RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   New DRM Scheme (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/137868-new-drm-scheme.html)

Billy Burpelson[_2_] October 23rd 08 01:10 AM

New DRM Scheme
 
From a news item at www.arrl.org:

On Monday, October 20, the ARRL filed a Petition for Modification or
Cancellation of Experimental Authorization (Petition) with the FCC
with respect to WE2XRH. According to the FCC, this experimental
license -- issued to Digital Aurora Radio Technologies (DART) --
proposes to "test digital transmissions in 4.50-5.10 MHz, 7.10-7.60
MHz and 9.25-9.95 MHz for a terrestrial digital radio service to the
citizens of Alaska."

According to the web search of DART, this is a DRM operational test for
two years with 100kW transmitter output and 660 kW ERP.

Has the FCC lost their senses again? Or did they get a big kick back?
How could they possibly issue an experimental license for this disaster
waiting to happen. Doesn't the FCC have any engineers there anymore? I
guess they don't care about WWV at 5 MHz or the rest of the spectrum
they will destroy..

Read the entire story at arrl.org

elaich October 23rd 08 05:27 AM

New DRM Scheme
 
Billy Burpelson wrote in news:diPLk.5674$be.500
@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com:

Has the FCC lost their senses again? Or did they get a big kick back?
How could they possibly issue an experimental license for this disaster
waiting to happen. Doesn't the FCC have any engineers there anymore? I
guess they don't care about WWV at 5 MHz or the rest of the spectrum
they will destroy..


Or the 31 and 60 meter shortwave bands. The ARRL is only interested in the
damage to 40 meters.

100 kw?

The FCC is nothing these days but a bunch of Bush appointed airheads who
care only about trying to auction off as much bandwidth as possible.

Dave[_18_] October 23rd 08 02:37 PM

New DRM Scheme
 
Billy Burpelson wrote:
From a news item at www.arrl.org:

On Monday, October 20, the ARRL filed a Petition for Modification or
Cancellation of Experimental Authorization (Petition) with the FCC
with respect to WE2XRH. According to the FCC, this experimental
license -- issued to Digital Aurora Radio Technologies (DART) --
proposes to "test digital transmissions in 4.50-5.10 MHz, 7.10-7.60
MHz and 9.25-9.95 MHz for a terrestrial digital radio service to the
citizens of Alaska."

According to the web search of DART, this is a DRM operational test for
two years with 100kW transmitter output and 660 kW ERP.

Has the FCC lost their senses again? Or did they get a big kick back?
How could they possibly issue an experimental license for this disaster
waiting to happen. Doesn't the FCC have any engineers there anymore? I
guess they don't care about WWV at 5 MHz or the rest of the spectrum
they will destroy..

Read the entire story at arrl.org


This is a DOD project. Good luck at the FCC.

BoobleStubble October 23rd 08 07:08 PM

New DRM Scheme
 
On Oct 23, 9:37�am, Dave wrote:
Billy Burpelson wrote:
�From a news item atwww.arrl.org:


On Monday, October 20, the ARRL filed a Petition for Modification or
Cancellation of Experimental Authorization (Petition) with the FCC
with respect to WE2XRH. According to the FCC, this experimental
license -- issued to Digital Aurora Radio Technologies (DART) --
proposes to "test digital transmissions in 4.50-5.10 MHz, 7.10-7.60
MHz and 9.25-9.95 MHz for a terrestrial digital radio service to the
citizens of Alaska."


According to the web search of DART, this is a DRM operational test for
two years with 100kW transmitter output and 660 kW ERP.


Has the FCC lost their senses again? Or did they get a big kick back?
How could they possibly issue an experimental license for this disaster
waiting to happen. Doesn't the FCC have any engineers there anymore? I
guess they don't care about WWV at 5 MHz or the rest of the spectrum
they will destroy..


Read the entire story at arrl.org


This is a DOD project. �Good luck at the FCC.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


"Why don't you use DRM on Shortwave?"

"Some large companies are pushing DRM by convincing program producers
and broadcasters to start airing in DRM ahead of time, but unless
there is mass availability and penetration of receivers on the
listeners side, this will remain - unfortunately - a technological
experiment, and broadcasters using it to reach their listeners now,
are clearly throwing their money out of the window."

http://www.egradio.org/index.php?name=FAQ&id_cat=7

LOL! Hopefully, Obama will get rid of the criminal FCC commissioners.

RHF October 25th 08 09:29 PM

(OT) : Total Flake UP Retard Kook Fool Mentally Unstable Banned EjectedImpotent Buffoon Rant - Salami Salami Baloney !
 
wrote:
.

(OT) : Total Flake UP Retard Kook Fool Mentally Unstable Banned Ejected
Impotent Buffoon Rant - Salami Salami Baloney !

OK little fake phony "rhf.roy" using my Screen ID from
'gmail.com' -- What with your Subject-Line Rant ?

I see that you are still using the
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.154.10.254/246/etc
GREAT PLAINS COMMUNICATIONS INC
GREAT-PL822-0 (NET-12-154-0-0-1)
12.154.0.0 - 12.154.15.255
GPCom -
http://www.gpcom.com/
Location : Blair, Nebraska 68008

It would 'appear that you and AWS (asswideshut)
at '138.mail.com' have a lot in common with the
other recent Screen ID Pirates posting here.


oh spineless-one - salami salami baloney ~ RHF
..


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com