|
(OT) : Obama-Speak© "Old Wealth" Tax The Rich To Death Liberation Theology
On May 27, 2:39*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27, (gone) - - Liberal-Fascists are almost always stuck with - - their heads-up-their-old-wealth-pasts ~ RHF - Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists". - Fascism is a right wing concept and goal. - Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships. Repeating Liberal Lies and Democrat Party of the USA Distortions does not change the Fact that Liberal-Fascism Exists [.] *~ RHF *. (Tons and tons of crap deleted) - And you can't define it, place the concept with it's founder, say who - else uses it but it's still real. *Sort of like "Alice in Wonderland". - Yes, the Wonderland of right wing dementia. Keith Cunningham - 'right wing dementia' - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - - [: To Liberal-Fascist Name Calling :] ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument : When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*. * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa |
Like watching Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz
On May 27, 7:53*pm, wrote:
On May 27, 2:17*am, Gary Forbis wrote: Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists". Fascism is a right wing concept and goal. Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships. Publik School Neo-Commie brainwashing is a terrible thing to waste Yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda lie by yet another ignorant Liberal Fascist. This is getting to be fun entertainment. *Like watching Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO! HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!! Once again, you right wing weirdos are happy to use a term, unhappy to define the term. So tell us, moron, what is a liberal fascist? A fascist who is to the liberal side? |
The Left's Guerrilla War Against the Creation of New Life{Abortion}
On May 27, 9:05*pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On May 27, 2:42*pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote: On May 27, 1:33*pm, "~ RHF" wrote: On May 27, 12:23*am, Gary Forbis wrote: On May 26, 10:18*pm, "Brenda Ann" wrote: "Gary Forbis" wrote in message ... So, Is the conservative or liberal point of view to impose their will upon the woman? Consider this. *Suppose a quadraplegic takes up residence in your home without your permission. *Do you then become responsible for the care of this human being? *If you say no then why does a woman become responsbile for some human who takes up residency in her womb without her permission? Has she not, by virtue of having had the requisite coitus, given defacto permission (rape notwithstanding)? - No. *pregnancy is no more a result of coitus - than becoming a millionare is a result of - playing lotto. GF - Oh Ye Great Denier of Biology {Obama-Speaker©} -*While you have to play to win few who play actually win. -wrt- The Human Sexual Act it's about 1-in-4 Chances. -ps- That Ain't a Million to One. -*Most who do it do it for fun not for the chance - of having a baby. Then again - Some/Many 'Do It' to Create a Baby : Which is a Natural Outcome of the Sexual Act. -*Those who do it to have a baby will not ask - for the human to be evicted. Abortion is not an 'eviction' The 'evicted' are out-on-the-street -but- Very Much Alive -and- Have a 'Chance' at a New Day -and- A New Beginning for Their Life The "Aborted" Are Dead {Murdered} -yeah- Very Much Dead -and- Have a 'NO Chance' at a New Day -and- A NO Beginning of Their Life Partial Birth Abortion -aka- ObamaCide© -*There is no meeting of the minds between - the parties prior to human taking up resident - in the womb so no contract was made. Don't Know whether there was a 'meeting-of-the-minds' -but- There Was Sure A "Meeting-of-the-Bodies" GF - "human taking up resident in the womb" # 1 - Yes It Is A Living Human Being : Not an organic tissue sample to disposed of... # 2 - "taking up resident in the womb" You make it sound like some space alien invasion. *. - Interesting, mostly when I read an anti-abortion screed, it's written - by some guy. *Now why is that? *Is it because banning abortion won't - influence them at all? *Sorta like Briston Palin's boy friend. - - And this "guy" is the same way. *He's not going to have a baby, he's - not going to deliver but he's still against every thing that doesn't - affect him. KC - Have One of Your Children Aborted {Murdered} Without Your Knowledge : Until Then STFU ~ RHF *. So tell us, prick, when did you have an abortion? What have you actually experienced? Just like all the scum sucking anti-abortion male activists you have never been pregnant but you know aaalllllll about abortion. The facts are simple. You are scared of women. You are scared to let women go and talk to their doctors and make their own decisions. And you are too gutless to have insisted that the repugs quit playing politics with the abortion issue. Yeah, a real gutless individual. When you had the power you never, ever proposed a constitutional amendment, a bill, any thing to out law abortion. You were happy to be used as a cash cow. |
The Left's Guerilla War
On May 27, 3:40*pm, Meldon wrote:
You heard it here first! Men by simply having sex, are not responsible for unwanted pregnancies because there’s no guarantee of pregnancy. While there can be no meeting of the minds between the mother or father and the life created there can be a meeting of the minds between the mother and the father concerning any life created. It behooves the couple to make a contract concerning such matters. We can move down the road to what obligations a society can force upon an individual if you'd like. We'd need to start from basic principles concerning such matters so we know these principles are consistently applied in all our decisions. Both the left and the right seem to be helter-skelter on the application of first principles. |
(OT) : Obama-Speakers© Dang It Flash-Back Time. . .
