RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Shortwave (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/)
-   -   First they came for Fox News (https://www.radiobanter.com/shortwave/147268-first-they-came-fox-news.html)

N∅ ∅baMa∅[_2_] October 14th 09 01:37 PM

First they came for Fox News
 
MSNBC/Media matters says quarantining FOX News is not enough and
encourages folks to go at FOX news.

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....-for-fox-news/

http://mises.org/books/TRTS/

Christopher Helms October 14th 09 02:12 PM

First they came for Fox News
 
On Oct 14, 7:37*am, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:
MSNBC/Media matters says quarantining FOX News is not enough and
encourages “folks to go at FOX news.”



Legitimate criticism solidly based in fact is not "coming after Fox
News," there, Glenn and deflecting criticism by invoking the Holocaust
over something this minor is probably not the best idea.

Dumbed Down Opies October 14th 09 03:04 PM

First they came for Fox News
 

"Knifefight Afterdance" wrote in message
...
N^. ^.baMa^. wrote:
MSNBC/Media matters says quarantining FOX News is not enough and
encourages "folks to go at FOX news."

http://therealbarackobama.wordpress....-they-came-for
-fox-news/

http://mises.org/books/TRTS/


Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.


Yeah, koo koo, koo koo. Call your Dad in Pakistan - Usama bin Dog****er..



N∅ ∅baMa∅[_2_] October 15th 09 12:42 AM

First they came for Fox News
 
On Oct 14, 9:18*am, Baron_Mind wrote:
"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.


That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..


LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwashed 0baMa0-bot heard from

http://liberalfascism.nationalreview.com/

N∅ ∅baMa∅[_2_] October 15th 09 12:46 AM

First they came for Fox News
 
On Oct 14, 8:12*am, Christopher Helms wrote:
On Oct 14, 7:37*am, N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:

MSNBC/Media matters says quarantining FOX News is not enough and
encourages “folks to go at FOX news.”


Legitimate criticism solidly based in fact is not "coming after Fox
News," there, Glenn and deflecting criticism by invoking the Holocaust
over something this minor is probably not the best idea.


Socialism and Fascism always ends in death and destruction.

RHF October 15th 09 03:06 AM

First they came for Fox News
 
On Oct 14, 7:18 am, Baron_Mind wrote:
"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:


- - Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

The is nothing 'crypto' about Liberal-Fascist {ism}

The Liberal Elitist {Fascist} will let you know
that it is THEY {Who Are The Chosen Ones}
that are All Knowing and THEY Will Tell You
How To Live Your Life By Their Rules.

Recovering Liberals Casting-Off Their me, Me. ME ! Elitism
should go to Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings and
repeat the Liberal's {Serenity} Prayer
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serenity_Prayer

God {Allah} Grant Me the Serenity {Political Sanity}
To Accept the Things I Can Not Change in Others
The Courage to Change the Things I Can in Myself
And the Wisdom To Know The Political Difference.

God {Allah} Grant Me the Respect for the Political
Beliefs and Rights of Others and Not to Violate
Their Basic Human Rights as Free Persons in a
Free Society of Equals.

God {Allah} Grant Me Spirit of Brotherhood and
Make Me the Equal of Everyman : Save Me from
trying to be an Overlord and Subjugator of My
Fellow Human Being to My Will and Beliefs.

- That would be a logical fallacy..

That's using 1930's Logic in the 21st Century.
which is a not living in the here-and-now fallacy.

- Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

"ISMs" change and evolve with the passage
of time {decades} and the History of the 1930's
is not the Reality of Today's 21st Century.

Who Is A "Fascist"? & Who Is A "Liberal" ?
Are Some One And The Same ?
-aka- "Liberal-Fascist" ?
Can They Exist ? & Do They Exist ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...9c9a87136d9a10

Baron_Mind October 15th 09 05:25 AM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
"no brainer" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.


That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..


LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash


So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
for example, the Action Franaise movement started a
campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
and restore the king to power. Although this movement
embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
the Kuomintang (The Chinese National Peoples Party), led
by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
the Ustae government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
distinguishes the Ustae from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
but writers on the subject have often found placing
fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
the main established currents, left right and center",
noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
often the right. However, he contends that German Nazism
was closer to Russian communism than to any other non-communist
system."

