IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?" GOP agast! Ru$hfalls!
 

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.
Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.
SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.

What ARE you talking about? Give a concrete example. Hell, Limbaugh
started during the era of the Fairness Doctrine. What about Joe Pyne?
Morton Downey Junior? Wally George? etc?
I'm talking about pre-Limbaugh. All there was to listen to on FM opinion
and news were liberals. Same deal on the public service stations. Those
people were not on the air back in NY or out here in southern
California. I have never listened any of the people you mentioned and I
don't watch TV.

That sounds like KPFK.

http://www.well.com/user/dmsml/kpfk1959/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Pyne

(Rebecca De Mornay's Dad) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wally_george

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_Downey_Jr

And in NYC, how could you miss this guy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Grant_(radio)

I didn't live in NYC but in western NY in the Buffalo area.


ReallY! I lived in N. Tonawanda and in Kenmore back in the 1950s.

A DXer as yourself was not interested in listening to NYC?

IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?" GOP agast! Ru$h falls!
 

In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
dave wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 16:00:37 -0700, Telamon wrote:

In article ,
who are you? wrote:

On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party
has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.
Yeah, Americans losing their free speech rights would be hilarious.

I think we should start with you.
Anybody was able to say anything they wanted before and after the
Fairness Doctrine was repealed.
SNIP

Baloney, people reading this news group were not born yesterday. I
remember the way things were before and after the "unfairness doctrine"
was enforced. For some reason you got the left point of view and that
was it. I could not stand listening to talk radio with the liberals in
control as a right wringer calling in would get shouted down by the
host. Basically people that called in got the same treatment from the
hosts as the liberal assholes that spew their crap on Usenet do here
today. The same old liberal lying crap said over and over like that
will
make it true. Well keep dreaming that the "unfairness doctrine" will
make a comeback as it is the only chance you got to fool people into
believing the liberal lie.

What ARE you talking about? Give a concrete example. Hell, Limbaugh
started during the era of the Fairness Doctrine. What about Joe Pyne?
Morton Downey Junior? Wally George? etc?
I'm talking about pre-Limbaugh. All there was to listen to on FM opinion
and news were liberals. Same deal on the public service stations. Those
people were not on the air back in NY or out here in southern
California. I have never listened any of the people you mentioned and I
don't watch TV.

That sounds like KPFK.

http://www.well.com/user/dmsml/kpfk1959/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Pyne

(Rebecca De Mornay's Dad) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wally_george

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morton_Downey_Jr

And in NYC, how could you miss this guy?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bob_Grant_(radio)

I didn't live in NYC but in western NY in the Buffalo area.


ReallY! I lived in N. Tonawanda and in Kenmore back in the 1950s.

I grew up in Tonawanda a few blocks from the intersection of Sheridan
Drive and Niagara Falls Blvd. My High school was Kenmore East.

A DXer as yourself was not interested in listening to NYC?

I've always been a program listener. So you must remember WKBW and all
the crazy stuff they did.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "(UN)FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?"
 

In article ,
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2009 16:57:27 -0700,
Telamon wrote:
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
Telamon wrote:
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
Telamon wrote:


I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
else.

CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can

Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."

Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.

I'm right and you know it ...

Being DELUSIONAL clearly is your long suit! LOL!!!

Ok, so you are a complete moron.

For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.

ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.

You mean to say all media should required to present the
point of view you like and that's it.

Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?

Get this through your very thick head. What you intend has
no basis on what the liberal Dem's intend to do.

LOL!! Whatever they do, it would be EXPONENTIALLY BETTER
than the CRAP that Warmonger-in-Thief GW Bush laid on us!!

He didn't do anything retard. Free speech does not need new regulation
by the Obominator.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "(UN)FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?"
 

In article ,
"(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com" wrote:

On Sun, 10 May 2009 16:57:27 -0700,
Telamon wrote:
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to be:
www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
Telamon wrote:
(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) www.LayoffRemedy.com wrote:
Telamon wrote:


I expect we are going to get the "fairness doctrine" shoved
down out throats in the near future but it will be called something
else.

CLUE, Mindless Loser -- FAIRNESS *cannot** be FORCED
upon anyone any more than any FREEDOM can

Clue: It's the "unfairness doctrine."

Wrong. Because it requires BOTH sides of issues to be
presented EQUALLY. And *that* is FAIR.

I'm right and you know it ...

Being DELUSIONAL clearly is your long suit! LOL!!!

For public airwaves to be ABUSED to give ONE-sided and
BIGOTED views -- as FAUX News has been doing. is UNfair.

ALL media should be required to present ALL sides of
issues, equally. And IF presented in a biased fashion, the
opposite view should be presented with EQUAL vigor.

You mean to say all media should required to present the
point of view you like and that's it.

Wrong! I mean to present both sides as the FACTS make
clear. Are you **afraid** of relevant FACTS?

Get this through your very thick head. What you intend has
no basis on what the liberal Dem's intend to do.

LOL!! Whatever they do, it would be EXPONENTIALLY BETTER
than the CRAP that Warmonger-in-Thief GW Bush laid on us!!

We have a LOT of crap to UNDO in these next 8 years! And
hopefully we'll have ANOTHER 8 after that!

