Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hiya...
I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The proper way to use two horizontal wires would be in a dipole or 'V' configuration but that's a completely different antenna design from an inverted-L. Otherwise there isn't any real benefit of using two horizontal wire sections 90-deg apart. It might be worse than one wire under certain conditions. If you keep the horizontal wire relatively short (30-50/ft) it won't be that directional, except for perhaps the highest shortwave frequencies. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael wrote:
Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The math is staggering. The concept of random wire includes the hard fact that at some freqs the antenna works broadside, at others it is end firing. Height above the ground also affects directionality quite a bit. If you really want something closer to omni, go with a sloper, rather than an "L". |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave" wrote in message m... Michael wrote: Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The math is staggering. The concept of random wire includes the hard fact that at some freqs the antenna works broadside, at others it is end firing. Height above the ground also affects directionality quite a bit. If you really want something closer to omni, go with a sloper, rather than an "L". Dave, I have a sloping "L" is that any good. It works fine for me. Burr's Radio Shack - http://tinyurl.com/3wuscn Red Mountain, California / Bulacan, Philippines |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Burr wrote:
"Dave" wrote in message m... Michael wrote: Hiya... I'm assembling all the fixings I need for a new antenna. Now that I'm committed to an inverted L with my balun ONLY one foot away from the earthen ground spike... Given that the horizontal section of an inverted L antenna could work directionally, would it be good to use two wires at the top of the vertical section ??? This way you would have one horizontal wire running say north to south and the second horizontal wire angled at 45 deg to run east and west ??? Michael The math is staggering. The concept of random wire includes the hard fact that at some freqs the antenna works broadside, at others it is end firing. Height above the ground also affects directionality quite a bit. If you really want something closer to omni, go with a sloper, rather than an "L". Dave, I have a sloping "L" is that any good. It works fine for me. Burr's Radio Shack - http://tinyurl.com/3wuscn Red Mountain, California / Bulacan, Philippines Of course. I have a J shaped 150' wire on a 70' X 100' rectangular lot. I can hear airplanes from 4,000 miles away. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What to do with WILDLY modified HW-7 | Equipment | |||
60m cap what radios have it or could beeasierly modified for it | General | |||
BC-348 modified for use as a BC-342 and BC-312. | Boatanchors | |||
modified DX-394 | Shortwave | |||
FS/FT Modified Radio Shack DX 398 | Swap |