Telamon wrote:
It's your history if you live in America. Genocide and slavery mark the early years, followed by hypocrisy and plunder. |
Like watching Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz
Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27, 7:53 pm, wrote: On May 27, 2:17 am, Gary Forbis wrote: Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists". Fascism is a right wing concept and goal. Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships. Publik School Neo-Commie brainwashing is a terrible thing to waste Yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda lie by yet another ignorant Liberal Fascist. This is getting to be fun entertainment. Like watching Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO! HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!! Once again, you right wing weirdos are happy to use a term, unhappy to define the term. So tell us, moron, what is a liberal fascist? A fascist who is to the liberal side? He thinks that the Nazis were socialists because they used the word in their name. Like when the commies call a country a "peoples' republic". It's plain cynicism, which flies right over the Bircher's head. |
Like watching Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz
Do you have flush toilets? (yes, one sh.tter) Difficulty with bathing
(no) and undressing? (no) http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=265364 Don't look at me, I am not going to help you. cuhulin |
(OT) : Obama-Speak© "Old Wealth" Tax The Rich To Death Liberation Theology
~ RHF wrote:
On May 27, 2:39 pm, Kevin Cunningham wrote: On May 27, (gone) - - Liberal-Fascists are almost always stuck with - - their heads-up-their-old-wealth-pasts ~ RHF - Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists". - Fascism is a right wing concept and goal. - Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships. Repeating Liberal Lies and Democrat Party of the USA Distortions does not change the Fact that Liberal-Fascism Exists [.] ~ RHF . (Tons and tons of crap deleted) - And you can't define it, place the concept with it's founder, say who - else uses it but it's still real. Sort of like "Alice in Wonderland". - Yes, the Wonderland of right wing dementia. Keith Cunningham - 'right wing dementia' - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - - [: To Liberal-Fascist Name Calling :] ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument : When a Super-Smart 'Enlightened" Liberal Starts Name Calling*. * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional - rotfl ~ RHF http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...8979fbe8546cfa . kevin, Kevin. KEVIN ! - You are becoming a real Obama-Speaker© {Truth Denier & Deleter} . The ObamaSpeakers© Denying That "Liberal-Fascism" Exists http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...943adbe30480e1 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d3aa8461de1401 ~ibid~ . The Validity of the Term "Liberal Fascist" ? Can It Exist? ? Does It Exist ? http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...4569002bba33ca http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc4aa52f959d40 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...070611dd003a01 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e38e44a0d1c320 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...5e688bb0612c63 ~ibid~ . Obama-Regime© Using Left-Wing Radial High Tech Media Shout-Down BARACKING© http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...579a6b903e62b1 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dda4284110e71f http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...dcfdaa2b7cbc2d . Don't Let The Truth Be Told : Manufacturing the Democrat Half-Truth and Liberal Media Lie by Distorting the Facts and Reality. ~ibid~ . Therefore It Follows . . . -from- Wikipedia The National Socialist German Workers' Party http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationa...Workers%E2%80%... (German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) Abbreviated NSDAP), commonly known in English as the NAZI Party (Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei) was a political party in Germany between 1919 and 1945. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi It was known as the German Workers' Party (DAP) . Today we have 21st Century "Liberal-Fascism" and the Liberal-Fascist Agents of Social Change. -aka- The Democrat Party of the USA attempting to Socialize the Nation under their One Party Control with their Charismatic Leader {Totalitarian} Barack 'Hussein' Obama . -aka- Change You Can Believe In ! -aka- "The Third Way" via Fascism Authoritarian {Elitist} and Totalitarian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_position http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism . The Validity of the Term "Liberal-Fascist" ? Can Liberal-Fascism Exist? ? Do Liberal-Fascists Exist ? http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...4569002bba33ca http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...bc4aa52f959d40 ~ibid~ . Denying the potential existence of 'Liberal-Fascism' does not change the fact that 'Liberal-Fascism' may and can exist in the world today. . Liberal-Fascist : Employing the Justification, Means and Tactics of Fascism {National Socialism} to Achieve the Ends of a One Party Liberal {Socialist} Agenda is what