Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On of the main causes of "common mode" [CM] noise is "differential
mode" [DM] noise that gets converted to into common mode noise. There are two main means of conversion. The least common but most powerful occurs when a device like a laptop is powered by the AC mains and is connected to a phone line or Ethernet cable. The noise from the power supply is coupled back on the AC mains and into the telephone or Ethernet line, and this forms a very effective unintentional antenna. Any device that is connected to the AC mains and any other conductor is very likely to be a source of significant common mode noise. This other conductor can be telephone, Ethernet, Coax Cable for DBS or CATV, or any other conductor. While we are used to thinking of antennas as needing to be an odd quarter wave length, effective antennas can in fact be much shorter. Ground leads approaching 1/20 f a wave length are effective radiators. The most common conversion of DM to CM occurs due to the imbalance in the AC mains. I have looked at over 20 different brands of 3 conductor cable used for domestic residential wiring. Some of this is new and some dates back to cable that is at least 30 years old. There are 3 main types: Type 1: H-G-N arranged in a triangle with the ground between the hot and neutral. Type 2: H-N-G arranged with the hot on one side, the neutral in the middle and the ground on the other outer side next to the neutral. Type 3: The H and N run, more or less in parallel, with the ground weaving back and forth from one to the other. At the start of this investigation I assumed the primary reason for DM to CM was caused by the interruption in what I had perceived "the natural balanced transmission characteristics" of AC power cords. I do accept that when the conductors that are nominally on 3/8" centers are spread for outlets, switches, light fixtures, and the mess inside a breaker panel, don't help the situation. However it became apparent in some tests at a new home with all of the AC and other cables installed, but with no connection to the real world via power, telephone or CATV, that my original idea was flawed. I now believe the primary cause is the extremely unbalanced "transmission line" effects caused by the ground conductor's relation ship to the purported balanced 2 conductor hot and neutral. In a simple test last night an Electrician friend brought over a ~100' piece of Romax of the type 1 construction. We(he) laid it out on the surface of ground and I used a Balun to couple the Romax to my R2000 operating on battery power. I terminated the far end with a non inductive 120 Ohm resistor. When this experiment is performed using 2 conductor zip or speaker cable there is minimal reception of all but my local 770KHz MW pest. However with the Romex reception of even distant MW and HF signals was significant. Grounding the Romex "ground' conductor did not have a significant effect. I suspect that if we could wire our homes with 2 conductor cable and run a separate grounding conductor we could reduce the conversion of DM to CM. Since the NEC would frown on such a scheme and because the costs would be extraordinary the only effective way to stop the conversion of DM into CM is to eliminate or at least reduce DM noise at the source. I hope to put a more detailed version of this experiment along with the new house test results on Will's stopRFI page "some day real soon". Terry ding the "Ground" conductor changed the |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 8:39 am, wrote:
On of the main causes of "common mode" [CM] noise is "differential mode" [DM] noise that gets converted to into common mode noise. There are two main means of conversion. The least common but most powerful occurs when a device like a laptop is powered by the AC mains and is connected to a phone line or Ethernet cable. The noise from the power supply is coupled back on the AC mains and into the telephone or Ethernet line, and this forms a very effective unintentional antenna. Any device that is connected to the AC mains and any other conductor is very likely to be a source of significant common mode noise. This other conductor can be telephone, Ethernet, Coax Cable for DBS or CATV, or any other conductor. While we are used to thinking of antennas as needing to be an odd quarter wave length, effective antennas can in fact be much shorter. Ground leads approaching 1/20 f a wave length are effective radiators. The most common conversion of DM to CM occurs due to the imbalance in the AC mains. I have looked at over 20 different brands of 3 conductor cable used for domestic residential wiring. Some of this is new and some dates back to cable that is at least 30 years old. There are 3 main types: Type 1: H-G-N arranged in a triangle with the ground between the hot and neutral. Type 2: H-N-G arranged with the hot on one side, the neutral in the middle and the ground on the other outer side next to the neutral. Type 3: The H and N run, more or less in parallel, with the ground weaving back and forth from one to the other. At the start of this investigation I assumed the primary reason for DM to CM was caused by the interruption in what I had perceived "the natural balanced transmission characteristics" of AC power cords. I do accept that when the conductors that are nominally on 3/8" centers are spread for outlets, switches, light fixtures, and the mess