On Aug 1, 6:08*pm, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:

- - -READ- Clintons Return White House Furniture
- - http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=121856&page=1
- - White House Furnishings Sent Back Following
- - following revelations of thief. *Plus the Clintons
- - also paid $86K in restitutions to the US Treasury
- - for the many items taken from the White House.

- That story says nothing about theft.

Oh Really . . .

-*It's about donations and gifts.

The The White House -aka- US Federal Government
NOT to the Clintons -so- What was removed was
the Property of the USA Not the Clintons

Sure Do - I Say SURE DO Sound Like 'Theft' To Me.

- They returned the stuff,

-corrrection- The return some of 'the stuff'
-hint- That would be consider a admission of GUILT.

and they might get some of it back.

? Get It Back ? - ? Legally How ?
-hint- They Could Pay For It.

Dave so when you return something
that you 'took' that did not belong to
you : THAT IS NOT THEFT !

Oops I am having a Bill Clinton Moment
pondering the definition of "is" . . .

Dave so when you pay restitution for
something that you 'took' that did not
belong to you : THAT IS NOT THEFT !

Channeling Bill again : 'is', 'Is'. "IS" !

-*No trashing of the White House.

Dave so you say . . .

-*No vandalism.

Dave so you say . . .

-*No looting of Air Force 1.

Dave so you say . . .