![]() |
Radio Singapore International to end transmissions
David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message ... QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) here back in 1984, but indeed, get 'em whilst you can. Confirmations of reception for MW DXers, to this day, are called "veries" as in "verifications" and not QSLs, althogh QSL can be used and is understood. I started SWLing around 1961, got my first ham license in 1965, have been around this newsgroup since 1990, and this is the very first mention of such a term I have ever encountered. -- Britney Spears' Guide to Semiconductor Physics http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm |
Radio Singapore International to end transmissions
"clifto" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) here back in 1984, but indeed, get 'em whilst you can. Confirmations of reception for MW DXers, to this day, are called "veries" as in "verifications" and not QSLs, althogh QSL can be used and is understood. I started SWLing around 1961, got my first ham license in 1965, have been around this newsgroup since 1990, and this is the very first mention of such a term I have ever encountered. You may have missed the fact I was referring to MW, not SW DXing. I suggest you look at the National Radio Club or International Radio Club of America page. Verifications for US MW DXers have been called veries for more than half a century. MW DXers speak of their "verie count" and "verifications received" and use "QSL" to a much lesser extent... since few MW stations send QSL cards, and haven't since the 40's for the most part. In fact, into the 50's many, many stations verified with EKKO stamps, not QSL cards. |
Radio Singapore International to end transmissions
dxAce wrote:
Be on your way, pedant. Why don't you lead by example? mike -- Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage, this filter blocks all postings from Gmail, Google Mail and Google Groups. http://improve-usenet.org/ |
Radio Singapore International to end transmissions
m II wrote: dxAce wrote: Be on your way, pedant. Why don't you lead by example? Aw heck, I was gonna leave that honour to you, a dumbass Canuck. |
Radio Singapore International to end transmissions
David Frackelton Gleason, still ranting as 'Eduardo', wrote: "clifto" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) here back in 1984, but indeed, get 'em whilst you can. Confirmations of reception for MW DXers, to this day, are called "veries" as in "verifications" and not QSLs, althogh QSL can be used and is understood. I started SWLing around 1961, got my first ham license in 1965, have been around this newsgroup since 1990, and this is the very first mention of such a term I have ever encountered. You may have missed the fact I was referring to MW, not SW DXing. I suggest you look at the National Radio Club or International Radio Club of America page. Verifications for US MW DXers have been called veries for more than half a century. MW DXers speak of their "verie count" and "verifications received" and use "QSL" to a much lesser extent... since few MW stations send QSL cards, and haven't since the 40's for the most part. In fact, into the 50's many, many stations verified with EKKO stamps, not QSL cards. A QSL (verie, for those in Glendale) can also be a letter! Now be off and away, pedant. |
What's an EKKO Stamp ? - AM/MW Radio Reception Verification Reports
On Jun 15, 8:03*pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"clifto" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) here back in 1984, but indeed, get 'em whilst you can. Confirmations of reception for MW DXers, to this day, are called "veries" as in "verifications" and not QSLs, althogh QSL can be used and is understood. I started SWLing around 1961, got my first ham license in 1965, have been around this newsgroup since 1990, and this is the very first mention of such a term I have ever encountered. You may have missed the fact I was referring to MW, not SW DXing. - I suggest you look at the National Radio Club or - International Radio Club of America page. - Verifications for US MW DXers have been called veries - for more than half a century. - MW DXers speak of their "verie count" and "verifications received" - and use "QSL" to a much lesser extent... - since few MW stations send QSL cards, - and haven't since the 40's for the most part. - - In fact, into the 50's many, many stations verified - with EKKO stamps, not QSL cards. OK - What's an EKKO Stamp ? http://reviews.ebay.com/WHAT-apos-S-...00000000839026 Verified Reception Stamps -aka- EKKO Stamps -by- Mike [EI2CL] http://www.qsl.net/ei2cl/bcqslstamps/bcqsl2.htm Radio Station Letterheads, QSL Cards and the EKKO Stamp http://www.uv201.com/Misc_Pages/letterheads_6.htm More than EKKO Stamps -by- Jon Pearkins http://www.radiotribute.com/ekko/ Reception Stamps {AM/MW Radio Reception Report} About - EKKO and Bryant Reception Stamps http://www.560.com/reception_stamps.htm RESEARCHING EKKO AND OTHER VERIFICATION STAMPS http://www.mail-archive.com/hard-cor.../msg05635.html -by- Glen Hauser Radio Stamps {in General} -by- Bart Lee [xWPE2DLT] http://www.antiqueradios.com/chrs/journal/stamps.html http://archive.hard-core-dx.com/chan...83019811..html the sound of radio echo's in my ear ~ RHF |
What's an EKKO Stamp ? - AM/MW Radio Reception Verification Reports
RHF wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:03 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote: "clifto" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... QSL'd (veried, for those in Glendale) here back in 1984, but indeed, get 'em whilst you can. Confirmations of reception for MW DXers, to this day, are called "veries" as in "verifications" and not QSLs, althogh QSL can be used and is understood. I started SWLing around 1961, got my first ham license in 1965, have been around this newsgroup since 1990, and this is the very first mention of such a term I have ever encountered. You may have missed the fact I was referring to MW, not SW DXing. - I suggest you look at the National Radio Club or - International Radio Club of America page. - Verifications for US MW DXers have been called veries - for more than half a century. - MW DXers speak of their "verie count" and "verifications received" - and use "QSL" to a much lesser extent... - since few MW stations send QSL cards, - and haven't since the 40's for the most part. - - In fact, into the 50's many, many stations verified - with EKKO stamps, not QSL cards. OK - What's an EKKO Stamp ? http://reviews.ebay.com/WHAT-apos-S-...00000000839026 Verified Reception Stamps -aka- EKKO Stamps -by- Mike [EI2CL] http://www.qsl.net/ei2cl/bcqslstamps/bcqsl2.htm Radio Station Letterheads, QSL Cards and the EKKO Stamp http://www.uv201.com/Misc_Pages/letterheads_6.htm More than EKKO Stamps -by- Jon Pearkins http://www.radiotribute.com/ekko/ Reception Stamps {AM/MW Radio Reception Report} About - EKKO and Bryant Reception Stamps http://www.560.com/reception_stamps.htm RESEARCHING EKKO AND OTHER VERIFICATION STAMPS http://www.mail-archive.com/hard-cor.../msg05635.html -by- Glen Hauser Radio Stamps {in General} -by- Bart Lee [xWPE2DLT] http://www.antiqueradios.com/chrs/journal/stamps.html http://archive.hard-core-dx.com/chan...183019811.html the sound of radio echo's in my ear ~ RHF . Why not just record the station as proof you received it? |
