newsgroup a few years ago? The correct anwer then and now is that the output signal is the modulating signal with a slow phase change impressed on it proportional to the instantaneous amplitude of the carrier. Think "rotating vector." No further replies forthcoming, as my troll-o-meter is edging into the red zone. |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
"Radium" wrote in message oups.com... Hi: Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question. I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation, carriers, and modulators. Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga- eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond? If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a nanosecond is shorter than a second. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 cycles is an extremely large amount of cycles. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles is even more because a gigacycle is more than a cycle. Giga-eon = a billion eons Eon = a billion years Gigacycle = a billion cycles. *nanocycle = billionth of a cycle Gigaphoton = a billion photons 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one large large number. 10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000 So you get: (10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to- the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10- to-the-power-1,000,000,000)] No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am really interested in this. Thanks, Radium Radium The answer is no. It takes a finite time for even so called 'instantaneous' quantum interactions to occur, so the frequencies quoted are a nonsense. Essentially frequencies above around 10 ^ 30 Hz may (as) well not exist. I am probably a few orders of magnitude out here, but that is the general idea. For a detailed explaination see "The Road to Reality: A complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe by Roger Penrose - ISBN 0739458477". Available from Amazon and all good booksellers. Mr. Penrose has collaborated with some of the greatest theoretical mathamaticians and physicists of the last fifty years and if you can follow the maths, all will become clear. This book will explain a lot of the maths required anyway, so worth giving it a go. Most mathematicians prefer to simplify equations by removing superfluous zeroes and exponents by cancellation on either side of the equation. :-) Mike G0ULI |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequencyon an astronomically-low carrier frequency
Mike Kaliski wrote:
For a detailed explaination see "The Road to Reality: A complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe by Roger Penrose - ISBN 0739458477". Mike, does he say anything about quantum entanglement? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
On Jun 28, 3:52 am, "Sal M. Onella"
wrote: "Radium" wrote in message oups.com... snip No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am really interested in this. Didn't you pull something like this crap in the sci.engr.television.advanced newsgroup a few years ago? The correct anwer then and now is that the output signal is the modulating signal with a slow phase change impressed on it proportional to the instantaneous amplitude of the carrier. Think "rotating vector." No further replies forthcoming, as my troll-o-meter is edging into the red zone. Your troll-o-meter is defective, it should be pegged hard in the red zone. Please have it recalibrated to a proper sensitivity. |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message t... Mike Kaliski wrote: For a detailed explaination see "The Road to Reality: A complete Guide to the Laws of the Universe by Roger Penrose - ISBN 0739458477". Mike, does he say anything about quantum entanglement? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com Cecil Yes indeed he does. This book is about as leading edge as it gets. The author has worked closely with Stephen Hawking and people of similar academic credentials. It doesn't get any better than that. It is clear from reading this book that we have reached a plateau in our capability of understanding how the universe works and we need to await the arrival of new technology and techniques to be able to test the latest theories. The theory has outstripped the technology for the time being. Mike G0ULI |
AM electromagnetic waves: astronomically-high modulation frequency on an astronomically-low carrier frequency
On Jun 28, 12:38 am, Radium wrote:
Hi: Please don't be annoyed/offended by my question. I have a very weird question about electromagnetic radiation, carriers, and modulators. Is it mathematically-possible to carry a modulator signal with a frequency of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles every 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond and an amplitude of 1-watt-per-meter-squared on a AM carrier signal whose frequency is 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) nanocycle* every 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 giga- eons and whose amplitude is a minimum of 10^1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000 gigaphotons per 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond? If it is not mathematically-possible, then please explain why. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) second is an extremely short amount of time. 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the- power-10^1,000,000,000) nanosecond is even shorter because a nanosecond is shorter than a second. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 cycles is an extremely large amount of cycles. 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 gigacycles is even more because a gigacycle is more than a cycle. Giga-eon = a billion eons Eon = a billion years Gigacycle = a billion cycles. *nanocycle = billionth of a cycle Gigaphoton = a billion photons 10^1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000 -- now that is one large large number. 10^1,000,000,000 = 10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000 So you get: (10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(1,000,000,000-to-the-power-10^1,000,000,000) = 10^-(10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000)-to-the-power-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) 10^-(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10-to-the- power-1,000,000,000) is an extremely small number at it equals 10-to- the-power-NEGATIVE-[(10-to-the-power-1,000,000,000) to the power (10- to-the-power-1,000,000,000)] No offense but please respond with reasonable answers & keep out the jokes, off-topic nonsense, taunts, insults, and trivializations. I am really interested in this. Thanks, Radium I guess you could have some real problems when the rise time of your modulated envelope becomes faster than the speed of light. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:32 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com