RHF: Historical Revisionist
 

In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed
to
have
a
PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37�pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24�am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23�pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any
conservatives that think the economic treaties between
the USA and China are a good thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with
China would eventually make sense. You should also
remember that it was Reagan who got the ball rolling on
NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that pretty much
was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty INTO LAW
[.] -ps- He could have Vetoed It -but- He 'Choose' to Sign
the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF �.
RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though
Clinton signed NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it
was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for
the negotiations during the 1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both
Democrats and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his
prediction that countries that trade with each other have
seldom fought wars. Yes, even the great Conservative
supported Free Trade Pacts. The Republican Party has always
been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That
clearly says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD
certainly must have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street
and the growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in
part, of the realization that our new president's policies
are designed to radically re-engineer the market-based U.S.
economy, not just mitigate the recession and financial
crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic
center has quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the
best policies of past Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy
on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare reform and a balanced
budget, for instance -- President Obama is returning to Jimmy
Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian defense
drawdown."

Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT
Barack Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the
pieces.
The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible
terms. It didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the
obomination's policies are any better.

The boys on Wall Street are the ones to be held the most
accountable. Their free ride with Georgie and his clan are over
and now they have to own up. Small wonder they are sh*tting
bricks.
The boys on wall street are not responsible for the wealth
destroying actions of the obomination. I know I'm one of the
"boys" as you call them. The market has been down since the
obomination won the election due to his promises to destroy
capitalism as we know it. The obomination speeches since he
assumed office have done nothing but inspire fear in the markets.
Those are the facts like them or not.

Those are not the facts if you take a look at the DJIA over the
last year. The greatest drops occurred with GWB in power. And
those are the facts like them or not.

http://www.djaverages.com/

I don't know what charts you are looking at. Are you saying you
exist in an alternate universe?

We'll chip and get you glasses since you obviously need them!

My vision is fine.

Not likely, Mr. Magoo!

What you must have tard'vision.

We'll chip in and get you meds to calm your Obama BC conspiracy since
you obviously need them!

You obviously don't follow the market as I do and the obaminator is
right up front with his wealth destroying plans. That's why the market
is reacting to him by going down. It doesn't take a genus to see this.

Lol - you go kooktard!

Go out and buy some stock and lose money then moron.

You can take your conspiracy nonsense and go shove it where it don't
shine. Be a jackass with someone else's time. Next time don't bother
posting.

Go **** yourself, RHF Jr.!

Nice language goofball.

I got out of the market a over a year ago now once I saw the Dem's were
likely to take over the white house with all the negative implications
involved in that. My crystal ball didn't show me that the Dem's would
also have control of both houses. Over the course of the election year
the Dem's picked the most liberal Senator to run for office. This looked
pretty bad for the economy and it sure turned out that way. This is the
perfect political storm against the stock market. You may have voted for
it but we are both going to pay for it. I think you should pay my share
for the damage the abomination has done and has yet to do.

How ironic that even Putin thinks the obominator is stupid for following
socialist policies.
Now there's a trustworthy source of info!

Gee, I guess you missed the irony in that reference huh. You must miss a
lot.


Damn - now you're back to projecting again, RHF Jr.!

Oh yeah, you are so convincing...not. Why bother to post moron? You got
nothing to say.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

RHF: Historical Revisionist
 

In article
,
Telamon wrote:

In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed
to
have
a
PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37�pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24�am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23�pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any
conservatives that think the economic treaties between
the USA and China are a good thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with
China would eventually make sense. You should also
remember that it was Reagan who got the ball rolling on
NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that pretty much
was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty INTO LAW
[.] -ps- He could have Vetoed It -but- He 'Choose' to Sign
the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF �.
RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though
Clinton signed NAFTA (and, yes,
he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it
was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for
the negotiations during the 1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both
Democrats and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his
prediction that countries that trade with each other have
seldom fought wars. Yes, even the great Conservative
supported Free Trade Pacts. The Republican Party has always
been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That
clearly says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD
certainly must have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street
and the growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in
part, of the realization that our new president's policies
are designed to radically re-engineer the market-based U.S.
economy, not just mitigate the recession and financial
crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic
center has quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the
best policies of past Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy
on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare reform and a balanced
budget, for instance -- President Obama is returning to Jimmy
Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian defense
drawdown."

Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT
Barack Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the
pieces.
The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible
terms. It didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the
obomination's policies are any better.

