|
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change the cell phone industry.
In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote: "John Navas" wrote in message ... Snip John Navas is a notorious Troll in many news groups. Please do not respond to him in re.radio.shortwave. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change thecell phone industry.
On 9/1/07 10:48 AM, in article
, "Telamon" wrote: In article , Don Bowey wrote: On 8/26/07 7:15 PM, in article , "John Navas" wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:52:55 -0700, Don Bowey wrote in : On 8/15/07 11:07 PM, in article , "John Navas" wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0700, Don Bowey wrote in : On 7/19/07 4:42 PM, in article , "John Navas" wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:45:00 GMT, wrote in : In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium wrote: Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less and a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz. In addition, the following must also apply: The audio bandwidth of the phone system is about 3 KHz. Actually more like 10 KHz. If he is commenting on the bandwidth of a message network channel/circuit, including cellular, it is about 3 kHz. Audio. Suggest you read more carefully. Audio WHAT? Read what more carefully? Are you attempting to say the audio bandwidth of a message network channel is greater than about 3 kHz? No. Suggest you read more carefully. Suggest you kiss my ass. I suggest you pay attention to the news groups to which you cross post. Plonk Idiot. The reply goes to whatever distribution was set on the posted message. Plonk yourself, Troll. |
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change the cell phone industry.
On Sep 1, 10:45 am, Telamon
wrote: In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "John Navas" wrote in message .. . Snip - John Navas is a notorious Troll in many news groups. - Please do not respond to him in re.radio.shortwave. - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Was 'that' an Oops ? ;-} {Please do not respond to him in re.radio.shortwave.} DOH ! - Oops It Was For Me Too ! :o) ~ RHF |
A more rational approach -- how I would like to change the cell phone industry.
On Sep 1, 10:48 am, Telamon
wrote: In article , Don Bowey wrote: On 8/26/07 7:15 PM, in article , "John Navas" wrote: On Thu, 16 Aug 2007 06:52:55 -0700, Don Bowey wrote in : On 8/15/07 11:07 PM, in article , "John Navas" wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 18:43:58 -0700, Don Bowey wrote in : On 7/19/07 4:42 PM, in article , "John Navas" wrote: On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:45:00 GMT, wrote in : In rec.radio.amateur.antenna Radium wrote: Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less and a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz. In addition, the following must also apply: The audio bandwidth of the phone system is about 3 KHz. Actually more like 10 KHz. If he is commenting on the bandwidth of a message network channel/circuit, including cellular, it is about 3 kHz. Audio. Suggest you read more carefully. Audio WHAT? Read what more carefully? Are you attempting to say the audio bandwidth of a message network channel is greater than about 3 kHz? No. Suggest you read more carefully. Suggest you kiss my ass. - I suggest you pay attention to the news groups to which you cross post. - - Plonk - - -- - Telamon - Ventura, California Telamon - Was 'that' an Oops ? ;-} { I suggest you pay attention to the news groups to which you cross post.} sci.electronics.basics, rec.radio.shortwave, rec.radio.amateur.antenna, alt.cellular.cingular, alt.internet.wireless DOH ! - Oops It Was For Me Too ! :o) ~ RHF |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com