"Joe from Kokomo" wrote in message
...

Joe from Kokomo wrote in -
september.org:

Chuck wrote:

So you voted in a confirmed moron with no birth certificate who
uses a teleprompter.
Sheesh...another mindless moron complaining about a Teleprompter.

Feel free to have other complaints about Obama if you wish, but why
bring up the Teleprompter???

Presidents who use/have used the Teleprompter:

Nixon

Ronnie Reagan

Bush I

Bush II

...and *EVERY* president of BOTH parties for at least the last *30
YEARS* have used the Teleprompter.

So please, please explain why you have such a hard-on because Obama
uses it too.

Conan the Barabarian wrote:

'Cuz he's supposed to be smarter and gooder than all of them combined.

Huh???

I don't believe that even the most rabid Obama supporter ever said that.

SaPeIsMa wrote:

Oh please.
Who was that journalist who felt a tingle up his leg at the thought of
Obambi ?

Not a clue. I don't remember that particular incident. But it's
certainly possible that the journalist in question was a either a
fool...or experiencing what the Londoners in Victorian England called a
"four penny knee-trembler". ;-)

And then we had those kids who were marching while chanting the praise
of the "chosen one"

Uh, you seem to be distorting the facts a bit, Sparky. Just because
people demonstrate for their candidate is a looong way from saying Obama
is "smarter and gooder than all of them combined" as did the original
poster.

And even if they did, that STILL doesn't explain why it's OK for ALL
presidents of ALL parties to get a free pass to use a Teleprompter and
Obama doesn't.

SaPeIsMa wrote:

It's not a question of being OK
It's a question of being UNable to function without one.

Well then, you are also implying that because Reagan, Bush I, Bush II,
et al used a Teleprompter, that they couldn't function without one
either. Sorry, Sparky...either your logic fails or you just shot
yourself in the foot.

Whatever else you can say about Obama, good or bad, he IS very
intelligent (demonstrably more so than his predecessor), and thus you
saying "he is unable to function without one" is pure BS and sour grapes
(and dare I say, a hint of racism?).

Sorry, still waiting for a -legitimate- answer to my question.

SaPeIsMa wrote:

Define "legitimate"
Is that a Double-Super-Secret criteria that ONLY YOU know to reject an
answer if you are UN able to answer the question ?

"Legitimate" is intuitively obvious (and rhetorical)...

1) This is America. If every prez of both parties for the last 30 years
used a prompter, there is no reason Obama can't use one nor is there any
reason to hold its use against him.

2) BS statements like "Cuz he's supposed to be smarter and gooder than
all of them combined" and "It's a question of being UNable to function
without one" are just that... more BS and sour grapes, but certainly
not legitimate.

Nice try Sparky, but no cigar.