Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Goodness, gravitates to those who know how to channel that energy?
Focused, intelligent, witty. And the rest of the team around her will
have to reflect that as well? OooooRAH.


I love working for Uncle Sam.....


mmmm mmmmmm mmmmm Rush Hudson Limbaugh mmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmm!


I don't mind cleaning up the mess with my big mop, I just need some
clean water, good pay, and some time to clean it up?


legal disclaimer:

Universal Legal Disclaimer for the Public Domain, Version 1.5, dated
Nov 7th, 2009 (which supersedes all previous versions, to which this
new version applies)

The writings, views, expressions expressed by this author to include
all written and electronic forms of communication are subject to the
following disclaimer and conditions:

a) The views expressed by this website and the author to include all
electronic forms of communication are not representative of
advertisers, or other third parties that may store and or transmit the
messages from this private computer, which you may observe at your own
risk, with no liability to the authors, or any party related to
transmitting, storing, or any other aspect of the material involved,
including email correspondence, which is not necessary to the function
of the website, and may or may not be archived due to other
limitations incorporated into the licensed email software in use at
the time such as automated spam or virus filters. No personal
information exchanged will be shared without your consent, or provided
to third parties with out the express permission of the parties and,
or, individuals concerned.

b) The author(s) of this content and those who may interact with it in
various known or unknown electronic methods do not give permission to
any third parties to share or provide private personal information who
may operate as part of any type of electronic or written
communications system, including all parties, who may technically
intercept communications due to the nature of network conditions
beyond both the author's legal and physical control, unless those
communications represent violations of the law, upon which the author,
and or web site will cooperate to pursue any legal remedies.

c) The views expressed by the author or website may or may not contain
factual information, due to the use of sarcasm or parody. The views
may or may not be complete, either by design, to pre-empt being called
a liar even if telling the truth, or by error due to typographical,
grammer, or other technical communication problems not realized or
imagined, or the possibility of views based on false or missing
information, or with the intention of being used for entertainment
purposes only, and not as a definitive judgment on the actions,
character, or reputation of an organization, individual, or groups of
individuals, with the intent of communicating with a limited group of
people, and not the general public, however no distribution
restrictions apply for fair use purposes described by the US Copyright
Office, if no other restrictions are present or communicated, with all
commercial proceeds associated with the distribution of the content to
remain the sole possession of the original author.

d) Any reference to copyrighted material is done in the spirit of fair
use, to illustrate the context of a discussion regarding public events
for reference purposes that adds to the conversation, for which that
discussion constitutes a new and separate piece of intellectual
property, for which the referenced copyrighted material can not convey
by itself, and that the author reserves the right to retain any
profits from the newly created intellectual property. This term also
serves to promote the referenced copyrighted material, without
necessarily endorsing the material for any particular fitness, use, or
purpose, for which the purpose of fair use referral law was created
for, through inclusion of a partial, but not whole, body of works that
the copyright fair use reference applies, for which the intent of all
terms of this disclaimer apply to that reference of a copyrighted
work.

e) Any humor if used, is not intended to offend people, and may be
designed to apply the principals of peer pressure through reverse
examination to accomplish the communication of principals or ideas
that consist of traditional or proposed social values that are proven
to advance the common good, and are not meant to discredit, disparage
or demean any person or entities in any professional or personal
manner, by attempting to share through the eyes or opinion of the
author, for which it is expected that you read at your own risk, with
no liability held to the author or any third parties who may store,
transfer, or forward this message to others, in the traditions of free
speech, fair use, and to play a positive role in a society that
believes that graphically depicting male homosexuals having sex, and
other unusual sex acts is considered free speech or that the use of
abortion to limit Negros, Latinos, and other races from "spreading the
wealth around" as a "matter of privacy" (which the author does not
condone).

f) The use of humor is a known ingredient in providing teachable
moments, and to validate and even demonstrate artistic expressions
that are not shared by others, as demonstrated by many valuable
scientific observations that were scoffed at in the past, yet proven
to be quite valid decades later, upon which the humor used in all
electronic communications by the author are based, in the principals
and traditions of free speech and pursuit of happiness, and may not be
a representation of others, including God.

