![]() |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM
Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote: Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin How exciting! Are the astronauts sober? Did the love birds all get along this trip? With Casanova astronauts, love triangles, diapers and kidnappings and all it's a wonder they have time to be "heroes". I guess since computers do all the important tasks that leaves the "heroes" with plenty of free time. What a colossal waste of taxpayers money. The make jobs operation called NASA should have been defunded decades ago. If the egg head PhD.'s want to play space cadets they should do it at their own expense or by private enterprise. Instead, hard working average Americans are forced to pay for it. I guess you have to give credit to the NASA public relations machine though. They've managed to perpetuate the con game for over 40 years now in spite of the glaring incompetence of the agency. Oooooo!!! Weeeee! More pictures of rocks and dust Mildred!!! WOW!!! I AM SO PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!!!!!! |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
|
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
|
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
|
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
On Aug 21, 2:10 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
Ironic, that the very technology that permits you to publish worldwide this diatribe about NASA....is a by-product of the space program.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. The internet would have, and did, evolve with or without the existence of NASA. It's not surprising that their PR Dept. tries to lay claim to makiing it all possible - a typical bureaucratic self congratulatory agrandizement tactic while trying to justify its existence. Raison d'être! |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
|
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:36:02 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:10:19 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: wrote: Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin How exciting! Are the astronauts sober? Did the love birds all get along this trip? With Casanova astronauts, love triangles, diapers and kidnappings and all it's a wonder they have time to be "heroes". I guess since computers do all the important tasks that leaves the "heroes" with plenty of free time. What a colossal waste of taxpayers money. The make jobs operation called NASA should have been defunded decades ago. If the egg head PhD.'s want to play space cadets they should do it at their own expense or by private enterprise. Instead, hard working average Americans are forced to pay for it. I guess you have to give credit to the NASA public relations machine though. They've managed to perpetuate the con game for over 40 years now in spite of the glaring incompetence of the agency. Oooooo!!! Weeeee! More pictures of rocks and dust Mildred!!! WOW!!! I AM SO PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!!!!!! Ironic, that the very technology that permits you to publish worldwide this diatribe about NASA....is a by-product of the space program. but not the shuttle program which is flat out failure according to the original specs for the machine Care to elaborate on that claim? the shuttle was suposed to be able to capture and repair GEO orbit sat's for one thing And has. And for another? "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ G |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
On Aug 21, 1:52 pm, dxAce wrote:
wrote: wrote: Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin How exciting! Are the astronauts sober? Did the love birds all get along this trip? With Casanova astronauts, love triangles, diapers and kidnappings and all it's a wonder they have time to be "heroes". I guess since computers do all the important tasks that leaves the "heroes" with plenty of free time. What a colossal waste of taxpayers money. The make jobs operation called NASA should have been defunded decades ago. If the egg head PhD.'s want to play space cadets they should do it at their own expense or by private enterprise. Instead, hard working average Americans are forced to pay for it. I guess you have to give credit to the NASA public relations machine though. They've managed to perpetuate the con game for over 40 years now in spite of the glaring incompetence of the agency. Oooooo!!! Weeeee! More pictures of rocks and dust Mildred!!! WOW!!! I AM SO PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!!!!!! You are free to return to the former Soviet Union at any time, 'tard boy. dxAce Michigan USA Don't do business with the Huntington Investment Company.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Yes I must be "one of them thar commie terrorists"! You are such a senile yokel I'm surprised anyone even responds to you anymore. Hope you incontinence problem continues to plague you. By the way, Wal-Mart has adult diapers on sale this week, you best run down and stock up. Your size to - JUMBO's. By the way, did you lose some of your welfare (AKA "social security") through stupid investing? Boo hooo!!! What a cry baby. Yeah blame the investment company for your lousy investments decisions. Did they put a gun to your head and make you give them your money? Be a man and stop whining, complaining and blaming others for your own inadequacies. You'd think that by once you enter the "twilight" (pretty dim lights at your age) years you would have learned that accepting responsiblity for you own actions was part of being a man. But I guess being able to wipe your own ass properly is part of the process of attaining manhood and we now know that you haven't quite mastered that task either. The more you post the more evidence you provide the world as to what a contempitible piece of **** you truly are. Please do the world a favor and die soon. |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
|
