RHF wrote:

Finally, for about the hundredth time, you mis-use "to" and "too". If
you could only grasp that basic concept, it -might- increase the
credibility of your apparent weak intellect.

It may be two much too ask.


? It may be two much too ask. ?

Not you to!



mike also

--
__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __
/ /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /\ / /
/ /\ \/ /\ \/This space for rent/\ \/ /\ \/ /
/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/ \/_/

Densa International©
'Think tanks cleaned cheap'

Due to the insane amount of spam and garbage,
I block all postings with a Gmail, Google Mail,
Google Groups or HOTMAIL address.
I also filter everything from a .cn server.

http://improve-usenet.org/

On Aug 14, 9:10*am, m II wrote:
RHF wrote:
Finally, for about the hundredth time, you mis-use "to" and "too". If
you could only grasp that basic concept, it -might- increase the
credibility of your apparent weak intellect.

- - - It may be two much too ask.
- - ? It may be two much too ask. ?
-
- Not you to!
-
- mike also

Twice is nice . . . and not too Too TOO Redundant !

Heard of Buffalo.Now, that's better!
cuhulin

Pravda has an article about that.Article is titled, Mr.Bush, Enough!!
http://english.pravda.ru
cuhulin