g) It is the opinion of the author that you respect people when you
consider their views, by reflecting their thoughts or actions against
your own, which may include use of language that conveys an emotional
depth that is to be imagined, but not enacted through use of language
that accurately, or inaccurately describes the situation,
circumstance, or idea, which does not imply that any action occur
other than the consideration of the thought, for which beyond the
author has no control, or liability for the action of the reader as
presented in all terms of this diclaimer, and may simply be the
venting of emotions with the intent of no consequence by the author to
an audience the author assumes will understand the message and intent,
and wishes to hear those views.

h) Since all intellectual property, discussions and other
communications this disclaimer applies to, either in written, or
electronic form, subscribe to the terms described in paragraph (e) and
(g) of this disclaimer, under no circumstances are any communications
meant to violate the terms of any electronic harassment laws which
include the word “harm”, for which the author understands to be
limited to the definition of physical harm (not self inflicted mental
harm) that requires immediate medical attention based solely or in
part by the communications of the author, regardless of whether the
author chooses to remain anonymous or not.

i) It is the intention and opinion of the author that History is full
of individuals that are not harmed by criticism, and in fact such
criticism can motivate and inspire them to prove their critics wrong.
Based on this historical evidence, any alleged mental harm amounts to
self inflicted injury not treatable by either medical or other
professionals (despite the fact that many people live from the profits
of lies through gradual illusion, without judicial interference), for
which the author has no control over the mental development of any
potential reader prior to the discovery or reading of the material for
which this disclaimer applies, as evident by the necessity that speech
is to be protected by law as determined by the founders of the United
States of America, who, in the opinion of the author, wrote the legal
framework, which was created by God, not slaves.

j) Additional use of automated anonymous page use tracking computer
scripts (web page programs) or advertisements may be licensed by
www.google.com, for bandwidth verification, or determination of
potential advertisement opportunities subject to all other terms
described in this disclaimer.

k) Advertisements that may appear are not necessarily endorsed by the
author, either by admission, or by silence, nor are any electronic
links that may transport the reader to other web pages, sites, or
computers, and such links that may be provided for all or any of the
following known or unknown purposes, but not limited to,
informational, educational, and for the purpose of giving copy right
credit referral information under the terms outlined in the conditions
applied to the term "fair use" regarding conversations and print under
US Copy Right Law, and for which the author assumes no liability for
any particular use, fitness, or legality there of, any link, current,
past, or future, which the reader should use at their sole risk, with
no liability to the author, or any other party that may store,
transmit, or otherwise facilitate use of the material for which this
disclaimer applies.

l) It is the opinion of the author that effective 1 December, 2009,
the proposed regulations from the FTC violate the first and fifth
amendments of the United States Constitution, by infringing through
economic affliction the burden without compensation all financial
details concerning the communications of both free enterprise and
opinion, and other civil rights such as "punishment must be fair" and
not at the "discretion" of public officials, or that advertisers are
assumed to be guilty of deception when United States law provides that
you are innocent before being proven guilty, and are in fact
demonstrations that there are current members of Congress that neither
understand the spirit of the law our founding fathers made for the
United States of America, or understand how they work in the opinion
of the author, as of October 10th, 2009, especially in light of
anticipated, and hopefully defeated, legislative taxes relating to
energy use and the burden of publishers and advertisers to comply with
the law and manage the environment, and in light that there are
various consumer protection agencies, including the Better Business
Bureau, which has free consumer information which preclude the use and
need for excessive government regulation that burdens business with
obstacles it may sense that it can not overcome without inflicting
harm on the business plan or survival ability of the business to
provide advertised, goods and or services.

m) Although the content provided meets or exceeds those new
requirements to the knowledge of the author, and modifications to
version 1.3 or 1.4 of this disclaimer is a result of the opinion of
the author that “blogging” is another definition for a potentially
infinite number or forms of electronic communication, as such the
author will retroactively apply this version, 1.5 to all forms of
previous communications, when and wherever possible, as time allows,
in order to properly convey the intention of the author and to
demonstrate an enthusiasm to comply with the law.

