|
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is
seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- in Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis were totalitarian control freaks. Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have won. The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the very height of German Romanticism. That is also why the Nazis hated both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the destruction of marriage and traditional families. Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn [ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169 ] [ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190 ] are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today. Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident, but a deliberate PR stunt. The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history, and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history. "Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics, because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world, not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the world today?) Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. The 1968 student riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time. Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy, capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism" because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science, technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism" became so popular in our college English and History departments. That is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media -- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the mediots who are running our media today. Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent "geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. Both Hitler and Stalin hated real science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps. The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth. That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not happy with searching out the truth. And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air tight. Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal Fascists] of today. But let's not forget their historical antecedents either. Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.] |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
On Aug 8, 9:23*am, No ObaMao wrote:
Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- *in Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis were totalitarian control freaks. Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have won. The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the very height of German Romanticism. *That is also why the Nazis hated both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the destruction of marriage and traditional families. Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169 ] [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190 ] are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today. Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident, but a deliberate PR stunt. The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history, and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history. "Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics, because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world, not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the world today?) Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. *The 1968 student riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time. Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy, capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism" because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science, technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism" became so popular in our college English and History departments. That is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media -- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the mediots who are running our media today. Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent "geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. * Both Hitler and Stalin hated real science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps. The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth. That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not happy with searching out the truth. And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air tight. Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal Fascists] of today. But let's not forget their historical antecedents either. Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.] Nice diatribe, but you do know that Liberal and Fascist are mutually exclusive, therefore your entire premise is a total cluster**** of idiocy, right? Moron |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
On Aug 8, 9:26*am, SteelersFanInTx wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.] Nice diatribe, but you do know that Liberal and Fascist are mutually exclusive, therefore your entire premise is a total cluster**** of idiocy, right? * Moron Another PhD [Piled highest & Deepest] LMFAO! http://liberalfascism.nationalreview.com/ |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis - “Astroturfazoids” vs the “Angry Mob” in Denver
On Aug 8, 9:23*am, No ObaMao wrote:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html “Astroturfazoids” vs the “Angry Mob” in Denver http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....mob-in-denver/ |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
No ObaMao wrote:
http://liberalfascism.nationalreview.com/ Shorter Jonah Goldberg: "I can win any debate by redefining the terms." |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
On Aug 8, 10:00*am, Spartakus wrote:
No ObaMao wrote: http://liberalfascism.nationalreview.com/ Shorter Jonah Goldberg: "I can win any debate by redefining the terms." Yeap, that's what Communists, Socialists and Liberal Fascists have done since Woodrow Wilson, PhD. |
(OT) : Nancy Pelosi [D-CA] -claims- Nazis Swastika Carrying AngryMobs - Another Liberal Lie and Democrat Distortion
On Aug 8, 7:57*am, Barry wrote:
- - On Aug 8, 9:23*am, No ObaMao wrote: - - http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html - - “Astroturfazoids” vs the “Angry Mob” in Denver - - http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....oturfazoids-vs... Barry, OK so one of the Protesters was carrying was one Sign with a Red Circle and a Red Bar {witch is the International "NO" 'Do-Not' Signage} that was imposed over a Black NAZI Swastika http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swastika -translation- SAY NO TO FASCISM [.] http://www.amazon.com/Anti-Swastika-.../dp/B0012SIORU -signage- Anti-Swastika But Democrat Pelosi only sees what she wants to see; and tells the Liberal Lie -aka- Democrat Distortion. "Protesters with Swastikas" when there was only an Anti-Swastika. {Just Say NO to Fascism} http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/0...n_252815..html This is because Pelosi herself is a Liberal-Fascist and Obama-Care© is a Liberal Plan to Enslave all Americans by Higher Taxes to a Big Government Single-Payer Health Care System that is Fascist by nature; because some of it's key features : * A "Scoring" System that would DENY both Medical Services and Treatment to Senior Citizens. {Passive Euthanasia} http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...d118cc06611488 * 'Imposed' More Birth Control for the Un-Desirable * 'Counseled' More Women to have Abortions after their First Baby like China's One Child Mandate obama-care america's seniors 'fear' it ~ RHF |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
On Aug 8, 7:26*am, SteelersFanInTx wrote:
On Aug 8, 9:23*am, No ObaMao wrote: Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- *in Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis were totalitarian control freaks. Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have won. The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the very height of German Romanticism. *That is also why the Nazis hated both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the destruction of marriage and traditional families. Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169 ] [http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190 ] are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today. Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident, but a deliberate PR stunt. The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history, and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history. "Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics, because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world, not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the world today?) Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. *The 1968 student riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time. Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy, capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism" because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science, technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism" became so popular in our college English and History departments. That is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media -- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the mediots who are running our media today. Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent "geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. * Both Hitler and Stalin hated real science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps. The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth. That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not happy with searching out the truth. And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air tight. Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal Fascists] of today. But let's not forget their historical antecedents either. Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.] - Nice diatribe, but you do know that Liberal and Fascist are mutually - exclusive, therefore your entire premise is a total cluster**** of - idiocy, right? * Moron SFiTx - "diatribe" SFiTx - "cluster****" SFiTx - "idiocy" SFiTx - "Moron" |
(OT) : Nancy Pelosi [D-CA] -claims- Nazis Swastika CarryingAng...
