|
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 InternationalScientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
On Mar 7, 7:56*pm, ka6uup wrote:
http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont.... A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 |
(OT) U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 InternationalScientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
|
(OT) : How Many Scientist That Proclaim Global Warming Can You FitOn The Head of a Pin ?
On Apr 5, 1:52*am, wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:56*pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont.... A tiny minority. *The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. *Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. *There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. *http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 The Bigger Issue is . . . How Many Scientist That Proclaim Global Warming Can You Fit On The Head of a Pin ? N O N E -cause- They Are Pinning Their Hopes On Hot Air ! |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
wrote:
On Mar 7, 7:56 pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont... A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
The problem is the liberal elite that want to make this an issue. Keep swallowing the liberal line and where that gets you is limits on the number of kids you can have, limits on what you can own, limits on your use of transportation, on energy use of any type, but not for them of course, as the "elite" that make these decisions in your life will not be subject to these limitations. The "liberal elite" are subject to intense scrutiny right now. I doubt the people who swept away the business-as-usual Republicans in the past couple years will have any more patience for unrespnsive Democrats. |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
Oh sure thing nice try yourself. If you want to go swallow the elitist crap don't expect other people to follow. You use the word "elite" like its a bad thing. |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Brenda Ann wrote:
If population continues to grow at the rate it has for the past 50 years (it's doubled in that time), there will likely be a vast increase in pollution levels (both air and water)... Increase in pollution? Just wait until you see how the rising Indian and Chinese economy will allow tens of millions of Indians and Chinese to trade in their bicycles for automobiles. THEN you will see an increase in pollution. |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 InternationalScie...
What does Hawaii produce other than FAKE Birth Certificates???
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=260751 cuhulin |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article 49d9aaa9.1277281@chupacabra,
Bob Dobbs wrote: Telamon wrote: Oh sure thing nice try yourself. If you want to go swallow the elitist crap don't expect other people to follow. How is it 'elitist' to accept scientific observations? When an elitist publishes non-scientific BS in order to promote an agenda. It's not like the voodoo xianity that requires blind faith. There are plenty of people out there that do just that. And if the planet becomes rendered unable to support human life, there wont't be any exceptions for those that refuse to acknowledge the fact, we'll all be dead. No worries then. Your staunch position would be expected if you worked in the petroleum industry, otherwise it's just foolish. I don't work in the petroleum industry. My position is not foolish the global warming idiots are the foolish ones. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
dave wrote: Telamon wrote: Oh sure thing nice try yourself. If you want to go swallow the elitist crap don't expect other people to follow. You use the word "elite" like its a bad thing. Contextually it is a bad thing. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Brenda Ann wrote:
"John Barnard" wrote in message ... wrote: On Mar 7, 7:56 pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont... A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. Part of the problem is that humans, as a species, tend to egocentricity. Anything else is based upon what we as individuals find appealing. We really have trouble with the concept of there being 6 billion others that all add up to cause global change. If population continues to grow at the rate it has for the past 50 years (it's doubled in that time), there will likely be a vast increase in pollution levels (both air and water) and a severe shortage of food to feed everyone. The planet has only so many resources, and unless we have developed FTL space travel, once those are gone, so are we.. Most people have problems comprehending the really large numbers. We use A.U. to represent 150 million km (93 million miles) and the mole in chemistry to deal with a large number of particles (6.022x10^23). The thought of 6 billion people is incomprehensible to most of us. I have no doubt that there will be wars over clean water, arable land and other resources. JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message ... wrote: On Mar 7, 7:56 pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont... A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. Part of the problem is that humans, as a species, tend to egocentricity. Anything else is based upon what we as individuals find appealing. We really have trouble with the concept of there being 6 billion others that all add up to cause global change. If population continues to grow at the rate it has for the past 50 years (it's doubled in that time), there will likely be a vast increase in pollution levels (both air and water) and a severe shortage of food to feed everyone. The planet has only so many resources, and unless we have developed FTL space travel, once those are gone, so are we.. Egocentric yes. The world is a big place and we are nowhere near having to many people. Education and culture