The boys on Wall Street are the ones to be held the most
accountable. Their free ride with Georgie and his clan are over
and now they have to own up. Small wonder they are sh*tting
bricks.
The boys on wall street are not responsible for the wealth
destroying actions of the obomination. I know I'm one of the
"boys" as you call them. The market has been down since the
obomination won the election due to his promises to destroy
capitalism as we know it. The obomination speeches since he
assumed office have done nothing but inspire fear in the markets.
Those are the facts like them or not.

Those are not the facts if you take a look at the DJIA over the
last year. The greatest drops occurred with GWB in power. And
those are the facts like them or not.


http://www.djaverages.com/


I don't know what charts you are looking at. Are you saying you
exist in an alternate universe?


We'll chip and get you glasses since you obviously need them!

My vision is fine.

We'll chip in and get you meds to calm your Obama BC conspiracy since
you obviously need them!

You obviously don't follow the market as I do and the obaminator is
right up front with his wealth destroying plans. That's why the market
is reacting to him by going down. It doesn't take a genus to see this.

You can take your conspiracy nonsense and go shove it where it don't
shine. Be a jackass with someone else's time. Next time don't bother
posting.

I got out of the market a over a year ago now once I saw the Dem's were
likely to take over the white house with all the negative implications
involved in that. My crystal ball didn't show me that the Dem's would
also have control of both houses. Over the course of the election year
the Dem's picked the most liberal Senator to run for office. This looked
pretty bad for the economy and it sure turned out that way. This is the
perfect political storm against the stock market. You may have voted for
it but we are both going to pay for it. I think you should pay my share
for the damage the abomination has done and has yet to do.

How ironic that even Putin thinks the obominator is stupid for following
socialist policies.

Now there's a trustworthy source of info!

Gee, I guess you missed the irony in that reference huh. You must miss a
lot.

Here you go. The obomination and Geithner both get an F from economists.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123671107124286261.html#

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

(OT) : ObamaSayers© Speaking Out of Both Side of their Mounts : Weak Leadership and Failed Policy
 

On Mar 11, 5:36*pm, John Barnard wrote:
Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*John Barnard wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
*dxAce wrote:

Michael W. Bryant, the totally discredited dufus who once claimed to
have
a
PhD,
wrote:

On Mar 6, 3:37 pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Mar 6, 5:24 am, Mike wrote:

On Mar 4, 8:23 pm, Telamon

wrote:
Political and cultural ties sure but I don't know any
conservatives that think the economic treaties between
the USA and China are a good thing.
I remember Ronald Reagan suggesting that trade pacts with
China would eventually make sense. You should also
remember that it was Reagan who got the ball rolling on
NAFTA and it was King George, the First, that pretty much
was responsible for finishing the negotiations on NAFTA.
- Clinton just signed it shortly after being elected.

MWB 'just' More Liberal Re-Writing of History Again.

President Bill Clinton Signed the NAFTA Treaty INTO LAW
[.] -ps- He could have Vetoed It -but- He 'Choose' to Sign
the NAFTA Treaty Into Law.

Yes History Will Show Clinton Was At The Very End
Responsible for the NAFTA Treaty Becoming LAW [. ]

mwb - the facts are the facts ~ RHF .
RHF,

As usual, you're just choosing to be difficult. Though
Clinton signed NAFTA (and, yes,
*he took grief from the labor unions for doing so), but it
*was the
Reagan and Bush administrations that were responsible for
the negotiations during the 1980's.

The responsibility for NAFTA was clearly shared by both
Democrats and Republicans. Reagan was famous for his
prediction that countries that trade with each other have
seldom fought wars. Yes, even the great Conservative
supported Free Trade Pacts. The Republican Party has always
been bigger supporters of such pacts.

What, RHF, no URLs to support your insanity this time? That
clearly says something..
What about your insanity, PhDufus?

After all, any 'tard boy who'd lie about having a PhD
certainly must have a screw or two loose.
You want insanity, this is insanity.

Obama's Radicalism Is Killing the Dow

By MICHAEL J. BOSKIN

"It's hard not to see the continued sell-off on Wall Street
and the growing fear on Main Street as a product, at least in
part, of the realization that our new president's policies
are designed to radically re-engineer the market-based U.S.
economy, not just mitigate the recession and financial
crisis.

The illusion that Barack Obama will lead from the economic
center has quickly come to an end. Instead of combining the
best policies of past Democratic presidents -- John Kennedy
on taxes, Bill Clinton on welfare reform and a balanced
budget, for instance -- President Obama is returning to Jimmy
Carter's higher taxes and Mr. Clinton's draconian defense
drawdown."