has morphed into "Liberal-Fascism" and those who are the Agents-of-One-Party-Socialist-Change are in-fact Liberal-Fascist. * Classically Fascism had one reasoned definition in the early 1900s. -but- Time Changes Words and their Meanings . . . . Time often changes Words and the Meaning of Words; and that is part of the Evolution of Language with the Passage of Time. . Hence the use of the 'Hyphen' between the Two Words Linking Them and Uniting Them into One Compound Word with a New Meaning and Usage. "Liberal-Fascism" & "Liberal-Fascist" . Liberal & Fascist have now become One Newly 'Hyphenated' {Combination} Word "Liberal-Fascist" with it's own new unique meaning. Yeah, it makes as much sense as "waterless water." http://www.publiceye.org/glossary/glossary_big.html#f Fascism and neofascism: Fascism is an especially virulent form of far-right populism. Fascism glorifies national, racial, or cultural unity and collective rebirth while seeking to purge imagined enemies, and attacks both revolutionary movements and liberal pluralism in favor of militarized, totalitarian mass politics. Fascism first crystallized in Europe in response to the Bolshevik Revolution and the devastation of World War I, and then spread to other parts of the world. If it is a post-WWII occurrence it should be called neofascist or neofascism unless it solely involves participants in older movements. Neofascists reinterpret fascist ideology and strategy in various ways to fit new circumstances. |
Like watching Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz
Kevin Cunningham wrote:
On May 27, 7:53 pm, wrote: On May 27, 2:17 am, Gary Forbis wrote: Repetition doesn't make Liberals "Fascists". Fascism is a right wing concept and goal. Liberals favor democratic rule over dictatorships. Publik School Neo-Commie brainwashing is a terrible thing to waste Yet another Liberal Fascist propaganda lie by yet another ignorant Liberal Fascist. This is getting to be fun entertainment. Like watching Kernal Klink and Sargent Shultz - ROTFLMAO! HEIL LIBERAL FASCIST HITLER!!! Once again, you right wing weirdos are happy to use a term, unhappy to define the term. So tell us, moron, what is a liberal fascist? A fascist who is to the liberal side? Modern Republicans and Democrats both misuse the term "fascist" -- and to such a degree that the misuse has started to be enshrined in dictionaries. In the broad sense, the term (from the Latin for "bundle") just means the strength of a united people -- as in the ancient Roman story in which a father asks his sons to gather sticks from the forest and bring them to him. Taking the wooden rods one at a time, he easily breaks each of them in two. But when the very same rods are bound together -- symbolizing a united family or people -- they are unbreakable. The fascist symbol, or _fasces_, thus became the symbol of the Roman Republic and its ideals. It was also used by the French republic, was adopted by Mussolini's 20th century Fascist movement, and was also used by the United States during the same era. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fasces The U.S. dime displayed the fascist symbol on its reverse from 1916-1945 See http://www.mountainviewcoins.com/10%...rse%201926.jpg and http://www.mountainviewcoins.com/Mercury_Dimes.php and it is displayed prominently to this day in the main chamber of the U.S. Senate: http://tinyurl.com/jfk-fasces It's also a prominent element of Daniel Chester French's highly idealized sculpture in the Lincoln Memorial. In the narrow sense, fascism means specifically the social movement popularized by Benito Mussolini and to some degree carried on into more recent times by the Movimento Sociale Italiano. It was characterized by the ideal of the state as expressing the will of the people, with the people being an organic, natural entity, not divided into classes with differing economic interests but instead with each sector of society (such as farmers, laborers, administrators, merchants, et cetera) able to elect its own legislative representatives. In practice, many compromises were made with allies and with the old order of things. The central government and ruling party had a lot of authority under Italian fascism, and that is really the only similarity real fascism shares with the pop-definition of the word. But other central governments and parties past and present had similar or greater degrees of authority -- such in fact being the norm for almost all human societies throughout history. The pop-definition of "fascist" is roughly "big, bad, scary, and mean authoritarianism." "Fascist" is used by the Democrat gang to refer to the Republicans and their often authoritarian views on (among other things) war, drugs, and sexuality -- and by the Republican gang to refer to the Democrats and their often authoritarian views on (among other things) freedom of association, financial privacy, and taxation. It's misused that way because both sides think they can make brownie points by scaring voters with the spectre of authoritarianism from the rival gang. Here's the truth: both modern Republicans and modern Democrats score pretty high on the authoritarianism scale -- somewhat higher, I'd say, than the Movimento Sociale Italiano. With every good wish, Kevin Alfred Strom. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:15 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com