RHF October 15th 09 09:42 AM

(OT) : Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings
 
On Oct 14, 9:25*pm, Baron_Mind wrote:
"no brainer" whimpered:



Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:


"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:


Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.


That would be a logical fallacy..


--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..


LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash


So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. *Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
* right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
* for example, the Action Franaise movement started a
* campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
* and restore the king to power. Although this movement
* embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
* of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
* revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
* have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
* but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
* the Kuomintang (The Chinese National Peoples Party), led
* by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
* Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
* 20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
* common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
* Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
* from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
* create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
* existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
* regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
* the Ustae government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
* and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
* to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
* distinguishes the Ustae from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
* but writers on the subject have often found placing
* fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
* difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
* was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
* of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
* centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
* of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

* The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
* view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
* argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
* and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
* make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
* that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
* alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
* that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
* become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
* groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

* Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
* to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
* Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
* always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
* elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
* Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
* the main established currents, left right and center",
* noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
* often the right.


- However, he contends that German Nazism
- was closer to Russian communism than to
- any other non-communist system."

Chinese 'Communism' {One Party Rule} Today
in the 21st Century is Uniquely Fascist :
The Great Leader {or One Party Leadership}
The Party United Behind The Great Leader
The People United Behind The Party

Recovering Liberals Casting-Off Their
me, Me. ME ! Elitism and should go to
Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings and
repeat the Liberal's {Serenity} Prayer
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...198eaab596d11c

N∅ ∅baMa∅ October 15th 09 01:41 PM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
On Oct 14, 11:25*pm, Baron_Mind wrote:
"no brainer" whimpered:



Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:


"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:


Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.


That would be a logical fallacy..


--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..


LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash


So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. *Now, for the historic facts..


I strongly suggest you visit a library and a book store and start
reading "the facts" about the roots of Fascism and its mother -
Progressivism and Neo-Liberalism.
Your naked ignorance reveals nothing more then your Communist rooted
propaganda lies.
Your ignorance is naked.

dave October 15th 09 01:50 PM

First they came for Fox News
 
RHF wrote:


"ISMs" change and evolve with the passage
of time {decades} and the History of the 1930's
is not the Reality of Today's 21st Century.


Bull****!

It's always been a war between the assholes and the cool people. The
suits and the dungarees. The Romans and the Christians. The British
and the American rebels. The fascists vs the socialists.

dave October 15th 09 01:59 PM

(OT) : Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings
 
RHF wrote:


Recovering Liberals Casting-Off Their
me, Me. ME ! Elitism and should go to
Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings and
repeat the Liberal's {Serenity} Prayer
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...198eaab596d11c
.


I thought "elite" meant exceptional. What's wrong with that?

dave October 15th 09 03:14 PM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
N? ?baMa? wrote:


I strongly suggest you visit a library and a book store and start
reading "the facts" about the roots of Fascism and its mother -
Progressivism and Neo-Liberalism.


Neo-liberalism? Isn't that the same thing as contemporary conservatism?

You make feel extra special to be a anarchist-socialist.

[email protected] October 15th 09 03:47 PM

(OT) : Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings
 
The Cash for Clunkers End Game (Clunker Pics)
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=275768

What a Waste!!!
cuhulin


N∅ ∅baMa∅[_2_] October 16th 09 01:41 AM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
On Oct 15, 9:14*am, dave wrote:
N? ?baMa? wrote:

I strongly suggest you visit a library and a book store and start
reading "the facts" about the roots of Fascism and its mother -
Progressivism and Neo-Liberalism.


Neo-liberalism? *Isn't that the same thing as contemporary conservatism?

You make feel extra special to be a anarchist-socialist.


Would you kindly mind your own business and stop ruining the Commie
Clap Traps.

Baron_Mind October 16th 09 05:23 AM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
"rf_not" writhed in sociopathic denials because:

Baron_Mind was pointing out the obvious, as it escaped laughing at:

"no brainer" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash


So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
for example, the Action Franaise movement started a
campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
and restore the king to power. Although this movement
embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
the Kuomintang (The Chinese National Peoples Party), led
by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
the Ustae government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
distinguishes the Ustae from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
but writers on the subject have often found placing
fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
the main established currents, left right and center",
noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
often the right. However, he contends that German Nazism
was closer to Russian communism than to any other non-communist
system."


