On Jan 8, 11:45*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

...
On Jan 8, 10:56 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:



Describe a couple of these supposedly plentiful cases of NYC stations
being
interferred with inside their interference free contours.

Pick any two NYC AM stations and I'll check them out.

WADO and WCAA.
Both sound terrible from IBOC splatter.

From whom?

More than one station in each case.

On Jan 8, 11:39*am, "David Cornholio" wrote:
DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of persons who
can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his crippled mind, the
idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a business is impossible...

Impossible? Not at all. Not even that unusual. What DxAce finds
difficult to believe, I think, is that you'd actually tell the truth
about something.

David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In aobut 8
years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections. On person
alone could not do anything about that...

Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell yourself
as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as evidenced by
the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and exiled with next to
nothing, about all that can be risked has been risked. There was not a civil
war, just one of over 100 changes of government in the 150 years of
independence of Ecuador. The people had not taken up arms for decades
there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took me 5
years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had written in
the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer John Callerman of
Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension to the information, and
changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a year
ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of persons who
can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his crippled mind, the
idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a business is impossible...
witness his obsession with "nothing in your name" when corporations are a
way of life in business. He is simply ignorant of how things work in
business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach would
be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your credibility,
like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.

Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the Mexican
Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by the law.



But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.

David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In aobut 8
years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections. On person
alone could not do anything about that...


Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell yourself
as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as evidenced by
the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and exiled with next to
nothing, about all that can be risked has been risked. There was not a civil
war, just one of over 100 changes of government in the 150 years of
independence of Ecuador. The people had not taken up arms for decades
there...

Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took me 5
years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had written in
the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer John Callerman of
Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension to the information, and
changed not a tad the facts.

Ah, the 60's! That was long berfore you adopted the 'Eduardo' shtick.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a year
ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing...

Sure I have! The biggest problem you have is that you are a pathological liar.

in fact, I have given dozens of names of persons who
can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his crippled mind, the
idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a business is impossible...
witness his obsession with "nothing in your name" when corporations are a
way of life in business. He is simply ignorant of how things work in
business and outside the US.

It's interesting how much you are now infatuated with the corporation thing! I
do recall you saying in the past (when questioned about the ownership thing)
that the number one reason you wanted Ecuadorian citizenship was so that you
could put your *radio stations* in your name.

But *conveniently* you were thrown out of the country just days before getting
citizenship.

It all makes for an interesting story, with little or no paper trail.



You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach would
be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your credibility,
like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.

Nor would I want to be.


Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the Mexican
Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by the law.

David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
Yeah, even I want to hear about how you defend democracy by leaving
the conflict.

For more than half a year, my colleague at Diario El Tiempo and I
voiced
opposition to the military junta in Ecuador by talking and writing
about
the promised return to democracy. He disappeared (or was disappeared)
and
I was given 24 hours to leave... the fellows in uniforms had rifles,
so
there was not a "road to appeal" available.
The heroes I know, who risked life and property to defend democracy
took up arms and brought the fight to those who would challenge
democracy.

And some took up themightiest sword, the pen.


But in each case, they took the fight to the enemy. Leaving
doesn't
risk, nor does it defend.



There is no risk in leaving the fight behind.

I would get a good chuckle out of finding out how you think I could have
remained, given I was escorted to the airport; the intent was to silence
the
radio stations by nationalization, not to silence me personally.

So, regale us yet again with your tale of selling the radio stations which
were
nationalized.

I did not ever sell any station in Ecuador. The government wished to
nationalize the station group. In the 24 hours I had before being put on a
plane (it was the era when there were not flights every day to the US out of
Quito, which was then only a daylight airport) I had my attorney (Lic.
Benjamín Cevallos assisted by Lic. Segundo Maiguashca) transfer most of the
stations to an employee cooperative, headed by Ulpiano Orozco. Since the
junta felt it was " a people's government" and was similar to that of Gral.
Velasco in Perú, they could not take the stations away from "the workers"
which was my intent... both to save their jobs and to keep the government
from closing the stations. The shares of two frequencies were transferred to
my daughter's name, and the whole deal made contingent on this last step,
under the hope the government would leave the whole arrangement alone due to
the adverse publicity messing with an employee cooperative would bring.

Didn't you say in the past that after going back to the US and/or Puerto Rico
(after getting tossed) that you were still trying to sell your stations in
Ecuador?

Now, in one rapid 24 hour period, you are telling us that you *transferred* it
all to some employee cooperative, before you got tossed?

Did you do that at gunpoint as well?



Since I had a VP / General Manager position in what is now the US' 13th
largest market within 2 weeks of leaving, I came out both alive and
employed. The experience of building a dozen stations in just a few years,
learning how to sell them and manage them, was of immense value... and given
the economic conditions of Ecuador today, probably as positive as the whole
thing was negative.

D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

There is no risk in leaving the fight behind.
I would get a good chuckle out of finding out how you think I could
have remained, given I was escorted to the airport; the intent was
to silence the radio stations by nationalization, not to silence me
personally.

How you would have stayed is not the question. You claim to have
been a defender of democracy. The question is, as a defender, how you
would risk life and property by leaving.

I did not leave, I was sent out of the country, by an armed escort. I
risked life and property, lost all my property and barely kept my life.
Changing the subject is another charming debate tactic designed
to get you out of clarifying a statement that makes no sense.

Once again, making my point for me.

You made no point. "Left the country" sounds voluntary. Removed at
gunpoint is the reality of the matter.



Yes, I did make a point. Whether you left voluntarily, or you were
removed at gun point, is a semantic matter-- the point is that you did
not stay and fight. The conflict remained in your absense. You did
nothing to defend democracy, because you didn't participate in the
fight. You did not risk life and property by leaving the fight behind you.