Whoreraldo Rivera once drew a map in the sand where our Troops were
going to next, in Iraq, so the whole wide World could see . TRAITOR! Whoreraldo Rivera! http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=271332 cuhulin |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
"SteelersFanInTx" wrote in message ... On Aug 8, 2:43 pm, "~ RHF" wrote: . The Validity of the Term "Liberal Fascist" ? Can It Exist? ? Does It Exist ?http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...5e688bb0612c63 ~ibid~ . . Who Is A "Fascist"? & Who Is A "Liberal" Are Some {Not All} One And The Same -aka- "Liberal-Fascist" Can They Exist ? & Do They Exist ? -the-reality-is-the-reality- ~ RHF . -Now, either show a REFERENCE book (ie. dictionary, thesaurus) to prove -they aren't mutually exclusive, or admit that you only have idiotic -rhetoric as your basis and go teabagging with your buddies. 'Liberal fascist'? Oh, like one of those pious atheists. Tricky *******s. Don't take your eye off 'em. Republicans might like to know that some prominent world figures share their opinion of liberals. Men like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Osama bin Laden, King Abdullah ibn Saud, they hate liberals too. I remember my old dad telling me you can know a man by the company he keeps. |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
On Aug 9, 12:32*am, "Grand Mal" wrote:
"SteelersFanInTx" wrote in message ... On Aug 8, 2:43 pm, "~ RHF" wrote: . The Validity of the Term "Liberal Fascist" ? Can It Exist? ? Does It Exist ?http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...af4569002bba33.... ~ibid~ . . Who Is A "Fascist"? & Who Is A "Liberal" Are Some {Not All} One And The Same -aka- "Liberal-Fascist" Can They Exist ? & Do They Exist ? -the-reality-is-the-reality- ~ RHF . -Now, either show a REFERENCE book (ie. dictionary, thesaurus) to prove -they aren't mutually exclusive, or admit that you only have idiotic -rhetoric as your basis and go teabagging with your buddies. - 'Liberal fascist'? Oh, like one of those pious atheists. Tricky *******s. - Don't take your eye off 'em. - Republicans might like to know that some prominent world figures share their - opinion of liberals. - Men like Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Osama bin Laden, - King Abdullah ibn Saud, they hate liberals too. - I remember my old dad telling me you can - know a man by the company he keeps. Dang "GM" you are right Prez Obama and the Saudi King exchanging 'gifts' http://www.sanfranciscosentinel.com/...di-king-21.jpg |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
"Spartakus" wrote in message ... Barry wrote: Spartakus wrote: No ObaMao wrote: (There's no such thing as a "liberal fascist". Anyone with a connection to reality would tell you that.) REALLY! What the hell do you call the white house trying to eliminate dissent? How about all of the conservatives receiving pies in the face (Ann Coulter) at Columbia, while Ahmedinajad was welcomed with open arms. I won't even mention all of the nasty surprises awaiting you in health care reform. Opps, it's now health insurance reform. Hitler was a proud member of the SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY. I could go on and on. HankG |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
As far as I can tell Nancy Pelosi's Nazis are the Republicans. While they are willing to confuse Nazis and Facist with Socialists and Communists the tactics being used mirror those of these groups. The current trick of disrupting town meetings would fit well with Mao's Red Guard. Heck they even share in the criticism of the Univiersity's "Cultural Elite". |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
|
(OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Rats© to "Report" {Rat-Out} their fellow American Citizens for saying anything bad about BHO
On Aug 9, 3:49*pm, Gary Forbis wrote:
As far as I can tell Nancy Pelosi's Nazis are the Republicans. While they are willing to confuse Nazis and Facist with Socialists and Communists the tactics being used mirror those of these groups. The current trick of disrupting town meetings would fit well with Mao's Red Guard. Prez Obama calls upon the Obama-Finks© to "Monitor" {Spy-On} their fellow American Citizens http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...e324c25fa3048f Liberal-Fascism Is Alive In Washington DC and It's Headquaters is the White House. -Heck they even share in the criticism of the - Univiersity's "Cultural Elite". -correction- That would be the Univiersity's "Socialist-Marxist Cultural Elite". |
(OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Rats© to "Report" {Rat-Out} their fellow American Citizens for saying anything bad about BHO