Recovering Liberals


Speaking of elitism, when are you going to quit pretending
that your failed political ideology is above questioning?

--Do you see the contradiction that's inherent with that?

RHF October 16th 09 10:57 AM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
On Oct 15, 7:14*am, dave wrote:
N? ?baMa? wrote:

I strongly suggest you visit a library and a book store and start
reading "the facts" about the roots of Fascism and its mother -
Progressivism and Neo-Liberalism.


- Neo-liberalism? *

Neo-Liberalism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo-liberalism

- Isn't that the same thing as contemporary conservatism?

-wrt- Conservatism in the United States
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conserv..._United_States

- You make feel extra special to be a anarchist-socialist.

Socialist-Anarchist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_anarchist
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_anarchism
* Libertarian Socialism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism

Nah Dave You Are Just "Dave" ~ RHF

dave October 16th 09 01:18 PM

(OT) : Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings
 
RHF wrote:
On Oct 15, 5:59 am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:

- - Recovering Liberals Casting-Off Their
- - me, Me. ME ! Elitism and should go to
- - Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings and
- - repeat the Liberal's {Serenity} Prayer
- - http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...198eaab596d11c
- - .

- I thought "elite" meant exceptional.
- What's wrong with that?

Dave - Nothing if you consider that :
Stalin was Exceptional
Hitler was Exceptional
Mao was Exceptional
Pol Pot was Exceptional
Osama bin Laden is Exceptional
and . . . some Liberals claim that
Prez Obama is very exceptional
.


You are rapidly veering into the Twilight Zone.

RHF October 16th 09 10:20 PM

(OT) : Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings
 
On Oct 16, 5:18*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 15, 5:59 am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:


- - Recovering Liberals Casting-Off Their
- - me, Me. ME ! Elitism and should go to
- - Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings and
- - repeat the Liberal's {Serenity} Prayer
- -http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/a5198eaab596d11c
- - * .


- I thought "elite" meant exceptional.
- What's wrong with that?


- - Dave - Nothing if you consider that :
- - Stalin was Exceptional
- - Hitler was Exceptional
- - Mao was Exceptional
- - Pol Pot was Exceptional
- - Osama bin Laden is Exceptional
- - and . . . some Liberals claim that
- - Prez Obama is very exceptional
http://www.johnmccaindog.com/brain/socialist_brain.gif

- You are rapidly veering into the Twilight Zone.

That's Land of the Obama-Zombies
http://divedesk.com/blog/09/obama-socialist.jpg
They Suck all the Money out of your Hardworking
Body in the name of Obama Higher Taxes

∅baMa∅ Tse Dung October 17th 09 12:43 AM

(OT) : Liberal's Anonymous [LA] Meetings
 
On Oct 16, 5:11*pm, dave wrote:

We have been leaching off the government long enough; time for paying it
back. *Bush tax cuts were merely postponements; *time's up!


No one is stopping you from making a donation to the IRS.

∅baMa∅ Tse Dung October 17th 09 12:45 AM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
On Oct 15, 9:14*am, dave wrote:

You make feel extra special to be a anarchist-socialist.


Which one are you today?


∅baMa∅ Tse Dung October 17th 09 12:47 AM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
On Oct 15, 11:23*pm, Baron_Mind wrote:

Speaking of elitism, when are you going to quit pretending
that your failed political ideology is above questioning?

--Do you see the contradiction that's inherent with that?- Hide quoted text -


Oh - enlighten us Dear Leader with more of your Neo-Commie 0baMa0
Propaganda LIES!
rotfl


Baron_Mind October 17th 09 01:46 AM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
"abdominally dumb" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was laughing at the intentional ignorance of:

"rf_not" writhed in sociopathic denials because:

Baron_Mind was pointing out the obvious, as it escaped laughing at:

"no brainer" whimpered:

Baron_Mind was having a laugh, at the expense of:

"night light, underpants" regurgitated the usual right-wing ignorance:

Everyone knows that liberals are crypto-fascists.

That would be a logical fallacy..

--Fascism has always been a right-wing ideology, per history..

LOL!!! Ah yes, another brainwash

So, you cited a web-log to support your foolishness?