Whether there was personal risk or loss is one thing. Whether you
risked, or lost defending democracy is something else.

Chauncey, your stories, and supporting evidence on your website,
change with the telling.

Doroteo Arámbula you are not.

I suggest you check-out "Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein (Canadian, not
dead). You either fled or you were disappeared.

D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In
aobut 8 years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections.
On person alone could not do anything about that...

Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell
yourself as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as
evidenced by the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and
exiled with next to nothing, about all that can be risked has been
risked. There was not a civil war, just one of over 100 changes of
government in the 150 years of independence of Ecuador. The people had
not taken up arms for decades there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took
me 5 years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had
written in the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer
John Callerman of Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension
to the information, and changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a
year ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of
persons who can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his
crippled mind, the idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a
business is impossible... witness his obsession with "nothing in your
name" when corporations are a way of life in business. He is simply
ignorant of how things work in business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach
would be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your
credibility, like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.

Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the
Mexican Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by
the law.


But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.


You know nothing about the Chicago Boys, do you?

On Jan 8, 3:12*pm, David wrote:
D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

* There is no risk in leaving the fight behind.
I would get a good chuckle out of finding out how you think I could
have remained, given I was escorted to the airport; the intent was
to silence the radio stations by nationalization, not to silence me
personally.

* * How you would have stayed is not the question. You claim to have
been a defender of democracy. The question is, as a defender, how you
would risk life and property by leaving.

I did not leave, I was sent out of the country, by an armed escort. I
risked life and property, lost all my property and barely kept my life.
* * Changing the subject is another charming debate tactic designed
to get you out of clarifying a statement that makes no sense.

* * Once again, making my point for me.

You made no point. "Left the country" sounds voluntary. Removed at
gunpoint is the reality of the matter.

* Yes, I did make a point. Whether you left voluntarily, or you were
removed at gun point, is a semantic matter-- the point is that you did
not stay and fight. The conflict remained in your absense. You did
nothing to defend democracy, because you didn't participate in the
fight. You did not risk life and property by leaving the fight behind you.

* Whether there was personal risk or loss is one thing. Whether you
risked, or lost defending democracy is something else.

* Chauncey, your stories, and supporting evidence on your website,
change with the telling.

* Doroteo Arámbula you are not.

I suggest you check-out "Shock Doctrine" *by Naomi Klein (Canadian, not
dead). *You either fled or you were disappeared.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

My guess: He fled *after* his attempts to *collaborate* with the junta
failed.

David wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In
aobut 8 years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections.
On person alone could not do anything about that...

Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell
yourself as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.

Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as
evidenced by the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and
exiled with next to nothing, about all that can be risked has been
risked. There was not a civil war, just one of over 100 changes of
government in the 150 years of independence of Ecuador. The people had
not taken up arms for decades there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.

Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took
me 5 years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had
written in the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer
John Callerman of Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension
to the information, and changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a
year ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.

DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of
persons who can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his
crippled mind, the idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a
business is impossible... witness his obsession with "nothing in your
name" when corporations are a way of life in business. He is simply
ignorant of how things work in business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach
would be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your
credibility, like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.

Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.

Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the
Mexican Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by
the law.


But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.


You know nothing about the Chicago Boys, do you?

Bigger than Fidel, Bigger than Che... It's David Frackelton Gleason, Freedom
Fighter!

dxAce wrote:

David wrote:

D Peter Maus wrote:
David Eduardo wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:
There was no fight, other than in the media. The junta fell when the
members started to disagree, and elections were finally held. In
aobut 8 years, I saw 5 changes of government, only two by elections.
On person alone could not do anything about that...
Then don't sell yourself as a Freedom Fighter. Do not sell
yourself as Risking Life and Property as a Defender of Democracy.
Excuse me, but when one comes within a hair of being shot (as
evidenced by the disappearance of my colleague at the newspaper), and
exiled with next to nothing, about all that can be risked has been
risked. There was not a civil war, just one of over 100 changes of
government in the 150 years of independence of Ecuador. The people had
not taken up arms for decades there...
Scans of documents supporting your claims, however, have.
Additions add depth, and do not change the underlying facts. It took
me 5 years to get a scan of a verification letter for HCRM1 that I had
written in the 60's, and I finally got one from well respected DXer
John Callerman of Krum, TX. Adding that only gave a bit of dimension
to the information, and changed not a tad the facts.

As documented in this group. DXAce having made that point more than a
year ago. Myself having witnessed what he pointed out had changed.
DXace proved nothing... in fact, I have given dozens of names of
persons who can corroborate the facts he so glibly dismissed. To his
crippled mind, the idea of a 17 year old with a corporation and a
business is impossible... witness his obsession with "nothing in your
name" when corporations are a way of life in business. He is simply
ignorant of how things work in business and outside the US.
You're very good at playing semantic games. Your debate coach
would be proud. But you are in conflict with your own facts. Your
credibility, like CCU's stock price, is slipping.


Doroteo Arámbula you are not.
Nor would I want to be.
Probably the truest thing you've said, to date.
Pancho Villa was basically a thief and a thug, who latched on to the
Mexican Revolution to achieve notoriety and to escape prosecution by
the law.

But he didn't leave the fight behind and then wave the flag of
Liberty. If nothing else, he stood and fought for what he believed.

Like I said, leave the fight behind, and you risk nothing. Put a
weapon in your hand, and you can make the claim.

You opted to take the road out that was handed you.

You may have lost much. But your risk, like other things, isn't what
you claim.


You know nothing about the Chicago Boys, do you?

Bigger than Fidel, Bigger than Che... It's David Frackelton Gleason, Freedom
Fighter!


Thanks, but I already knew you were a moron.