n) Use of this disclaimer for either personal or professional use is
permitted with no restrictions. These restrictions or disclaimers do
not prohibit the author from pursuing or communicating in a truthful
manner, or guarantee that the audience will understand all things as
intended.

o) This disclaimer is meant to establish the intent of the author who
may participate in message forums, or create other written or
electronic forms of communication to comply with current law, and may
be revoked without prior notice, due to circumstances beyond the
author's control, changes in the law, or for any of the purposes,
terms, or conditions that may be in effect or described by this
disclaimer, or to changes in this disclaimer that the author may
clarify in a revised version of this disclaimer.

p) This disclaimer is attached to this message, and retroactively
applies to all previous forms of communication by the author, and is
done so because there is no recognized central suppository of a public
disclaimer recognized by the Government of the United States to the
author, and as such, the legal imperative of the author is to apply
this disclaimer to all manner of correspondence as the author seems
fit or prudent, so that no misunderstandings occur, or to comply with
past, current or future revisions of the law, due to any of, but not
limited to, any or all of the terms, partial terms, or combination of
terms, of this disclaimer, which is derived from the freedom of
speech, for it appears to the author that the zeal of lawmakers to
take away free speech outweigh the providence of attaching this
disclaimer to all correspondence for which this applies, and any
inconvenience for which this presents, is the result of simply
complying with the law, and not to inconvenience the reader.



Use of this private web site or web page is at your own risk, for
which you agree not to sue the authors or anyone who may publish or
share this article (which must include this disclaimer) with or
without the consent of the author(s) if you do not agree, you are
violating the terms of conditions to view the content, and you may not
use or view the content for any purpose. Discussions, and or links to
media and (or) resources do not automatically indicate that either the
author, this web site, or anyone who discusses the material either
endorse the individuals or organizations referenced, either in part,
or in whole, and the author's ask the readers to make their own
conclusions.

No individual or organization, including CSPAN, Glenn Beck, Fox News,
Rush Limbaugh, endorses this web site or the use of their material on
this web site at this time, which may be either removed by request or
without notice. Use of the material is assumed appropriate for use
under the copy right act concerning fair use for discussion, to
include artistic expression to demonstrate a particular viewpoint, in
a single or group of discussions. Video or film footage may not
include the full context of the original publishing video or audio
clips, and therefore are not necessarily representative of any
referenced individual or organization

Its obvious why Fail-in Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:28:44 -0800, Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:

Goodness, gravitates to those who know how to channel that energy?
Focused, intelligent, witty. And the rest of the team around her will
have to reflect that as well? OooooRAH.

I bet she can't wait to invade the country of Africa! It was written on
her hand.


mmmm mmmmmm mmmmm Rush Hudson Limbaugh mmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmm!

Funny how she's already pre-apologizing to the leader of the hypocritical
do-nothing-party-of-NO GOP on FUAX today.
I bet Ru$h limpballs used a whole bottle of blue pills to poke her in
the butt. Too bad that was her mouth. It still must have came out
smelling like **** anyway.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On Feb 8, 6:28*pm, Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote:
Goodness, gravitates to those who know how to channel that energy?
Focused, intelligent, witty. *

Yeah she's genuine Mensa material. That's why she needed to scrawl
crib notes on her hand like a fifth grader cheating on a test in
school.
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepol...ves/193773.asp

Not to worry, it's likely your wet dream will come true. The ruling
elite will engineer her "election" to the Presidency (if not in 2012,
then 2016). She's exactly the type of useful idiot they love to use as
their sock puppet. They are undoubtedly working feverishly to find an
unelectable dolt to run against her whenever her time comes. Maybe
they can bribe Bob Dole to switch parties so he can play the role of
Democrat "opposition" in the election, thereby creating the illusion
that you lemmings had a say in the matter. After all he did it so well
when they decided Slick Willie Clinton was to be their sock puppet in
1992.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010 21:00:13 -0800 (PST), Priest
wrote:

