|
(OT) : Warning Black Friday Approaches -was- SPECIAL: Buy Nothing Day
On Nov 27, 12:01*pm, Dave wrote:
http://www.adbusters.gro/campaigns/bnd Dave - President-Elect Barack Hussein Obama appreciates your efforts to send the US Consumer Economy into the tank. * 30 US States are in Recession. http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-11-04-voa39.cfm buy american -if- you can find it ~ RHF |
(OT) : Warning Black Friday Approaches -was- SPECIAL: Buy NothingDay
RHF wrote:
On Nov 27, 12:01 pm, Dave wrote: http://www.adbusters.gro/campaigns/bnd Dave - President-Elect Barack Hussein Obama appreciates your efforts to send the US Consumer Economy into the tank. * 30 US States are in Recession. http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-11-04-voa39.cfm buy american -if- you can find it ~ RHF . Warning Black Friday [BF] Approaches . . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Friday_(shopping) BF -Info- http://www.blackfriday.info/ BF -adz- http://bfads.net/ . I fail to see how putting more crap on credit cards helps the economy in the long term. The sooner you realize that you are screwed, the sooner you will take steps to mitigate said screwedness. |
(OT) : Warning Black Friday Approaches -was- SPECIAL: Buy NothingDay
On Nov 28, 6:56*am, Dave wrote:
RHF wrote: On Nov 27, 12:01 pm, Dave wrote: http://www.adbusters.gro/campaigns/bnd Dave - President-Elect Barack Hussein Obama appreciates your efforts to send the US Consumer Economy into the tank. * 30 US States are in Recession. http://www.voanews.com/english/2008-11-04-voa39.cfm buy american -if- you can find it ~ RHF *. Warning Black Friday [BF] Approaches . . . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Friday_(shopping) BF -Info-http://www.blackfriday.info/ BF -adz-http://bfads.net/ *. I fail to see how putting more crap on credit cards helps the economy in the long term. *The sooner you realize that you are screwed, the sooner you will take steps to mitigate said screwedness. Prices are cheap compared to what they will be after ObaMao's socialist welfare state bankrupts the U.S. and the dollar goes the way of the československá Koruna. Better you buy what you want now! "As the Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, an economist, anti-totalitarian and climate change sceptic, prepares to take up the rotating presidency of the European Union next year, climate alarmists are doing their best to traduce him. "The New York Times opened a profile of Klaus, 67, this week with a quote from a 1980s communist secret agent's report, claiming he behaves like a "rejected genius", and asserts there is "palpable fear" he will "embarrass" the EU. .... http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/m...491635989.html |
(OT) : Warning Black Friday Approaches -was- SPECIAL: Buy NothingDay
On Nov 28, 6:56*am, Dave wrote:
I fail to see how putting more crap on credit cards helps the economy in the long term. *The sooner you realize that you are screwed, the sooner you will take steps to mitigate said screwedness. Barack Obama says that we have to "jolt" the economy. That certainly makes sense, if you take the media's account of the economy seriously-- but should the media be taken seriously? Amid all the political and media hysteria, national output has declined by less than one-half of one percent. In fact, it may not have declined even that much-- or at all-- when the statistics are revised later, as they very often are. We are not talking about the Great Depression, when output dropped by one-third and unemployment soared to 25 percent. What we are talking about is a golden political opportunity for politicians to use the current financial crisis to fundamentally change an economy that has been successful for more than two centuries, so that politicians can henceforth micro-manage all sorts of businesses and play Robin Hood, taking from those who are not likely to vote for them and transferring part of their earnings to those who will vote for them. For that, the politicians need lots of hype, and that is being generously supplied by the media. Whatever the merits of trying to shore up some financial institutions, in order to prevent a major disruption of the credit flows that keep the whole economy going, what has in fact been done has been to create a huge pot of money-- hundreds