On Aug 10, 1:20*am, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Aug 9, 3:49*pm, Gary Forbis wrote: As far as I can tell Nancy Pelosi's Nazis are the Republicans. While they are willing to confuse Nazis and Facist with Socialists and Communists the tactics being used mirror those of these groups. The current trick of disrupting town meetings would fit well with Mao's Red Guard. Prez Obama calls upon the Obama-Finks© to "Monitor" {Spy-On} their fellow American Citizenshttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1ae324c25fa3048f Liberal-Fascism Is Alive In Washington DC and It's Headquaters is the White House. The idea was to fight ideas with ideas. If you know who is spreding bad ideas you know who you need to convince. The irrational fears suggested by the right wing spin machine are there to make sure this isn't a rational debate. -Heck they even share in the criticism of the - Univiersity's "Cultural Elite". -correction- That would be the Univiersity's "Socialist-Marxist Cultural Elite". The motif is the same as is the playbook. i guess being anti-obama for his liberal politics and programs is now a 'crime' in america ~ RHF Unlike under Bush, the protestors aren't being arrested for peaceful protest. Crimes are still crimes, even under a "liberal" president. The ends never justify the means. It cannot be the case that the same acts are moral or immoral depending upon one's cause. |
(OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Rats©to "Report" {Rat-Out...
|
(OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Rats©to "Report" {Rat-Out...
|
(OT) : The Obama-Enemies-List . . . It's Growing Everyday
On Aug 10, 6:03*am, Gary Forbis wrote:
On Aug 10, 1:20*am, "~ RHF" wrote: On Aug 9, 3:49*pm, Gary Forbis wrote: As far as I can tell Nancy Pelosi's Nazis are the Republicans. While they are willing to confuse Nazis and Facist with Socialists and Communists the tactics being used mirror those of these groups. The current trick of disrupting town meetings would fit well with Mao's Red Guard. Prez Obama calls upon the Obama-Finks© to "Monitor" {Spy-On} their fellow American Citizenshttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1ae324c25fa3048f Liberal-Fascism Is Alive In Washington DC and It's Headquaters is the White House. The idea was to fight ideas with ideas. *If you know who is spreding bad ideas you know who you need to convince. *The irrational fears suggested by the right wing spin machine are there to make sure this isn't a rational debate. -Heck they even share in the criticism of the - Univiersity's "Cultural Elite". -correction- That would be the Univiersity's "Socialist-Marxist Cultural Elite". The motif is the same as is the playbook. i guess being anti-obama for his liberal politics and programs is now a 'crime' in america ~ RHF Unlike under Bush, the protestors aren't being arrested for peaceful protest. *Crimes are still crimes, even under a "liberal" president. *The ends never justify the means. -*It cannot be the case that the same acts are - moral or immoral depending upon one's cause. But with the Obama-Regime© They Are [.] Protest Against Prez Obama's Politics Policies and Programs are Immoral and a Crime : Judge Prez Obama's Own Words and Actions * Prez Obama calls upon the Obama-Finks© to "Monitor" {Spy-On} their fellow American Citizens * Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Rats© to "Report" {Rat-Out} their fellow American Citizens * The Obama-Enemies-List . . . It's Growing Everyday ALL Part of "Liberal-Fascism" Obama Style. http://wearesc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86585 |
(OT) : Afghanistan - It's Obama's Bloody War ! . . . and It's GrowingEveryday
On Aug 10, 7:55*pm, wrote:
- When/if the U.S.Military Draft makes a come back, - who/whom are the dims and libs going to blame it on? - cuhulin The New World Order [US] Draft will add to the Obama-Death-List . . . and It's Growing Everyday -wrt- Afghanistan - It's Obama's Bloody War ! http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/18/wa...eb-troops.html + More Troops - Thanks to Prez Obama + More Money - Thanks to Prez Obama + More Equipment - Thanks to Prez Obama + More Death - Thanks to Prez Obama WAY TO GO PREZ OBAMA ! http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/25/we.../25cooper.html =Q= Where are the Peace Protesters Now ? Oh the Silence of the Liberals when They Kill in the Name of Their New World Socialist Order |
(OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Rats© to "Report" {Rat-Out} their fellow American Citizens for saying anything bad about BHO
Gary Forbis wrote:
It cannot be the case that the same acts are moral or immoral depending upon one's cause. Tell that to the evangelicals trying to take over the government and the military. We are screwed. America is over. |
(OT) : Prez Obama calls-up the Obama-Rats©to "Report" {Rat-Out...