How quaint.. Now, for the historic facts..

http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_...3/Fascism.html

Compared to Other Radical Right-Wing Ideologies

"Although fascism comes in many forms, not all radical
right-wing movements are fascist. In France in the 1890s,
for example, the Action Franaise movement started a
campaign to overthrow the democratic government of France
and restore the king to power. Although this movement
embraced the violence and the antidemocratic tendencies
of fascism, it did not develop the fascist myth of
revolutionary rebirth through popular power. There
have also been many movements that were simply nationalist
but with a right-wing political slant. In China, for example,
the Kuomintang (The Chinese National Peoples Party), led
by Chiang Kai-shek, fought leftist revolutionaries until
Communists won control of China in 1949. Throughout the
20th century this type of right-wing nationalism was
common in many military dictatorships in Latin America,
Africa, and Asia. Fascism should also be distinguished
from right-wing separatist movements that set out to
create a new nation-state rather than to regenerate an
existing one. This would exclude cases such as the Nazi puppet
regime in Croatia during World War II. This regime, known as
the Ustae government, relied on paramilitary groups to govern,
and hoped that their support for Nazism would enable Croatia
to break away from Yugoslavia. This separatist goal
distinguishes the Ustae from genuine fascist movements."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Position in the political spectrum

"Fascism is normally described as "extreme right",
but writers on the subject have often found placing
fascism on a conventional left-right political spectrum
difficult. There is a scholarly consensus that fascism
was influenced by both the left and the right. A number
of historians have regarded fascism either as a revolutionary
centrist doctrine, as a doctrine which mixes philosophies
of the left and the right, or as both of those things.

The historians Eugen Weber, David Renton, and Robert Soucy
view fascism as on the ideological right. Rod Stackelberg
argues that fascism opposes egalitarianism (particularly racial)
and democracy, which according to him are characteristics that
make it an extreme right-wing movement. Stanley Payne states
that pre-war fascism found a coherent identity through
alliances with right-wing movements. Roger Griffin argues
that since the end of World War II, fascist movements have
become intertwined with the radical right, describing certain
groups as part of a "fascist radical right".

Walter Laqueur says that historical fascism "did not belong
to the extreme Left, yet defining it as part of the extreme
Right is not very illuminating either", but that it "was
always a coalition between radical, populist ('fascist')
elements and others gravitating toward the extreme Right".
Payne says "fascists were unique in their hostility to all
the main established currents, left right and center",
noting that they allied with both left and right, but more
often the right. However, he contends that German Nazism
was closer to Russian communism than to any other non-communist
system."

Recovering Liberals


Speaking of elitism, when are you going to quit pretending
that your failed political ideology is above questioning?


Oh - enlighten us


Enlighten yourself, if that's your path, neophyte..

--Yours is no disgrace..

RHF October 17th 09 06:43 AM

(OT) : The Obama+Pelosi+Reid Tax Hikes Planned for 2011
 
On Oct 16, 3:11*pm, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:
On Oct 16, 5:18 am, dave wrote:


- You are rapidly veering into the Twilight Zone.


- - That's Land of the Obama-Zombies
- - http://divedesk.com/blog/09/obama-socialist.jpg
- - They Suck all the Money out of your Hardworking
- - Body in the name of Obama Higher Taxes

- We have been leaching off the government long enough;
- time for paying it back.
-*Bush tax cuts were merely postponements;
-*time's up!

Dave yes the Year 2011 is approaching and soon all
the working American people will get a Tax Increase
of 13% due to Prez Obama and the Democrat Controlled
US Congress of Pelosi and Reid.
http://www.kiplinger.com/businessres...11_090424.html

Prez Obama 'promised' {fingers crossed} No New Taxes;
and BHO is sort-of kind-of right cause all Americans will
be paying Higher Taxes at the Old {not new} Tax Rates
in 2011.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...110901790.html

Add Prez Obama's Cap-&-Trade Taxes and Fees

Add Prez Obama's Obama-Care Taxes and Fees

dave October 17th 09 01:03 PM

First they came for "liberal media", then they made fools ofthemselves with Lush Dumbjaugh, Grim Dreck and Insanity with Clowns..
 
?baMa? Tse Dung wrote:
On Oct 15, 9:14 am, dave wrote:
You make feel extra special to be a anarchist-socialist.


Which one are you today?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_socialism


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com