"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and
extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson!

dxAce wrote:



But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

The stations are granted a license to use the public airwaves and must
serve the public in return. I'd support a return to the days when every
station did news and every station had meaningful public service
programming.

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
..
.
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.


Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to
pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and
extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson!

Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the time.
Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these left
leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these I recall
was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward.

Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...9/BAG212JO5B.D
TL

Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being behind
bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing.
http://www.blowmeuptom.com/

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Oct 22, 6:52*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,





*dxAce wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
..
.
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.

Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.
Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has been so from the
beginning many decades ago) existed coincident with the original
doctrine, with almost no legal issues. A station or network had to
pretty
much specifically be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any
legal action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer for opposing
view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery and
extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson!

Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the time.
Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these left
leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these I recall
was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward.

Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../BAG212JO5B..D
TL

Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being behind
bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing.
http://www.blowmeuptom.com/

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

So, Leykis is despicable because - Why? He talks about things that
make you blush?

You just want an excuse to bad-mouth him because he's middle-liberal,
and to you and other ideologues that's a dirty word.

Bruce

In article
,
bpnjensen wrote:

On Oct 22, 6:52*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,





*dxAce wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message

m..
.
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the
sky with viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.

Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only
require equal time for the other side. Fox News should not
have a problem with that if they were to actually be true to
their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election
season. Conservative talk radio (really almost all of it has
been so from the beginning many decades ago) existed
coincident with the original doctrine, with almost no legal
issues. A station or network had to pretty much specifically
be 'in the tank' for a given candidate to elicit any legal
action by the Commission.
As I recall, all it took to be compliant was an open offer
for opposing view points.

I believe that was precisely the situation, yes.

But the thing is, it's just a hassle for the stations...

And, the Liberal/Democrat/Marxists are big into hassling, bribery
and extortion... just ask Jesse Jackson!

Talk radio on AM and FM once upon a time was all Liberal all the
time. Not only did I not care for that point of view many of these
left leaning hosts were disgusting, despicable people. Two of these
I recall was Tom Leykis and another was Bernie Ward.

Bernie finally got a jail sentence for child porn.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl.../08/29/BAG212J
O5B.D TL

Leykis is still free but one day I expect to read about him being
behind bars for getting caught doing some disgusting thing.
http://www.blowmeuptom.com/


So, Leykis is despicable because - Why? He talks about things that
make you blush?

You just want an excuse to bad-mouth him because he's middle-liberal,
and to you and other ideologues that's a dirty word.

No I bad mouth him for the reason I stated. The speaks about and
advocates immoral behavior. He clearly abuses his position as a public
speaker.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Oct 23, 5:50*pm, Telamon
wrote:

No I bad mouth him for the reason I stated. The speaks about and
advocates immoral behavior. He clearly abuses his position as a public
speaker.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California- Hide quoted text -

I feel the same way about Rush Limbaugh ;-)

I think we need to recognize that your statement is an opinion and not
a fact. In any case, factually, what he advocates is not illegal.
Like most people on the radio, his goal is to fill a nitch and
entertain, which of course leads to earning a living. Like Limbaugh.

Bruce

In article
,
bpnjensen wrote:

On Oct 23, 5:50*pm, Telamon
wrote:

No I bad mouth him for the reason I stated. The speaks about and
advocates immoral behavior. He clearly abuses his position as a public
speaker.

I feel the same way about Rush Limbaugh ;-)

I'm not joking and this is not political. I listen to Rush once in a
great while and also his web site is devoid of socially immoral material
unlike Leykis. Just checkout the front page.

http://www.blowmeuptom.com/

I think we need to recognize that your statement is an opinion and not
a fact. In any case, factually, what he advocates is not illegal.
Like most people on the radio, his goal is to fill a nitch and
entertain, which of course leads to earning a living. Like Limbaugh.

Well, it's not your opinion now is it? But you can look at this
objectively as Leykis's web site is replete with this material.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Oct 23, 7:38*am, bpnjensen wrote:
On Oct 22, 6:52*pm, Telamon



wrote:
In article ,

*dxAce wrote:
Brenda Ann wrote:

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann wrote:
"MNMikeW" wrote in message
...
wrote in message
..
.
On Oct 16, 6:04 pm, wrote:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=242205
cuhulin
Between Beck and O'Reilly Fox will blow everyone out of the sky with
viewership ratings - they're an AWESOME pair!

Until the Dopeocrats fix it with the fairness doctrine.

Fairness doctrine would not take anyone off the air, only require equal
time for the other side. Fox News should not have a problem with that if
they were to actually be true to their slogan "Fair and Balanced".

Aside from that, the doctrine only applies during election season.

RHF wrote:


BpnJ - Acutally "libEral" is really two dirty words
"Libe" and "Eral" sharing a common vowel "E" ;-} ~ RHF
.

The USA was founded by radical liberals, er, liberal radicals, er freaks.