Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
Old November 17th 07, 08:12 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Receivers

In article ,
David wrote:

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:33:50 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

You could not work where I work because you would fail the drug testing.


Nonsense. They can only test you when they offer you a job, and
anybody with any brains quits smoking dope when job hunting.


Oh yeah? How many days could you go without smoking pot?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #52   Report Post  
Old November 18th 07, 10:34 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 837
Default Receivers

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:12:12 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
David wrote:

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:33:50 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

You could not work where I work because you would fail the drug testing.


Nonsense. They can only test you when they offer you a job, and
anybody with any brains quits smoking dope when job hunting.


Oh yeah? How many days could you go without smoking pot?


Several hundred if need be.
  #53   Report Post  
Old November 19th 07, 12:56 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,494
Default Receivers

In article ,
David wrote:

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 20:12:12 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
David wrote:

On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:33:50 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

You could not work where I work because you would fail the drug testing.

Nonsense. They can only test you when they offer you a job, and
anybody with any brains quits smoking dope when job hunting.


Oh yeah? How many days could you go without smoking pot?


Several hundred if need be.


Great. Time to get started. We will see how long you last.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #54   Report Post  
Old November 19th 07, 06:10 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,027
Default Receivers

On Nov 16, 6:44 pm, "k9kz" wrote:
"bpnjensen" wrote in message

news:033141c9-9bb1-4d1a-bbdb-

You must be. I've had excellent results with the R75 and quite modest
antennas on a small lot in one of the most RFI- and QRM-polluted
environments I can imagine short of the inside of an electronics
factory. The radio is sensitive, selective, not prone to images, and
delivers under less-than-optimum circumstances.


My experience with it is just great, and I have no hesitation in
recommending it as a good $1k choice.


Bruce Jensen


The R75 is quite nice. The E1 is very good for a portable. In fact
outstanding in comparison with other portables. To have both is a very good
setup imo. To have either is a bargain!

Bill


That's how I've always felt too, about both of these receivers.
Contrary to what some folks seem to feel, adding the Kiwa mods was no
big deal on the R75, and it lets me hear everything I want to hear
quite well. I'd love to try the Eton one of these days.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Web Contolled Receivers (or Internet accessed receivers) msg Shortwave 3 June 20th 07 03:44 PM
GE MVP Receivers Hunchy Swap 0 August 4th 06 12:53 AM
FS: Receivers James B. Geer Boatanchors 1 January 18th 04 02:24 AM
HF Receivers FS milradio Boatanchors 0 December 8th 03 01:37 PM
HF Receivers FS milradio Swap 0 December 8th 03 01:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:08 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017