Go read the rest of it he
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123629969453946717.html

The obomination is looking more like Carter II everyday.

Failed capitalism and its supporters did Wall Street in NOT
Barack Obama. He has the unfortunate job of picking up the
pieces.
The stock market disagrees with you in strongest possible
terms. It didn't like Jimmy's policies and it doesn't think the
obomination's policies are any better.

The boys on Wall Street are the ones to be held the most
accountable. Their free ride with Georgie and his clan are over
and now they have to own up. Small wonder they are sh*tting
bricks.
The boys on wall street are not responsible for the wealth
destroying actions of the obomination. I know I'm one of the
"boys" as you call them. The market has been down since the
obomination won the election due to his promises to destroy
capitalism as we know it. The obomination speeches since he
assumed office have done nothing but inspire fear in the markets.
Those are the facts like them or not.

Those are not the facts if you take a look at the DJIA over the
last year. The greatest drops occurred with GWB in power. And
those are the facts like them or not.

http://www.djaverages.com/

I don't know what charts you are looking at. Are you saying you
exist in an alternate universe?

We'll chip and get you glasses since you obviously need them!

My vision is fine.

Not likely, Mr. Magoo!



We'll chip in and get you meds to calm your Obama BC conspiracy since
you obviously need them!

You obviously don't follow the market as I do and the obaminator is
right up front with his wealth destroying plans. That's why the market
is reacting to him by going down. It doesn't take a genus to see this.

Lol - you go kooktard!



You can take your conspiracy nonsense and go shove it where it don't
shine. Be a jackass with someone else's time. Next time don't bother
posting.

- Go **** yourself, RHF Jr.!

Do Not Accept Any "RHF Jr."s

Insist on the real "RHF" and accept no substitutes.

this is 'rhf' and i approve of this message ~ RHF

(OT) : WHAT IF ? - It Is Determined That Barack 'Hussein' Obama Were 'In-Fact' NOT Eligible {Qualified} To Be The US President ?
 

In article telamon_spamshield-12AA25.17331311032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-C7DA93.22542010032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-6CE316.22421809032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...


BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-F07439.01012709032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article
,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-6C7774.17402108032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article
,
dave wrote:

~ RHF wrote:


Dave -oops- ? WHAT IF ? - It is determined that
Barack 'Hussein' Obama were 'in-fact' NOT
Eligible {Qualified} to be the US President ?
- - - As Prescribed by the US Constitution.

Too late now. He has been sworn.

Yeah, I've sworn at him many times myself. I'm sure many
people
have
done the same.

Someone needs to hack the obama-prompter.



Wow, you guys are really desperate, aren't you Telemundo?

It's a joke.

It's as stale as the green bread in my trash can, kind of like
the
Bryant PhD stuff, only not quite that old and tired out.

The fact that Bryant lied about having a PhD will never grow old.

I plan on keeping it alive!




Some folks thought Bob Hope was funny.

Nobody thinks you are funny, or intelligent, or worth reading.



Then plonk me Telemundo! Make the pussy move, it's what you are, isn't
it?

Did I call you a pussy? Nope, but maybe that's what you are.



No. you just talk tough, like..you know..BWHAHAHA!

Yeah, you are looking like more of a pussy with every post you make.



Well, you can call me whatever you want if it makes you feel better
about yourself.

I can call you a kookturd, just for fun.

--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

RHF: Historical Revisionist
 

In article telamon_spamshield-4DD610.17313611032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-0EA882.23084010032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...
Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258478
cuhulin



After reading most of the "article", it seems to me Scalia is doing what
is known as "Humoring the whackjob". In other words, make them happy so
they will go away.

What would we do without the whack job perspective you provide
Kookaburra? Oh that's right, we would be better off.


And what a dull world it would be without you Obama BC kooktards. You
give the gift of laughter to the world, and seem to enjoy the ridicule
you so rightly deserve.

The world doesn't need you or the obomination.



Sadly, that's not true. The last guy really screwed things up. I hate to
admit it, but I voted for him the first time.
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

RHF: Historical Revisionist
 

In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-4DD610.17313611032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-0EA882.23084010032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...
Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258478
cuhulin



After reading most of the "article", it seems to me Scalia is doing
what
is known as "Humoring the whackjob". In other words, make them happy
so
they will go away.

What would we do without the whack job perspective you provide
Kookaburra? Oh that's right, we would be better off.


And what a dull world it would be without you Obama BC kooktards. You
give the gift of laughter to the world, and seem to enjoy the ridicule
you so rightly deserve.

