RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   SPECIAL: USA founded by liberals (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/136259-special-usa-founded-liberals.html)

Brian Hill[_2_] September 1st 08 10:24 PM

SPECIAL: USA founded by liberals
 

"Dave" wrote in message
m...
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 09:31:59 -0500, Brian Hill wrote:


The liberal politician of today and the liberal politician of yesterday
have little in common in regards to those that hold power within that
political party today. To compare the likes of Tomas J, John Adams and
Ben F etc.. to today's party leaders is a severe insult to all our
founding fathers and a joke. And F--K! the republican politicians too!

BH

I'm pretty sure we agree. The Congress is a Parliament of Whores, like
O'Rourke said. With a few exceptions like Kucinich and Feingold and
Paul; and old Bernie Sanders; they are all traitors. They have sold out
completely to fascism.


So why position yourself as a modern Liberal?

BH



Dave[_17_] September 1st 08 10:46 PM

(OT) : Today's "Liberal" Democrats are NOT the Party of FDR andJFK.
 
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:05:18 -0700, RHF wrote:


Even the 'liberal' JFK would not be a "Liberal" Democrat by today's
standards.

Today's "Liberal" Democrats are 'not' the Party of FDR and JFK.


Name 2 Liberal Democrats.


Dave[_17_] September 1st 08 10:47 PM

SPECIAL: USA founded by liberals
 
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:24:32 -0500, Brian Hill wrote:



So why position yourself as a modern Liberal?

BH


I do not. I am a libertarian anarchist.

Dave[_17_] September 2nd 08 12:13 AM

SPECIAL: USA founded by liberals
 
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:50:57 -0700, RHF wrote:

On Sep 1, 2:47Â*pm, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:24:32 -0500, Brian Hill wrote:


- - So why position yourself as a modern Liberal? - -
- - BH

- I do not.
-Â*I am a libertarian anarchist.

Translation : Confused


Not at all. I'm pretty well focused. You are the one who's confused.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism
.



Dave[_17_] September 2nd 08 12:15 AM

(OT) : Dave -asks- Name 2 Liberal Democrats . . .
 
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:59:54 -0700, RHF wrote:

On Sep 1, 2:46Â*pm, Dave wrote:
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:05:18 -0700, RHF wrote:


- - Even the 'liberal' JFK would not be a "Liberal" Democrat - - by
today's standards.
- -
- - Today's "Liberal" Democrats are 'not' the Party of FDR and JFK.

- Name 2 Liberal Democrats.

Barack Hussein Obama II [2nd] : He is a "2"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obama

Joseph Robinette "Joe" Biden, Jr. [2nd] : He is a "2" too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Biden

. . . while John "Smiley" McCain III : He is a "3"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCain
.


Wrong. Russell Feingold is a liberal democrat. Barack Obama is not.

Brian Hill[_2_] September 2nd 08 12:21 AM

SPECIAL: USA founded by liberals
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:51:58 -0500, Brian Hill wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 01 Sep 2008 16:24:32 -0500, Brian Hill wrote:



So why position yourself as a modern Liberal?

BH

I do not. I am a libertarian anarchist.


Oh! ok. Sorry


BH



I'm also a pragmatist.



Most people try to be.

BH



[email protected] September 2nd 08 08:41 PM

(OT) : Dave -asks- Name 2 Liberal Democrats . . .
 
On Sep 1, 6:15*pm, Dave wrote: *.

Russell Feingold is a liberal democrat. *Barack Obama is not. *- Hide quoted text -


Feingold is a pure Liberal Fascist Socialist - period!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com