RadioBanter - Fort Hood Shooting was Preventable

From:

http://www.radiotalkingpoints.com/ar...eA ndLet.html

Fort Hood Shooting was Preventable

I'll keep this short and sweet. The shootings at a recruiter station
in the United States earlier this year were evidence that a subversive
element in the United States was present and acting to effect the harm
of soldiers in the employ of the United States Government. The event
of 9/11 was also evidence that radical terrorists were in the United
States trying to inflict damage.

This event is preventable by following the most basic of all infantry
combat rules, don't congregate soldiers. This goes back to the
Revolutionary War, you don't stand in a line and exchange fire with
the enemy. I sincerely believe there was no need to congregate those
soldiers in that manner on the base, they could have staggered the
processing so that no more than a dozen or so soldiers would be
processed at any one point in the laborious processing day, or within
firing range of a hand gun.

This is not unreasonable, considering that the military probably has
within its ranks members who have been exposed to radical Islamic
propaganda, which has proven to be effective when certain social and
environmental factors are mentally projected in the right combination
on an individual to effect their thought patterns and ideas. Without
going into a lengthy psychoanalysis (90% of the science is junk
anyway, you end up writing a book to disprove contemporary thinking)
the same thought process that a person goes through to wake up and go
to work with a smile on their face can also be manipulated to make one
think their lot in life is hopeless because of others (sound familiar,
tactics used on the poor?)

Of course this is a curious observation to communists, since you can
not possibly pursue a world government when there are large blocks of
poverty, and redistributing the wealth does nothing to tell people how
to create it, which deepens, rather than solves problems (hence why
Conservatism is on fire today)?

I had the privilege of serving at Fort Hood, and when the base is
locked down, the security is very deep, including metal detectors at
entrances of sensitive buildings. These kinds of things are not new,
the events have happened through out the history of war, and police
stations and other military recruiting centers are targeted frequently
by those in Iraq and other countries.

By congregating so many unarmed soldiers in one area, it sounds like
they made a temptation to good to pass up to the mind of a terrorist.
In any event, you can be sure that future security measures may
include armed guards to accompany events where large numbers of
soldiers are congregated, or that soldiers are allowed to carry
personal fire arms. Part of being a soldier that lives, is
understanding that to avoid becoming a target, you stay away from
others as much as possible.

Military training bases are basically artificial hell on earth, in
some aspects. They simulate combat and social pressures designed to
break and train soldiers for real battles. If you did not want the hot
temper of an 18 year old with a gun in a training environment, surely
the trainers and supervisors should always have them. An ammo clip
with $10 worth of ammo could have prevented the loss of life and
liberty, not to mention the hundreds of hours of training spent on
these people.

And it also sends the message to the rest of us, if we don't carry a
gun, maybe we should at least carry a big steel ball bearing, or a
baseball, or a rock, and practice a simple technique(s)at home in our
spare time, drop, roll, and throw, at simulated targets of bad guys.

Being that this is the most exciting, most entertaining, fact finding,
brain busting, fun loving, liberal egg shell mind crunching,
invincible smacketh downeth erectus amongus, you can't see the truth
coming, but you know it is anyway, sonic boom of Conservatism, and,
most powerful keyboard in the world,

Do you feel lucky?

Universal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.4, dated Oct
10th, 2009

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of the internet communications system, including
all parties, who may technically intercept communications due to the
nature of network conditions beyond both the author's legal and
physical control, unless those communications represent violations of
the law, upon which the author, and or web site will cooperate to
pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgement on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possesion of the original author.

d) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

e)The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

f) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) may be licensed by www.google.com, for
bandwidth verification or potential advertisement opportunities or
incorporation of web master tools in the future.

g) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are related links,
that may be provided for all or any of the following known or unknown
purposes, but not limited to, informational, educational, and for the
purpose of giving copy right credit referal information under the
terms outlined in the conditions applied to the term "fair use"
regarding conversations and print under US Copy Right Law.

h) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information.

i)Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of the
author that blogging is another definition for a potentially infinite
number or forms of electronic communication, as such the author will
retroactively apply this version, 1.4 to all forms of previous
communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows, in order
to properly convey the intention of the author and to demonstrate an
enthusiasm to comply with the law, and not enthusiastically pursue
getting high on cocaine as often as possible as Barack Hussein Obama
has admitted in his book (paraphrase, synopsis), according to (mmm,
mmm, mmm (sonic emphasis)) Rush Hudson Limbaugh, (mmm mmm mmm (sonic
emphasis)).

j) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended, and, or result in being called incoherent, or even a Chicken
Chaser!