![]() |
Sarah Palin is Missing!
bvallely wrote:
That's great. When is Obama going to produce the jobs America has paid a trillion dollars for? Under $200 billion has been spent on the stimulus. Mr. Bush gave a $ trillion to Wall Street, maybe that's what you're thinking of. |
Sarah Palin is Missing!
|
Sarah Palin is Missing!
In article ,
says... Washington Times ad: Obama is NOT a Natural Born Citizen, therefore is NOT Eligible to be President. http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=269159 That is old, but True news.Washington Times is finally wakeing up. cuhulin It's just their meds wearing off, and the voices came back. -- BDK.. Leader of the nonexistent paid shills. Non Jew Jew Club founding member. Former number one Kook Magnet, title passed to Iarnrod. |
Sarah Palin is Missing!
|
Sarah Palin is Missing!
I am not a sissy, and I don't roll my eyes.
I hardly ever put on my bra, it is too uncomfortable.Lots of dudes who have boobs wear a bra. cuhulin |
Sarah Palin is Missing!
neoconis_ignoramus wrote:
Jim Alder wrote: John Barnard wrote: m II wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: Her logic is bizarre, to say the least... who's going to vote for a president that may quit mid-term to go off and write a book? * * Clinton quit his last term as governor to run for president after specifically promising not to do so when running for that last term. * *Ya voted for HIM, didn't you? Um, dumb****, WHAT, ****4brains? did PLAIN[SIC] quit to run for president? I don't know. Maybe. Did she promise NOT to? That was kind of my point, since Clinton LIED, saying specifically that he would NOT do that to win the election, then went ahead and did it anyway. Sorry, I thought that was clear to the simplest slackjawed yokel, but I didn't know YOU would be reading it. Of course, Obama said in 2004 that he was NOT running for president in 2008 because he had just taken office and wouldn't know what he was doing if he won the presidency. So you can't say he didn't warn you, but I fail to get why you now hold this against Palin. Seems to me that she couldve done this, you know, like when the presdiential race actually started. In two years. I guess it depends on what plans she has in the immediate future. You don't know and neither do I, so your latest expression of comtempt and hatred for everything not Liberal is once again based on nothing but your hatred of everything not Liberal. LOL - drooling conservadolts fawning over the Queen of Ignorance. Leave your mom out of this, **** head. -- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far? |
Sarah Palin is Missing!
BDK wrote:
says... BDK wrote: says... John Barnard wrote: m II wrote: Brenda Ann wrote: Her logic is bizarre, to say the least... who's going to vote for a president that may quit mid-term to go off and write a book? Clinton quit his last term as governor to run for president after specifically promising not to do so when running for that last term. Ya voted for HIM, didn't you? I seriously doubt he did. Maybe you can figure out why... First I would need to figure out why you think Brenda Ann is a 'him.' Did Mommy skip that lesson? Then I would need to be the type of idiot who plays the stupid "I know something you don't - can you 'figure it out?" game you leftwing morons like to play. And that will be the day. LOL, I thought you were posting to John Barnard, ooops. Yes, that whole "" thing is a complicated code to crack. I'm not a huge Obama fan, but we have to give him time to reverse the mess he was left with before we give him a final score, right? Hmmm, let's see. We were talking about Sarah Palin leaving the office of governor early and how that disqualified her for the presidency, and I asked why Clinton didn't suffer the same condemnation when he promised not to leave early, so your logical progression to the discussion is: "Shouldn't we give Obama more time to fix things?"?? Okay, I'll play along. I was willing to wait. OBAMA was the one who called for a final vote when he said the stimulus worked. Even a rightwing moron waits until the game is over before declaring a winner, right? I wouldn't know what a rightwing moron does or thinks, but do you recall when the "worst presidency in history" accusations first started during the Bush administration? I'm remembering the great patience the Left had while calling the 'surge' a failure before it had even started. Same for the invasion of Baghdad. Come to think, the tax cuts didn't exactly get a full count either. Want to try again? -- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far? |
Sarah Palin is Missing!
BDK wrote:
says... BDK wrote: wrote: LOL, I thought you were posting to John Barnard, ooops. Yeah, right . Ooops. rolling my eyes Golly teacher, I messed up, I'm sorry. I'm not a huge Obama fan, Bwahahahahahaah. Uh, yeah, uh huh, EVERYONE believes you. LOL, you're in a good mood today, not all cranky like yesterday. Good for you. You're not a fan of The Messiah.rolling my eyes. The messiah? I only hear right wingers claim anyone considers him one. Of course, you didn't hear Farrakan call him that, you only heard the 'right wingers' repeat it, but didn't hear WHO they were repeating. I believe 'messiah' means 'chosen one' and I'm sure you never heard Oprah call him that with adoration in her eyes? Didn't think so. But compared to the disaster of Bush, some people might think he was. Perhaps it was Bush's eight year crucifixion that made people think messiah when Obama appeared immediately after? Do you want me to pull up your posts in the neighborhood of, should I guess, over two hundred plus, that some how, some way....makes fun of ANYONE that didn't vote for Barry? With the choices available, he was the best one by far. That remains to be seen. Just to keep Palin out of the on deck circle. McCain picking Palin was a huge mistake, a fatal one. I'm not the only one that thinks that way, BTW. You're not the only one, but calling it 'thinking' is a stretch. It was a kneejerk reaction to whoever he might have chosen. She was a wrong choice immediately, and it was only a matter of assembling the negative list of reasons once they had a name to work with. The first article I saw about her - the day her name came out - said that her hairdo was 20 years out of date! I guess they had to work fast. -- So, how's that whole "hopey - changey" thing working out for you so far? |
Sarah Palin is Missing!
"Jim Alder" wrote in message 42... I don't know. Maybe. Did she promise NOT to? That was kind of my point, since Clinton LIED, saying specifically that he would NOT do that to win the election, then went ahead and did it anyway. Isn't it just possible (and mind you, I think that Clinton should be serving prison time over the Monica thing) that MAYBE there's a LITTLE bit of difference between lying and changing one's mind? Lying is when he said "I did not have sex with that woman, Monica Lewinski." I would have to read the original text, but somehow I doubt that the word "promise" entered into the statement. Even if it did, and he later found he had a good chance to obtain higher office, and thus changed his mind, it still would not be a lie. A lie is a purposeful untruth.. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com