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:14:48 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:36:02 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:10:19 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: wrote: Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin How exciting! Are the astronauts sober? Did the love birds all get along this trip? With Casanova astronauts, love triangles, diapers and kidnappings and all it's a wonder they have time to be "heroes". I guess since computers do all the important tasks that leaves the "heroes" with plenty of free time. What a colossal waste of taxpayers money. The make jobs operation called NASA should have been defunded decades ago. If the egg head PhD.'s want to play space cadets they should do it at their own expense or by private enterprise. Instead, hard working average Americans are forced to pay for it. I guess you have to give credit to the NASA public relations machine though. They've managed to perpetuate the con game for over 40 years now in spite of the glaring incompetence of the agency. Oooooo!!! Weeeee! More pictures of rocks and dust Mildred!!! WOW!!! I AM SO PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!!!!!! Ironic, that the very technology that permits you to publish worldwide this diatribe about NASA....is a by-product of the space program. but not the shuttle program which is flat out failure according to the original specs for the machine Care to elaborate on that claim? the shuttle was suposed to be able to capture and repair GEO orbit sat's for one thing And has. nope it has not it can't get near a GEO orbit sat only LEO I'm not sure I agree there, having watched one sat retrieval and repair mission while at NASA, itself. But if you're right, then in that case, give it time. One of the reasons for the space station in to serve as a base for deeper space missions. I'm amazed at the ever increasing impatience of today's citizen, expecting instant and immediate on target results without error, and without question. Space exploration is as uncertain as medicine. The technology often has to be created in order to make new thrusts. Sometimes that's years in development, with often hundreds of balks before a qualified success. To simply declare a program as a failure because it hasn't met architects specifications, especially after some rather spectacular setbacks, delays, and one very long hiatus, is the kind of unmititaged bilge that expects war to run on schedule, without misstep and without setback. It's the kind of crap that sees a father at Little League dress down an 8 year old for not hitting on the first attempt. Or a mother sniping at her 15 year old daughter for not being asked to a Jr High dance. Things take time to learn. Processes take time to develop. And successes are cumulative and incremental. And this applies not only to the space shuttle, but to life in general. Anything set before the shuttle program by its architects will be accomplished. Not without setback. Not without misstep. Not without delays as new technologies are created to overcome obstacles. Expected and otherwise. Long vision. "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ G |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:14:18 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Aug 21, 2:10 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: Ironic, that the very technology that permits you to publish worldwide this diatribe about NASA....is a by-product of the space program.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. The internet would have, and did, evolve with or without the existence of NASA. It's not surprising that their PR Dept. tries to lay claim to makiing it all possible - a typical bureaucratic self congratulatory agrandizement tactic while trying to justify its existence. Raison d'être! Take a step back. I'm not talking about the internet. But the electronics that drives it. THAT is a by-product of the Space Program. step back yourself what would not have been developed without the space program I am all for space exploration but NASA has been an increasing **** up since aApollo And how and what would YOU have done differently? "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ G |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
On Aug 21, 3:14 pm, D Peter Maus wrote:
wrote: On Aug 21, 2:10 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: Ironic, that the very technology that permits you to publish worldwide this diatribe about NASA....is a by-product of the space program.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. The internet would have, and did, evolve with or without the existence of NASA. It's not surprising that their PR Dept. tries to lay claim to makiing it all possible - a typical bureaucratic self congratulatory agrandizement tactic while trying to justify its existence. Raison d'être! Take a step back. I'm not talking about the internet. But the electronics that drives it. THAT is a by-product of the Space Program. Still bull****. The electronic technology that drives the internet would have evolved with or without the existence of NASA - llkely decades sooner had private enterprise and market forces been involved. You employed by the NASA public relations juggernaut per chance? |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
dxAce wrote: Don't do business with the Huntington Investment Company. wrote: By the way, did you lose some of your welfare (AKA "social security") Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure you will), but broadly speaking, "Social Security" is returning OUR money that WE had to pay into the system for our entire working careers. Getting our own money back can hardly be construed as "welfare". wrote: Did they [Huntington] put a gun to your head and make you give them your money? Be a man and stop whining, complaining and blaming others for your own inadequacies. Now don't be too hard on Steve...he's a finance guy who tells us about his Accounting/ Bookkeeping degree. If Huntington can do this to a big-time finance guy with a financial degree like Steve, there's no telling what these Huntington guys can do to us poor slobs that aren't as financially astute as Steve. Steve, thanks for the "heads-up". |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