On Feb 8, 6:28*pm, Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote:
Goodness, gravitates to those who know how to channel that energy?
Focused, intelligent, witty. *

Yeah she's genuine Mensa material. That's why she needed to scrawl
crib notes on her hand like a fifth grader cheating on a test in
school.
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepol...ves/193773.asp

Not to worry, it's likely your wet dream will come true. The ruling
elite will engineer her "election" to the Presidency (if not in 2012,
then 2016). She's exactly the type of useful idiot they love to use as
their sock puppet. They are undoubtedly working feverishly to find an
unelectable dolt to run against her whenever her time comes. Maybe
they can bribe Bob Dole to switch parties so he can play the role of
Democrat "opposition" in the election, thereby creating the illusion
that you lemmings had a say in the matter. After all he did it so well
when they decided Slick Willie Clinton was to be their sock puppet in
1992.


Wow. You idiots certainly are terrified of Palin aren;t you. After
all if she's nothing more than a flash in the pan and is no big deal
then why are all of you imbeciles so obseesed?
Too ****ing funny.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:
Goodness, gravitates to those who know how to channel that energy?
Focused, intelligent, witty.

Intelligent? She can see the moon from her back yard so that makes her
an astronaut? She can see Russia, so that gives her International
Relations credentials? Oh, sorry, ignore that one. It was a damned lie
anyway -- she never was in the part of Alaska where you could see Russia.

And while we're on the subject of Failin' Palin the Quitter, everyone's
favorite MILF, let me ask a sincere question about her (and others) that
are perpetually whining about Obama's use of the Teleprompter.

Ronnie Reagan used it regularly.

Bush #1 used it regularly.

Bush #2 used it regularly.

EVERY president of both parties has used Teleprompters for the last 30
YEARS.

So why is she (and others) always whining about it????

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Priest wrote:
On Feb 8, 6:28 pm, Editor RadioTalkingPoints
wrote:
Goodness, gravitates to those who know how to channel that energy?
Focused, intelligent, witty.

Yeah she's genuine Mensa material. That's why she needed to scrawl
crib notes on her hand like a fifth grader cheating on a test in
school.
http://blog.seattlepi.com/seattlepol...ves/193773.asp

Not to worry, it's likely your wet dream will come true. The ruling
elite will engineer her "election" to the Presidency (if not in 2012,
then 2016). She's exactly the type of useful idiot they love to use as
their sock puppet. They are undoubtedly working feverishly to find an
unelectable dolt to run against her whenever her time comes. Maybe
they can bribe Bob Dole to switch parties so he can play the role of
Democrat "opposition" in the election, thereby creating the illusion
that you lemmings had a say in the matter. After all he did it so well
when they decided Slick Willie Clinton was to be their sock puppet in
1992.


I'm no fan of Bill Clinton, but the man is gifted. He has an incredible
intellect. Ms. Palin likes toast.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

First Post wrote:


Wow. You idiots certainly are terrified of Palin aren;t you. After
all if she's nothing more than a flash in the pan and is no big deal
then why are all of you imbeciles so obseesed?
Too ****ing funny.

I like the way her clothes are too small. Definitely needs something in
her mouth though.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Sarah Palin is my HERO!
http://www.SarahPAC.com
cuhulin

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On 2/9/2010 8:55 AM, dave wrote:
First Post wrote:


Wow. You idiots certainly are terrified of Palin aren;t you. After
all if she's nothing more than a flash in the pan and is no big deal
then why are all of you imbeciles so obseesed?
Too ****ing funny.

I like the way her clothes are too small. Definitely needs something in
her mouth though.

The rednecks just love her. but, you may want to look closer at the
money behind her and the tea bag heads. they will try to take over the
repug party. i'm the first person to say we need more than 2 main
parties. but look what happened when RR invited/needed the religious
wacko's to win. brings the term "RINO", to mind. so don't let some
douche bag BS ya. we will be cleaning up from Bush, for years to
come. and after that, we will be cleaning up from Obama. I won't
live long enough to see this country back to the way it was in
the 60's.

Drifter...

