![]() |
Question about matching transformer (9:1 un-un)
On Jan 26, 11:08*am, bpnjensen wrote:
On Jan 26, 1:54*am, wrote: On Jan 25, 4:05*pm, bpnjensen wrote: On Jan 25, 6:27*am, "D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 1/24/10 11:55 , bpnjensen wrote: Another question on this subject - what core should be used for this application? Amidon, among others, has cores of many materials including 43 and 77, both of which seem to get use in these applications; however, for RFI problems below 10 MHz, Amidon recommends cores of J material, and my RFI problems (while not confined to under 10 MHz) are primarily below that frequency. *Would use of J material be wise here, or for this matching transformer would I be better using the old standbys 43 or 77, and then making lots of separate chokes from other materials such as J? * *Without specifics on the nature of your RFI, I'd build the transformer from the recommended materials, 43 or 77, and then build frequency specific chokes to purpose. That way, if your RFI changes, as it often can, you're solution is to built another choke, not to revise your receiver's input. * *Kevin makes a good point about the antenna trim control at the input of DX-160. That covers a multitude of sins. Not unlike my Nationals, similarly equipped. * *That control showed up on DX-120, and was the reason I got interested in this line in the first place. I couldn't afford one until DX-150. Bought one of those, and have had two DX-160s since. Fun radios. Not quite as selective as my S-40 and S-53 Halli's but good for program listening on the big guys. DX-160 had less hum in the audio, and came on immediately. After more than a decade of tubes, by that time, I thought that was bitchin' cool. Just couldn't justify the money at the time. * *DX-160 has pretty lifeless audio. Not much above 6k, and bottom rolled of below 150hz. You can bring a little life back to that bottom end, by changing a couple of the capacitors. One in the audio circuit, and one bringing the audio from the detector to the audio stage. Which ones at this point, specifically, I don't recall, but I think one is on a trace on the extreme right of the PCB. It's out there by itself, easy to replace. The other is further inboard, near the audio IC. But you can cut-and-try with a .5ufd or a .1 ufd film, across the any of the likely candidates listening for a change. Can make quite a difference. Although with the fact AGC, and the generally poor audio stage, don't expect Little Jewel audio. * *You can clean up the woolly audio by replacing all the ceramic capacitors on the board with films. Better definition and clarity. Small films will fit right in the ceramic positions, and by selecting your components carefully, for things like thermal coefficient, you can mitigate some of the drift. Not all, but some. * *And DX-160 will drift. * *Further cleaning can be achieved by replacing the electrolytics. Not only in the power supply, but those dispersed throughout the board. After all these years, some will have become, or have begun to become unformed. Some my be distended, indicating impending failure. Some may even leak. Simple replacement procedure. * *Touching up the alignment will also help, and using WWV as a frequency standard, you can do a creditable job calibrating dial positions. * *Lastly, the dial lights have decent, but not remarkably long life. You can find drop-in LED replacements at Digi-Key, or SuperbrightLeds.com. The warm whites look just like incandescents, and last 100 times longer. You may have to add a small series resistor to the dial light circuit to limit current to the LED replacements. That's a small matter, and dramatically improves life of the lamp without significantly altering lumen output. * *Now, if you REALLY want to make this rig over, you can install Murata filters in the IF's. But that may be a long reach for such a simple receiver. * *p Thank you once again, Peter and Kevin - great stuff! *My 160 does need freq calibration pretty badly, and possibly (probably?) alignment as well. Bruce- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - * * * * * *After changing just 2 or 3 ceramics in the audio stages has improved enormously in my DX-160. Drift is somewhat moderate, compared to other radios of similar design and era. But, the band switch is VERY troublesome. Really kills gain and sometimes creates other problems as well (requires incessant care,like a newborn). On the positive note: the IF filter is actually of mechanical type,built right into the IF coil ! *Calibration is an over statement in this receiver- it was never designed to be a precision gadjet,alas. *Even the model which preceded it , the SX/AX- 190 was miles ahead of it in most respects. * * * * *Radio Shack has been lowering it's standards ever since...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi, Anthony - when you changed the ceramics, did you change the values too or just a like-for-like replacement with films? My DX-160 freqs are so far off that it needs SOMETHING... :-O *Band 3 is a disaster; 2 is quite good, 4 is pretty far off but usable, 5 is not great. *Band 1 is so full of intermod products as to be useless anyway... How does the bandswitch kill gain? *I have pretty good sensitivity on all of the bands (sometimes too much!)