In article ,
Billy Burpelson wrote:

In article , Billy Burpelson
wrote:

Billy Burpelson wrote:

President Bush gave a small speech from Beijing chastising
Russia for invading Georgia. Bush's main point why Russia
shouldn't have invaded was that "Georgia is a sovereign
nation".

Like Iraq was a sovereign nation, Mr. Bush?

LOL at his hypocrisy... :-)
Telamon wrote:

And LOL at your stupidity.

I'm "stupid" for observing and noting that W is chastising Putin for
doing -exactly- the same thing W did?

Yes, because they are not "the same thing".

Fair enough, enjoy the laugh...

...but I'm just a private citizen that didn't start a bogus
trillion dollar, thousands of lives war by invading a sovereign
nation. Too bad you totally dodged, avoided and missed the main
point of the post, namely his hypocrisy.

Telamon wrote:

I don't think it is funny. Comparing the two actions is a non
sequitur. You are way to clueless to evaluate the situation.

What's to evaluate? It was very clear when W chastised Putin for
invading a "sovereign nation", exactly the same thing W did. Not
complicated, not much "evaluation" needed.

Exactly my point, you have no ability to evaluate, the situations are
not the same.

This is a good example of the liberal mindset that is Obama so go
vote for that fool.

Huh? The discussion was about the hypocrisy of the sitting president. W
accused Putin of invading a sovereign nation (Georgia). W himself
invaded a sovereign nation (Iraq). Hypocritical. Simple concept. How did
you change the subject around to be "voting for Obama"?

What? Instead of bitching I gave him an action to take. Is that so hard
to figure out. Idiot.

You are way to clueless to evaluate the situation.

Finally, for about the hundredth time, you mis-use "to" and "too". If
you could only grasp that basic concept, it -might- increase the
credibility of your apparent weak intellect.

Finally, for about the hundredth time, you have proven that you are
clueless on just about any subject.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California