Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-for sale
 

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-for sale
 

An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
 

Dorpmuller wrote:

An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721

Sure it does! It's for sale at auction.

Is the seller getting money for it? Yes.

When the hammer is dropped does the auctioneer often times say 'Sold!"? Yes.

Therefore a sale has been made.

I rest my case.

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
 

Dorpmuller wrote:
An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721



And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good.

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-for sale
 

Audiophiles debate this one -- maybe read URL:
"David" wrote in message
...
Dorpmuller wrote:
An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721



And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good.

Audiophiles avidly debate this one -- maybe read URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound

Lamont

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
 

On Jan 9, 12:51*pm, dxAce wrote:
Dorpmuller wrote:
An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721

Sure it does! It's for sale at auction.

Is the seller getting money for it? Yes.

When the hammer is dropped does the auctioneer often times say 'Sold!"? Yes.

Therefore a sale has been made.

I rest my case.

The 'Item' is being "Sold" at Auction.

The 'Item' is being "Placed" at Auction.

Each is understood to mean the 'Item is : "For Sale"

~ RHF

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
 

On Jan 9, 1:17*pm, David wrote:
Dorpmuller wrote:
An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721

- And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good.

Hence the expression "Down The Tube" :o) ~ RHF

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
 

The Shadow wrote:
Audiophiles debate this one -- maybe read URL:
"David" wrote in message
...
Dorpmuller wrote:
An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721



And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good.

Audiophiles avidly debate this one -- maybe read URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound

Lamont

They also fought against lowering the speed of phonograph records from
78.66 RPM to 33.33 RPM.

My definition of audiophile is someone who spent so much money on
hardware he can't really enjoy the tunes.

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
 

On Jan 10, 12:48*pm, David wrote:
The Shadow wrote:
Audiophiles debate this one *-- maybe read *URL:
"David" wrote in message
...
Dorpmuller wrote:
An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721

And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good.

Audiophiles avidly debate this one *-- maybe read *URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound

Lamont

They also fought against lowering the speed of phonograph records from
78.66 RPM to 33.33 RPM.

My definition of audiophile is someone who spent so much money on
hardware he can't really enjoy the tunes.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


the best sounding stereo I own, cost me $10- it was built in 1965, and
is a single ended tube design- dual monoblocks- in an Akai reel to
reel, model M8

it sounds better than my modern digital Technics solid state rack
system

even a "cheap" stereo tube set, sounds better than solid state- tubes
color the sound- solid state music has no soul

Pioneer SX-2000 stereo tube amped receiver-vintage 1968-MINT-forsale
 

Dwight D. Eisenhower wrote:
On Jan 10, 12:48 pm, David wrote:
The Shadow wrote:
Audiophiles debate this one -- maybe read URL:
"David" wrote in message
...
Dorpmuller wrote:
An AUCTION doesn't mean for sale!
"Dwight D. Eisenhower" wrote in message
...
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...m=140196937721
And "tube" doesn't automatically mean it sounds good.
Audiophiles avidly debate this one -- maybe read URL:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tube_sound
Lamont
They also fought against lowering the speed of phonograph records from
78.66 RPM to 33.33 RPM.

My definition of audiophile is someone who spent so much money on
hardware he can't really enjoy the tunes.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


the best sounding stereo I own, cost me $10- it was built in 1965, and
is a single ended tube design- dual monoblocks- in an Akai reel to
reel, model M8

it sounds better than my modern digital Technics solid state rack
system

even a "cheap" stereo tube set, sounds better than solid state- tubes
color the sound- solid state music has no soul

That's absurd. Perhaps true 40 or 50 years ago.