inside a breaker panel, don't help the situation. However it became apparent in some tests at a new home with all of the AC and other cables installed, but with no connection to the real world via power, telephone or CATV, that my original idea was flawed. I now believe the primary cause is the extremely unbalanced "transmission line" effects caused by the ground conductor's relation ship to the purported balanced 2 conductor hot and neutral. In a simple test last night an Electrician friend brought over a ~100' piece of Romax of the type 1 construction. We(he) laid it out on the surface of ground and I used a Balun to couple the Romax to my R2000 operating on battery power. I terminated the far end with a non inductive 120 Ohm resistor. When this experiment is performed using 2 conductor zip or speaker cable there is minimal reception of all but my local 770KHz MW pest. However with the Romex reception of even distant MW and HF signals was significant. Grounding the Romex "ground' conductor did not have a significant effect. I suspect that if we could wire our homes with 2 conductor cable and run a separate grounding conductor we could reduce the conversion of DM to CM. Since the NEC would frown on such a scheme and because the costs would be extraordinary the only effective way to stop the conversion of DM into CM is to eliminate or at least reduce DM noise at the source. I hope to put a more detailed version of this experiment along with the new house test results on Will's stopRFI page "some day real soon". Terry ding the "Ground" conductor changed the Terry, Insightful Report and a good read. Alas, the NEC is all about Electrical Safety and not concerned about RFI Suppression. I always thought that if I were having a Home Built and could do the Electrical Wiring myself. It would be better to use Type "AC" Wire through-out the House http://homerenovations.about.com/od/.../artbxwire.htm then the "NM" Plastic Covered Stuff. http://homerenovations.about.com/od/...artromexnm.htm Check-Out the "STOP RFI" Group on Yahoo ! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopRFI/ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 12:16 pm, RHF wrote:
On Sep 26, 8:39 am, wrote: On of the main causes of "common mode" [CM] noise is "differential mode" [DM] noise that gets converted to into common mode noise. There are two main means of conversion. The least common but most powerful occurs when a device like a laptop is powered by the AC mains and is connected to a phone line or Ethernet cable. The noise from the power supply is coupled back on the AC mains and into the telephone or Ethernet line, and this forms a very effective unintentional antenna. Any device that is connected to the AC mains and any other conductor is very likely to be a source of significant common mode noise. This other conductor can be telephone, Ethernet, Coax Cable for DBS or CATV, or any other conductor. While we are used to thinking of antennas as needing to be an odd quarter wave length, effective antennas can in fact be much shorter. Ground leads approaching 1/20 f a wave length are effective radiators. The most common conversion of DM to CM occurs due to the imbalance in the AC mains. I have looked at over 20 different brands of 3 conductor cable used for domestic residential wiring. Some of this is new and some dates back to cable that is at least 30 years old. There are 3 main types: Type 1: H-G-N arranged in a triangle with the ground between the hot and neutral. Type 2: H-N-G arranged with the hot on one side, the neutral in the middle and the ground on the other outer side next to the neutral. Type 3: The H and N run, more or less in parallel, with the ground weaving back and forth from one to the other. At the start of this investigation I assumed the primary reason for DM to CM was caused by the interruption in what I had perceived "the natural balanced transmission characteristics" of AC power cords. I do accept that when the conductors that are nominally on 3/8" centers are spread for outlets, switches, light fixtures, and the mess inside a breaker panel, don't help the situation. However it became apparent in some tests at a new home with all of the AC and other cables installed, but with no connection to the real world via power, telephone or CATV, that my original idea was flawed. I now believe the primary cause is the extremely unbalanced "transmission line" effects caused by the ground conductor's relation ship to the purported balanced 2 conductor hot and neutral. In a simple test last night an Electrician friend brought over a ~100' piece of Romax of the type 1 construction. We(he) laid it out on the surface of ground and I used a Balun to couple the Romax to my R2000 operating on battery power. I terminated the far end with a non inductive 120 Ohm resistor. When this experiment is performed using 2 conductor zip or speaker cable there is minimal reception of all but my local 770KHz MW pest. However with the Romex reception of even distant MW and HF signals was significant. Grounding the Romex "ground' conductor did not have a significant effect. I suspect that if we could wire our homes with 2 conductor cable and run a separate grounding conductor we could reduce the conversion of DM to CM. Since the NEC would frown on such a scheme and because the costs would be extraordinary the only effective way to stop the conversion of DM into CM is to eliminate or at least reduce DM noise at the source. I hope to put a more detailed version of this experiment along with the new house test results on Will's stopRFI page "some day real soon". Terry ding the "Ground" conductor changed the Terry, Insightful Report and a good read. Alas, the NEC is all about Electrical Safety and not concerned about RFI Suppression. I always thought that if I were having a Home Built and could do the Electrical Wiring myself. It would be better to use Type "AC" Wire through-out the Househttp://homerenovations.about.com/od/electrical/a/artbxwire.htm then the "NM" Plastic Covered Stuff.http://homerenovations.about.com/od/...artromexnm.htm Check-Out the "STOP RFI" Group on Yahoo ! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopRFI/ . STOP RFI =http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopRFI/ . ~ RHF . There is some thought that the soft steel of the armor flex type cables may hurt more then it helps. The spiral wrap is a real concern. For some general research on conduit and transfer impedance please see: http://www.emcconsultinginc.com/docs/conduitse.PDF I have the url at home of a company that makes "Armor flex" that has a real tinned copper braid and is damn near RF proof. I will dig it out and post it. The electrician that I mentioned just completed a wiring contract where all the conduit was copper tubing. Very Expensive! This was for a computer lab that I suspect deals with unusual data. There were three layers of screening, the EMC certification lab I worked at for a while only had 2!, and the AC mains go through more filters then I have ever seen. I suspect the one reason why my common mode noise issue is so low is my ground ring. It offers a very low resistance/impedance to the earth. And at least one circuit in every room has a 6AWG aux bonding to the ground ring. But I still think the best solution is to stop DM at the source. Terry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 26, 12:16 pm, RHF wrote:
On Sep 26, 8:39 am, wrote: On of the main causes of "common mode" [CM] noise is "differential mode" [DM] noise that gets converted to into common mode noise. There are two main means of conversion. The least common but most powerful occurs when a device like a laptop is powered by the AC mains and is connected to a phone line or Ethernet cable. The noise from the power supply is coupled back on the AC mains and into the telephone or Ethernet line, and this forms a very effective unintentional antenna. Any device that is connected to the AC mains and any other conductor is very likely to be a source of significant common mode noise. This other conductor can be telephone, Ethernet, Coax Cable for DBS or CATV, or any other conductor. While we are used to thinking of antennas as needing to be an odd quarter wave length, effective antennas can in fact be much shorter. Ground leads approaching 1/20 f a wave length are effective radiators. The most common conversion of DM to CM occurs due to the imbalance in the AC mains. I have looked at over 20 different brands of 3 conductor cable used for domestic residential wiring. Some of this is new and some dates back to cable that is at least 30 years old. There are 3 main types: Type 1: H-G-N arranged in a triangle with the ground between the hot and neutral. Type 2: H-N-G arranged with the hot on one side, the neutral in the middle and the ground on the other outer side next to the neutral. Type 3: The H and N run, more or less in parallel, with the ground weaving back and forth from one to the other. At the start of this investigation I assumed the primary reason for DM to CM was caused by the interruption in what I had perceived "the natural balanced transmission characteristics" of AC power cords. I do accept that when the conductors that are nominally on 3/8" centers are spread for outlets, switches, light fixtures, and the mess inside a breaker panel, don't help the situation. However it became apparent in some tests at a new home with all of the AC and other cables installed, but with no connection to the real world via power, telephone or CATV, that my original idea was flawed. I now believe the primary cause is the extremely unbalanced "transmission line" effects caused by the ground conductor's relation ship to the purported balanced 2 conductor hot and neutral. In a simple test last night an Electrician friend brought over a ~100' piece of Romax of the type 1 construction. We(he) laid it out on the surface of ground and I used a Balun to couple the Romax to my R2000 operating on battery power. I terminated the far end with a non inductive 120 Ohm resistor. When this experiment is performed using 2 conductor zip or speaker cable there is minimal reception of all but my local 770KHz MW pest. However with the Romex reception of even distant MW and HF signals was significant. Grounding the Romex "ground' conductor did not have a significant effect. I suspect that if we could wire our homes with 2 conductor cable and run a separate grounding conductor we could reduce the conversion of DM to CM. Since the NEC would frown on such a scheme and because the costs would be extraordinary the only effective way to stop the conversion of DM into CM is to eliminate or at least reduce DM noise at the source. I hope to put a more detailed version of this experiment along with the new house test results on Will's stopRFI page "some day real soon". Terry ding the "Ground" conductor changed the Terry, Insightful Report and a good read. Alas, the NEC is all about Electrical Safety and not concerned about RFI Suppression. I always thought that if I were having a Home Built and could do the Electrical Wiring myself. It would be better to use Type "AC" Wire through-out the Househttp://homerenovations.about.com/od/electrical/a/artbxwire.htm then the "NM" Plastic Covered Stuff.http://homerenovations.about.com/od/...artromexnm.htm Check-Out the "STOP RFI" Group on Yahoo ! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopRFI/ . STOP RFI =http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopRFI/ . ~ RHF . Another article on conduits for EMI control. I found the most important comment was the need for a insulated out jacket to be very interesting. http://www.powerqualityanddrives.com/emi_rfi/ Terry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .com,
wrote: On of the main causes of "common mode" [CM] noise is "differential mode" [DM] noise that gets converted to into common mode noise. There are two main means of conversion. The least common but most powerful occurs when a device like a laptop is powered by the AC mains and is connected to a phone line or Ethernet cable. The noise from the power supply is coupled back on the AC mains and into the telephone or Ethernet line, and this forms a very effective unintentional antenna. Any device that is connected to the AC mains and any other conductor is very likely to be a source of significant common mode noise. This other conductor can be telephone, Ethernet, Coax Cable for DBS or CATV, or any other conductor. While we are used to thinking of antennas as needing to be an odd quarter wave length, effective antennas can in fact be much shorter. Ground leads approaching 1/20 f a wave length are effective radiators. The most common conversion of DM to CM occurs due to the imbalance in the AC mains. I have looked at over 20 different brands of 3 conductor cable used for domestic residential wiring. Some of this is new and some dates back to cable that is at least 30 years old. There are 3 main types: Type 1: H-G-N arranged in a triangle with the ground between the hot and neutral. Type 2: H-N-G arranged with the hot on one side, the neutral in the middle and the ground on the other outer side next to the neutral. Type 3: The H and N run, more or less in parallel, with the ground weaving back and forth from one to the other. At the start of this investigation I assumed the primary reason for DM to CM was caused by the interruption in what I had perceived "the natural balanced transmission characteristics" of AC power cords. I do accept that when the conductors that are nominally on 3/8" centers are spread for outlets, switches, light fixtures, and the mess inside a breaker panel, don't help the situation. However it became apparent in some tests at a new home with all of the AC and other cables installed, but with no connection to the real world via power, telephone or CATV, that my original idea was flawed. I now believe the primary cause is the extremely unbalanced "transmission line" effects caused by the ground conductor's relation ship to the purported balanced 2 conductor hot and neutral. In a simple test last night an Electrician friend brought over a ~100' piece of Romax of the type 1 construction. We(he) laid it out on the surface of ground and I used a Balun to couple the Romax to my R2000 operating on battery power. I terminated the far end with a non inductive 120 Ohm resistor. When this experiment is performed using 2 conductor zip or speaker cable there is minimal reception of all but my local 770KHz MW pest. However with the Romex reception of even distant MW and HF signals was significant. Grounding the Romex "ground' conductor did not have a significant effect. I suspect that if we could wire our homes with 2 conductor cable and run a separate grounding conductor we could reduce the conversion of DM to CM. Since the NEC would frown on such a scheme and because the costs would be extraordinary the only effective way to stop the conversion of DM into CM is to eliminate or at least reduce DM noise at the source. I hope to put a more detailed version of this experiment along with the new house test results on Will's stopRFI page "some day real soon". Terry ding the "Ground" conductor changed the Nice post! Thanks. -j |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 27, 2:27 am, RHF wrote:
On Sep 26, 10:03 am, wrote: On Sep 26, 12:16 pm, RHF wrote: On Sep 26, 8:39 am, wrote: On of the main causes of "common mode" [CM] noise is "differential mode" [DM] noise that gets converted to into common mode noise. There are two main means of conversion. The least common but most powerful occurs when a device like a laptop is powered by the AC mains and is connected to a phone line or Ethernet cable. The noise from the power supply is coupled back on the AC mains and into the telephone or Ethernet line, and this forms a very effective unintentional antenna. Any device that is connected to the AC mains and any other conductor is very likely to be a source of significant common mode noise. This other conductor can be telephone, Ethernet, Coax Cable for DBS or CATV, or any other conductor. While we are used to thinking of antennas as needing to be an odd quarter wave length, effective antennas can in fact be much shorter. Ground leads approaching 1/20 f a wave length are effective