|
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
Radio industry gets a bad signal
"Music formats, which will be widely available from a variety of sources, are most vulnerable, Harrison said.Bill White, program director of Charlotte's WBT-AM (1110), told those attending that his station has found success by focusing intensely on community-oriented programming and by serving local sponsors. And we have a lot of fun,"White added. Richard Neer, a sportscaster on New York's sports radio station WFAN, said although his station isn't a ratings leader in its market, it is highly successful because of the sports-talk niche it serves.It's going to be the last surviving dinosaur, said Neer, who lives in Mooresville and connects electronically with WFAN for his show. "It's specifically aimed at a very passionate audience." http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/294878.html Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music FMs are screwed, just liek I've been saying! News/talk/sports AMs will be the last survivors, if not killed off by AM-HD! No wonder, FM-HDs want to simulcast AMs! You are nothing but a ****ing lier and IBOC-shill! |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
IBOCcrock wrote: Radio industry gets a bad signal "Music formats, which will be widely available from a variety of sources, are most vulnerable, Harrison said.Bill White, program director of Charlotte's WBT-AM (1110), told those attending that his station has found success by focusing intensely on community-oriented programming and by serving local sponsors. And we have a lot of fun,"White added. Richard Neer, a sportscaster on New York's sports radio station WFAN, said although his station isn't a ratings leader in its market, it is highly successful because of the sports-talk niche it serves.It's going to be the last surviving dinosaur, said Neer, who lives in Mooresville and connects electronically with WFAN for his show. "It's specifically aimed at a very passionate audience." http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/294878.html Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music FMs are screwed, just liek I've been saying! News/talk/sports AMs will be the last survivors, if not killed off by AM-HD! No wonder, FM-HDs want to simulcast AMs! You are nothing but a ****ing lier and IBOC-shill! That's our Edweenie! |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 7:52 am, IBOCcrock wrote:
Radio industry gets a bad signal "Music formats, which will be widely available from a variety of sources, are most vulnerable, Harrison said.Bill White, program director of Charlotte's WBT-AM (1110), told those attending that his station has found success by focusing intensely on community-oriented programming and by serving local sponsors. And we have a lot of fun,"White added. Richard Neer, a sportscaster on New York's sports radio station WFAN, said although his station isn't a ratings leader in its market, it is highly successful because of the sports-talk niche it serves.It's going to be the last surviving dinosaur, said Neer, who lives in Mooresville and connects electronically with WFAN for his show. "It's specifically aimed at a very passionate audience." http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/294878.html Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music FMs are screwed, just liek I've been saying! News/talk/sports AMs will be the last survivors, if not killed off by AM-HD! No wonder, FM-HDs want to simulcast AMs! You are nothing but a ****ing lier and IBOC-shill! My my, you certainly do spel gud... |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 8:08 am, Roadie wrote:
On Sep 27, 7:52 am, IBOCcrock wrote: Radio industry gets a bad signal "Music formats, which will be widely available from a variety of sources, are most vulnerable, Harrison said.Bill White, program director of Charlotte's WBT-AM (1110), told those attending that his station has found success by focusing intensely on community-oriented programming and by serving local sponsors. And we have a lot of fun,"White added. Richard Neer, a sportscaster on New York's sports radio station WFAN, said although his station isn't a ratings leader in its market, it is highly successful because of the sports-talk niche it serves.It's going to be the last surviving dinosaur, said Neer, who lives in Mooresville and connects electronically with WFAN for his show. "It's specifically aimed at a very passionate audience." http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/294878.html Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music FMs are screwed, just liek I've been saying! News/talk/sports AMs will be the last survivors, if not killed off by AM-HD! No wonder, FM-HDs want to simulcast AMs! You are nothing but a ****ing lier and IBOC-shill! My my, you certainly do spel gud...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My, my, my - boring. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 8:08 am, Roadie wrote:
