![]() |
Propagation Getting Better Since Last Weekend
|
Propagation Getting Better Since Last Weekend
dave wrote:
http://www.solarcycle24.com/pictures/spots5.jpg Thank you... and that's quite a photograph. I dispute the generally-held opinion that higher sunspot numbers mean "better propagation," though. While the higher bands, say 7 MHz and above, improve -- the lower frequencies tend to get shorter and absorption gets higher. This bodes ill for 160 meters, for example, and 75 meters during the day goes almost silent (though it may be better at night for short to medium skip). And dramatic DX on longwave and mediumwave becomes less frequent. No matter what, though, it's interesting, and the clouds we cannot see bring magic. With my best, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
Propagation Getting Better Since Last Weekend
Kevin Alfred Strom wrote:
dave wrote: http://www.solarcycle24.com/pictures/spots5.jpg Thank you... and that's quite a photograph. I dispute the generally-held opinion that higher sunspot numbers mean "better propagation," though. While the higher bands, say 7 MHz and above, improve -- the lower frequencies tend to get shorter and absorption gets higher. This bodes ill for 160 meters, for example, and 75 meters during the day goes almost silent (though it may be better at night for short to medium skip). And dramatic DX on longwave and mediumwave becomes less frequent. No matter what, though, it's interesting, and the clouds we cannot see bring magic. With my best, Kevin, WB4AIO. You need UV radiation to energize the upper atmosphere. Sunspots are where the UV rays come from. It's in your Extra Class test. |
Propagation Getting Better Since Last Weekend
dave wrote:
[...] You need UV radiation to energize the upper atmosphere. Sunspots are where the UV rays come from. It's in your Extra Class test. Yes, I know about the ionosphere. But what I am trying to say is that more radiation is not always "better." And there's always some, even at sunspot minima. For example, during the bottom of the solar cycle, 75 meters is alive during the day, with stations heard many hundreds of miles away with good signals. Near the top of the cycle, the absorption is so high, you can hardly hear any stations at all daytimes on 75. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. -- http://kevinalfredstrom.com/ |
Propagation Getting Better Since Last Weekend
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:41:53 +0000 (UTC), Kevin Alfred Strom
wrote: dave wrote: [...] You need UV radiation to energize the upper atmosphere. Sunspots are where the UV rays come from. It's in your Extra Class test. Yes, I know about the ionosphere. But what I am trying to say is that more radiation is not always "better." And there's always some, even at sunspot minima. For example, during the bottom of the solar cycle, 75 meters is alive during the day, with stations heard many hundreds of miles away with good signals. Near the top of the cycle, the absorption is so high, you can hardly hear any stations at all daytimes on 75. With all good wishes, Kevin, WB4AIO. I think that corona holes and the resulting solar windstream are the biggest disruption to propagation. At least here in the higher latitudes. We had an impact last night and the bands are in noticeably poorer condition today even though the K index is back to 2 (5 last night). http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/rt_plots/kp_3d.html Jim |
Propagation Getting Better Since Last Weekend
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 14:40:27 -0800, dave wrote:
wrote: I think that corona holes and the resulting solar windstream are the biggest disruption to propagation. At least here in the higher latitudes. We had an impact last night and the bands are in noticeably poorer condition today even though the K index is back to 2 (5 last night). http://www.swpc.noaa.gov/rt_plots/kp_3d.html Jim I can hear lots of noise very few stations on 20, not wall to wall traces as would be normal this time of day. Seems to be slowly getting stronger. Seems to take about 2 days for things to get back to normal after particle impact. I look at that "current auroral oval" map at: http://www.spaceweather.com/index.html If there is a white mist covering the midwest, its usually bad news (like today). Jim |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com