Obama's record at Harvard was no more authentic than John Kerry's
record in Vietnam.

On the surface, at least, Barack Obama's single most impressive
accomplishment has been his 1990 election to the presidency of the
Harvard Law Review.

Khalid al-Mansour, principle adviser to Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin
Talal, lobbied friends like Manhattan Borough President Percy Sutton
to intervene at Harvard on Obama's behalf. An orthodox Muslim, al-
Mansour has not met the crackpot anti-Semitic theory he could not
embrace.

These are not connections that Obama would like to see broadcast,
which further explains his shyness about the Harvard experience.

There is more. Obama did not make the Harvard Law Review (HLR) the old-
fashioned way, the way HLR's first black editor, Charles Houston, did
70 years prior.

Unlike most editors, and likely all its presidents, Obama was not a
writer. During his tenure at Harvard, he wrote only one heavily
edited, unsigned note.

"Obama cast himself as an eager listener," the New York Times
reported, "sometimes giving warring classmates the impression that he
agreed with all of them at once."

In February 1990, after an ideologically charged all-day affair,
Obama's fellow editors elected him president from among 19 candidates.
As it happened, Obama prevailed only after the HLR's small
conservative faction threw him its support.

Curiously, once elected, Obama contributed not one signed word to the
HLR or any other law journal. As Matthew Franck has pointed out in
National Review Online, "A search of the HeinOnline database of law
journals turns up exactly nothing credited to Obama in any law review
anywhere at any time."

http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?f...w&pageId=74877