|
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
|
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:26:55 -0400, dxAce
wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! When was al gore arrested? bob k5qwg |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Bob Miller wrote: On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 19:26:55 -0400, dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! When was al gore arrested? Drugged, Dazed And Confused. + Al Gore is mentally ill. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
dxAcehole wrote:
Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! http://tinyurl.com/2up9pf http://www.apfn.net/messageboard/BushWT.jpg http://files.blog-city.com/files/aa/...bush_drunk.jpg http://www.indymedia.org.uk/icon/2005/11/327382.jpg mike |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce
wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. Personally, I wish he partake of something -- maybe then he'd get back to reality. These evangelical types just can't handle power. bob k5qwg I think not! But Al Gore's son certainly has been caught with drugs! Calm down little Liberal Boy... have mommy explain it to you. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Bob Miller wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Your presumptions are showing. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Wasen't jeb bush's son busted for doing drugs?
I have never done drugs or dope before, that crap scares me.I do nicotine and I do caffine and I do alcohol too.I just now finished off a ''cold one'' about half an hour ago.I am an alcoholic. cuhulin |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
|
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Tommy Tootles wrote: Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. Like Father, Like Daughters! dxAce wrote: They been busted for coke? Has George? I think not! Then you'd be wrong yet again, Dusty. Nowhere did I say they were "busted". However... .... Holland, Michigan must be more of a redneck, hick backwater than I suspected. The following items have been reported *numerous* times in both the the print and broadcast media (which apparently don't make it to Holland): 1) The daughters have had *numerous* drug, sex and alcohol escapades. 2) George W was (is?) a *SELF-ADMITTED* abuser of alcohol and weaseled when asked about cocaine (rather than giving a simple "no"). 3) "Dime-Bag" Laura? Don't worry about the print media (I know you are fighting that comprehension problem), but when listening to the news, please try and pay attention. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising. We Democrats get all the fun :-) bob k5qwg Your presumptions are showing. Yep. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Tommy Tootles wrote: Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. Like Father, Like Daughters! dxAce wrote: They been busted for coke? Has George? I think not! Then you'd be wrong yet again, Dusty. Nowhere did I say they were "busted". However... ... Holland, Michigan must be more of a redneck, hick backwater than I suspected. The following items have been reported *numerous* times in both the the print and broadcast media (which apparently don't make it to Holland): 1) The daughters have had *numerous* drug, sex and alcohol escapades. 2) George W was (is?) a *SELF-ADMITTED* abuser of alcohol and weaseled when asked about cocaine (rather than giving a simple "no"). 3) "Dime-Bag" Laura? Don't worry about the print media (I know you are fighting that comprehension problem), but when listening to the news, please try and pay attention. Aw come on, Tommy, get mommy to explain it to you. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising. We Democrats get all the fun :-) You're in Fantasy Land. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
I have never been to Michigan before.But I know Michigan is a Great
State.During World War Two, Michigan built all kinds of things for our U.S.Military and many many people from Michigan served their Country proudly, just as they are doing now in the War on Terror.There was a guy by the last name of Wotring in our unit in Vietnam in 1964.I think he once said he is from the Detroit area.America would have had a hard time winning World War Two if it haden't been for Michigan, and all of the other U.S.States. cuhulin |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Bob Miller wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. You missed my point. Either answer would have diverted attention from his policies on the campaign trail. "Yes" would have sparked ceaseless wrangling. And "No" would have sparked ceaseless wrangling. If he'd done cocaine, and admitted it, there would have been a couple of his snorting buddies trotted out who'd have testified they snorted with him, and then there would have been the entire, 'what did he snort and when did he snort it' questions anywhere he went. All the talking heads would have been on it. It would have become an albatross on the campaign trail. If he'd not done cocaine, and denied it, as evidenced by the lengths to which the opposition went in the military discharge story (ie, abject dismissal of Bush's senior