Zeke Zzzppt wrote: dxAce wrote: Don't do business with the Huntington Investment Company. wrote: By the way, did you lose some of your welfare (AKA "social security") Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure you will), but broadly speaking, "Social Security" is returning OUR money that WE had to pay into the system for our entire working careers. Getting our own money back can hardly be construed as "welfare". wrote: Did they [Huntington] put a gun to your head and make you give them your money? Be a man and stop whining, complaining and blaming others for your own inadequacies. Now don't be too hard on Steve...he's a finance guy who tells us about his Accounting/ Bookkeeping degree. If Huntington can do this to a big-time finance guy with a financial degree like Steve, there's no telling what these Huntington guys can do to us poor slobs that aren't as financially astute as Steve. Steve, thanks for the "heads-up". No problem. dxAce Michigan USA Don't do business with the Huntington Investment Company. |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
|
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:37:12 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:14:48 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:36:02 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:10:19 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: wrote: Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin How exciting! Are the astronauts sober? Did the love birds all get along this trip? With Casanova astronauts, love triangles, diapers and kidnappings and all it's a wonder they have time to be "heroes". I guess since computers do all the important tasks that leaves the "heroes" with plenty of free time. What a colossal waste of taxpayers money. The make jobs operation called NASA should have been defunded decades ago. If the egg head PhD.'s want to play space cadets they should do it at their own expense or by private enterprise. Instead, hard working average Americans are forced to pay for it. I guess you have to give credit to the NASA public relations machine though. They've managed to perpetuate the con game for over 40 years now in spite of the glaring incompetence of the agency. Oooooo!!! Weeeee! More pictures of rocks and dust Mildred!!! WOW!!! I AM SO PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!!!!!! Ironic, that the very technology that permits you to publish worldwide this diatribe about NASA....is a by-product of the space program. but not the shuttle program which is flat out failure according to the original specs for the machine Care to elaborate on that claim? the shuttle was suposed to be able to capture and repair GEO orbit sat's for one thing And has. nope it has not it can't get near a GEO orbit sat only LEO I'm not sure I agree there, having watched one sat retrieval and repair mission while at NASA, itself. But if you're right, then in that case, give it time. One of the reasons for the space station in to serve as a base for deeper space missions. it is a matter of record that th e shuttle can't get up to the geo orbits it has retreived one maybe 2 LEO sat I'm amazed at the ever increasing impatience of today's citizen, expecting instant and immediate on target results without error, and without question. the shuttle was first launched in the 80 and still does not prefrom to spec what did NASA do? they cahnged the spec, and declared victory Space exploration is as uncertain as medicine. The technology often has to be created in order to make new thrusts. Sometimes that's years in development, with often hundreds of balks before a qualified success. To simply declare a program as a failure because it hasn't met architects specifications, especially after some rather spectacular setbacks, delays, and one very long hiatus, is the kind of unmititaged bilge that expects war to run on schedule, without misstep and without setback. it can't do the tasks we built it for it is just that simple I am glad they have things it can do but it isn't what we paid for It is. It's just not reached its full potential, yet. For the reasons I've stated. and nothing is realy on the drawing board to replace it either Because it's not ready to be replaced. |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:39:25 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:14:18 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Aug 21, 2:10 pm, D Peter Maus wrote: Ironic, that the very technology that permits you to publish worldwide this diatribe about NASA....is a by-product of the space program.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Bull****. The internet would have, and did, evolve with or without the existence of NASA. It's not surprising that their PR Dept. tries to lay claim to makiing it all possible - a typical bureaucratic self congratulatory agrandizement tactic while trying to justify its existence. Raison d'être! Take a step back. I'm not talking about the internet. But the electronics that drives it. THAT is a by-product of the Space Program. step back yourself what would not have been developed without the space program I am all for space exploration but NASA has been an increasing **** up since aApollo And how and what would YOU have done differently? rejected the shuttle and built a beter vechile begun to lay the foundation of comercail use of space return to the moon with perminat settlement complete with mass drivers to allow cheap use of lunar resources in space and here on earth complete the R@D on the Sacoorv drive and begin serious interplanetary stuff as well interstellar lay real foundations for the long range survival of mankind though deep space exploration I"m sure, then, you're in contact with NASA about these goals, and have begun to develop the strategies to implement them? tell the truth about mistakes mades and be in John glen "honest forthright and Magnanous " about our failures and proud when suceed "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ G |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
Looks like the Space Shuttles will be retired in a few years.