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Bob Dobbs wrote:

wrote:
Sarah Palin is my HERO!
http://www.SarahPAC.con
cuhulin

Why does that come as no surprise?
Your the type that represents the core demographic of her base.

That of course should be 'you're...

And, by your use of 'your', you are the type that represents Obama's base.

And, that type would be: Clown 'Tard.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Hit a big nerve, eh?

Bob Dobbs wrote:

dxArse drooled
whilst ogling his latest download of failin' palin the quitter,
then offered his new sig line:

And, that would be: Clown 'Tard.

dxArse
Michigan
USA

--

Operator Bob
Echo Charlie 42

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Priest wrote:

.. She's exactly the type of useful idiot they love to use as
their sock puppet.

I get it,you're their useful sock puppet and it frightens you.

She might make it to the ****ehouse before you or even despite you.

Keep on posting,we can always use you for a belly laugh:-)

HANDNYH

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:02:59 -0500, Drifter wrote:

On 2/9/2010 8:55 AM, dave wrote:
First Post wrote:


Wow. You idiots certainly are terrified of Palin aren;t you. After
all if she's nothing more than a flash in the pan and is no big deal
then why are all of you imbeciles so obseesed?
Too ****ing funny.

I like the way her clothes are too small. Definitely needs something in
her mouth though.

The rednecks just love her. but, you may want to look closer at the
money behind her and the tea bag heads. they will try to take over the
repug party. i'm the first person to say we need more than 2 main
parties. but look what happened when RR invited/needed the religious
wacko's to win. brings the term "RINO", to mind. so don't let some
douche bag BS ya. we will be cleaning up from Bush, for years to
come. and after that, we will be cleaning up from Obama. I won't
live long enough to see this country back to the way it was in
the 60's.

Drifter...

Indeed. Who can forget those good old days of high pollution, racisl
unrest, protests everyday of the week and thousands of soldiers dying
in a little place called Vietnam. Ahhh the memories.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Vietnam Conflict didn't last forever.We are now in a ''War'' (a Pile of
SH.T!) which has NO End!

53 degrees right now inside my flower box on doggy's front porch, bright
Sunshine and kind of windy out thar.I worked on that tree stump in
doggy's front yard thi afternoon, two and a half hours.Workin that bow
saw AT ground level is RUFF on me!
cuhulin, the stump

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

So, my HERO Sarah Palin wrote Hy Mom on her hand.So damn what!? At least
my HERO Sarah Palin doesn't need a telepieceofSh.t to read from like
Born in Kenya!
DUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
ASSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSdoes,
when she is talking.
ROCK ON, Sarah Palin, ROCK ONNNNNNNNNNNNNN,,,,,,,,,,,
cuhulin

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On Feb 9, 1:25*pm, First Post
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:02:59 -0500, Drifter wrote:
On 2/9/2010 8:55 AM, dave wrote:
First Post wrote:

Wow. You idiots certainly are terrified of Palin aren;t you. After
all if she's nothing more than a flash in the pan and is no big deal
then why are all of you imbeciles so obseesed?
Too ****ing funny.

I like the way her clothes are too small. Definitely needs something in
her mouth though.

The rednecks just love her. but, you may want to look closer at the
money behind her and the tea bag heads. they will try to take over the
repug party. i'm the first person to say we need more than 2 main
parties. but look what happened when RR invited/needed the religious
wacko's to win. brings the term "RINO", to mind. so don't let some
douche bag BS ya. we will be cleaning up from Bush, for years to
come. and after that, we will be cleaning up from Obama. I won't
live long enough to see this country back to the way it was in
the 60's.

Drifter...

Indeed. Who can forget those good old days of high pollution, racisl
unrest, protests everyday of the week and thousands of soldiers dying
in a little place called Vietnam. *Ahhh the memories.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh for the days of yore! The Cuban Missile crisis when the world came
dangerously close to incinerating itself with nuclear missiles...when
women had few rights and worked for half the pay of men even though
performing the same work...disenfranchised blacks who were not
permitted to vote even though they were citizens and paid
taxes...forced conscription into the military to become cannon fodder
for the war profiteers...ah yes, utopia lost indeed!