HEALTH CARE REFORM: CONGRESS HAS NO AUTHORITY TO LEGISLATE.
www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd461.htm cuhulin |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
"HankG" wrote:
"Spartakus" wrote... (There's no such thing as a "liberal fascist". *Anyone with a connection to reality would tell you that.) REALLY! *What the hell do you call the white house trying to eliminate dissent? You're delusional. How about all of the conservatives receiving pies in the face (Ann Coulter) at Columbia, Street theatre. while Ahmedinajad was welcomed with open arms. He was given a forum and those who listened did not agree with him. I won't even mention all of the nasty surprises awaiting you in health care reform. *Opps, it's now health insurance reform. Hitler was a proud member of the SOCIALIST DEMOCRAT PARTY. Better brush up on your history. There was no "Socialist Democrat Party" in Germany back then. There was a "Social Democratic Party", and I can assure you, Hitler was *not* a member. In fact, Hitler *banned* the Social Democrat Party in 1933. I could go on and on. And be just as wrong. |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
www.worldwar2database.com/html/nazis.htm
Cuzz, if y'all wants to get in a real Good newsgroper abouts World War Two stuff, head on over to the soc.history.war.world-war-ii newsgroper. cuhulin |
Nancy Pelosi's Nazis
Lilies of the Field, TCM channel.
AMEN.Nobody could sing it like Sidney Poitier, and those five Sisters. cuhulin |
Quote:
N9ZAS. |
Amateur Radio Group?
n9zas wrote: No ObaMao;685430 Wrote: Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- in Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis were totalitarian control freaks. Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have won. The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the very height of German Romanticism. That is also why the Nazis hated both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the destruction of marriage and traditional families. Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn [ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169 ] [ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190 ] are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today. Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident, but a deliberate PR stunt. The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history, and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history. "Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics, because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world, not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the world today?) Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. The 1968 student riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time. Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy, capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism" because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science, technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism" became so popular in our college English and History departments. That is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media -- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the mediots who are running our media today. Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent "geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. Both Hitler and Stalin hated real science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps. The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth. That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not happy with searching out the truth. And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air tight. Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal Fascists] of today. But let's not forget their historical antecedents either. Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.] Who really cares? Babble,babble!!! WHAT does any of this crap have to do with amateur radio??? Stay on topic,huh? N9ZAS. I wasn't aware that this was an 'amateur radio' group. dxAce Michigan USA |
Quote:
Enough already! You are in the SHORTWAVE forum,FYI! N9ZAS. |
Amateur Radio Group?