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6357772 Some new American Rockets that will replace the Space Shuttles are being tested at Stennis Space Center. The Space Shuttle's Rocket Engines are tested at Stennis Space Center before they go into orbit. www.devilfinder.com Stennis Space Center cuhulin |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
Zeke Zzzppt wrote: dxAce wrote: Don't do business with the Huntington Investment Company. wrote: By the way, did you lose some of your welfare (AKA "social security") Correct me if I'm wrong (and I'm sure you will), but broadly speaking, "Social Security" is returning OUR money that WE had to pay into the system for our entire working careers. Getting our own money back can hardly be construed as "welfare". wrote: Did they [Huntington] put a gun to your head and make you give them your money? Be a man and stop whining, complaining and blaming others for your own inadequacies. Now don't be too hard on Steve...he's a finance guy who tells us about his Accounting/ Bookkeeping degree. If Huntington can do this to a big-time finance guy with a financial degree like Steve, there's no telling what these Huntington guys can do to us poor slobs that aren't as financially astute as Steve. Steve, thanks for the "heads-up". Here is one of my favourite funds: http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=FSEAX dxAce Michigan USA Don't do business with the Huntington Investment Company. |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
|
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
AMEN!!!! I used to work for them, and finally quit, nothing to do.
Every day the guy in charge would try to rack his brain to find some project to do. Funny part, they all pretended they were doing something useful and patriotic. What a waste. On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:41:56 -0700, wrote: wrote: Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin How exciting! Are the astronauts sober? Did the love birds all get along this trip? With Casanova astronauts, love triangles, diapers and kidnappings and all it's a wonder they have time to be "heroes". I guess since computers do all the important tasks that leaves the "heroes" with plenty of free time. What a colossal waste of taxpayers money. The make jobs operation called NASA should have been defunded decades ago. If the egg head PhD.'s want to play space cadets they should do it at their own expense or by private enterprise. Instead, hard working average Americans are forced to pay for it. I guess you have to give credit to the NASA public relations machine though. They've managed to perpetuate the con game for over 40 years now in spite of the glaring incompetence of the agency. Oooooo!!! Weeeee! More pictures of rocks and dust Mildred!!! WOW!!! I AM SO PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN!!!!!!!! |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... wrote: [snip] The transistor was invented in 1947. It took nearly a decade before it was incorporated into a product because market forces are also possessed of considerable inertia. And then it was trivial applications like transistor radios. Production was slow, and rejection and failure rates were high. I know I'm sorta nitpicking here, but the transistor we're familiar with, the junction transistor was invented in 48, but Bell Labs didn't announce it until 1951. It was first commercially used in hearing aids in 1952. http://semiconductormuseum.com/Photo...lery_CK718.htm However, with mission critical pressures of the space program, techniques needed to be developed to produce large scale miniaturized electronics working at frequencies not even considered in terrestrial applications. Which led to microwave technological innovations on a grand scale. Driven by lower cost, higher volume, reliable production of solid state devices, and rapid development of miniaturized computer driven hardware. Fuel cell technology had been known since WWII, but had never had a real application. Practical results in the space program have given us real world workable fuel cell technologies. Battery technology developed by orders of magnitude through the space program. And medical knowledge has expanded more than a thousand fold through the space program. And all that can be said in spades for military technological development. I used to have an old Radio-Electronics magazine from 1965 or so which included an article about the upcoming integrated circuit revolution. It said that 90% of the then current IC production capacity was being used for military production. It was expected to be 50-50 around 1970 and then consumer production would explode. The silicon transistor was developed around 1955 and it's early production was also dominated by the military. [snip] Frank Dresser |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote in message ... Due to come home this morning.I think the lady at NASA said 11:32 AM Central Standard Time. I will be watching the NASA channel, 376 on DirecTV. cuhulin It's ENDEAVOUR actually. -- Simon Mason http://www.simonmason.karoo.net |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