... Bruce- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Arthur , not Anthony is the name here. Made some audio changes several years ago according to www.mods.dk (excellent site, by the way). If I remember correctly, it was C58 0.1uF became 5uF (electrolytic) and C62 0.001 became 100pF. Audio became listenable at this stage and I was never interested in making an eagle out of this turkey. Stability is an old problem with most analog radios,whether tubed or solid state ! Power supply, mixer/oscillator, variable capacitors as well as regular component drift- all of these will reflect in short/long term drift. The worst offender ,in my opinion is S350 purchased from RShack. Under a Grundig label it was really a Tecsun made portable. Never in my life did I see such abnormal drift! Had something to do with temperature since it would get really freaky in the summertime, especially pronounced at the higher HF frequencies. DX-160's problems are nowhere near this bad. Oh, about that GoldPoint bandswitch,Peter. What material is it made of ? If it has silver contacts,then it is a real switch. |
Question about matching transformer (9:1 un-un)
On Jan 26, 9:32*pm, wrote:
On Jan 26, 11:08*am, bpnjensen wrote: On Jan 26, 1:54*am, wrote: On Jan 25, 4:05*pm, bpnjensen wrote: On Jan 25, 6:27*am, "D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 1/24/10 11:55 , bpnjensen wrote: Another question on this subject - what core should be used for this application? Amidon, among others, has cores of many materials including 43 and 77, both of which seem to get use in these applications; however, for RFI problems below 10 MHz, Amidon recommends cores of J material, and my RFI problems (while not confined to under 10 MHz) are primarily below that frequency. *Would use of J material be wise here, or for this matching transformer would I be better using the old standbys 43 or 77, and then making lots of separate chokes from other materials such as J? * *Without specifics on the nature of your RFI, I'd build the transformer from the recommended materials, 43 or 77, and then build frequency specific chokes to purpose. That way, if your RFI changes, as it often can, you're solution is to built another choke, not to revise your receiver's input. * *Kevin makes a good point about the antenna trim control at the input of DX-160. That covers a multitude of sins. Not unlike my Nationals, similarly equipped. * *That control showed up on DX-120, and was the reason I got interested in this line in the first place. I couldn't afford one until DX-150. Bought one of those, and have had two DX-160s since.. Fun radios. Not quite as selective as my S-40 and S-53 Halli's but good for program listening on the big guys. DX-160 had less hum in the audio, and came on immediately. After more than a decade of tubes, by that time, I thought that was bitchin' cool. Just couldn't justify the money at the time. * *DX-160 has pretty lifeless audio. Not much above 6k, and bottom rolled of below 150hz. You can bring a little life back to that bottom end, by changing a couple of the capacitors. One in the audio circuit, and one bringing the audio from the detector to the audio stage. Which ones at this point, specifically, I don't recall, but I think one is on a trace on the extreme right of the PCB. It's out there by itself, easy to replace. The other is further inboard, near the audio IC. But you can cut-and-try with a .5ufd or a .1 ufd film, across the any of the likely candidates listening for a change. Can make quite a difference. Although with the fact AGC, and the generally poor audio stage, don't expect Little Jewel audio. * *You can clean up the woolly audio by replacing all the ceramic capacitors on the board with films. Better definition and clarity.. Small films will fit right in the ceramic positions, and by selecting your components carefully, for things like thermal coefficient, you can mitigate some of the drift. Not all, but some. * *And DX-160 will drift. * *Further cleaning can be achieved by replacing the electrolytics. Not only in the power supply, but those dispersed throughout the board. After all these years, some will have become, or have begun to become unformed. Some my be distended, indicating impending failure. Some may even leak. Simple replacement procedure. * *Touching up the alignment will also help, and using WWV as a frequency standard, you can do a creditable job calibrating dial positions. * *Lastly, the dial lights have decent, but not remarkably long life. You can find drop-in LED replacements at Digi-Key, or SuperbrightLeds.com. The warm whites look just like incandescents, and last 100 times longer. You may have to add a small series resistor to the dial light circuit to limit current to the LED replacements. That's a small matter, and dramatically improves life of the lamp without significantly altering lumen output. * *Now, if you REALLY want to make this rig over, you can install Murata filters in the IF's. But that may be a long reach for such a simple receiver. * *p Thank you once again, Peter and