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:08:14 -0400, dxAce wrote:
n9zas wrote: No ObaMao;685430 Wrote: Nancy Pelosi has a very florid imagination. In her mind's eye she is seeing people "carrying swastikas" at Town Hall meetings to protest Obama's Central Plan for American medicine. Which makes me wonder why all the swastika-carrying nutsies -- or Nazis? or just nasties? -- in Ms. Pelosi's imagination are not in favor of Obama's plan to control US medicine. It's a control freak's dream, after all, and the Nazis were totalitarian control freaks. Can we get serious? One of the painful things today is the massive failure of history teaching in the schools and colleges, so that kids confuse Hitler's Nazis with the people who fought for freedom against them. Stalin and Hitler forged an alliance in 1938. Had Hitler not gone mad and invaded Stalin's Soviet Union, the Nazis and Soviets would have gone to war against the West together. And they would have won. The Nazis were totalitarian romantics. That is why Hitler imitated and glorified Richard Wagner, the Siegfried mythographer who marked the very height of German Romanticism. That is also why the Nazis hated both Jews and Christians, and promoted a neo-pagan religion based on the Nordic gods and the glorification of killing and war. The Nazis were romantics -- just like the hippies in the Sixties. They loved going "back to nature," "the noble Savage," nudism, and the destruction of marriage and traditional families. Obama's former good buds Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn [ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2169 ] [ http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/i...asp?indid=2190 ] are prototypical anarchist Romantics, people who are quite willing to kill for their cause. Hitler's Nazis were emotional revolutionaries with an endless craving to attack, subvert, control and co-opt all the existing structures of society. Oh, and yes, they had a Mass Cult of the Leader not unlike the idolatry whipped up for Barack Obama today. Obama's "Citizens of the World!" speech in front of 200,000 cheering Berliners had that very familiar look to it. That was not an accident, but a deliberate PR stunt. The best explanation of Nazism ever written is Peter Viereck's Metapolitics: The roots of the Nazi mind. If you only give your kids one book this year, that should be the one. Viereck's Metapolitics was written in great fear and passion during the early days of Hitler's rise, when the author was still a graduate student of German history, and then revised two decades later. But it's one of those books that remains relevant because it hits the nail on the head. You can't get more accurate than Viereck did. A few years later Thomas Mann wrote an Epilogue to Viereck's book, endorsing its main conclusions. They both understood how deeply the Nazis were rooted in German history. "Metapolitics" is the name the Nazis gave to their brand of politics, because in their minds they were trying to change the entire world, not just be another political party. Marxism is metapolitics; Nazism is metapolitics. And yes, some of today's political fantasists dream the same dreams. (Hint: Who do you think wants to revolutionize the world today?) Metapolitics was very controversial even after World War Two, because it criticized European Romanticism, beloved by European and American scholars and writers. But Peter Viereck was right and his critics were wrong. German Romanticism of the totalitarian variety survived the Nazis, and just re-emerged as the [Socialist] Green movement in Europe. Nazism was always a "back to nature" movement anyway. After the Nazis were defeated, all the Wagnerian Romantics turned into Socialist Romantics. Often they were the very same people, like Martin Heidegger, Paul de Man, and even Jean-Paul Sartre. The 1968 student riots in Europe, which ultimately brought the Greens to power, were run by anarchists identical to the Nazi rioters of the Munich beer halls. Some of them have realized as much since that time. Post-modernism is an attack on Western rationalism, democracy, capitalism, free speech and free thought. It's called "Post-Modernism" because it wants to kill modernism. Modernism stands for science, technology, democracy, medicine and yes, bourgeois capitalism: The keys to modern prosperity and well-being. That is why "Post-Modernism" became so popular in our college English and History departments. That is also why we have the "global warming" fraud, the anti-science movements, the anti-nuclear power campaigns, the "post-modern" media -- run by propaganda artists who were taught in college that lying for a "good cause" was better than telling the truth. Those are the mediots who are running our media today. Culturally, the Nazis would have felt right at home with that attack on Western rationalism, capitalism, and freedom of thought. It was exactly what they wanted. The Nazis were Post-Modernists. Modernity was their enemy. Hitler characteristically called Albert Einstein's relativity theory "Jewish science." Back in Moscow, Jozef Stalin promoted an attack on science by peddling fraudulent agricultural genetics. Stalin thought he could discipline his marching ranks of wheat stalks to grow taller by force, encouraged by his fraudulent "geneticist" Trofim Lysenko. Both Hitler and Stalin hated real science. They had real scientists sent to concentration camps. The reason is of course that real science is about telling the truth. That is why "global warming" is also a totalitarian scheme; it's fraudulent science. It is also why the Left cannot openly debate the pros and cons of Central Planning in American medicine. They are not happy with searching out the truth. And I'm afraid, that is also why Nancy Pelosi has to imagine "people with swastikas" flooding the Town Hall meetings in America, to fight against all the Good and Noble people like herself. Nancy is a certifiable airhead, but the beliefs echoing in her head come from decades of ideological indoctrination -- of the Totalitarian Romantic kind. People like Ms. Pelosi have been given all the answers by the ideologues of the Left. That is why their minds are shut so air tight. Let's not call them names, our Totalitarian Romantics [Liberal Fascists] of today. But let's not forget their historical antecedents either. Hint: It's not Washington, Madison, Jefferson or Lincoln. http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/...cys_nazis.html HEIL HITLER! [get used to it.] Who really cares? Babble,babble!!! WHAT does any of this crap have to do with amateur radio??? Stay on topic,huh? N9ZAS. I wasn't aware that this was an 'amateur radio' group. dxAce Michigan USA About as much as it is a 'shortwave radio' group anymore. If it weren't for John Plimmer, Brenda Ann, and sometimes you Steve, there wouldn't even be an on topic post in this wasteland. -- "What do you mean there's no movie?" |
Amateur Radio Group?