of billions of dollars-- that politicians can use to give out goodies hither and yon, to whomever they please for whatever reason they please. No doubt we could all use a few billion dollars every now and then. But the question of who actually gets it will be strictly in the hands of Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. It is one of the few parts of the legacy of the Bush administration that the Democrats are not likely to criticize. Much as we may deplore partisanship in Washington, bipartisan disasters are often twice as bad as partisan disasters-- and this is a bipartisan disaster in the making. Too many people who argue that there is a beneficial role for the government to play in the economy glide swiftly from that to the conclusion that the government will in fact confine itself to playing such a role. In the light of history, this is a faith which passeth all understanding. Even in the case of the Great Depression of the 1930s, increasing numbers of economists and historians who have looked back at that era have concluded that, on net balance, government intervention prolonged the Great Depression. Many of those who have, over the years, praised the fact that this was the first time that the federal government took responsibility for trying to get the country out of a depression do not ask what seems like the logical follow-up question: Did this depression therefore end faster than other depressions where the government stood by and did nothing? The Great Depression of the 1930s was in fact the longest-lasting of all our depressions. Government policy in the 1930s was another bipartisan disaster. Despite a myth that Herbert Hoover was a "do nothing" president, he was the first President of the United States to step in to try to put the economy back on track. With the passing years, it has increasingly been recognized that what FDR did was largely a further extension of what Hoover had done. Where Hoover made things worse, FDR made them much worse. Herbert Hoover did what Barack Obama is proposing to do. Hoover raised taxes on high-income people and put restrictions on international trade, in order to try to save American jobs. It didn't work then and it is not likely to work now. Perhaps the most disastrous of all the counterproductive policies of the federal government was the National Industrial Recovery Act under FDR, which set out to do exactly what the politicians today want to do-- micro-manage businesses. Fortunately, the Supreme Court declared that Act unconstitutional, sparing the country an even bigger disaster. Today, it is unlikely that the courts will let anything as old- fashioned as the Constitution stand in the way of "change." In short, the economy today has some serious problems but things are not desperate, though they can be made desperate by politicians. http://townhall.com/columnists/Thoma...nomy?page=full |
(OT) : Warning Black Friday Approaches -was- SPECIAL: Buy Nothing Day
|
(OT) : Warning Black Friday Approaches -was- SPECIAL: Buy NothingDay
|
(OT) : Warning Black Friday Approaches -was- SPECIAL: Buy NothingDay
On Nov 30, 8:15*am, Dave wrote:
wrote: On Nov 28, 6:56 am, Dave wrote: I fail to see how putting more crap on credit cards helps the economy in the long term. *The sooner you realize that you are screwed, the sooner you will take steps to mitigate said screwedness. Barack Obama says that we have to "jolt" the economy. That certainly makes sense, if you take the media's account of the economy seriously-- but should the media be taken seriously? Amid all the political and media hysteria, national output has declined by less than one-half of one percent. In fact, it may not have declined even that much-- or at all-- when the statistics are revised later, as they very often are. I am amazed that you stae these numbers as though they were real, even while admitting they are subject to correction later on. Rich people live in a very self-delusional world. *Get down to Main Street and look around. *Then tell us this country's OK, Professor Graham. Main Street San Francisco Calipornia is as far from reality as you can get. And it certainly isn't any place for any respectable person to be "lookin' around". Get out of bed and go to work you lazy S.O.B. |
(OT) : ? What Were the Real Un-Employment Numbers for the GreatDepression ?