are the key to managing population. The third world nations have the population boom. Once their standard of living is higher having big families to survive will become a thing of the past as it has in all the advanced nations. The world population will then stabilize. What makes you think that any country which has a high level of pressure on its current cropland land will have the time to have such an increase in the standard living to come into existence before having to decide which elements of its population survives or dies? There have been enough examples of the effects of catastrophic droughts on countries. One failed crop harvest is all it takes. The problem is the liberal elite that want to make this an issue. Keep swallowing the liberal line and where that gets you is limits on the number of kids you can have, limits on what you can own, limits on your use of transportation, on energy use of any type, but not for them of course, as the "elite" that make these decisions in your life will not be subject to these limitations. Only gluttons fear limits. Which, in your case, doesn't surprise me! JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Bob Dobbs wrote:
Telamon wrote: Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Anyone that thinks people are the biggest influence on climate must have had a lousy education. No one said people are the biggest influence, even though nothing even comes close second. You act as if you had no education at all. Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. Industry is not the other side of the argument What do you think is the 'other side of the argument'? but nice try anyway. But you didn't even try. Are you so challenged that your only option is to toss empty criticisms? That's been Telemundoh's problem all along. He is quite the sophist but he does have severe problems trying to formulate anything of substance. He engages in pseudoscience and tries to pass it off as science. JB |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message ... wrote: On Mar 7, 7:56 pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont... A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. Part of the problem is that humans, as a species, tend to egocentricity. Anything else is based upon what we as individuals find appealing. We really have trouble with the concept of there being 6 billion others that all add up to cause global change. If population continues to grow at the rate it has for the past 50 years (it's doubled in that time), there will likely be a vast increase in pollution levels (both air and water) and a severe shortage of food to feed everyone. The planet has only so many resources, and unless we have developed FTL space travel, once those are gone, so are we.. Egocentric yes. The world is a big place and we are nowhere near having to many people. Education and culture are the key to managing population. The third world nations have the population boom. Once their standard of living is higher having big families to survive will become a thing of the past as it has in all the advanced nations. The world population will then stabilize. What makes you think that any country which has a high level of pressure on its current cropland land will have the time to have such an increase in the standard living to come into existence before having to decide which elements of its population survives or dies? There have been enough examples of the effects of catastrophic droughts on countries. One failed crop harvest is all it takes. China would be the best example. The problem is the liberal elite that want to make this an issue. Keep swallowing the liberal line and where that gets you is limits on the number of kids you can have, limits on what you can own, limits on your use of transportation, on energy use of any type, but not for them of course, as the "elite" that make these decisions in your life will not be subject to these limitations. Only gluttons fear limits. Which, in your case, doesn't surprise me! Only idiots like yourself continually project their fears and weaknesses upon other like you just did. When are you going to learn that a subject like "gluttony" that you just brought up comes from you as a unprovoked attack. If I was talking about hoarding food or eating all the time then you would be making commentary about it as a subject already under discussion. Since you brought this up out the blue this means it is an internal issue with you not me. Sort of the way a shrink uses ink blots to get you to talk about internal things that are an issue with you. That make any sense to you? And "limits" is not a "fear" but something I clearly don't want foisted upon myself and others by clueless liberal retards that would not know what worked if their life depended on it. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message ... wrote: On Mar 7, 7:56 pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont... A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. Part of the problem is that humans, as a species, tend to egocentricity. Anything else is based upon what we as individuals find appealing. We really have trouble with the concept of there being 6 billion others that all add up to cause global change. If population continues to grow at the rate it has for the past 50 years (it's doubled in that time), there will likely be a vast increase in pollution levels (both air and water) and a severe shortage of food to feed everyone. The planet has only so many resources, and unless we have developed FTL space travel, once those are gone, so are we.. Egocentric yes. The world is a big place and we are nowhere near having to many people. Education and culture are the key to managing population. The third world nations have the population boom. Once their standard of living is higher having big families to survive will become a thing of the past as it has in all the advanced nations. The world population will then stabilize. What makes you think that any