wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin

Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.

I don't have anything to do with Glen Beck.Or Paul Gallo either.
www.supertalkms.com
One time a few years ago I phoned Paul Gallo on his politics radio talk
show.He told me to Go to Hell! then he slammed his phone down and hung
up, crazy little bandy legged Italian rooster!

More Gay Sex Allegations Involving Obama. www.rense.com
cuhulin

B HO is getting his/her gay ass busted while he is in Hawaii.
cuhulin

"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin

Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time
for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they
were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine,
with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much
specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal
action by the Commission.

Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal time
for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if they
were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original doctrine,
with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty much
specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal
action by the Commission.


As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and
extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson!

dxAce wrote:



But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

The stations are granted a license to use the public airwaves and must
serve the public in return. I'd support a return to the days when every
station did news and every station had meaningful public service
programming.

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
..
.
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to
pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and
extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson!

Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the time.
Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these left
leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these I recall
was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward.

Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...9/BAG212JO5B.D
TL

Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being behind
bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing.
http://www.blowmeuptom.com/

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Oct 22, 6:52*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,





*dxAce wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
..
.
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.

Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to
pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and
extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson!

Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the time.
Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these left
leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these I recall
was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward.

Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../BAG212JO5B..D
TL

Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being behind
bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing.
http://www.blowmeuptom.com/

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, Leykis is despicable because - Why? He talks about things that
make you blush?

You just want an excuse to bad-mouth him because he's middle-liberal,
and to you and other ideologues that's a dirty word.

Bruce