Telamon wrote:
In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

Dave wrote:

Why no official denial?
D Peter Maus wrote:

For the same reasons there's never an official denial.
And that reason would be??? Please, do tell the rest of the story.

We're still waiting to hear the official government explanation of why
Guckert/Gannon (the male prostitute) had free reign at the White House.

As usual Billy you are clueless.

Maybe yes, maybe no...but as usual, *you* are -again- dodging, dancing,
spinning and refusing to answer a simple, direct, point-blank question
about -your- statement.

Why do you refuse to defend/explain it?