Isn't it interesting how Mr. "Drifter" exposes himself as the moronic
racist he is without even knowing he is doing so. The sad part is that
he and his ilk deny until their last breath that they are ignorant
chauvanistic racists (he's probably a church going "Christian" to
boot). I almost feel some sympathy for the old fart, after reading
some of the drivel he has posted it is clear he doesn't have much gray
matter left to work with. I suspect he ingested way too many drugs
while in Vietnam back in the "good old days" or perhaps inhaled too
much agent orange. Either way, he's a very sad case.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 18:37:05 -0800 (PST), Priest
wrote:

On Feb 9, 1:25*pm, First Post
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:02:59 -0500, Drifter wrote:
On 2/9/2010 8:55 AM, dave wrote:
First Post wrote:

Wow. You idiots certainly are terrified of Palin aren;t you. After
all if she's nothing more than a flash in the pan and is no big deal
then why are all of you imbeciles so obseesed?
Too ****ing funny.

I like the way her clothes are too small. Definitely needs something in
her mouth though.

The rednecks just love her. but, you may want to look closer at the
money behind her and the tea bag heads. they will try to take over the
repug party. i'm the first person to say we need more than 2 main
parties. but look what happened when RR invited/needed the religious
wacko's to win. brings the term "RINO", to mind. so don't let some
douche bag BS ya. we will be cleaning up from Bush, for years to
come. and after that, we will be cleaning up from Obama. I won't
live long enough to see this country back to the way it was in
the 60's.

Drifter...

Indeed. Who can forget those good old days of high pollution, racisl
unrest, protests everyday of the week and thousands of soldiers dying
in a little place called Vietnam. *Ahhh the memories.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Oh for the days of yore! The Cuban Missile crisis when the world came
dangerously close to incinerating itself with nuclear missiles...when
women had few rights and worked for half the pay of men even though
performing the same work...disenfranchised blacks who were not
permitted to vote even though they were citizens and paid
taxes...forced conscription into the military to become cannon fodder
for the war profiteers...ah yes, utopia lost indeed!

Isn't it interesting how Mr. "Drifter" exposes himself as the moronic
racist he is without even knowing he is doing so. The sad part is that
he and his ilk deny until their last breath that they are ignorant
chauvanistic racists (he's probably a church going "Christian" to
boot). I almost feel some sympathy for the old fart, after reading
some of the drivel he has posted it is clear he doesn't have much gray
matter left to work with. I suspect he ingested way too many drugs
while in Vietnam back in the "good old days" or perhaps inhaled too
much agent orange. Either way, he's a very sad case.

To be honest everything is relative. I'm partial to the 70's simply
because those were my teenage years. The draft ended before I got out
of high school so there was none of that pressure. As most people of
my age I wasn't concerned about politics to speak of. Hell, after
being a grade schooler during Vietnam and living in a city that
literally burned during the civil rights riots, the Iranian hostage
crisis was just something on the news. Didn't have any bills and
still lived at home. Drove a "hot rod" (1973 Cuda). Had a job after
HS making $3.25 an hour and had all the cash I needed.
Black and white folks seemed to get along a lot better then than now.
Black on black as well as black on white crime was a hell of a lot
lower then than now. People didn't screen every word out of your
mouth back then looking for something politically incorrect to bitch
about. Hell the phrase politically correct didn't even exist yet.
People seemed to laugh more then. The early days of SNL, ABC's
attempt at competition with "Fridays", seeing The Stones, Nugent,
Seeger and many many more for $6 to $8 a ticket. ****, the world I
existed in at that time of my life was pretty fun.
In 1980 I got married. The fun was over. LOL

Its obvious why Fail-in Sarah Palin makes them so jealous? Lookin the other hand
 

On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 04:38:14 +0100, abelard wrote:

On Tue, 9 Feb 2010 03:34:35 +0000 (UTC), Ima wrote:

On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 16:28:44 -0800, Editor RadioTalkingPoints wrote:


I bet she can't wait to invade the country of Africa! It was written on
her hand.


mmmm mmmmmm mmmmm Rush Hudson Limbaugh mmmmm mmmmmm mmmmmm!

