RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   For those of you that are interested in Journalism (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/138419-those-you-interested-journalism.html)

Telamon November 8th 08 10:11 PM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan,
non ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Bernard Peters[_2_] November 9th 08 12:30 AM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan, non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307


Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck. Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of fairness.

Telamon November 9th 08 08:10 PM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
In article ,
Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan, non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307


Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck. Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of fairness.


McCain ran the worst campaign in history negative or not. McCain was
unelectable from the beginning and demonstrated it with a horrible
decisions throughout the campaign. The Dem's could have put up Ronald
McDonald and still won.

Now we will have a marxist turn us into hamburger.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon November 9th 08 08:15 PM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article , e says...
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan, non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307


Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck. Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of fairness.



Telamundo is still trying to accept the fact that Obama won, so you have
to cut him some slack. He's still hanging on to the Obama was born in
Kenya kookery. That alone shows how desperately pitiful he is.


You won't take your meds. It will be all better when you take them.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

RHF November 9th 08 09:17 PM

(OT) : For those of you that are Interested in Journalism
 
On Nov 9, 4:23*am, Dave wrote:
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:
"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan, non
ideological and non political."


Go here to check out the media election coverage.


It's an interesting read.


http://www.journalism.org/node/13307


I think they have Infotainment confused with real news, which doesn't
exist in the deregulated electronic media. *This is another result of the
Reagan Revolution. *Just like the financial system, our information
systems have imploded. *The media is just another tool of the rich to
keep the Great Unwashed in a vulnerable state.

Obama gets better ratings, Obama gets better coverage.


MWB,

Please note that this is another (OT) : Message
Thread : That I Did NOT Post and Contribute To:

dang - oops - i just did ~ RHF

BDK[_5_] November 10th 08 06:11 AM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
In article telamon_spamshield-FE8183.12105209112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan, non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307


Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck. Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of fairness.


McCain ran the worst campaign in history negative or not. McCain was
unelectable from the beginning and demonstrated it with a horrible
decisions throughout the campaign. The Dem's could have put up Ronald
McDonald and still won.

Now we will have a marxist turn us into hamburger.




Only problem is he isn't a marxist. Any more than you're sane.
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

BDK[_5_] November 10th 08 06:11 AM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
In article telamon_spamshield-1A9108.12150509112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
e says...
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan, non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307

Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck. Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of fairness.



Telamundo is still trying to accept the fact that Obama won, so you have
to cut him some slack. He's still hanging on to the Obama was born in
Kenya kookery. That alone shows how desperately pitiful he is.


You won't take your meds. It will be all better when you take them.



Poor kooktard, it's you who went off your meds.


--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

Telamon November 10th 08 07:52 AM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-1A9108.12150509112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
e says...
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan,
non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307

Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck.
Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press
coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of
fairness.



Telamundo is still trying to accept the fact that Obama won, so you have
to cut him some slack. He's still hanging on to the Obama was born in
Kenya kookery. That alone shows how desperately pitiful he is.


You won't take your meds. It will be all better when you take them.



Poor kooktard, it's you who went off your meds.


You are freaking weird and unstable judging by your posts. You posts
reflect that and you appear to need medication. I suggest you keep your
weapons locked up as you lack judgment.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon November 10th 08 07:58 AM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-FE8183.12105209112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
Bernard Peters wrote:

On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan, non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307

Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck. Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of fairness.


McCain ran the worst campaign in history negative or not. McCain was
unelectable from the beginning and demonstrated it with a horrible
decisions throughout the campaign. The Dem's could have put up Ronald
McDonald and still won.

Now we will have a marxist turn us into hamburger.




Only problem is he isn't a marxist. Any more than you're sane.


No the only problem here is your ignorance on the subject. Well actually
you have another problem and that is your refusal for whatever reason to
get educated on a subject you know nothing about although you take the
time to write numerous BS posts. This make you a Trolling moron at best
and a Kookaburra at the worst.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

BDK[_5_] November 10th 08 08:50 AM

For those of you that are interested in Journalism
 
In article telamon_spamshield-78F87F.23523309112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-1A9108.12150509112008
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
e says...
On Sat, 08 Nov 2008 14:11:57 -0800, Telamon wrote:

"The Pew Research Center's Project for Excellence in Journalism is a
research organization that specializes in using empirical methods to
evaluate and study the performance of the press. It is non partisan,
non
ideological and non political."

Go here to check out the media election coverage.

It's an interesting read.

http://www.journalism.org/node/13307

Duh!

McCan't got blow-back from running his negative campaign. He had no
issues and could only throw **** on the wall and leverage what stuck.
Of
course, this gets reported as "negative".

If he had positive issues, he would have had more positive press
coverage.

Media Bias would have been to sugar coat the turd in the name of
fairness.



Telamundo is still trying to accept the fact that Obama won, so you have
to cut him some slack. He's still hanging on to the Obama was born in
Kenya kookery. That alone shows how desperately pitiful he is.

You won't take your meds. It will be all better when you take them.



Poor kooktard, it's you who went off your meds.


You are freaking weird and unstable judging by your posts. You posts
reflect that and you appear to need medication. I suggest you keep your
weapons locked up as you lack judgment.




My irony meters just exploded!!
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com