The world doesn't need you or the obomination.



Sadly, that's not true.

I don't post BS. The world doesn't need you and when you die it won't
even miss you. Same goes for your chosen one.

The last guy really screwed things up. I hate to admit it, but I
voted for him the first time.

Oh don't worry about that. The obomination just needs time and rope to
hang himself. We should be a real mess by the time he is done.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

RHF: Historical Revisionist
 

On Mar 13, 7:39*pm, Telamon
wrote:
In article ,



*BDK wrote:
In article telamon_spamshield-4DD610.17313611032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
says...
In article ,
*BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-0EA882.23084010032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
says...
In article ,
*BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...
Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case. * *
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258478
cuhulin

After reading most of the "article", it seems to me Scalia is doing
what
is known as "Humoring the whackjob". In other words, make them happy
so
they will go away.

What would we do without the whack job perspective you provide
Kookaburra? Oh that's right, we would be better off.

And what a dull world it would be without you Obama BC kooktards. You
give the gift of laughter to the world, and seem to enjoy the ridicule
you so rightly deserve.

The world doesn't need you or the obomination.

Sadly, that's not true.

I don't post BS. The world doesn't need you and when you die it won't
even miss you. Same goes for your chosen one.

The last guy really screwed things up. I hate to admit it, but I
voted for him the first time.

Oh don't worry about that. The obomination just needs time and rope to
hang himself. We should be a real mess by the time he is done.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Fear of ObamaNomics© Destroyed to Valve of
100 Million American's Individual Retirement
Savings Accounts (IRAs, 401Ks & Roths)

1 - The Democrats Hate the Individual Freedom of
American's Individual Retirement Savings Accounts.
and have planned to destroy them for years.

2 - The Democrats want to force All Americans to
rely only on Social Security and become Totally
Dependent on the US Government for Support
giving the US Government {Democrats} complete
Control over Individual Americans Financial Freedom.

Until the pending Economic Collapse of the US
Treasury due to the Foreign Capital Pull-out :
Buy and Hold bankers boxes of 100CNY Chinese
Notes or open-up a Chinese Bank Account in
China Yuan {Renminbi} not US Dollars; along
with buying and holding Gold and Silver.

Within a year maybe three at most the US Dollar
will be worth 5 to 10 Cents and the Yuan will be
on Parity {equal} with the Dollar meaning a 600%
to 700% Gain in the Yuan Bank Account Holdings.
The Gold and Silver will show roughly an Equal
Gain against the US Dollar too.

-=Update=-
The Chinese are shoring-up sources of Oil around
the World to Fuel their Economy after the Collapse
of the US Economy : So that they can rely on the
World as a Market without the USA being a major
Buyer in that market. Plus the Chinese will be
able to Import US Food at a discount.

The Euro will be BUST as well as the EU.

On the good side Foreign Goods and Services
will be too costly for Americans to buy with a
100 {old} US Dollar Chinese made Celphone
costing 500 {new} US Dollars at Wal*Mart.
Over the next Decade Jobs will becoming back
to America in Factories Owned and Operated
by Foreign Investors and Made-in-American
will be the good 'cheaper' Products on the Shelf

Many most Illegal Mexican Invaders will be
going back to Mexico as living there 'poor'
will be easier than living in the USA 'poor'.

it's a 'vision' thingee ~ RHF

(OT) : WHAT IF ? - It Is Determined That Barack 'Hussein' Obama Were 'In-Fact' NOT Eligible {Qualified} To Be The US President ?
 

In article telamon_spamshield-B2158A.21273013032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-12AA25.17331311032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-C7DA93.22542010032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-6CE316.22421809032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,

says...


BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-F07439.01012709032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article
,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-6C7774.17402108032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article
,
dave wrote:

~ RHF wrote:


Dave -oops- ? WHAT IF ? - It is determined
that Barack 'Hussein' Obama were 'in-fact'
NOT Eligible {Qualified} to be the US
President ? - - - As Prescribed by the US
Constitution.

Too late now. He has been sworn.

Yeah, I've sworn at him many times myself. I'm
sure many people have done the same.

Someone needs to hack the obama-prompter.



Wow, you guys are really desperate, aren't you
Telemundo?

It's a joke.

It's as stale as the green bread in my trash can,
kind of like the Bryant PhD stuff, only not quite
that old and tired out.

The fact that Bryant lied about having a PhD will never
grow old.

I plan on keeping it alive!




Some folks thought Bob Hope was funny.

Nobody thinks you are funny, or intelligent, or worth
reading.



