Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BoobleStubble wrote:
"HD Radio set to botch its first impression" "It is patently stupid to tack on HD stations to existing analog frequences (as in 98.5-1, 98.5-2, 98.5-3) and then put three different things on those frequencies... Furthermore, the names are so incredibly clunky, moving newfangled digital radio strongly in the direction of even clunkier HAM radio. It's a confusing mass of digits, decimals, and dashes. We would be better off reconceptualizing the entire dial and taking this opportunity to simplify it across the board. For example (and brace yourself), how about numbering our stations 1 to 100? If this sounds like Satellite Radio, just remember HD Radio was your idea, not mine." http://www.hear2.com/2005/08/hd_radio_set_to.html "RDS - The Radio Data System" "RDS brings intelligence into the tuning of a radio. The autotuning facility comes into its own on long journeys when the car moves from the service area of one transmitter to the next. Without RDS the radio has to be manually tuned to the next station. This is not always easy because it is difficult to reliably detect which is the strongest station. An RDS set will look for the Programme Identification or PI code. A national network will be broadcast from a large number of different transmitters around the country. The station or network eg Radio 4 will have its own PI code. When the radio moves out of the range of one transmitter the radio will seek the strongest signal which has the same PI code, allowing the radio to remain tuned to the same programme. When radios fitted with RDS store a station frequency, they also store the PI code along side it. This has the advantage that when the radio is turned on in a place outside the coverage area for the transmitter frequency which is stored then the radio will seek the strongest signal which has the correct PI code." http://www.radio-electronics.com/inf...st/rds/rds.php You could have nationalized HD Radio, just like SIRI, and not have to worry so much about the 10db FM-HD power increase. You could have picked 10 to 25 good formats and spaced them out in each market, so when the HD channels started dropping out, programmed the autotuning sensitivity to jump to a stronger signal with the same program! All the user would to have to do is preprogram his HD Radio for his favorite P1 formats! The smart way to do it would be to used one tower and transmitter for every station in a town. I'd use less compression than Sirius/XM, and get maybe 60 channels between 76 and 88 MHz. Give the analog FM band to the infomercials and yak channels, currently on MW. Make MW exclusively 50,000 Watt clear channel regional stations. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is Struble grooming Jury? | Shortwave | |||
An email from Robert Struble, CEO iBiquity | Shortwave | |||
An open letter to iBiquity - Bob Struble | Shortwave | |||
Low-power HD chipsets - more Struble lies! | Shortwave |