There has no regulation of free speech retard so there is nothing to
undo.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Dave -speaks-out-about- The Capital Class To The Detriment OfEveryone Else
 

dave wrote:
m II wrote:
dave wrote:

You are a tool. If you aren't part of the solution you are the problem.



If you aren't part of the solution, you're precipitate...




mike



Add some heat.


And a lot of water!

Liberal NPR/PBS/CPB -versus- The "Fairness Doctrine" = ROTFL
 

On May 9, 1:27*pm, who are you? wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that matter,
rather openly proclaimed since way back during the presidential
campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some time and here
[link below] is her latest (with some good links) on what may be an
impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg, WGN Radio

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

* *Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

WAY - Fairness For All Equally
-or- It Ain't Fairness At All ~ RHF

(OT) : Who Needs The Fairness Doctrine When You Have Liberal-FascistName Calling !
 

On May 10, 12:15*am, who are you? wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 23:03:56 -0700, ~ RHF wrote:
On May 9, 1:27*pm, who are you? wrote:
On Sat, 09 May 2009 12:35:17 -0700, obamao.sux.donki.dixsss wrote:
We think it is and that it has long been planned and, for that
matter, rather openly proclaimed since way back during the
presidential campaign. Michelle Malkin has been concerned for some
time and here [link below] is her latest (with some good links) on
what may be an impending disaster for talk radio. - Milt Rosenberg,
WGN Radio

would be pretty funny to take the only tool the republican't party has
over it's lemmings, childish name calling.

Ru$h LimpBalls would be out-a a job!

* *Without FUD for the republican't party to use to control it's
lemmings, they will be forced to come up with real ideas

- - WAY - Speaking of 'childish name calling' * 'lemmings'
- - * 'Ru$h LimpBalls'

- sigh I was doing my part to communicate with your type *:-)

WAY - Liberal-Fascist Name Calling
-remains- Liberal-Fascist Name Calling
-ps- It Ain't Communications of any 'type' ~ RHF

(OT) : Dave -proclaims- Consumerism Is The Opposite Of Freedom.
 

On May 10, 5:46*am, dave wrote:
wrote:
On May 9, 7:58 pm, dave wrote:

Then let the public decide what is in their best interest.
That is precisely why broadcast media needs to be more down the middle..

Ja, let Heil 0baMa0 Hitler decide what is "down the middle" instead of
Free Market Consumers - (me and you)

- There are no "free markets". Consumerism is the opposite of freedom.

Dave -proclaims- There Are No "Free Markets".
* Note to Dave Yeah the Obama-Regime© Controls the Markets Now.

(OT) : Dave -the-obama-speaker-proclaims- Get Out Of The Way Or YouWill Be Run Over.
 

On May 10, 5:55*am, dave wrote:
~ RHF wrote:
On May 9, 3:47 pm, dave wrote:
wrote:

ery

media outlet everywhere.
The airwaves belong to everyone and cannot be used to create a poisonous
political atmosphere. *Licensees have an obligation to serve the public
interest.

Newspapers can print whatever they like, because anybody can start a
newspaper. *Spectrum is a finite commodity. -
- They cannot be coralled and used to further
- political objectives of the capital class to the
- detriment of everyone else.

- - Dave -speaks-out-about- The Capital Class
- - To The Detriment Of Everyone Else

- You are a tool.
-*If you aren't part of the solution you are the problem.
- Get out of the way or you will be run over.

Dave -proclaims- You Are A Tool.
* Note to Dave Yeah You Are A "Tool" of the Obama-Regime©

IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "FAIRNESS DOCTRINE?" GOP agast! Ru$hfalls!
 

On May 11, 5:53*am, dave wrote:
Telamon wrote:
I didn't live in NYC but in western NY in the Buffalo area.

ReallY! *I lived in N. Tonawanda and in Kenmore back in the 1950s.

I grew up in Tonawanda a few blocks from the intersection of Sheridan
Drive and Niagara Falls Blvd. My High school was Kenmore East.

A DXer as yourself was not interested in listening to NYC?

I've always been a program listener. So you must remember WKBW and all
the crazy stuff they did.

We moved to PHX in November of 1957. K-Big was just getting started and
I was only 8 years old.

-*I remember Frank Dill, but he wasn't on KBW or BEN.

This Frank Dill [KNBR-AM-680]
http://www.broadcastlegends.com/dill.html
http://www.hapharper.com/radio.shtml

IS THIS THE RETURN OF THE "FAIRNESSDOCTRINE?" GOP agast! Ru$h ...
 

B F F (Barney FAGGOT Frank) has done jacked up the price of postage
stamps again.Two cents, now they cost Forty Four cents.

Heh, there is a coupon thingy I can fill out and snail mail for a $5.00
refund on the Heartguard I bought today, and there is a coupon in the
bag of Pro Pac dog food too.Now I will have to wait untill the next time
I go shopping and stop off at the post office for some two cent stamps.
I spent $278.51 today for Heartguard and Advantage 55 and a 33 pound of
Pro Pac dog food.$18.22 of that is Mississippi RIP OFF! sales taxes.
cuhulin