On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:33:51 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

http://TheRealBarackObama.wordpress.com

A Federal Communications Commission investigation of on-air military
analysts is providing a glimpse of what Democrats and an Obama
administration will do to critics once they capture Washington.


Let's not spend $78M investigating a true crime like the president
getting a blowjjob when there are hundreds of thousands being killed by
the current administration. Opps! We already did!

In article ,
Bernard Peters wrote:

On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:33:51 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

http://TheRealBarackObama.wordpress.com

A Federal Communications Commission investigation of on-air military
analysts is providing a glimpse of what Democrats and an Obama
administration will do to critics once they capture Washington.


Let's not spend $78M investigating a true crime like the president
getting a blowjjob when there are hundreds of thousands being killed by
the current administration. Opps! We already did!

You expect O-bla-ma to out do Clinton in that regard? Maybe Michelle
should screen all the interns and just pick the ugly ones.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

"Bernard Peters" wrote in message
...
Let's not spend $78M investigating a true crime like the president
getting a blowjjob

That wasn't the crime. The crime was lying about it under oath - you know,
perjury. An actual, impeachable offense.

The same offense, BTW, that everyone claims Bush did: "Bush Lied".
Unfortunately, a politician lying isn't against the law. Unless he does it
under oath, like Clinton did.

when there are hundreds of thousands being killed by
the current administration.

Where is the current administration killing "hundreds of thousands"?

Opps! We already did!

What is "Opps"?

Bob Campbell wrote:

The same offense, BTW, that everyone claims Bush did: "Bush Lied".
Unfortunately, a politician lying isn't against the law. Unless he
does it under oath, like Clinton did.

So, you'll swallow all the lies that Bush and Cheney have fed to you, as
long as they're not 'under oath'?