What will happen on SW after the election
 

On Nov 2, 5:07*pm, wrote:
On Nov 2, 6:49*pm, harvey wrote:



On Nov 2, 6:04*pm, Telamon
wrote:

I wonder if I will hear another Alex Jones meltdown after the election
with a marxist terrorist for president. I swear he sounded this close to
an on the air heart attack one time I was listening to him.

I predict all RHC announcers will be in a state of euphoria.

So what do other people predict will happen on SW with an Obama win?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Obama is the Democratic Candidate for President

Check out this video

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GtREqAmLso

ObaMa0's Thugocracy

http://youtube.com/watch?v=nZttIYfPn...?v=BTS82eSj1Po

Nonesense.
Baseless slander.
Moron.

What will happen on SW after the election
 

On Nov 2, 3:04*pm, Telamon
wrote:
I wonder if I will hear another Alex Jones meltdown after the election
with a marxist terrorist for president. I swear he sounded this close to
an on the air heart attack one time I was listening to him.

I predict all RHC announcers will be in a state of euphoria.

So what do other people predict will happen on SW with an Obama win?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

The country will be much better off getting rid of the rotten crook
Republicans, and as the economy and foreign policy is returned to
adult auspices for the first time in eight years, prosperity will
gradually return to America.

What will happen on SW after the election
 

On Nov 3, 12:10*pm, Mike wrote:
On Nov 3, 12:09*pm, RHF wrote:



Those are not BHO's 'own' Words; but the
words of his 'ghost' Writer Bill Ayers

More nonsense. Obama's book was written in 1994 (published in early
1995). He first met Ayers in the second half of 1995. You should
research before spewing your nonsense, Roy....

I like my fiction better than Obama's facts.

What will happen on SW after the election
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

1 (one) vote may not count for all that much out of millions of votes, but
what if
all of the people who think that their 1 (one) vote doesn't count don't
vote?

Elections can, and are, lost because of all the individuals who think that
their 1
(one) vote doesn't count.

If only the "popular vote" was counted, then every vote would count. But
the way everyone's vote is compartmentalized into states (the "electoral
college" scam), all it takes is one person voting in each state to determine
the winner.

Example: You want to vote for candidate Tweedle Dee, but you say **** it I
don't feel like voting. Your state goes for Tweedle Dee, but candidate
Tweedle Dum wins the election.

Explain to me again how "every vote counts". Your vote would have made
absolutely no difference at all, because of the "electoral college"
bull****. If popular votes counted, then your vote COULD have made a
difference.

The fact that it is possible get the most actual votes, yet lose the
election is proof that the "electoral college" bull**** is an absurd way to
elect a national leader. The person with the most votes should win, not
based on where those votes came from.

What will happen on SW after the election
 

What will happen on SW after the election
 

Bob Campbell wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

1 (one) vote may not count for all that much out of millions of votes, but
what if
all of the people who think that their 1 (one) vote doesn't count don't
vote?

Elections can, and are, lost because of all the individuals who think that
their 1
(one) vote doesn't count.

If only the "popular vote" was counted, then every vote would count. But
the way everyone's vote is compartmentalized into states (the "electoral
college" scam), all it takes is one person voting in each state to determine
the winner.

Example: You want to vote for candidate Tweedle Dee, but you say **** it I
don't feel like voting. Your state goes for Tweedle Dee, but candidate
Tweedle Dum wins the election.

Explain to me again how "every vote counts". Your vote would have made
absolutely no difference at all, because of the "electoral college"
bull****. If popular votes counted, then your vote COULD have made a
difference.

The fact that it is possible get the most actual votes, yet lose the
election is proof that the "electoral college" bull**** is an absurd way to
elect a national leader. The person with the most votes should win, not
based on where those votes came from.

But then the power would all be concentrated in the states with major population
centres.

You Liberal/Democrat/Marxists need to stop whining.

What will happen on SW after the election
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
But then the power would all be concentrated in the states with major
population
centres.

Why? They already have the most "electoral college" votes anyway. What
would change?

I'll tell you what would change. EVERY VOTE WOULD COUNT! That's why it
won't happen, and national politics will continue to concentrate on "the
states with major population centres".

You Liberal/Democrat/Marxists need to stop whining.

I'm neither Liberal/Democrat/Marxist nor whining. The last time I voted
was in 88, and I voted for Bush. But hey, nice attempt to label me just
because you disagree with my point.

What will happen on SW after the election
 

Bob Campbell wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
But then the power would all be concentrated in the states with major
population
centres.

Why? They already have the most "electoral college" votes anyway. What
would change?

Can't figure it out, can you, Bob?



I'll tell you what would change. EVERY VOTE WOULD COUNT!

Every vote does count, Bob, it's just that you don't quite get it.

That's why it
won't happen, and national politics will continue to concentrate on "the
states with major population centres".

You Liberal/Democrat/Marxists need to stop whining.

I'm neither Liberal/Democrat/Marxist nor whining. The last time I voted
was in 88, and I voted for Bush. But hey, nice attempt to label me just
because you disagree with my point.

OK, but you are a whiner.

What will happen on SW after the election
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Bob Campbell wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
But then the power would all be concentrated in the states with major
population
centres.

Why? They already have the most "electoral college" votes anyway.
What
would change?

Can't figure it out, can you, Bob?

Obviously you can't, since you have no answer.

It's OK, I didn't really expect one from you, the known kook of rrs.

I can't wait, can you just call me "tard boy" now and get it over with?
Meanwhile I'll PLONK you and get THAT over with.

Bye

What will happen on SW after the election
 

Bob Campbell wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Bob Campbell wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...
But then the power would all be concentrated in the states with major
population
centres.

Why? They already have the most "electoral college" votes anyway.
What
would change?

Can't figure it out, can you, Bob?

Obviously you can't, since you have no answer.

It's OK, I didn't really expect one from you, the known kook of rrs.

I can't wait, can you just call me "tard boy" now and get it over with?
Meanwhile I'll PLONK you and get THAT over with.

Thanks, Bob.