![]() |
Radio Interference
In article
, Bushcraftgregg wrote: On Mar 6, 8:20*pm, Telamon wrote: In article , *dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , *"McFerg" wrote: These new energy efficient household bulbs really cause a lot interference on my medium wave and the lower short wave bands. Is there anything I can do to eliminate it, short of switching back to the old filament type No easy way. You are better off with the incandescent bulbs as those screw type florescence are a mercury hazard and depending on the instillation they will not last long. The best use for the energy efficient bulbs are ones that are not switched on/off often and are mounted upright. That eliminates most uses. A better system would be low voltage quartz or LED type lighting but that takes rewiring the house. Incandescent bulbs release way more mercury than the occasional broken CFL. You will have to explain that one. I turn mine on and off just like any other lamp; *no ill effects. If you use them upside down in any ceiling fixture you will shorten the life of the bulb. I use them vertically, horizontally, and at various angles in-between. Again, no ill effects. If you are turning them on and off all the time you will shorten the life of the bulb. There are LED lamps that run on 110 VAC. Those have switching power supplies that should be avoided. Indeed. We found out the hard way with our patio light, it is upside down. After going through three bulbs in 7-8 maybe nine months, I switched. Maybe the moisture of being outside also had something to do with it. That is true what you said, I've never read that but the two bulbs we do use in the house are vertical and we leave them on all the time and as far as I know not one of them has expired yet. I'm still waiting for Dave to explain the mercury in an incandescent bulb. The socket at the top configuration subjects the electronics and the filaments to more heat, aging them faster. Starting the bulb up puts a lot of stress on the circuits and filaments, actually the only time they are really used, and wears them out. The bulbs don't like repeated hot to cold temperature extremes either. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Radio Interference
|
Radio Interference
There are LED lamps that run on 110 VAC. Those have switching power supplies that should be avoided. None of my 120 (or 220) volt LED lamps use a switching supply. They use a simple series string with a rectifier, dropping resistor and filter cap. |
Radio Interference
Bushcraftgregg wrote:
On Mar 6, 8:20 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "McFerg" wrote: These new energy efficient household bulbs really cause a lot interference on my medium wave and the lower short wave bands. Is there anything I can do to eliminate it, short of switching back to the old filament type No easy way. You are better off with the incandescent bulbs as those screw type florescence are a mercury hazard and depending on the instillation they will not last long. The best use for the energy efficient bulbs are ones that are not switched on/off often and are mounted upright. That eliminates most uses. A better system would be low voltage quartz or LED type lighting but that takes rewiring the house. Incandescent bulbs release way more mercury than the occasional broken CFL. You will have to explain that one. Most electricity is produced by burning coal, which contains mercury. There is mercury in the smokestack emissions from coal plants. The extra mercury released by the power plant in the lifetime of an Edison lamp is more than that spilled by a broken CFL. Simply a matter of arithmetic. I turn mine on and off just like any other lamp; no ill effects. If you use them upside down in any ceiling fixture you will shorten the life of the bulb. That's a heat thing. You can use them ballast up, but you have to ensure adequate ventilation of the ballast. I use them vertically, horizontally, and at various angles in-between. Again, no ill effects. If you are turning them on and off all the time you will shorten the life of the bulb. You're turn for a scientific explanation. There are LED lamps that run on 110 VAC. Those have switching power supplies that should be avoided. Modern switch-mode power supplies are usually carefully tailored to the load and any RF emission is minimized; not just for Part 15, but because it is less efficient to waste power making radio waves. |
Radio Interference
dave wrote:
Bushcraftgregg wrote: On Mar 6, 8:20 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "McFerg" wrote: These new energy efficient household bulbs really cause a lot interference on my medium wave and the lower short wave bands. Is there anything I can do to eliminate it, short of switching back to the old filament type No easy way. You are better off with the incandescent bulbs as those screw type florescence are a mercury hazard and depending on the instillation they will not last long. The best use for the energy efficient bulbs are ones that are not switched on/off often and are mounted upright. That eliminates most uses. A better system would be low voltage quartz or LED type lighting but that takes rewiring the house. Incandescent bulbs release way more mercury than the occasional broken CFL. You will have to explain that one. Most electricity is produced by burning coal, which contains mercury. There is mercury in the smokestack emissions from coal plants. The extra mercury released by the power plant in the lifetime of an Edison lamp is more than that spilled by a broken CFL. Simply a matter of arithmetic. I turn mine on and off just like any other lamp; no ill effects. If you use them upside down in any ceiling fixture you will shorten the life of the bulb. That's a heat thing. You can use them ballast up, but you have to ensure adequate ventilation of the ballast. I use them vertically, horizontally, and at various angles in-between. Again, no ill effects. If you are turning them on and off all the time you will shorten the life of the bulb. You're turn for a scientific explanation. Wow. I must not have been awake yet. Y-O-U-R. I did a little looking up. The minimum recommended "on" period is 15 minutes, which is not long enough for the terlet, but I still get good service from the CFLs in there. I change them every 2 or 3 years maybe. The totals hours on is probably low, but they certainly don't require a lot of attention. There are LED lamps that run on 110 VAC. Those have switching power supplies that should be avoided. Modern switch-mode power supplies are usually carefully tailored to the load and any RF emission is minimized; not just for Part 15, but because it is less efficient to waste power making radio waves. |
Radio Interference
In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote: There are LED lamps that run on 110 VAC. Those have switching power supplies that should be avoided. None of my 120 (or 220) volt LED lamps use a switching supply. They use a simple series string with a rectifier, dropping resistor and filter cap. That's fine but what do you think that diode is doing every 60Hz cycle? It's switching on and off generating broadband noise. You know how some white noise generator sources are made right? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Radio Interference