On Sep 27, 7:52 am, IBOCcrock wrote: Radio industry gets a bad signal "Music formats, which will be widely available from a variety of sources, are most vulnerable, Harrison said.Bill White, program director of Charlotte's WBT-AM (1110), told those attending that his station has found success by focusing intensely on community-oriented programming and by serving local sponsors. And we have a lot of fun,"White added. Richard Neer, a sportscaster on New York's sports radio station WFAN, said although his station isn't a ratings leader in its market, it is highly successful because of the sports-talk niche it serves.It's going to be the last surviving dinosaur, said Neer, who lives in Mooresville and connects electronically with WFAN for his show. "It's specifically aimed at a very passionate audience." http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/294878.html Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music FMs are screwed, just liek I've been saying! News/talk/sports AMs will be the last survivors, if not killed off by AM-HD! No wonder, FM-HDs want to simulcast AMs! You are nothing but a ****ing lier and IBOC-shill! My my, you certainly do spel gud...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Stupid ****. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
"IBOCcrock" wrote in message ups.com... Radio industry gets a bad signal "Music formats, which will be widely available from a variety of sources, are most vulnerable, Harrison said.Bill White, program director of Charlotte's WBT-AM (1110), told those attending that his station has found success by focusing intensely on community-oriented programming and by serving local sponsors. And we have a lot of fun,"White added. Richard Neer, a sportscaster on New York's sports radio station WFAN, said although his station isn't a ratings leader in its market, it is highly successful because of the sports-talk niche it serves.It's going to be the last surviving dinosaur, said Neer, who lives in Mooresville and connects electronically with WFAN for his show. "It's specifically aimed at a very passionate audience." http://www.charlotte.com/business/story/294878.html Ha! Ha! Eduardo! Music FMs are screwed, just liek I've been saying! News/talk/sports AMs will be the last survivors, if not killed off by AM-HD! No wonder, FM-HDs want to simulcast AMs! You are nothing but a ****ing lier and IBOC-shill! This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 9:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. It's all got to do with content. Nobody's going to waste their time listening to the snake oil and bible thumper drivel that dominates over the large majority of AM stations. Why do: A) These stations remain on the air, if practically nobody is listening. B) Why are people paying for time on these things. Do they not know any better? I keep saying it's time for the paid-programming peanut whistles to go off the air, and open the band up to mega-powered stations doing a contemporary general interest talk formats, no matter what the language (English, Spanish, Korean, etc.). Sports talk, when done locally and done well (see WFAN if you want to know how it's done) is a good revenue getter in the "proper" demographics. Stop targeting news/talk stations exclusively to right wingers or left wingers. Just make them compelling listening for EVERYONE across the political spectrum. Emphasize LOCAL talk. People want to discuss stuff that's going on in their own cities and talk radio is an excellent forum for that. Especially big cities like New York, Dallas or even Denver have plenty of material for people to talk about on the air. Music may be dead on AM, but I have a gut feeling that properly programmed talk shows could bring back some attractive demos and revitalize the band quite a bit. Get RID of the paid programming. All that is doing is damaging the long-term survival of the band in return for quick immediate profits. Stephanie Weil New York City, USA |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 10:01 am, Stephanie Weil wrote:
On Sep 27, 9:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. It's all got to do with content. Nobody's going to waste their time listening to the snake oil and bible thumper drivel that dominates over the large majority of AM stations. Why do: A) These stations remain on the air, if practically nobody is listening. B) Why are people paying for time on these things. Do they not know any better? I keep saying it's time for the paid-programming peanut whistles to go off the air, and open the band up to mega-powered stations doing a contemporary general interest talk formats, no matter what the language (English, Spanish, Korean, etc.). Sports talk, when done locally and done well (see WFAN if you want to know how it's done) is a good revenue getter in the "proper" demographics. Stop targeting news/talk stations exclusively to right wingers or left wingers. Just make them compelling listening for EVERYONE across the political spectrum. Emphasize LOCAL talk. People want to discuss stuff that's going on in their own cities and talk radio is an excellent forum for that. Especially big cities like New York, Dallas or even Denver have plenty of material for people to talk about on the air. Music may be dead on AM, but I have a gut feeling that properly programmed talk shows could bring back some attractive demos and revitalize the band quite a bit. Get RID of the paid programming. All that is doing is damaging the long-term survival of the band in return for quick immediate profits. Stephanie Weil New York City, USA But then were will Tardo sell his colloidal silver? |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message ps.com... On Sep 27, 9:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. It's all got to do with content. Nobody's going to waste their time listening to the snake oil and bible thumper drivel that dominates over the large majority of AM stations. Why do: A) These stations remain on the air, if practically nobody is listening. Either they make money or someone thinks they can make money. B) Why are people paying for time on these things. Do they not know any better? The evangelists and preachers judge media by the amount they get in donations; if the show pays for itself and allows the "word" to be spread, they continue to buy time. Most want not just the time cost but some extra money for their church, though. I keep saying it's time for the paid-programming peanut whistles to go off the air, and open the band up to mega-powered stations doing a contemporary general interest talk formats, no matter what the language (English, Spanish, Korean, etc.). The dominant stations on the band were licensed for population centers and city sizes that existed in the 1930's... the basic plan goes back to 1928. Cities have outgrown all but a few AMs in every market.... sometimes all of them in markets like DC. The whole system is out of date, and a huge cleansing and reallocation would be needed. The AM band and its technology are approaching 100 years of age; the delivery system is defective by today's standards and the allocations are such that in the top 100 markets only about 250 stations are even competitively viable. Music may be dead on AM, but I have a gut feeling that properly programmed talk shows could bring back some attractive demos and revitalize the band quite a bit. AM just doesn't exist in the minds of most under-35 listeners. And experiments like Air America have shown that there is not a deep talent pool of entertaining liberal talk hosts. Get RID of the paid programming. All that is doing is damaging the long-term survival of the band in return for quick immediate profits. I don't think there is a valid model for the bad technical facilities other than brokered time or religion. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... But then were will Tardo sell his colloidal silver? When will you actually contribute to a thread? Stephanie posted some excellent observations, worthy of discussion and consideration. But you respond with a hackneyed and not-very-funny comeback that has nothing to do with her well reasoned post. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 9:01 am, Stephanie Weil wrote:
On Sep 27, 9:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. It's all got to do with content. Nobody's going to waste their time listening to the snake oil and bible thumper drivel that dominates over the large majority of AM stations. Why do: A) These stations remain on the air, if practically nobody is listening. B) Why are people paying for time on these things. Do they not know any better? I keep saying it's time for the paid-programming peanut whistles to go off the air, and open the band up to mega-powered stations doing a contemporary general interest talk formats, no matter what the language (English, Spanish, Korean, etc.). Sports talk, when done locally and done well (see WFAN if you want to know how it's done) is a good revenue getter in the "proper" demographics. Stop targeting news/talk stations exclusively to right wingers or left wingers. Just make them compelling listening for EVERYONE across the political spectrum. Emphasize LOCAL talk. People want to discuss stuff that's going on in their own cities and talk radio is an excellent forum for that. Especially big cities like New York, Dallas or even Denver have plenty of material for people to talk about on the air. Music may be dead on AM, but I have a gut feeling that properly programmed talk shows could bring back some attractive demos and revitalize the band quite a bit. Get RID of the paid programming. All that is doing is damaging the long-term survival of the band in return for quick immediate profits. Stephanie Weil New York City, USA EXCEPT THAT Paid - Programming brings in a lot of money to the people paying for the programming. Religious organizatoins garner large sums from their listeners. And that's who the programming targets - their specific listeners. So, paid programming is an easy way for stations to make money, plus the people paying for the programming are reaching the audience they want because that's who listens to their program in the first place. BUT that means that only certain people will listen to a station at certian times. It doesn't build station loyalty or help the other advertisers in other time slots. It does, however, bring in revenue for the station, and for the paid programmers. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 9:50 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message ps.com... On Sep 27, 9:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. It's all got to do with content. Nobody's going to waste their time listening to the snake oil and bible thumper drivel that dominates over the large majority of AM stations. Why do: A) These stations remain on the air, if practically nobody is listening. Either they make money or someone thinks they can make money. B) Why are people paying for time on these things. Do they not know any better? The evangelists and preachers judge media by the amount they get in donations; if the show pays for itself and allows the "word" to be spread, they continue to buy time. Most want not just the time cost but some extra money for their church, though. AMEN!!!!!1 I keep saying it's time for the paid-programming peanut whistles to go off the air, and open the band up to mega-powered stations doing a contemporary general interest talk formats, no matter what the language (English, Spanish, Korean, etc.). The dominant stations on the band were licensed for population centers and city sizes that existed in the 1930's... the basic plan goes back to 1928. Cities have outgrown all but a few AMs in every market.... sometimes all of them in markets like DC. The whole system is out of date, and a huge cleansing and reallocation would be needed. The AM band and its technology are approaching 100 years of age; the delivery system is defective by today's standards and the allocations are such that in the top 100 markets only about 250 stations are even competitively viable. Music may be dead on AM, but I have a gut feeling that properly programmed talk shows could bring back some attractive demos and revitalize the band quite a bit. AM just doesn't exist in the minds of most under-35 listeners. And experiments like Air America have shown that there is not a deep talent pool of entertaining liberal talk hosts. Get RID of the paid programming. All that is doing is damaging the long-term survival of the band in return for quick immediate profits. I don't think there is a valid model for the bad technical facilities other than brokered time or religion. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
Houston is the fourh largest City in America.Many years ago, one of my
sisters moved to Houston (you have to be crazy to live in a City like that,,, skinny twin sister is going to sell her house next door to me [[so she said so last week]] and move back to Texas near Galveston.**** on that lesbian Bitch! Let her move out of Mississippi is what I Say! She called me a dumbass,,, her lesbian ass need NOT ever knock on my door ever again for any kind of help.The damn BITCH! cuhulin |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 7:50 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Stephanie Weil" wrote in message ps.com... On Sep 27, 9:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. It's all got to do with content. Nobody's going to waste their time listening to the snake oil and bible thumper drivel that dominates over the large majority of AM stations. Why do: A) These stations remain on the air, if practically nobody is listening. Either they make money or someone thinks they can make money. B) Why are people paying for time on these things. Do they not know any better? The evangelists and preachers judge media by the amount they get in donations; if the show pays for itself and allows the "word" to be spread, they continue to buy time. Most want not just the time cost but some extra money for their church, though. I keep saying it's time for the paid-programming peanut whistles to go off the air, and open the band up to mega-powered stations doing a contemporary general interest talk formats, no matter what the language (English, Spanish, Korean, etc.). The dominant stations on the band were licensed for population centers and city sizes that existed in the 1930's... the basic plan goes back to 1928. Cities have outgrown all but a few AMs in every market.... sometimes all of them in markets like DC. The whole system is out of date, and a huge cleansing and reallocation would be needed. The AM band and its technology are approaching 100 years of age; the delivery system is defective by today's standards and the allocations are such that in the top 100 markets only about 250 stations are even competitively viable. Music may be dead on AM, but I have a gut feeling that properly programmed talk shows could bring back some attractive demos and revitalize the band quite a bit. AM just doesn't exist in the minds of most under-35 listeners. - And experiments like Air America have shown that there - is not a deep talent pool of entertaining liberal talk hosts. There is a Deep Cess-Pool of Non-Entertaining Liberal Talk Hosts [.] The PBS and NPR TV-Radio Networks and Public Radio Stations put forward more Hours of Liberal Talk Radio {Taxpayer Paid Info-Mercials} then all the Commercial Radio Stations combined put forward the Conservative Talk Radio Shows. ~ RHF |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 10:36 am, "
wrote: On Sep 27, 9:01 am, Stephanie Weil wrote: On Sep 27, 9:23 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: This is why, then that major markets like Houston now have only 12% of total listening going to AM stations, and in 18-34, it is less than 5%? AM is dead under 45, and dying as its remaining listeners age out of the desirable sales demos. It's all got to do with content. Nobody's going to waste their time listening to the snake oil and bible thumper drivel that dominates over the large majority of AM stations. Why do: A) These stations remain on the air, if practically nobody is listening. B) Why are people paying for time on these things. Do they not know any better? I keep saying it's time for the paid-programming peanut whistles to go off the air, and open the band up to mega-powered stations doing a contemporary general interest talk formats, no