Frank Dresser wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... wrote: [snip] The transistor was invented in 1947. It took nearly a decade before it was incorporated into a product because market forces are also possessed of considerable inertia. And then it was trivial applications like transistor radios. Production was slow, and rejection and failure rates were high. I know I'm sorta nitpicking here, but the transistor we're familiar with, the junction transistor was invented in 48, but Bell Labs didn't announce it until 1951. It was first commercially used in hearing aids in 1952. According to Shockley's papers, 1947. I'm not familiar with the hearing aid appliction. Again, Shockely's papers report the first use in 56 or 57, in consumer entertainment applications. Not bad for what was intended to be an industrial switch. Thanks for the tip, though. http://semiconductormuseum.com/Photo...lery_CK718.htm However, with mission critical pressures of the space program, techniques needed to be developed to produce large scale miniaturized electronics working at frequencies not even considered in terrestrial applications. Which led to microwave technological innovations on a grand scale. Driven by lower cost, higher volume, reliable production of solid state devices, and rapid development of miniaturized computer driven hardware. Fuel cell technology had been known since WWII, but had never had a real application. Practical results in the space program have given us real world workable fuel cell technologies. Battery technology developed by orders of magnitude through the space program. And medical knowledge has expanded more than a thousand fold through the space program. And all that can be said in spades for military technological development. I used to have an old Radio-Electronics magazine from 1965 or so which included an article about the upcoming integrated circuit revolution. It said that 90% of the then current IC production capacity was being used for military production. It was expected to be 50-50 around 1970 and then consumer production would explode. Oh yeah. The technology that came out of WWII for instance fueled generations of innovation. The silicon transistor was developed around 1955 and it's early production was also dominated by the military. I remember reading that military leaders attempted to corral all silicon transistor production to keep it out of the hands of general interests, and our enemies. The Cold War did wonders for technological evolution. |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
CBX, did you say you used to work for them, as in NASA? Was there a
woman who worked there when you was there? I think her last name is Green.Did you read that article in Popular Mechanics magazine about five something years ago about that woman who retired from NASA and she said NASA is broken.I have that magazine floatin around here somewhere, (because I subscribe to that magazine (Popular Science magazine too, snail mail home delivery) but it would take me forever to find it.I am sooooo unorganized and lazyyyy.Head on over to your local area libraries and see can you find that article.If you do, copy it on a library copying machine and take it home and scan it and post it in this newsgroup for all the World to read. cuhulin |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
And whilst is while, Actually.
cuhulin |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:18:31 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:08:14 GMT, D Peter Maus setback. it can't do the tasks we built it for it is just that simple I am glad they have things it can do but it isn't what we paid for It is. It's just not reached its full potential, yet. For the reasons I've stated. it has no such poetencail because NASA settled for what they got Then why don't you help them remedy this? Complaining to RRS won't get you where you want to go. I have done what I can, nor have ever sugested that complaining RRS will aidNASA till this monet complaining wher e the shutle and NASA comes up rasies awareness that there is something wrong with NASA So, then, by shouting on street corners to those who cannot effect change, you're doing a pubic service. Thanks for that clarification. "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ G |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
wrote:
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 04:07:43 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 05:18:31 GMT, D Peter Maus wrote: wrote: On Tue, 21 Aug 2007 21:08:14 GMT, D Peter Maus setback. it can't do the tasks we built it for it is just that simple I am glad they have things it can do but it isn't what we paid for It is. It's just not reached its full potential, yet. For the reasons I've stated. it has no such poetencail because NASA settled for what they got Then why don't you help them remedy this? Complaining to RRS won't get you where you want to go. I have done what I can, nor have ever sugested that complaining RRS will aidNASA till this monet complaining wher e the shutle and NASA comes up rasies awareness that there is something wrong with NASA So, then, by shouting on street corners to those who cannot effect change, you're doing a pubic service. but indeed we can effect change slowly and painfully but we can Yes, I see what changes you've effected. Impressive. |
(OT) Space Shuttle Endeavor.
www.devilfinder.com High Dive - Popular Science
Some people are showing NASA how to do some things.And there is Burt Rutan with his Spacecraft thingys. cuhulin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com