What's an EKKO Stamp ? - AM/MW Radio Reception Verification Reports
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... Why not just record the station as proof you received it? EKKO stamps ended after The War, and until the 60's, recording was impractical. In fact, even in the 60's it was not a good idea... most tapes made in that era deteriorated rapidly. Most of my prized audio IDs did not make it into a more advanced media as the tape flaked... some nice ones like HCRE1 855 and CX28 were lost that way, although verified by letter or card. There were wire recorders. Very durable. You could also record on vinyl records. Have you checked the price of a wire recorder, in today's dollars? They cost more than a car did when they were available. And I don't recall any recorder that could record directly to vinyl. Radio nets and some major stations had disk recorders that recorded onto aluminum-center acetate disks, with very expensive heads that needed constant replacement . Acetates were also used to make the master for record pressing. |
What's an EKKO Stamp ? - AM/MW Radio Reception Verification Reports
Telamon wrote:
In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... Why not just record the station as proof you received it? EKKO stamps ended after The War, and until the 60's, recording was impractical. In fact, even in the 60's it was not a good idea... most tapes made in that era deteriorated rapidly. Most of my prized audio IDs did not make it into a more advanced media as the tape flaked... some nice ones like HCRE1 855 and CX28 were lost that way, although verified by letter or card. There were wire recorders. Very durable. You could also record on vinyl records. I have a pair of Webster wire recorders. One, I bought at a local junk shop and spent a year restoring. The other, I got from my grandfather. Along with a rack of wire spools. Some dating as far back as the Truman inauguration with some very cool recordings of shows like the Sealtest Variety Theatre, Yours Truly, Johnny Dollar, Have Gun Will Travel, and the Stan Freberg Show. I still find spools of wire at antique shows, flea markets and junk shops. Always a bit of an adventure to hear the audio. Print-through is less of an issue, and the wire definitely doesn't slough off magnetic material. But they are susceptible to elevated noise from stray magnetic fields. So, storage environment is as important as it is with tape. I've also got a couple of disc recorders. And an armload of home-made records. As well as some made in drug store recording kiosks. They're not quite as archivally stable as they may seem. Many are not vinyl, but acetate on an aluminum substrate. The acetate breaks down, becomes brittle, often lifts from the substrate, or shrinks. And the low quality vinyl used also tends to be less stable over time than that used more recently. I've spent a lot of hours recovering audio from wire and disc recordings, for friends and colleagues. Sometimes, all you get is one pass before there is too much damage to continue with the discs. And magnetically contaminated wire will often develop a whining noise mixed with the audio as it passes through the head. So a very great deal of care is required when handling these recordings. By far, the wire recordings are a lot easier to handle without damage. Both may be more durable than tape, but they're not for casual listening after long spans of time. One careless pass, and the recording may be irretrievably lost. |
What's an EKKO Stamp ? - AM/MW Radio Reception Verification Reports
David Eduardo wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "dave" wrote in message ... Why not just record the station as proof you received it? EKKO stamps ended after The War, and until the 60's, recording was impractical. In fact, even in the 60's it was not a good idea... most tapes made in that era deteriorated rapidly. Most of my prized audio IDs did not make it into a more advanced media as the tape flaked... some nice ones like HCRE1 855 and CX28 were lost that way, although verified by letter or card. There were wire recorders. Very durable. You could also record on vinyl records. Have you checked the price of a wire recorder, in today's dollars? They cost more than a car did when they were available. Oh, you're so full of ****, you're scary. You can pick up an Armour type wire recorder in pristine condition at a high end antique shop for less than $300. I paid less than $50 for my last Webster, and recently passed on a Silvertone AM/Phono/Wire recorder combo at a brick and mortar antique shop for less than $200. You can even get scammed on eBay for one for less than $300. Geez, get a ****ing grip, Pancho. And I don't recall any recorder that could record directly to vinyl. Radio nets and some major stations had disk recorders that recorded onto aluminum-center acetate disks, with very expensive heads that needed constant replacement . Acetates were also used to make the master for record pressing. Home recorders recorded to an acetate, sometimes vinyl (higher end blanks which were available later) coating on an aluminum substrate. Those were also not expensive. If you don't recall one, your experience is lacking. Oooh...hold on, let me soak that up. As for expense...again, not VERY expensive. I have one by Meissner that was less than $130 new. And we had a pair of professional machines at WEW. The heads didnt' wear out. Though they did fail if abused. The recording styli, however, were regularly replaced. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com