Supreme Court reinstates First Amendment
 

D. Peter Maus wrote:
On 1/26/10 08:13 , wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jan 2010 20:12:19 -0600, "D. Peter Maus"
wrote:

THe taxes they pay are miniscule related to the amount they make.


So what?

They must, therefore, pay more.



Why?


Because they benefit more.

Supreme Court reinstates First Amendment
 

Joe from Kokomo wrote:
bpnjensen wrote:

Well, whatever else they've done - they have handed the elections and
thus, the lawmaking machinery, to the wealthiest corporations in America.

Wealthiest corporations in *America*???

Heard on the media last night (01/25) that this ruling also applies to
FOREIGN corporations.

Has anyone else heard this or can it be verified?

-If- it is indeed true, people on these NGs that support the ruling
are either extremely naive -- or should be in jail (along with the
Supreme Court) for supporting such a treasonous idea.

Sorry, but I don't want some Saudi or Chinese company donating millions
to support a candidate of THEIR choice in an AMERICAN election.

A little late for the outrage...

Supreme Court reinstates First Amendment
 

On 1/26/2010 7:14 PM, Joe from Kokomo wrote:




"D. Peter Maus" wrote:

On 1/26/10 16:55 , dxAce wrote:

-snipo-


D. Peter Maus wrote:

Sad, but true, Steve. Sad, but true.

Jeez, Mouse, can't you do better than to perpetually be a boot-licking
sycophant* for someone like Lare? It's very unbecoming of you.

*For those of you whose Funk and Wagnall's is in the shop, sycophant: a
self-seeking, servile flatterer; fawning parasite, toady, yes man,
flunky, fawner.

OK! i removed the crapy cross-posting. I just want to know if
your related to Okie-Joe?

Drifter...