The Shiny Object of Realism in Democracy?
 

From:
http://www.radiotalkingpoints.com/ar...leTheBall.html


Fumbling the Democratic Football?

Hells Bells, (ACDC rock band tune) if you change the lyrics to say if
you are fighting evil you're a friend of mine (instead of the word
into)? Well, that would make great background music for the splash
page? We may never know...

Before I begin today, let me reference yesterday's article about the
minimum wage and the accusation of whether or not I thought that Rush
thought his listener(s) are stupid. That might be called a penalty in
a football game, he called the play at the end of the game or his
show, and left the conversation hanging in my opinion about the
minimum wage. He didn't have time to explain in detail how that
effects the economy, but a new listener to his show could come to what
conclusion?

Honestly, this is not about Rush Limbaugh. If you want to be Gosh Darn
Golly Gee Honest about what the dollar is, and what it means, then be
careful what you wish for, because we are not going to throw out the
Democrats to let the Republicans fumble the ball again? The problem is
it is not a game anymore? We have ruthless politicians around the
world that murder citizens that they don't like, that voice their
mandates, and they call themselves a Democracy?

Well, I must apologize for not calling over the phone Rush Limbaugh
for his take on the matter. That's why I did not call Rush Limbaugh to
ask why he said that, number one, this is a series, of articles,
written daily, and the explanations for what I say may not be apparent
that day. I also took the way he said what he said, as though that was
final, he had already made up his mind?

Well I am sorry for not calling you Rush, and talking about you
without offering all of the available explanations surrounding the
event in question, because I will not be mistaken for Rev Wind
Mistaken. Revving up the winds of doubt and mistrust, about Rush
Limbaugh? Not me, not today, not unless he does something stupid.
Asking the question is not the same as describing an event, noun,
verb, adjective, or whatever, is it? A question is a question, how you
answer it depends on you?

So this is about the media fumbling the ball? If you can't explain the
value of the dollar, how can you expect your member of Congress to
represent your desires, or worse, discover when we need to throw out
members of Congress that are not protecting or regulating the dollar?
I can illustrate this simply by a common thing many Americans, enjoy,
that Rush Limbaugh, may not, is shopping in the ninety nine cent
store?

Maybe the Rev Wind Mistaken can help us with this one? After all, we
must explain the concepts of social justice to those who rev up the
winds of doubt and trust in government through their negligence of
explaining the issues? How many negro high school drop outs would we
have if Bill Cosby was on the Cover of Time Magazine 7 or 8 times a
year?

Pardon me, Rev Wind Mistaken, I have Attention Definition Disorder.
Getting back to the ninety nine cent store, which has no historical
significance to either the anti-Christ, abortion, or Obama (for those
who are mentally challenged and their minds wander away from the
conversation) what do you say when you pick up an object in the ninety
nine cent store?

Yoda says pick up, you will? Yes Jedi Master, I will now demonstrate
my powers of levitivity for you? What is the minimum wage? A little
over six dollars an hour, or in terms that the high school drop out
can understand, one dollar for ten minutes of your time. Can you
honestly say to yourself, that you could make anything in a ninety
nine cent store, within the space of ten minutes? No, you can not.
Why? Is it explained by currency trading? No. Why? Some things are
made in different countries, and some of them in the United States!

OMG!, well then how do things get sold in a ninety nine cent store,
does it come from the Obama stash? Is it dropped from the sky by
Chinese billionares? Of course not, items in a ninety nine cent store,
perhaps not all, but the majority of, come from mechanical
reproduction lines, the industrial revolution. Produce that we buy
from the store is evidence of intellectual power, that coordinates the
mass production and distribution of materials and labor at a profit.

In other words one kid in the class took his crayon out, drew a
picture, and Glenn Beck went and dug out the ore by hand (imaginary
Obama hard labor retribution laws are awful) (just kidding Glenn) and
another kid took the picture and the ore, and made a machine, and
another kid ran the machine, and another kid wrapped up so many things
per hour, so you could buy something with less than the amount of
money that it represents for you to actually stand in line and wait
ten minutes? That is a miracle?

And that is what your dollar today represents, and it may not
tommorrow? If the value of the dollar is worth at least ten minutes of
your time, and you can purchase something that obviously takes longer
than that to make, is that not only an economic miracle, but an
underscore of how social justice is represented by freedom from the
government?