matter what the language (English, Spanish, Korean, etc.). Sports talk, when done locally and done well (see WFAN if you want to know how it's done) is a good revenue getter in the "proper" demographics. Stop targeting news/talk stations exclusively to right wingers or left wingers. Just make them compelling listening for EVERYONE across the political spectrum. Emphasize LOCAL talk. People want to discuss stuff that's going on in their own cities and talk radio is an excellent forum for that. Especially big cities like New York, Dallas or even Denver have plenty of material for people to talk about on the air. Music may be dead on AM, but I have a gut feeling that properly programmed talk shows could bring back some attractive demos and revitalize the band quite a bit. Get RID of the paid programming. All that is doing is damaging the long-term survival of the band in return for quick immediate profits. Stephanie Weil New York City, USA EXCEPT THAT Paid - Programming brings in a lot of money to the people paying for the programming. Religious organizatoins garner large sums from their listeners. And that's who the programming targets - their specific listeners. So, paid programming is an easy way for stations to make money, plus the people paying for the programming are reaching the audience they want because that's who listens to their program in the first place. BUT that means that only certain people will listen to a station at certian times. It doesn't build station loyalty or help the other advertisers in other time slots. It does, however, bring in revenue for the station, and for the paid programmers.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - An lets not forget all those Vitamin and Herb {Nutrition} Health and Wellness Paid Programming Radio Shows. Half-Hour and One-Hour Non-Stop "Info-Mercials". |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
I like to watch Mrs.Bucket on the PMS Pre Men Strual tv channel on
Sunday evenings. cuhulin |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 10:55 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... But then were will Tardo sell his colloidal silver? When will you actually contribute to a thread? Stephanie posted some excellent observations, worthy of discussion and consideration. But you respond with a hackneyed and not-very-funny comeback that has nothing to do with her well reasoned post. At least I don't lie about my education. And let's face it, 99% of the threads you "contribute" to are off-topic. So, you see, you should dismount your high horse. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 27, 10:55 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message ups.com... But then were will Tardo sell his colloidal silver? When will you actually contribute to a thread? Stephanie posted some excellent observations, worthy of discussion and consideration. But you respond with a hackneyed and not-very-funny comeback that has nothing to do with her well reasoned post. At least I don't lie about my education. And let's face it, 99% of the threads you "contribute" to are off-topic. So, you see, you should dismount your high horse. In a group filled with everything from white supremacy posts to political rants, I fail to see that there is a lot that is technically on the topic. This might have to due more with SW being a "window on the world" than strict adherence to loggings and receiver spec posting. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 28, 12:15 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message ups.com... On Sep 27, 10:55 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message roups.com... But then were will Tardo sell his colloidal silver? When will you actually contribute to a thread? Stephanie posted some excellent observations, worthy of discussion and consideration. But you respond with a hackneyed and not-very-funny comeback that has nothing to do with her well reasoned post. At least I don't lie about my education. And let's face it, 99% of the threads you "contribute" to are off-topic. So, you see, you should dismount your high horse. In a group filled with everything from white supremacy posts to political rants, I fail to see that there is a lot that is technically on the topic. I encourage you to become part of the solution rather than part of the problem. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 27, 10:50 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
And why should we believe anything you say, given your history of deception and evasion in this group. You have the credibility of a 14 year old's myspace page. |
Radio industry gets a bad signal - Ediuardo's a lier!
On Sep 28, 6:48 am, Steve wrote:
On Sep 27, 10:55 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: "Steve" wrote in message oups.com... But then were will Tardo sell his colloidal silver? When will you actually contribute to a thread? Stephanie posted some excellent observations, worthy of discussion and consideration. But you respond with a hackneyed and not-very-funny comeback that has nothing to do with her well reasoned post. At least I don't lie about my education. And let's face it, 99% of the threads you "contribute" to are off-topic. So, you see, you should dismount your high horse. i r a hi-skool grade-u-wait - i kan spell Gee Eee Dee ! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com