On Nov 29, 7:28*pm, wrote:
On Nov 28, 6:56*am, Dave wrote: I fail to see how putting more crap on credit cards helps the economy in the long term. *The sooner you realize that you are screwed, the sooner you will take steps to mitigate said screwedness. Barack Obama says that we have to "jolt" the economy. That certainly makes sense, if you take the media's account of the economy seriously-- but should the media be taken seriously? Amid all the political and media hysteria, national output has declined by less than one-half of one percent. In fact, it may not have declined even that much-- or at all-- when the statistics are revised later, as they very often are. - We are not talking about the Great Depression, - when output dropped by one-third and - unemployment soared to 25 percent. ? What Were the Real Un-Employment Numbers for the Great Depression ? Actually the 25% was only for White Males Over the Age of 18 and Under the Age of 60 [Over the Age of 16? and Under the Age of 65?] # Subsistence Farmers {Share Croppers et al} did not Count as Employed or Un-Employed. * Did not include White Women@ ~67% # Women working in the Home {Maids etc} or Women with Home Based Businesses {Laundry} did not Count as Employed or Un-Employed. * Did not include Blacks and Asians @ ~75% * Did not include Mexicans @ ~80% # Many Mexicans moved back to Mexico during the Great Depression Again the 25% Figure often cited for the High Un-Employment Number of the Great Depression was not a true count by Today's Standards of Full Employment for All. {Figure the True Number was roughly between 33%~42%} What we are talking about is a golden political opportunity for politicians to use the current financial crisis to fundamentally change an economy that has been successful for more than two centuries, so that politicians can henceforth micro-manage all sorts of businesses and play Robin Hood, taking from those who are not likely to vote for them and transferring part of their earnings to those who will vote for them. For that, the politicians need lots of hype, and that is being generously supplied by the media. Whatever the merits of trying to shore up some financial institutions, in order to prevent a major disruption of the credit flows that keep the whole economy going, what has in fact been done has been to create a huge pot of money-- hundreds of billions of dollars-- that politicians can use to give out goodies hither and yon, to whomever they please for whatever reason they please. No doubt we could all use a few billion dollars every now and then. But the question of who actually gets it will be strictly in the hands of Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid. It is one of the few parts of the legacy of the Bush administration that the Democrats are not likely to criticize. Much as we may deplore partisanship in Washington, bipartisan disasters are often twice as bad as partisan disasters-- and this is a bipartisan disaster in the making. Too many people who argue that there is a beneficial role for the government to play in the economy glide swiftly from that to the conclusion that the government will in fact confine itself to playing such a role. In the light of history, this is a faith which passeth all understanding. Even in the case of the Great Depression of the 1930s, increasing numbers of economists and historians who have looked back at that era have concluded that, on net balance, government intervention prolonged the Great Depression. Many of those who have, over the years, praised the fact that this was the first time that the federal government took responsibility for trying to get the country out of a depression do not ask what seems like the logical follow-up question: Did this depression therefore end faster than other depressions where the government stood by and did nothing? The Great Depression of the 1930s was in fact the longest-lasting of all our depressions. Government policy in the 1930s was another bipartisan disaster. Despite a myth that Herbert Hoover was a "do nothing" president, he was the first President of the United States to step in to try to put the economy back on track. With the passing years, it has increasingly been recognized that what FDR did was largely a further extension of what Hoover had done. Where Hoover made things worse, FDR made them much worse. Herbert Hoover did what Barack Obama is proposing to do. Hoover raised taxes on high-income people and put restrictions on international trade, in order to try to save American jobs. It didn't work then and it is not likely to work now. Perhaps the most disastrous of all the counterproductive policies of the federal government was the National Industrial Recovery Act under FDR, which set out to do exactly what the politicians today want to do-- micro-manage businesses. Fortunately, the Supreme Court declared that Act unconstitutional, sparing the country an even bigger disaster. Today, it is unlikely that the courts will let anything as old- fashioned as the Constitution stand in the way of "change." In short, the economy today has some serious problems but things are not desperate, though they can be made desperate by politicians. http://townhall.com/columnists/Thoma...jolting_the_ec... |
(OT) This crisis is far more serious than the Great Depression.