Kevin - great stuff! *My 160 does need freq calibration pretty badly, and possibly (probably?) alignment as well. Bruce- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - * * * * * *After changing just 2 or 3 ceramics in the audio stages has improved enormously in my DX-160. Drift is somewhat moderate, compared to other radios of similar design and era. But, the band switch is VERY troublesome. Really kills gain and sometimes creates other problems as well (requires incessant care,like a newborn). On the positive note: the IF filter is actually of mechanical type,built right into the IF coil ! *Calibration is an over statement in this receiver- it was never designed to be a precision gadjet,alas. *Even the model which preceded it , the SX/AX- 190 was miles ahead of it in most respects. * * * * *Radio Shack has been lowering it's standards ever since...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi, Anthony - when you changed the ceramics, did you change the values too or just a like-for-like replacement with films? My DX-160 freqs are so far off that it needs SOMETHING... :-O *Band 3 is a disaster; 2 is quite good, 4 is pretty far off but usable, 5 is not great. *Band 1 is so full of intermod products as to be useless anyway... How does the bandswitch kill gain? *I have pretty good sensitivity on all of the bands (sometimes too much!)... Bruce- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - * Arthur , not Anthony is the name here. *Made some audio changes several years ago according to *www.mods.dk*(excellent site, by the way). If I remember correctly, it was C58 0.1uF became 5uF (electrolytic) and C62 0.001 became 100pF. Audio became listenable at this stage and I was never interested in making an eagle out of this turkey. Stability is an old problem with most analog radios,whether tubed or solid state ! *Power supply, mixer/oscillator, variable capacitors as well as regular component drift- all of these *will reflect in short/long term drift. The worst offender ,in my opinion is S350 purchased from RShack. Under a Grundig label it was really a Tecsun made portable. Never in my life did I see such abnormal drift! Had something to do with temperature since it would get really freaky in the summertime, especially pronounced at the higher HF frequencies. DX-160's problems are nowhere near this bad. Oh, about that GoldPoint bandswitch,Peter. What material is it made of ? If it has silver contacts,then it is a real switch. Arthur, thank you, and please accept my apologies for erring on your name! Bruce |
Question about matching transformer (9:1 un-un)
On Jan 27, 12:53*am, bpnjensen wrote:
On Jan 26, 9:32*pm, wrote: On Jan 26, 11:08*am, bpnjensen wrote: On Jan 26, 1:54*am, wrote: On Jan 25, 4:05*pm, bpnjensen wrote: On Jan 25, 6:27*am, "D. Peter Maus" wrote: On 1/24/10 11:55 , bpnjensen wrote: Another question on this subject - what core should be used for this application? Amidon, among others, has cores of many materials including 43 and 77, both of which seem to get use in these applications; however, for RFI problems below 10 MHz, Amidon recommends cores of J material, and my RFI problems (while not confined to under 10 MHz) are primarily below that frequency. *Would use of J material be wise here, or for this matching transformer would I be better using the old standbys 43 or 77, and then making lots of separate chokes from other materials such as J? * *Without specifics on the nature of your RFI, I'd build the transformer from the recommended materials, 43 or 77, and then build frequency specific chokes to purpose. That way, if your RFI changes, as it often can, you're solution is to built another choke, not to revise your receiver's input. * *Kevin makes a good point about the antenna trim control at the input of DX-160. That covers a multitude of sins. Not unlike my Nationals, similarly equipped. * *That control showed up on DX-120, and was the reason I got interested in this line in the first place. I couldn't afford one until DX-150. Bought one of those, and have had two DX-160s since. Fun radios. Not quite as selective as my S-40 and S-53 Halli's but good for program listening on the big guys. DX-160 had less hum in the audio, and came on immediately. After more than a decade of tubes, by that time, I thought that was bitchin' cool. Just couldn't justify the money at the time. * *DX-160 has pretty lifeless audio. Not much above 6k, and bottom rolled of below 150hz. You can bring a little life back to that bottom end, by changing a couple of the capacitors. One in the audio circuit, and one bringing the audio from the detector to the audio stage. Which ones at this point, specifically, I don't recall, but I think one is on a trace on the extreme right of the PCB. It's out there by itself, easy to replace. The other is further inboard, near the audio IC. But you can cut-and-try with a .5ufd or a .1 ufd film, across the any of the likely candidates listening for a change. Can make quite a difference. Although with the fact AGC, and the generally poor audio stage, don't expect Little Jewel audio. * *You can clean up the woolly audio by replacing all the ceramic capacitors on the board with