|
Why no Leap Second lately?
|
Why no Leap Second lately?
On Dec 31, 5:36*am, David wrote:
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Question - Why No Leap Second Lately ? It's All In The Graph -translation- It Ain't Time Yet ! ~ RHF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:L...nd.ut1-utc.svg |
Why no Leap Second lately?
RHF wrote:
On Dec 31, 5:36 am, David wrote: - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Question - Why No Leap Second Lately ? It's All In The Graph -translation- It Ain't Time Yet ! ~ RHF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:L...nd.ut1-utc.svg . You need to look again. There's a 300 ms differential. That's a lifetime for some particles. |
Why no Leap Second lately?
On Dec 31, 10:40*am, David wrote:
RHF wrote: On Dec 31, 5:36 am, David wrote: -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Question - Why No Leap Second Lately ? It's All In The Graph -translation- It Ain't Time Yet ! ~ RHF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:L...nd.ut1-utc.svg *. - - You need to look again. -*There's a 300 ms differential. * - That's a lifetime for some particles. - David - I will not long be a 'particle' to this discussion. :o) ~ RHF http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Particle_physics Wishing Everyone a Silly Milli-Second of Laughter this New Years Eve. http://www.dichotomistic.com/mind_readings_humour.html |
Why no Leap Second lately?
David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. dxAce Michigan USA |
Why no Leap Second lately?
"dxAce" wrote in message ... David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. Thought they did away with the leap second some years ago? Or was that the leap minute? Memory just isn't what it used to be (was it ever?). |
Why no Leap Second lately?
dxAce wrote:
David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. dxAce Michigan USA We're off the same as we were in 1999 and more than we were in 1994. The last correction was plus 300 ms; obviously someone thinks that's an acceptable deviation. |
Why no Leap Second lately?
David wrote: dxAce wrote: David wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leap_second Why? Because it is not yet necessary. We're off the same as we were in 1999 and more than we were in 1994. The last correction was plus 300 ms; obviously someone thinks that's an acceptable deviation. Obviously. |
Why no Leap Second lately?
On Dec 31, 7:38 am, RHF wrote:
Question - Why NoLeap SecondLately ? It's All In The Graph -translation- It Ain't Time Yet ! ~ Real time plots from the folks in charge of deciding are at http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/ specifically in the frame http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/produc...bined/C04.html with the integrated offset easy to see in the plot generated by http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/produc...Submit+request but the physics of the rotation rate is easier to see in the plot generated by http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/produc...Submit+request The announcements about whether there will be a leap in Bulletin C in frame http://hpiers.obspm.fr/eop-pc/produc...bulletins.html |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com