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.p...t=va&aid=10977 The financial crisis is deepening, with the risk of seriously disrupting the system of international payments. This crisis is far more serious than the Great Depression. All major sectors of the global economy are affected. Recent reports suggest that the system of Letters of Credit as well as international shipping, which constitute the lifeline of the international trading system, are potentially in jeopardy. The proposed bank "bailout" under the so-called Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) is not a "solution" to the crisis but the "cause" of further collapse. The "bailout" contributes to a further process of destabilization of the financial architecture. It transfers large amounts of public money, at taxpayers expense, into the hands of private financiers. It leads to a spiraling public debt and an unprecedented centralization of banking power. Moreover, the bailout money is used by the financial giants to secure corporate acquisitions both in the financial sector and the real economy. In turn, this unprecedented concentration of financial power spearheads entire sectors of industry and the services economy into bankruptcy, leading to the layoff of tens of thousands of workers. The upper spheres of Wall Street overshadow the real economy. The accumulation of large amounts of money wealth by a handful of Wall Street conglomerates and their associated hedge funds is reinvested in the acquisition of real assets. Paper wealth is transformed into the ownership and control of real productive assets, including industry, services, natural resources, infrastructure, etc. Collapse of Consumer Demand The real economy is in crisis. The resulting increase in unemployment is conducive to a dramatic decline in consumer spending which in turn backlashes on the levels of production of goods and services. Exacerbated by neoliberal macro-economic policy, this downward spiral is cumulative, ultimately leading to an oversupply of commodities. Business enterprises cannot sell their products, because workers have been laid off. Consumers, namely working people, have been deprived of the purchasing power required to fuel economic growth. With their meager earnings, they cannot afford to acquire the goods produced. Overproduction Triggers a String of Bankruptcies Inventories of unsold goods pile up. Eventually, production collapses; the supply of commodities declines through the closing down of production facilities, including manufacturing assembly plants. In the process of plant closure, more workers become unemployed. Thousands of bankrupt firms are driven off the economic landscape, leading to a slump in production. Mass poverty and a Worldwide decline in living standards is the result of low wages and mass unemployment. It is the outcome of a preexisting global cheap labor economy, largely characterized by low wage assembly plants in Third World countries. The current crisis extends the geographic contours of the cheap labor economy, leading to the impoverishment of large sectors of the population in the so-called developed countries (including the middle classes). In the US, Canada and Western Europe, the entire industrial sector is potentially in jeopardy. We are dealing with a long-term process of economic and financial restructuring. In its earlier phase, starting in the 1980s during the Reagan Thatcher era, local and regional level enterprises, family farms and small businesses were displaced and destroyed. In turn, the merger and acquisition boom of the 1990s led to the concurrent consolidation of large corporate entities both in the real economy as well as in banking and financial services. In recent developments, however, the concentration of bank power has been at the expense of big business. What is distinct in this particular phase of the crisis, is the ability of the financial giants (through their overriding control over credit) not only to create havoc in the production of goods and services, but also to undermine and destroy large corporate entities of the real economy. Bankruptcies are occurring in all major sectors of activity: Manufacturing, telecoms, consumer retail outlets, shopping malls, airlines, hotels and tourism, not to mention real estate and the construction industry, victims of the subprime mortgage meltdown. General Motors has confirmed that "it could run out of cash within a few months, which could prompt one of the biggest bankruptcy filings in U.S. history". (USNews.com, November 11, 2008)) In turn this would backlash on a string of related industries. Estimates of job losses in the US auto industry range from 30,000 to as much as 100,000.(Ibid). |
University of Ottawa’s Resident Neo-Nazi
On Nov 30, 5:33*pm, wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MBB7l-SfoK4 "More and more money is being invested in a wider array of research and development all over the world. There are millions of projects by inventors looking to improve a product or service. Some changes will be small and some will have enormous implications. When the steam engine was being invented, there were just a handful of inventors who understood the steam engine and could work on one. Today, we have the luxury of having thousands of scientists, engineers, programmers, and inventors working on all manner of projects large and small. And as cheap and fast broadband becomes ubiquitous in the developing world, we will be adding tens of millions more to the process. A few of these multiplied millions will invent radical new products, adding to the pace of change. "As our knowledge expands, as our tools grow in number and decrease in cost, our ability to find useful products increases at an ever-growing rate. The tools that our current and future horde of inventors will create will allow for all sorts of new products and discoveries. "There are thousands of such tools, big and small, being created by scientists and inventors in research labs all over the world every month in scores of different industries. Each one allows the next group of inventors to create even more and better tools and ultimately products. Globalization is not just a manufacturing and sales process. It is also an intellectual process, as scientist from many parts of the globe can collaborate on a project, each bringing their specialized knowledge to the project. That allows scientists in smaller countries or in countries without significant resources to add to the sum total of brainpower being thrown at a project. All this means change is going to come faster than ever before. And with these new changes will come renewed economic growth, and millions of new jobs in the US and all over the world. "Today's current crisis will pass, just as past crises have. And this will not be the last crisis or recession of our lives. We will sadly create whole new ways to foment a crisis. But in 20 years, no one is going to look back and say I wish I could go back to the good old days of 2007. We will then be living in the most exciting age in the history of man. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:18 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com