films. Better definition and clarity. Small films will fit right in the ceramic positions, and by selecting your components carefully, for things like thermal coefficient, you can mitigate some of the drift. Not all, but some. * *And DX-160 will drift. * *Further cleaning can be achieved by replacing the electrolytics. Not only in the power supply, but those dispersed throughout the board. After all these years, some will have become, or have begun to become unformed. Some my be distended, indicating impending failure. Some may even leak. Simple replacement procedure. * *Touching up the alignment will also help, and using WWV as a frequency standard, you can do a creditable job calibrating dial positions. * *Lastly, the dial lights have decent, but not remarkably long life. You can find drop-in LED replacements at Digi-Key, or SuperbrightLeds.com. The warm whites look just like incandescents, and last 100 times longer. You may have to add a small series resistor to the dial light circuit to limit current to the LED replacements. That's a small matter, and dramatically improves life of the lamp without significantly altering lumen output. * *Now, if you REALLY want to make this rig over, you can install Murata filters in the IF's. But that may be a long reach for such a simple receiver. * *p Thank you once again, Peter and Kevin - great stuff! *My 160 does need freq calibration pretty badly, and possibly (probably?) alignment as well. Bruce- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - * * * * * *After changing just 2 or 3 ceramics in the audio stages has improved enormously in my DX-160. Drift is somewhat moderate, compared to other radios of similar design and era. But, the band switch is VERY troublesome. Really kills gain and sometimes creates other problems as well (requires incessant care,like a newborn). On the positive note: the IF filter is actually of mechanical type,built right into the IF coil ! *Calibration is an over statement in this receiver- it was never designed to be a precision gadjet,alas. *Even the model which preceded it , the SX/AX- 190 was miles ahead of it in most respects. * * * * *Radio Shack has been lowering it's standards ever since...- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Hi, Anthony - when you changed the ceramics, did you change the values too or just a like-for-like replacement with films? My DX-160 freqs are so far off that it needs SOMETHING... :-O *Band 3 is a disaster; 2 is quite good, 4 is pretty far off but usable, 5 is not great. *Band 1 is so full of intermod products as to be useless anyway... How does the bandswitch kill gain? *I have pretty good sensitivity on all of the bands (sometimes too much!)... Bruce- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - * Arthur , not Anthony is the name here. *Made some audio changes several years ago according to *www.mods.dk*(excellent site, by the way). If I remember correctly, it was C58 0.1uF became 5uF (electrolytic) and C62 0.001 became 100pF. Audio became listenable at this stage and I was never interested in making an eagle out of this turkey. Stability is an old problem with most analog radios,whether tubed or solid state ! *Power supply, mixer/oscillator, variable capacitors as well as regular component drift- all of these *will reflect in short/long term drift. The worst offender ,in my opinion is S350 purchased from RShack. Under a Grundig label it was really a Tecsun made portable. Never in my life did I see such abnormal drift! Had something to do with temperature since it would get really freaky in the summertime, especially pronounced at the higher HF frequencies. DX-160's problems are nowhere near this bad. Oh, about that GoldPoint bandswitch,Peter. What material is it made of ? If it has silver contacts,then it is a real switch. Arthur, thank you, and please accept my apologies for erring on your name! Bruce- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - No problem,Bruce. After the audio modification it's frequency response will improve substantially . Original design claimed 300Hz- 3 KHz. Ever tried to run it on 12VDC external power supply- may solve some of the drift. N.B. The IF bandwith is 4 KHz, if not mistaken. T16 is a coil with a mechanical filter, not very spectacular at all- has rather broad attenuation skirts for such a component. May be one day I will swap it with a Murata or NTT ,if they match the holes. Wonder what impedances are involved here, sometimes it makes a tremendous difference. No standard Collins (new or old) filters that I know of will fit in here, thanks God ! |
Question about matching transformer (9:1 un-un)
On Jan 27, 12:53 am, wrote: Oh, about that GoldPoint bandswitch, Peter. What material is it made of ? If it has silver contacts,then it is a real switch. Gold, actually. Select the number of switch positions you want, stack the layers you need, and wire it up. Pretty slick. Not cheap, but you'll never have to screw around with a bandswitch again. Truthfully, it's overkill for DX-160 and it's family. But then, anything worth doing is worth overdoing. http://www.goldpt.com/selector.html |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com