and commanding officers who asserted he had completed his service with distinction, and falsification of documents asserting otherwise), there would have been a couple of people who would have been brought forward and testified that he did, in fact, use cocaine, followed by allegations he was high in the military, while in flight, during his tenure as Governor, etc, etc...and now he's got a REAL problem. And make no mistake, this was in the works. Two of his college classmates admitted to being paid by sources unrevealed to make these charges when the time came. It didn't, and they didn't, and though the story didn't die, it didn't become a liability, either. But the tools were in place to make it so should he eventually respond. Al Franken, on Letterman, told of an encounter with Bush where he tried to trick Bush into admitting he'd used amphetamines to get though finals week in college. And Bush failed to respond to that, too. Which surprised Franken..because if he responded to that question about amphetamines, why would he not then comment when asked about cocaine. Franken said, and this is a quote, "He outsmarted me. He just outsmarted me. He took away anything that could have been asserted after that." So, to not answer simply removed potential obstacles far greater than the nagging suspicions left in the wake of an unanswered question. Because if he had addressed the question, he'd have been screwed either way. This was a strictly political maneuver. On both sides. And it was very well played to a stalemate. So, in response to your remark...."Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would no have been truthful," is inaccurate. He had only one choice....a non answer. Because to respond either way would have been disastrous. Leaving the implication that he didn't say 'no' because it would have been untruthful as the only thing left to complete the mission of the person who asked the question in the first place: To implicate the candidate by his own words whether they were spoken or not. It's a twist on the classic 'have you stopped beating your wife' scenario....there isn't a response leads to anything but an indictment. Becasue of the politics, the only thing that can be concluded by Bush's failure to respond with either a 'no' or a 'yes' is that the question remains unanswered. Anybody in politics knows why. The public, only wishing for an indictment of his character, is left to draw a conclusion that is implied by the questioner, but not by the candidate. Again, excellently played. And without a single fact, without a single accusation, affirmation or denial. Typical big-time politics. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Jul 5, 5:20 am, dxAce wrote:
Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? I think not! But Al Gore's son certainly has been caught with drugs! Calm down little Liberal Boy... have mommy explain it to you. Actually Found with Four Separate Drugs : MJ and 3-Scrips without and RX. TT, The young man clearly has a real medical problem -and- needs help - i am a compassionate conservative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compassionate_conservatism ~ RHF |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
RHF wrote:
The young man clearly has a real medical problem -and- needs help - i am a compassionate conservative. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compassionate_conservatism http://tinyurl.com/2nhznn |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Telamon wrote:
In article , dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Al will be coming out with a NEW book soon: An Inconvenient Son Good one. This is better... http://www.danerd.com/media/183_geor...ick+nose+funny mike |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Telamon wrote:
No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Well, maybe so...but then please explain the Jeb Bush's son being arrested for public intoxication and the Bush twins alcohol, drug and sex escapades. Are you saying they've gone Democratic??? P.S. Thanks again for the on-topic short wave post, you two-faced hypocrite. P.P.S. I realize you probably won't see this because you are perpetually hiding behind your mommy's skirt, otherwise known as your cowardly plonks... |
(OT) : Drugged, Dazed And Confused - Let Us Pray for Al Gore, his Son, and his Family
On Jul 5, 6:48 pm, Telamon
wrote: In article , Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising. We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". -- Telamon Ventura, California- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Telamon Re-write : No, Democrats & Liberals are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Jul 6, 4:25 am, Tel-a-Dip wrote:
Telamon wrote: No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Well, maybe so...but then please explain the Jeb Bush's son being arrested for public intoxication and the Bush twins alcohol, drug and sex escapades. Are you saying they've gone Democratic??? P.S. Thanks again for the on-topic short wave post, you two-faced hypocrite. P.P.S. I realize you probably won't see this because you are perpetually hiding behind your mommy's skirt, otherwise known as your cowardly plonks... Tel-A-Dip - Well 'you' are no Telamon -but- Clearly "You" Are A 'Dip' ! ~ RHF |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 19:22:18 -0400, dxAce
wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising. The ability to raise funds does not necessarily equate to the ability to actually be President and handle the job. Obama lacks basic skills, which should be painfully obvious even to the most jaded Liberal. It remains to be seen whether Obama will reach the golden level, but when it comes to experience, who had more than our current esteemed Veep who appears to gone totally kookoo lately? Right now I'm looking for good judgement and truthfulness in a candidate, which is enough to disqualify just about everyone :-) bob k5qwg |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:48:10 -0700, Telamon
wrote: In article , Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 16:49:28 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:20:31 -0400, dxAce wrote: Tommy Tootard wrote: dxAce wrote: Al Gore's son arrested (yet again): http://www.breitbart.tv/html/2581.html Like Father, Like Son! Yup, it almost reminds you of W's coke head daughters. They been busted for coke? Has George? When Bush/43 was asked about his cocaine use he refused to answer the question. If he couldn't say "no" that leaves only one alternative. By that logic, if he couldn't say 'yes' that leaves only one alternative as well. Since he was running for president on a conservative ticket, his two choices were either "no" or to simply not answer, if "no" would not have been truthful. I don't think he could have done what Obama has done, admit to taking cocaine and then set a record in presidential fund raising. We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? bob k5qwg |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
www.devilfinder.com Fair.org rush limbaugh The Way Things Aren't
rush limbaugh is a MORON.I once tried to listen to that MORON when he first showed up on the air.I caught that MORON in so many LIES, after about one month, I quit listening to that MORON.al gore is a MORON too. cuhulin |
(OT) : The Pray for Born-Again-Canadians - To Love Canada - More That You Hate America
On Jul 6, 11:01 pm, m II wrote:
RHF wrote: Mike (M II) - My Compassionate Conservatism even includes the Children of Conservatives. Very nice. They need a lot of prayer. http://tinyurl.com/2nhznn mike Mike (M II) - As Do You - Amen ~ RHF - - - Hating America Is An Addiction : Mike (M II) 'you' can Kick the Habit. Dear God {Allah} Help this Can-A-Duh-Ian to become a Born-Again-Canadian : * To Love Canada - More Than He Hates America * To Be Proud To Be A Canadian * To Love Being A Canadian * To Public Proclaim : I Am A Canadian and we all say - amen, Amen and Amen ! |
(OT) : To Pray for Born-Again-democracy
RHF wrote:
Mike (M II) - As Do You - Amen ~ RHF - - - Hating America Is An Addiction : Mike (M II) 'you' can Kick the Habit. How does showing pictures of Politician's drunken children make me an American hater? Why did you not speak up when the drunk was a child of a Democrat? What you should be hating is the complete collection of low lifes on both sides of the political spectrum who have made Representative Democracy a complete joke...and not just in the States. mike |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Bob Miller wrote:
We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. |
(OT) : Mike (M II) - So You Admit You Have A Problem
On Jul 7, 7:13 pm, m II wrote:
RHF wrote: Mike (M II) - As Do You - Amen ~ RHF - - - Hating America Is An Addiction : Mike (M II) 'you' can Kick the Habit. How does showing pictures of Politician's drunken children make me an American hater? Why did you not speak up when the drunk was a child of a Democrat? - What you should be hating is the complete collection - of low lifes on both sides of the political spectrum who - have made Representative Democracy a complete joke - ...and not just in the States. - - Miike Mike (M II), So you Admit that you post 'selected' Pictures of American {Conservative} Politician's Children {who happen to be drunk or on drugs} . Would 'you' Dare to Post some Dirt on Canadian Politicians and their Families and Children . . . - - - Oops you can't because you would be locked up in a Mental Ward in Canada for doing so. Mike (M II) - That is Good - The First Step to Recovery is to Admit that 'you' have a Problem. Or does one has to wonder -if- posting the Pictures of Politician's Children - GETS YOU OFF ! This IMHO put's 'you' one step away from being into Child Pornography . . . * Exploiting Innocent Children for Political Gain. * Using Drug and Alcohol Problems of Others as a Political Propaganda Tool. * Victimizing Non-Politicians in a Political War. Mike (M II) Get Help - Please ~ RHF |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus
wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact, as per the Swift boatees & that "vast right wing conspiracy" that followed the Clintons around for eight years; I'm just waiting for them to get back in gear again... once we decide on Hillary, Obama, Gore or whomever, the possiblities will be rich with so much time to kill after super-duper Tuesday, early next year. bob k5qwg |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