CountFloyd wrote:
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 05:08:14 -0400, dxAce wrote: About as much as it is a 'shortwave radio' group anymore. If it weren't for John Plimmer, Brenda Ann, and sometimes you Steve, there wouldn't even be an on topic post in this wasteland. Didja get any onya? |
(OT) : Take One Name 'Off' {Offed?} The Obama-Enemies-List
On Aug 10, 5:34*pm, "~ RHF" wrote:
On Aug 10, 6:03*am, Gary Forbis wrote: On Aug 10, 1:20*am, "~ RHF" wrote: On Aug 9, 3:49*pm, Gary Forbis wrote: As far as I can tell Nancy Pelosi's Nazis are the Republicans. While they are willing to confuse Nazis and Facist with Socialists and Communists the tactics being used mirror those of these groups. The current trick of disrupting town meetings would fit well with Mao's Red Guard. PrezObamacalls upon theObama-Finks© to "Monitor" {Spy-On} their fellow American Citizenshttp://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/1ae324c25fa3048f Liberal-Fascism Is Alive In Washington DC and It's Headquaters is the White House. The idea was to fight ideas with ideas. *If you know who is spreding bad ideas you know who you need to convince. *The irrational fears suggested by the right wing spin machine are there to make sure this isn't a rational debate. -Heck they even share in the criticism of the - Univiersity's "Cultural Elite". -correction- That would be the Univiersity's "Socialist-Marxist Cultural Elite". The motif is the same as is the playbook. i guess being anti-obamafor his liberal politics and programs is now a 'crime' in america ~ RHF Unlike under Bush, the protestors aren't being arrested for peaceful protest. *Crimes are still crimes, even under a "liberal" president. *The ends never justify the means. -*It cannot be the case that the same acts are - moral or immoral depending upon one's cause. But with theObama-Regime© They Are [.] Protest Against PrezObama'sPolitics Policies and Programs are Immoral and a Crime : Judge PrezObama'sOwn Words and Actions * PrezObamacalls upon theObama-Finks© to "Monitor" {Spy-On} their fellow American Citizens * PrezObamacalls-up theObama-Rats© to "Report" {Rat-Out} their fellow American Citizens * TheObama-Enemies-List. . . It's Growing Everyday ALL Part of "Liberal-Fascism"ObamaStyle.http://wearesc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86585 *. PrezObamaRemember When Democrats* -claimed- "Since When Has It Been Part of American Patriotism to Keep Our Mouths Shut?" - Hillary Clinton 2006 * Now We Have The Enforced Silence of Democrat Party of the USofA Liberal-Fascism PrezObamaRemember When Democrats* -claimed- "Dissent is the Highest form of Patriotism" - Hillary Clinton 2006 * Now We Have The Enforced Silence of Democrat Party of the USofA Liberal-Fascism PrezObamaRemember When Democrats* -claimed- "Blind Faith In Bad Leadership Is Not Patriotism" - Hillary Clinton 2006 * Now We Have The Enforced Silence of Democrat Party of the USofA Liberal-Fascism yeah - prezobamaremember when . . . ~ RHF *. Take One Name 'Off' {Offed?} The Obama-Enemies-List© ! Ex-Blagojevich Adviser Dies Before Prison Term ! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090913/...ndraiser_death -or- Was this Obama-Cide© ? - Which is becoming like the Arkansas {Clinton} Death Syndrome ! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1142670/posts * The Clinton Body Count ? Will Prez Obama Make Bigger ? http://www.zpub.com/un/un-bc-body.html * The Clinton Legacy ? Will the Obama-Regime© Out-Do-Them ? http://www.prorev.com/legacy.html |
(OT) : Take One Name 'Off' {Offed?} The Obama-Enemies-List
Blago's murder trail?
cuhulin |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com