What really made the ninety nine cent widget? Skills. Education. Not
the minimum wage. The miracle of the industrial revolution is that
your purchasing power is only limited by the skills and physical
limits of those making the products, not by units of time measured in
different activities.

So this is the boiling down to where Rev Wind Mistaken(s) out there
can think about their choice of words a little more carefully in the
future? Bribing votes in a Democracy results in negligent poverty when
politicians award benefits to those who opt out of participating in
the industrial revolution, refusing to learn skills, refusing to
create things others need?

Democracy disguised as looting, or revolutionary backwards type
dictatorships only accomplish what, tweaking the media to appeal to
those communities where the high school drop out rate approaches 70
percent? Do you have any idea how aggravating to watch a news station
conduct on the street interviews for people voting for mayor, and
honestly say, they don't know who they are voting for, two days before
the election, or why?

These are the people who are going to kick you out of your house by
jacking up property taxes you may not be able to pay due to rampant
spending so large you will never find all the money because it is
spread out everywhere, and they are "clean cut", polite talkers, and
will distract you with shiny objects to take your mind off the direct
connection between spending, rising tax rates, and rising insurance
rates due to increased values?

Shiny objects such as queers in Congress with buddies in the mortgage
industry that benefit from rising property values? Only 30 percent of
voters are expected to vote for a mayoral race, because the media
wants you to believe it does not matter?

Why the media would never do that, would they, censor out the people
that are going to vote, saying "hell ya I'm gonna throw those bums out
of office", or is the editor going to pick out some goof ball that
says he does not care (or is silent because afraid of union thugs
knocking on his door?)? Is this the kind of Democracy you really want?

Getting back to Rev Wind Mistaken, social justice is why America is so
wonderful, so great, and not an experiment. It is a gift from God
because the founders understood the principals of slavery. They
understood that the rich will rule the poor, and designed a system
where by political momentum, create a society where everyone can get
rich. That has been achieved, they call it freedom.

We of course have voluntary slavery, called credit financing, Rev Wind
Mistaken(s) out there, and some of them wear football jerseys? The
bottom line is they want to censor Rush Limbaugh by calling him a
racist, and I applaud Rush Limbaugh today for finally demanding that
these people retract their baseless accusations? They want to destroy
Rush Limbaugh by making new listeners hate him before they hear him?
God pays back the evil of stealing audience members seven fold?

I wish it ended there, but it does not? If intellectual based income
(services, books, magazines, novelties, whatever) is limited by the
spending power of your citizens, then what has to happen if the supply
is greater than the demand? If 60 percent of your workforce is
unemployed, and they all wrote a book, would your economy function if
every book was sold?

I doubt it, you have to know the discretionary income of your citizens
in order to calculate that, and believe me, they are spending the
equivalent of eons figuring out how and what you spend your money on?
If you come to the conclusion that you can not create jobs by everyone
writing books, or computer programs, or whatever else services
involve, what is left? The industrial revolution, running a machine?
Is a professional football game based on labor, or intellectual hype
that makes money?

So cap and tax, or tax and kill seniors, will do what? Fire up the
banana peels, to design and run new machines, or Fire up the banana
peels, and wonder why they are not high on the economic ladder scale?
We then see that a minimum wage can play a valuable role in society,
but hight tech skills is realism. Is the minimum wage a result of
positive thinking, when the real agenda is to fool the poor, and
create communism and unions? Did some National Public Rip Off Radio
Station mention a book today about how positive thinking, the lack
there of, is why there are so many negro high school drop outs, with
poor manners and a history of not being reliable, and then play a
bunch of classical music to make them watch the burial of their nation
while enjoying their day? Did you watch the snow fall today, all most
like she enjoyed figuring out how Americans will not avoid these
taxes? Do snow flakes have genders, or do Republicans have any, pause,
way to change this?

Being that this is the most powerful keyboard in the world, and will
waive ten fingers in front of your eyeballs, uttering the phrase you
can't see me, after you receive the hardest hitting, the greatest
smacketh downeth of all time, you've got to ask yourself a
question...did I fumble the ball, or ...

do you feel lucky?



Animated videos may be based on snippets from video footage from
CSPAN, special effects may be incoroporated snips of public videos
provided, subject to the following conditions:

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!