Then plonk me Telemundo! Make the pussy move, it's what you
are, isn't it?

Did I call you a pussy? Nope, but maybe that's what you are.



No. you just talk tough, like..you know..BWHAHAHA!

Yeah, you are looking like more of a pussy with every post you
make.



Well, you can call me whatever you want if it makes you feel better
about yourself.

I don't need you permission pussy boy.

Obviously, but it's fun to see you pretend to be a semi-tough guy. Do
you pound your fist on your desk when you pretend you're a semi-tough
guy?


I can call you a kookturd, just for fun.

You can post whatever you want in a public news group but all you got
going is Kookaburra level of credibility.

LOL, if you say so, semi-tough guy. Seems like some others think you're
not all there too.

--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
Former #1 kOOk Magnet (Title passed to Larnrod!)
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

RHF: Historical Revisionist
 

In article telamon_spamshield-06C3E7.19390613032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-4DD610.17313611032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-0EA882.23084010032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...
Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258478
cuhulin



After reading most of the "article", it seems to me Scalia is doing
what
is known as "Humoring the whackjob". In other words, make them happy
so
they will go away.

What would we do without the whack job perspective you provide
Kookaburra? Oh that's right, we would be better off.


And what a dull world it would be without you Obama BC kooktards. You
give the gift of laughter to the world, and seem to enjoy the ridicule
you so rightly deserve.

The world doesn't need you or the obomination.



Sadly, that's not true.

I don't post BS. The world doesn't need you and when you die it won't
even miss you.

ROTFL, you're a real meanine, Telemundo. Boo ****ing hoo. You getting
angry is the best part of playing with you.

Oh, and you post little else but BS, especially when you get into the
political stuff.

Same goes for your chosen one.

LOL, it was a choice between "my chosen one", and a cranky 70+ year old
fossil, and the choice was easy. The GOP will have to earn a vote from
me again, at least in the foreseeable future. McCain was one of the few
GOP'ers I actually liked. In the past, I voted mostly GOP, in statewide
and national elections. No more. I'm not happy with the Dems gun
nonsense, but there are other problems to worry about that right now.


The last guy really screwed things up. I hate to admit it, but I
voted for him the first time.

Oh don't worry about that.

I won't.

The obomination just needs time and rope to
hang himself. We should be a real mess by the time he is done.

I doubt he will screw things up nearly as bad as Bush did the last 8
years. It would take a whole lot of screwing up to even approach that
level of incompetence.

--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
Former #1 kOOk Magnet (Title passed to Larnrod!)
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

RHF: Historical Revisionist
 

In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-06C3E7.19390613032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-4DD610.17313611032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article telamon_spamshield-0EA882.23084010032009
@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net,
lid says...
In article ,
BDK wrote:

In article ,
says...
Scalia: You need 4 votes for Obama eligibility case.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=258478
cuhulin



After reading most of the "article", it seems to me Scalia is
doing
what
is known as "Humoring the whackjob". In other words, make them
happy
so
they will go away.

What would we do without the whack job perspective you provide
Kookaburra? Oh that's right, we would be better off.


And what a dull world it would be without you Obama BC kooktards. You
give the gift of laughter to the world, and seem to enjoy the
ridicule
you so rightly deserve.

The world doesn't need you or the obomination.



Sadly, that's not true.

I don't post BS. The world doesn't need you and when you die it won't
even miss you.

ROTFL, you're a real meanine, Telemundo. Boo ****ing hoo. You getting
angry is the best part of playing with you.

Oh, and you post little else but BS, especially when you get into the
political stuff.

Truth hurts huh? You don't have a grip on much do you.

Same goes for your chosen one.

LOL, it was a choice between "my chosen one", and a cranky 70+ year old
fossil, and the choice was easy. The GOP will have to earn a vote from
me again, at least in the foreseeable future. McCain was one of the few
GOP'ers I actually liked. In the past, I voted mostly GOP, in statewide
and national elections. No more. I'm not happy with the Dems gun
nonsense, but there are other problems to worry about that right now.

Cranky sure but the rest sound more like a self description.

There is no difference between the GOP and the Dem's in california.

The last guy really screwed things up. I hate to admit it, but I
voted for him the first time.

Oh don't worry about that.

I won't.

Yeah because it is in the past.

The obomination just needs time and rope to
hang himself. We should be a real mess by the time he is done.

I doubt he will screw things up nearly as bad as Bush did the last 8
years. It would take a whole lot of screwing up to even approach that
level of incompetence.

Well he is, and he will continue to make things worse for the nation.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California