Funny how she's already pre-apologizing to the leader of the
hypocritical do-nothing-party-of-NO GOP on FUAX today.
I bet Ru$h limpballs used a whole bottle of blue pills to poke her in
the butt. Too bad that was her mouth. It still must have came out
smelling like **** anyway.

you are incoherent
you must be a socialist

Maybe, but did you see in her right hand, all the semen stains from
stroking the GOP elite?

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On 2/9/2010 9:37 PM, Priest wrote:
On Feb 9, 1:25 pm, First
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:02:59 -0500, wrote:
On 2/9/2010 8:55 AM, dave wrote:
First Post wrote:

Oh for the days of yore! The Cuban Missile crisis when the world came
dangerously close to incinerating itself with nuclear missiles...when
women had few rights and worked for half the pay of men even though
performing the same work...disenfranchised blacks who were not
permitted to vote even though they were citizens and paid
taxes...forced conscription into the military to become cannon fodder
for the war profiteers...ah yes, utopia lost indeed!

Isn't it interesting how Mr. "Drifter" exposes himself as the moronic
racist he is without even knowing he is doing so. The sad part is that
he and his ilk deny until their last breath that they are ignorant
chauvanistic racists (he's probably a church going "Christian" to
boot). I almost feel some sympathy for the old fart, after reading
some of the drivel he has posted it is clear he doesn't have much gray
matter left to work with. I suspect he ingested way too many drugs
while in Vietnam back in the "good old days" or perhaps inhaled too
much agent orange. Either way, he's a very sad case.

Way too funny. another cross posting fool. I guess this is RHF's
replacement fool. BTW, how are thing's, living in your Mother's
basement? me a racist? now that's rich. another one for the Fan
Bucket/ or, bit bucket. better up your meds there son.

Drifter...

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:10:01 -0500, Drifter wrote:

On 2/9/2010 9:37 PM, Priest wrote:
On Feb 9, 1:25 pm, First
wrote:
On Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:02:59 -0500, wrote:
On 2/9/2010 8:55 AM, dave wrote:
First Post wrote:

SNIPPIE.


Way too funny. another cross posting fool. I guess this is RHF's
replacement fool. BTW, how are thing's, living in your Mother's
basement? me a racist? now that's rich. another one for the Fan
Bucket/ or, bit bucket. better up your meds there son.

Drifter...


Driftie, just had to jump on this one. looks like you picked up a
fanboi. just another wacko. Sara trys to bring the worst out
of people.

you comin down DC next week? I'll grab the lunch.

OJ.

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

On 2/11/2010 10:31 AM, wrote:
On Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:10:01 -0500, wrote:




Driftie, just had to jump on this one. looks like you picked up a
fanboi. just another wacko. Sara trys to bring the worst out
of people.

you comin down DC next week? I'll grab the lunch.

OJ.

Hay Joe. I'll be in DC Tuesday. Daytona,13, 14,15. hate to miss
Prez day on Monday, yuk yuk. if Nick can dig out his Beech, we
should be flying down Friday eve. hope the weather is better
down there. and, BTW, shouldn't you be reading someone's email
or such? other words, do your job and mind your own bis, and
don't be spoofing other peoples IP AD.

Drifter...

Its obvious why Sarah Palin makes them so jealous?
 

Dog gets mugged in FREEZING New York as cruel thieves nab his green wool
coat.
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=283569

Poor doggy, nybody who would steal a dog's coat should be Buried Under
the Jail!

Up to five inches of snow predicted for London.Heh, those Limeys can't
handle any snow.WAPT tv news weather guy David Hartman said a possible
SIX INCHES of snow, the WLBT tv news Noon Day News weather guy just now
said a possible EIGHT INCHES of snow.I can handle it, but I HATE snow!

I am Glad I did my driving and shopping Yesterday, I don't need to go
anywhere for a week or two or three or four or five,,,,,
cuhulin