dxAce wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! The pre-eminent manufacturer and liar out there today is Al Gore! And you dweebs fall for it! Boggling. |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
I remember one time seeing on tv, (when IMPEACHED! klintoon was the
prez) the way gore was standing behind and just to the right of bill klintoon,,,, gore was looking at klintoon just as though gore was wanting to do a ''monica lewinsky'' on klintoon. cuhulin |
(OT) : Why Did Hillary Marry Bill Clinton ? - I Was Drugged, Dazed And Confused :o)
On Jul 8, 10:38 am, Bob Miller wrote:
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact, as per the Swift boatees & that "vast right wing conspiracy" that followed the Clintons around for eight years; I'm just waiting for them to get back in gear again... once we decide on Hillary, Obama, Gore or whomever, the possiblities will be rich with so much time to kill after super-duper Tuesday, early next year. bob k5qwg- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - (OT) : Why Did Hillary Marry Bill Clinton ? - I Was Drugged, Dazed And Confused :o) Bob [K5QWG], With 250 Sworn "I Have No Recollection . . ." and "I Don't Recall" and Quotes to Hillary's Credit. A One-a-Week Radio and TV 30 Second Spot quoting Hillary in one of these many "I Don't Recall" Issues from the Convention to the Election should be a pretty good character smear champaign to slant the Voting Public's View of Her : Don't Elect Hillary - Recall Her ! - - - Paid for by the Sworn Truth About Hillary Committee the truth i swear by it - not at it ~ RHF |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 13:55:20 -0400, dxAce
wrote: dxAce wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! The pre-eminent manufacturer and liar out there today is Al Gore! And you dweebs fall for it! Boggling. You just proved my point. bob k5qwg |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 13:55:20 -0400, dxAce wrote: dxAce wrote: Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! The pre-eminent manufacturer and liar out there today is Al Gore! And you dweebs fall for it! Boggling. You just proved my point. Ha! |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
I remember one time back in 1970 or 1971 when I was looking through a
Hemmings Motor News www.hemmingsmotornews.com and I saw an ad in there where a guy in Barn Gat Light, New York had an old T Model Ford car for sale.I own a 1914 T Model Runabout Roadster car that I bought for $1,800.00 cold hard cash in November of 1971 from Mr.and Mrs.Gary Peterson in Sioux Falls,South Dakota.Mrs.Peterson, she was a pretty blonde gal, they let me sleep on their couch that night.They was moving to Minnesota and they said they couldn't take the car with them.Of course, she took my money, just like Mrs.Clay Mason in Raymond,Mississippi www.devilfinder.com Raymond Mississippi (Raymond is eight miles Southwest of doggy's couch) took my $150.00 for my little doggy. www.cattledog.com www.acdca.org Yesuhhh,,, Mrs.Clay Mason is very pretty too. cuhulin |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
Them wimmins always have their mitts out, now don't they?
cuhulin |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
I can Truthly say that old black and white stacylost ''phonograph''
french photograph ''dazzed'' me! cuhulin |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
dxAce wrote:
Bob Miller wrote: On Sun, 08 Jul 2007 04:33:09 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: Bob Miller wrote: We Democrats get all the fun :-) No, Democrats are a perverse group of people that think abusing drugs is "fun". Hey, if Rush limbo can possess enough illegal drugs to "sedate a horse" what's the big deal? Also a case of conjecture. Never proven. Never disproven. Such is the nature of a public accusation, followed by a great deal of media release, and then dropped charges....nothing ever has to be proven. Nothing can ever be denied. And the stain on the accused's name can never be removed. From that point everything done by either party must become a show for the media. Also a well played political move on the part of a Democrat DA, whose supporters have admitted pressuring him into the case to get Rush out of the neighborhood. Like the GWB cocaine implication, I suspect there is far less to the story than has to date been stated, or implied. And in the Rush case, the star 'witness' admitted to selling her story by the tabloids prior to being approached by the authorities. Though I believe Rush when he admits to the addiction, and believe that he's not lightning white, the handling of the accusation and the nature of the claims of the witness point to more manufacture than fact. Be that as it may, the Republicans are far more talented at manufacture rather than fact... Hogwash! That sums up pretty much what comes out of a Repug's mouth. You, of course, being a stellar example. JB |
(OT) Drugged, Dazed And Confused
I never had sex with a Canadian girl before.I wonder what it's like?
Metinks there are some Canadians here in Jackson, lets me LQQK around. cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com