McFerg wrote:
These new energy efficient household bulbs really cause a lot interference on my medium wave and the lower short wave bands. Is there anything I can do to eliminate it, short of switching back to the old filament type I'd switch brands. I have, in over 20 years of using small fluorescents, found very few that made electrical noise. What brand lamps are you using? You're not trying to use them with dimmers, are you? Agreed... I've had mini-fluors in a standard lamp and a table lamp, both within a metre either side of my Eton E1, for several years with only one instance of a "noisy" tube. That's now in a lamp in another room where it's seldom turned on. |
Radio Interference
In article ,
dave wrote: Bushcraftgregg wrote: On Mar 6, 8:20 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "McFerg" wrote: These new energy efficient household bulbs really cause a lot interference on my medium wave and the lower short wave bands. Is there anything I can do to eliminate it, short of switching back to the old filament type No easy way. You are better off with the incandescent bulbs as those screw type florescence are a mercury hazard and depending on the instillation they will not last long. The best use for the energy efficient bulbs are ones that are not switched on/off often and are mounted upright. That eliminates most uses. A better system would be low voltage quartz or LED type lighting but that takes rewiring the house. Incandescent bulbs release way more mercury than the occasional broken CFL. You will have to explain that one. Most electricity is produced by burning coal, which contains mercury. There is mercury in the smokestack emissions from coal plants. The extra mercury released by the power plant in the lifetime of an Edison lamp is more than that spilled by a broken CFL. Simply a matter of arithmetic. That's sounds like environmental BS arithmetic like the man made global warming BS. I don't want a broken bulb with mercury in it in my house and that doesn't take any BS arithmetic. I turn mine on and off just like any other lamp; no ill effects. If you use them upside down in any ceiling fixture you will shorten the life of the bulb. That's a heat thing. You can use them ballast up, but you have to ensure adequate ventilation of the ballast. I posted that already. The electronics up will be hotter than down and this shortens the life of the bulbs as people are finding out. I use them vertically, horizontally, and at various angles in-between. Again, no ill effects. If you are turning them on and off all the time you will shorten the life of the bulb. You're turn for a scientific explanation. I already explained this. Your longest life will occur with the bulb pointed up, which is contrary to ceiling mount bulbs. You will have longer life in a standard table lamp. There are LED lamps that run on 110 VAC. Those have switching power supplies that should be avoided. Modern switch-mode power supplies are usually carefully tailored to the load and any RF emission is minimized; not just for Part 15, but because it is less efficient to waste power making radio waves. Only some of the more expensive brands have done this. Other brands (most) made in China haven't bothered. I would only buy these bulbs by manufacturers that guarantee the spectra of the bulbs. Some of these bulbs put out more UV than they are supposed to, which can cause cancer. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Radio Interference
In article ,
dave wrote: dave wrote: Bushcraftgregg wrote: On Mar 6, 8:20 pm, Telamon wrote: In article , dave wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "McFerg" wrote: These new energy efficient household bulbs really cause a lot interference on my medium wave and the lower short wave bands. Is there anything I can do to eliminate it, short of switching back to the old filament type No easy way. You are better off with the incandescent bulbs as those screw type florescence are a mercury hazard and depending on the instillation they will not last long. The best use for the energy efficient bulbs are ones that are not switched on/off often and are mounted upright. That eliminates most uses. A better system would be low voltage quartz or LED type lighting but that takes rewiring the house. Incandescent bulbs release way more mercury than the occasional broken CFL. You will have to explain that one. Most electricity is produced by burning coal, which contains mercury. There is mercury in the smokestack emissions from coal plants. The extra mercury released by the power plant in the lifetime of an Edison lamp is more than that spilled by a broken CFL. Simply a matter of arithmetic. I turn mine on and off just like any other lamp; no ill effects. If you use them upside down in any ceiling fixture you will shorten the life of the bulb. That's a heat thing. You can use them ballast up, but you have to ensure adequate ventilation of the ballast. I use them vertically, horizontally, and at various angles in-between. Again, no ill effects. If you are turning them on and off all the time you will shorten the life of the bulb. You're turn for a scientific explanation. Wow. I must not have been awake yet. Y-O-U-R. I did a little looking up. The minimum recommended "on" period is 15 minutes, which is not long enough for the terlet, but I still get good service from the CFLs in there. I change them every 2 or 3 years maybe. The totals hours on is probably low, but they certainly don't require a lot of attention. More important than the grammar is the environmental BS arithmetic. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
Radio Interference
In article ,
Nobody wrote: McFerg wrote: These new energy efficient household bulbs really cause a lot interference on my medium wave and the lower short wave bands. Is there anything I can do to eliminate it, short of switching back to the old filament type I'd switch brands. I have, in over 20 years of using small fluorescents, found very few that made electrical noise. What brand lamps are you using? You're not trying to use them with dimmers, are you? Agreed... I've had mini-fluors in a standard lamp and a table lamp, both within a metre either side of my Eton E1, for several years with only one instance of a "noisy" tube. That's now in a lamp in another room where it's seldom turned on. Those are not the same thing as the CFL's being discussed. The older lamps have low frequency ballasts where the only radio noise they generate is at startup. The noise stops as soon as the bulb plasma is conducting. The current generation of high efficiency bulbs use a high frequency oscillator to excite the plasma in the bulb and this is a constant source of interference depending on brand and location. This is an insidious problem because it is location dependent. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com