(OT) : Dave -proclaims- "God" Has No Place In Politics
 

~ RHF wrote:
On Mar 22, 6:22 am, dave wrote:

- "God" has no place in politics.

Dave -proclaims- "God" Has No Place In Politics.

Dave so you would 'limit' the Political Rights and
Individual Freedoms of Persons-of-Faith {Believers}
--- some real american you are ~ RHF

You are free to believe any kind of crazy off-the-wall **** you want to,
but keep that nonsense away from my government.

(OT) : Obama Says {Read My Teleprompter} No New Taxes !
 

On Mar 22, 4:44*pm, Berkeley Bolshevik
wrote:
Comrade *Billy Burpelson * wrote:

Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:

It will be hard to vote her and her crew out of office if Obammy
achieves his goal to put 95% of Americans on welfare.

First, what would be the point of having 95% of the people on welfare?
What would that "goal" accomplish?

The economy is a mess and it is ripe for politician to express
government is the answer to all our troubles. With his expansion of
government and new entitlements, he will increase the dependent class.
It's given, government entitlements are hard for politicians to let
go.



Finally, even if this were so, how could the 5% that are working support
the 95% that aren't?

We are on a progressive road of having the ratio of tax receivers
coming close to *taxpayers. By the time the baby boom generation
retires, there will be less people paying into the system. We also
have the second highest corporate tax amongst industrialized nations.

The top 1 percent of income earners, by household, paid 39 percent of
all federal income taxes in 2005, whereas the bottom 50 percent paid a
little over 3 percent. Further, 32 percent of all tax returns filed in
2005 were from people who paid no federal income tax at all.

During Fiscal Year (FY) 2006, the IRS collected more than $2.2
trillion in tax net of refunds, about 44 percent of which was
attributable to the individual income tax. This is partially due to
the nature of the individual income tax category; containing taxes
collected from working class, small business, self employed, and
capital gains. Of the Individual Income Tax, the top 5% of income
earners pay 60% of this amount.

It stands to reason that 60% represents less people than those who pay
little or no tax at all.
-


- Obama did not break his promise to review bills that
- reach his desk line by line to eliminate earmarks. He now
- says when he said it, it was a Teleprompter malfunction.

Obama Says {Read My Teleprompter} No New Taxes !

-translation- Just the same old Taxes . . .
doubled over again ~ RHF

Americans Fired, ObaMa0 Workers Hired
 

Comrade "Brenda Ann" wrote:


"Berkeley Bolshevik" wrote in message
.. .
The top 1 percent of income earners, by household, paid 39 percent of
all federal income taxes in 2005, whereas the bottom 50 percent paid a
little over 3 percent. Further, 32 percent of all tax returns filed in
2005 were from people who paid no federal income tax at all.

The reason that the top 1% of income earners (and I use the term loosely)
pay 39% of the taxes, is that they glean more than 39% of the money. Actual
taxes paid per dollar *earned* tend to be higher for the middle class
because the middle class doesn't incorporate their wealth into tax shelter
land, so they end up paying a much higher percentage of their actual income
than the upper class...


That's why we need a flat tax. It's more fair.
-

Obama did not break his promise to review bills that
reach his desk line by line to eliminate earmarks. He now
says when he said it, it was a Teleprompter malfunction.

Americans Fired, ObaMa0 Workers Hiredtop 5% maychoose to Dampertheir income for the next four years of Obama
 

Berkeley Bolshevik wrote:
Comrade "Brenda Ann" wrote:

"Berkeley Bolshevik" wrote in message
...
The top 1 percent of income earners, by household, paid 39 percent of
all federal income taxes in 2005, whereas the bottom 50 percent paid a
little over 3 percent. Further, 32 percent of all tax returns filed in
2005 were from people who paid no federal income tax at all.
The reason that the top 1% of income earners (and I use the term loosely)
pay 39% of the taxes, is that they glean more than 39% of the money. Actual
taxes paid per dollar *earned* tend to be higher for the middle class
because the middle class doesn't incorporate their wealth into tax shelter
land, so they end up paying a much higher percentage of their actual income
than the upper class...


That's why we need a flat tax. It's more fair.

You're right, and the http://Fairtax.org is a good solution. The best
thing is that it spreads the tax bill over a larger group so that when
that top 5% don't have income or some of them choose to Damper their
income for the next four years of Obama, they won't be able to shut down
the economy by drying up the tax receipts into the IRS.