country which has a high level of pressure on its current cropland land will have the time to have such an increase in the standard living to come into existence before having to decide which elements of its population survives or dies? There have been enough examples of the effects of catastrophic droughts on countries. One failed crop harvest is all it takes. China would be the best example. Chinas hasn't had a catastrophic crop failure in decades and the standard of living in China's rural areas (where the bulk of the population still resides to the tune of 55% - 60%) is dismal compared to the larger cities. China instituted population control well in advance of its recent prosperity so that negates any sort of wealth-population control. Couple that with sex-selective abortions which has created an immense gender-imbalance which helps to slow population growth and the wealth-population issue less important to the other considerations. In the case of India and China it's far too late for wealth-population to have any real effect. If those 2 countries suffer simultaneous catastrophic crop losses they'll walk all over their smaller neighbours for food. The problem is the liberal elite that want to make this an issue. Keep swallowing the liberal line and where that gets you is limits on the number of kids you can have, limits on what you can own, limits on your use of transportation, on energy use of any type, but not for them of course, as the "elite" that make these decisions in your life will not be subject to these limitations. Only gluttons fear limits. Which, in your case, doesn't surprise me! Only idiots like yourself continually project their fears and weaknesses upon other like you just did. When are you going to learn that a subject like "gluttony" that you just brought up comes from you as a unprovoked attack. Play up the victim image, Kim-il Telemundoh! If I was talking about hoarding food or eating all the time then you would be making commentary about it as a subject already under discussion. You need to grab a dictionary or thesaurus as see that "gluttony" refers to more that food. But such a thing is well beyond capacity to comprehend. But thank you for showing us that you a glutton for punishment. Since you brought this up out the blue this means it is an internal issue with you not me. Sort of the way a shrink uses ink blots to get you to talk about internal things that are an issue with you. That make any sense to you? It figures that you would refer to an useless test but you do seem to have good familiarity with it. And "limits" is not a "fear" but something I clearly don't want foisted upon myself and others by clueless liberal retards that would not know what worked if their life depended on it. |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
In article ,
John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message ... wrote: On Mar 7, 7:56 pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont. .. A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. Part of the problem is that humans, as a species, tend to egocentricity. Anything else is based upon what we as individuals find appealing. We really have trouble with the concept of there being 6 billion others that all add up to cause global change. If population continues to grow at the rate it has for the past 50 years (it's doubled in that time), there will likely be a vast increase in pollution levels (both air and water) and a severe shortage of food to feed everyone. The planet has only so many resources, and unless we have developed FTL space travel, once those are gone, so are we.. Egocentric yes. The world is a big place and we are nowhere near having to many people. Education and culture are the key to managing population. The third world nations have the population boom. Once their standard of living is higher having big families to survive will become a thing of the past as it has in all the advanced nations. The world population will then stabilize. What makes you think that any country which has a high level of pressure on its current cropland land will have the time to have such an increase in the standard living to come into existence before having to decide which elements of its population survives or dies? There have been enough examples of the effects of catastrophic droughts on countries. One failed crop harvest is all it takes. China would be the best example. Chinas hasn't had a catastrophic crop failure in decades and the standard of living in China's rural areas (where the bulk of the population still resides to the tune of 55% - 60%) is dismal compared to the larger cities. China instituted population control well in advance of its recent prosperity so that negates any sort of wealth-population control. Couple that with sex-selective abortions which has created an immense gender-imbalance which helps to slow population growth and the wealth-population issue less important to the other considerations. In the case of India and China it's far too late for wealth-population to have any real effect. If those 2 countries suffer simultaneous catastrophic crop losses they'll walk all over their smaller neighbours for food. The problem is the liberal elite that want to make this an issue. Keep swallowing the liberal line and where that gets you is limits on the number of kids you can have, limits on what you can own, limits on your use of transportation, on energy use of any type, but not for them of course, as the "elite" that make these decisions in your life will not be subject to these limitations. Only gluttons fear limits. Which, in your case, doesn't surprise me! Only idiots like yourself continually project their fears and weaknesses upon other like you just did. When are you going to learn that a subject like "gluttony" that you just brought up comes from you as a unprovoked attack. Play up the victim image, Kim-il Telemundoh! I'm not a victim you twit. If I was talking about hoarding food or eating all the time then you would be making commentary about it as a subject already under discussion. You need to grab a dictionary or thesaurus as see that "gluttony" refers to more that food. But such a thing is well beyond capacity to comprehend. But thank you for showing us that you a glutton for punishment. You are just confusing my ability to understand with your pathetic communication skills. Since you brought this up out the blue this means it is an internal issue with you not me. Sort of the way a shrink uses ink blots to get you to talk about internal things that are an issue with you. That make any sense to you? It figures that you would refer to an useless test but you do seem to have good familiarity with it. No, what figures is your inability to understand or comprehend. My mistake is attempting to explain something to a person incapable of understanding. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
U. S. Senate Minority Report: More Than 650 International ScientistsDissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims
Telamon wrote:
In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , John Barnard wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "Brenda Ann" wrote: "John Barnard" wrote in message ... wrote: On Mar 7, 7:56 pm, ka6uup wrote: http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.c...ity.Blogs&Cont. .. A tiny minority. The vast majority of climate-competent scientists agree global warming is man-made and is a serious emergency. Sure there are crooked oil-industry scientists just like there were crooked tobacco industry scientists. There's a lot of oil money for lying to the public by denying the fact of human-caused global warming. At any rate, it's almost beyond question that humans are causing it. http://www.reuters.com/article/envir...5332BU20090404 Anyone who thinks that 6 billion people can't have an effect on this planet need to learn how to think! Every industry tends to play up the good and play down the bad. You'd be surprised at how often that really happens. Part of the problem is that humans, as a species, tend to egocentricity. Anything else is based upon what we as individuals find appealing. We really have trouble with the concept of there being 6 billion others that all add up to cause global change. If population continues to grow at the rate it has for the past 50 years (it's doubled in that time), there will likely be a vast increase in pollution levels (both air and water) and a severe shortage of food to feed everyone. The planet has only so many resources, and unless we have developed FTL space travel, once those are gone, so are we.. Egocentric yes. The world is a big place and we are nowhere near having to many people. Education and culture are the key to managing population. The third world nations have the population boom. Once their standard of living is higher having big families to survive will become a thing of the past as it has in all the advanced nations. The world population will then stabilize. What makes you think that any country which has a high level of pressure on its current cropland land will have the time to have such an increase in the standard living to come into existence before having to decide which elements of its population survives or dies? There have been enough examples of the effects of catastrophic droughts on countries. One failed crop harvest is all it takes. China would be the best example. Chinas hasn't had a catastrophic crop failure in decades and the standard of living in China's rural areas (where the bulk of the population still resides to the tune of 55% - 60%) is dismal compared to the larger cities. China instituted population control well in advance of its recent prosperity so that negates any sort of wealth-population control. Couple that with sex-selective abortions which has created an immense gender-imbalance which helps to slow population growth and the wealth-population issue less important to the other considerations. In the case of India and China it's far too late for wealth-population to have any real effect. If those 2 countries suffer simultaneous catastrophic crop losses they'll walk all over their smaller neighbours for food. The problem is the liberal elite that want to make this an issue. Keep swallowing the liberal line and where that gets you is limits on the number of kids you can have, limits on what you can own, limits on your use of transportation, on energy use of any type, but not for them of course, as the "elite" that make these decisions in your life will not be subject to these limitations. Only gluttons fear limits. Which, in your case, doesn't surprise me! Only idiots like yourself continually project their fears and weaknesses upon other like you just did. When are you going to learn that a subject like "gluttony" that you just brought up comes from you as a unprovoked attack. Play up the victim image, Kim-il Telemundoh! I'm not a victim you twit. If I was talking about hoarding food or eating all the time then you would be making commentary about it as a subject already under discussion. You need to grab a dictionary or thesaurus as see that "gluttony" refers to more that food. But such a thing is well beyond capacity to comprehend. But thank you for showing us that you a glutton for punishment. You are just confusing my ability to understand with your pathetic communication skills. Like your ability to read "racism" from "inbreeding" even when there is no obvious connection? Since you brought this up out the blue this means it is an internal issue with you not me. Sort of the way a shrink uses ink blots to get you to talk about internal things that are an issue with you. That make any sense to you? It figures that you would refer to an useless test but you do seem to have good familiarity with it. No, what figures is your inability to understand or comprehend. My mistake is attempting to explain something to a person incapable of understanding. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com