radiators. The most common conversion of DM to CM occurs due to the imbalance in the AC mains. I have looked at over 20 different brands of 3 conductor cable used for domestic residential wiring. Some of this is new and some dates back to cable that is at least 30 years old. There are 3 main types: Type 1: H-G-N arranged in a triangle with the ground between the hot and neutral. Type 2: H-N-G arranged with the hot on one side, the neutral in the middle and the ground on the other outer side next to the neutral. Type 3: The H and N run, more or less in parallel, with the ground weaving back and forth from one to the other. At the start of this investigation I assumed the primary reason for DM to CM was caused by the interruption in what I had perceived "the natural balanced transmission characteristics" of AC power cords. I do accept that when the conductors that are nominally on 3/8" centers are spread for outlets, switches, light fixtures, and the mess inside a breaker panel, don't help the situation. However it became apparent in some tests at a new home with all of the AC and other cables installed, but with no connection to the real world via power, telephone or CATV, that my original idea was flawed. I now believe the primary cause is the extremely unbalanced "transmission line" effects caused by the ground conductor's relation ship to the purported balanced 2 conductor hot and neutral. In a simple test last night an Electrician friend brought over a ~100' piece of Romax of the type 1 construction. We(he) laid it out on the surface of ground and I used a Balun to couple the Romax to my R2000 operating on battery power. I terminated the far end with a non inductive 120 Ohm resistor. When this experiment is performed using 2 conductor zip or speaker cable there is minimal reception of all but my local 770KHz MW pest. However with the Romex reception of even distant MW and HF signals was significant. Grounding the Romex "ground' conductor did not have a significant effect. I suspect that if we could wire our homes with 2 conductor cable and run a separate grounding conductor we could reduce the conversion of DM to CM. Since the NEC would frown on such a scheme and because the costs would be extraordinary the only effective way to stop the conversion of DM into CM is to eliminate or at least reduce DM noise at the source. I hope to put a more detailed version of this experiment along with the new house test results on Will's stopRFI page "some day real soon". Terry ding the "Ground" conductor changed the Terry, Insightful Report and a good read. Alas, the NEC is all about Electrical Safety and not concerned about RFI Suppression. I always thought that if I were having a Home Built and could do the Electrical Wiring myself. It would be better to use Type "AC" Wire through-out the Househttp://homerenovations.about.com/od/electrical/a/artbxwire.htm then the "NM" Plastic Covered Stuff.http://homerenovations.about.com/od/...artromexnm.htm Check-Out the "STOP RFI" Group on Yahoo ! http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopRFI/ . STOP RFI =http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stopRFI/ . ~ RHF . Another article on conduits for EMI control. - I found the most important comment was the - need for a insulated out jacket to be very interesting. - -http://www.powerqualityanddrives.com/emi_rfi/ - - Terry The need for and Outer Insulated Jacket would only apply to Metal Framed Buildings. The common Wooden Framed House would not have the Metal-to-Metal contact problem and the resulting RFI / EMF re-radiation by the Building's Metal Frame itself. - imho ~ RHF . True for older homes, but around here, in Central Kentucky, many homes are being built with metal "2X4". While my latest investigation was at 750K house which was all wood except for some bracing in the roof trusses, most of the 'affordable' 250K used the metal "2X4". In every home around here the AC mains approached the heating and coolnig duct work closer then I like, but non had contact. In two of the lower end 250K homes, not wired by my friend, the Romex was in almost direct contact with the copper water pipes. Another reason I like the newer non spiral wrapped armor that is formed from extruded aluminum is that with age the edges of the wrap tend to corrode. My parents house, built in 1948 and upgraded to matalic 1960 has RFI issues that weren't there when I was a SWL there.Some checking revealed that in two places the armored cable had a light coating of rust. And those two runs re radiated a mix of two not so close MW signals, 590 and 630. The mixing appears to be solely a product of the corroded sections. I have several experiments I am waiting in severe frustration because of my bum right arm. I hope to do some real world tests with various AC cables and see if matalic is better then Romex. Given the 1/20 of a wavelength maximum ground lead "rule" it will be interesing to see how armor cable fairs. I suspect it will radiate nearly as bad as Romex becasue of both the length and the typical poor bonding between the metal armor and outlet and junction boxes. Terry Terry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
making a common mode filter | Antenna | |||
A different way to reduce common mode noise, | Shortwave | |||
A different way to reduce common mode noise, addendum. | Shortwave | |||
Common Mode noise reduction | Shortwave | |||
Common-Mode Noise . . . | Shortwave |